<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>35533</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2025</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>6</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject_ref</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2025-03-05</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Software Architecture for Co-Innovation Projects</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Purpose Innovation is essential for competitive advantage and business growth and can be driven by approaches like open innovation (OI) and co-innovation (COI). Because of the complexity of innovation, traditional project management principles cannot be implemented to innovation projects. To deal with the complexity of innovation, software solutions can be used, especially to coordinate co-innovation projects (COIP). However, current software options only cover a few project phases and fail to address COI challenges comprehensively. Consequently, this study aims to develop a software architecture that addresses these gaps. Methodology The architecture was developed using requirement engineering. A focus group of ten industry experts used a canvas to determine specific requirements for producing companies. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify international requirements and global challenges. Finally, existing software solutions were analyzed to identify further gaps in requirements. These m</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">2024 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">979-8-3503-6736-2</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2372-7268</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10878172/authors#authors</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1109/ICTMOD63116.2024.10878172</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BTU">an der BTU erstellt / created at BTU</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <author>
      <firstName>Arian</firstName>
      <lastName>Lamann</lastName>
    </author>
    <submitter>
      <firstName>Anne-Katrin</firstName>
      <lastName>Meister</lastName>
    </submitter>
    <author>
      <firstName>Herwig</firstName>
      <lastName>Winkler</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Nizar</firstName>
      <lastName>Abdelkafi</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Hans Rüdiger</firstName>
      <lastName>Lange</lastName>
    </author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="3407">FG Produktionswirtschaft</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>36217</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2025</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>514</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>519</pageLast>
    <pageNumber>6</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>134</volume>
    <type>articler</type>
    <publisherName>Elsevier</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Amsterdam</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2025-06-17</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Co-innovation tools, mechanisms and methods : status quo and potentials</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Co-innovation and open innovation are approaches to innovation management that are designed to stimulate innovation in organizations. This study analyzes technical offline and online support tools that can aid co-innovation projects by identifying appropriate functionalities. A systematic literature review and analysis of co-innovation tools reveals a lack of support, particularly in the areas of (i) intellectual property management, (ii) compliance and legal management, (iii) planning and analysis management, and (iv) performance and monitoring management. Physical toolkits show advanced development in meeting the criteria, while software solutions lag behind. The findings highlight the need for comprehensive innovation support tools.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Procedia CIRP</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">2212-8271</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827125005360</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.procir.2025.02.165</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BTU">an der BTU erstellt / created at BTU</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="ConferenceTitle">58th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems 2025</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>
      <firstName>Arian</firstName>
      <lastName>Lamann</lastName>
    </author>
    <submitter>
      <firstName>Anne-Katrin</firstName>
      <lastName>Meister</lastName>
    </submitter>
    <author>
      <firstName>Herwig</firstName>
      <lastName>Winkler</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Hans Rüdiger</firstName>
      <lastName>Lange</lastName>
    </author>
    <author>
      <firstName>Nizar</firstName>
      <lastName>Abdelkafi</lastName>
    </author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Innovation projects; Innovation management; Support tools</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="3407">FG Produktionswirtschaft</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
