@misc{HaaseWoll, author = {Haase, Florian Vincent and Woll, Ralf}, title = {Assessment of Reliability Implementation in Manufacturing Enterprises}, series = {Management and Production Engineering Review}, volume = {7}, journal = {Management and Production Engineering Review}, number = {2}, issn = {2082-1344}, doi = {10.1515/mper-2016-0012}, pages = {12 -- 20}, language = {en} } @misc{HaaseWoll, author = {Haase, Florian Vincent and Woll, Ralf}, title = {Zeit ist Trumpf - Schnellere Fehlerkorrektur in der Produktion durch Analyse von Feldausf{\"a}llen}, series = {Qualit{\"a}t und Zuverl{\"a}ssigkeit}, volume = {61}, journal = {Qualit{\"a}t und Zuverl{\"a}ssigkeit}, number = {7}, issn = {0720-1214}, pages = {31 -- 33}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{PeplowskyRichterJacobitzetal., author = {Peplowsky, Stefan and Richter, Christian and Jacobitz, S. and Woll, Ralf}, title = {Individuality - A challenge for production and quality}, series = {Proceedings, 19th QMOD-ICQSS Conference International Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Rom (Italy)}, booktitle = {Proceedings, 19th QMOD-ICQSS Conference International Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Rom (Italy)}, editor = {Dahlgaard-Park, Su Mi and Dahlgaard, Jens J{\"o}rn}, publisher = {Lund}, address = {Lund University Library Press}, isbn = {978-91-7623-086-2}, pages = {1538 -- 1546}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{PeplowskyPueschelWoll, author = {Peplowsky, Stefan and P{\"u}schel, Louis and Woll, Ralf}, title = {What customers want? - Development of a software-based method to evaluate subjective requirement on the example of motorcycles}, series = {Proceedings, 19th QMOD-ICQSS Conference International Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Rom (Italy)}, booktitle = {Proceedings, 19th QMOD-ICQSS Conference International Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Rom (Italy)}, editor = {Dahlgaard-Park, Su Mi and Dahlgaard, Jens J{\"o}rn}, publisher = {Lund University Library Press}, address = {Lund}, isbn = {978-91-7623-086-2}, pages = {1522 -- 1537}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{WorlitzNoackWoll, author = {Worlitz, Jane and Noack, Felix and Woll, Ralf}, title = {How to Identify a Suitable Six Sigma Rollout Strategy}, series = {Proceedings, 19th QMOD-ICQSS Conference International Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Rom (Italy)}, booktitle = {Proceedings, 19th QMOD-ICQSS Conference International Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Rom (Italy)}, publisher = {Lund University Library Press}, address = {Lund}, isbn = {978-91-7623-086-2}, pages = {726 -- 746}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{HaaseDierlHenkeetal., author = {Haase, Florian Vincent and Dierl, Adrian and Henke, Anna and Woll, Ralf and Sarradj, Ennes}, title = {Development of an experiment for impedance measurement of structured sandwich sheet metals by using a full factorial multi-stage approach}, series = {Proceedings, 19th QMOD-ICQSS Conference International Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Rom (Italy)}, booktitle = {Proceedings, 19th QMOD-ICQSS Conference International Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Rom (Italy)}, editor = {Dahlgaard-Park, Su Mi and Dahlgaard, Jens J{\"o}rn}, publisher = {Lund University Library Press}, address = {Lund}, isbn = {978-91-7623-086-2}, pages = {448 -- 462}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{RichGoldmannWoll, author = {Rich, Beatrice Monique and Goldmann, Christine and Woll, Ralf}, title = {Product Audits - Why we don't ask the customers?}, series = {Proceedings, 19th QMOD-ICQSS Conference International Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Rom (Italy)}, booktitle = {Proceedings, 19th QMOD-ICQSS Conference International Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Rom (Italy)}, editor = {Dahlgaard-Park, Su Mi and Dahlgaard, Jens J{\"o}rn}, publisher = {Lund University Library Press}, address = {Lund}, isbn = {978-91-7623-086-2}, pages = {229 -- 244}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{HaaseGeithnerWoll, author = {Haase, Florian Vincent and Geithner, Fabian Paul and Woll, Ralf}, title = {Description of reliability content by using the ReliaLibrary web-database}, series = {Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice, Proceedings of the ESREL 2016, Glasgow (United Kingdom)}, booktitle = {Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice, Proceedings of the ESREL 2016, Glasgow (United Kingdom)}, editor = {Walls, Lesley and Revie, Matthew and Bedford, Tim}, publisher = {CRC Press}, address = {Boca Raton}, isbn = {978-1-138-02997-2}, pages = {2076 -- 2082}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{HaaseReinholdWolletal., author = {Haase, Florian Vincent and Reinhold, Maximilian and Woll, Ralf and Wolf, Matthias and Seidlitz, Holger}, title = {Reliability capability assessment of cooperative networks using the example of developing demonstrators of structured materials}, series = {Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice, Proceedings of the ESREL 2016, Glasgow (United Kingdom)}, booktitle = {Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice, Proceedings of the ESREL 2016, Glasgow (United Kingdom)}, editor = {Walls, Lesley and Revie, Matthew and Bedford, Tim}, publisher = {CRC Press}, address = {Boca Raton}, isbn = {978-1-138-02997-2}, pages = {1323 -- 1329}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{RichPeplowskyWoll, author = {Rich, Beatrice Monique and Peplowsky, Stefan and Woll, Ralf}, title = {Machbarkeitsstudie zum Abgleich von Qualit{\"a}tsmaßst{\"a}ben}, series = {Heutige und zuk{\"u}nftige Herausforderungen an die Qualit{\"a}tswissenschaft in Forschung und Praxis ; Bericht zur GQW-Jahrestagung 2017 Erlangen}, booktitle = {Heutige und zuk{\"u}nftige Herausforderungen an die Qualit{\"a}tswissenschaft in Forschung und Praxis ; Bericht zur GQW-Jahrestagung 2017 Erlangen}, editor = {Otten, Heiner and G{\"o}tz, J{\"u}rgen and Pollak, Sebastian}, publisher = {FAU University Press}, address = {Erlangen}, isbn = {978-3-96147-021-1}, pages = {309 -- 327}, language = {de} } @misc{WorlitzStablerPeplowskyetal., author = {Worlitz, Jane and Stabler, Anne and Peplowsky, Stefan and Woll, Ralf}, title = {Video Tutorials: An Appropriate Way of Teaching QM Tools Applied with Software}, series = {Quality Innovation Prosperity}, volume = {20}, journal = {Quality Innovation Prosperity}, number = {2}, issn = {1335-1745}, doi = {10.12776/qip.v20i2.754}, pages = {169 -- 184}, abstract = {Purpose: The aim of this research is to verify the applicability of video tutorials for the improvement of software skills. Methodology/Approach: Video tutorial prototypes were created according to design criteria found in literature and tested as teaching material of selforganized/self-regulated learning. 65 students were parted in two groups and asked to work on an assignment concerning the use of quality tools in Microsoft Excel. One group used video tutorials and the other group was guided by a teacher. Before and after the assignment the students were asked to fill out a survey evaluating their software skills as well as the aid used during the test. Findings: The results of the survey do not show a significant difference between the evaluation of video tutorials and guidance of the teacher. Also the performance of both groups concerning the assignment was comparable. From these findings it can be concluded that video tutorials and classroom teaching are equal ways of teaching in the investigated field. Research Limitation/implication: The suitability of video tutorials for the application of quality-tools with the use of appropriate software has been confirmed. The results do not show conclusions about the extent to which video tutorials can be suitable for the mediation of complex issues. Follow-up studies are required for this purpose. Originality/Value of paper: The study demonstrates that video tutorials, as a form of self-organized/self-regulated learning, are suitable to improve skills in applying quality tools by using software.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{WorlitzHaschkePeplowskyetal., author = {Worlitz, Jane and Haschke, Dennis and Peplowsky, Michael and Peplowsky, Stefan and Woll, Ralf}, title = {FMEA Software comparison}, series = {20th QMOD Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Helsing{\o}r (Denmark), 2017}, booktitle = {20th QMOD Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Helsing{\o}r (Denmark), 2017}, isbn = {978-91-7623-086-2}, abstract = {Purpose Quality requirements, as per customer, are steadily rising. To meet these requirements it is extremely important for manufacturing and developing companies to implement an early detection and prevention of failures. A widely used method, the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is used to detect and avoid potential errors in the early development process and as well as to optimize the system as a whole. The FMEA team is led by a moderator, and is interdisciplinary and cross departmental. The FMEA is carried out according to a systematic approach. For the implementation and documentation of the results, special software is available. As a rule the system function and malfunction, structures of the product and or process are created in the form of tree diagram. Afterwards the failure, failure causes, failure outcome, and existing measures are recorded in a form. If necessary, other measures and responsibilities are defined. The special software used for this purposes is criticized for the complicated user interface restricted access to the result and the inflexibility of the tree structure. In 2005, the Chair of Quality Management developed an Excel template to carry out the FMEA and to document the results, and since then it has been constantly under development. Using standardized software, the training period should be reduced and the flexibility to the results should be increased. Instead of using tree structures, company specific product and process visual aids are implemented. Both methods are tested in order to see the suitability in different situations and to support the implementation of the FMEA as well as the documentation of the results. The programs IQ-RM PRO 6.5 from APIS and the Excel template Flex-FMEA 2.0 from the Chair of Quality Management are compared to each other. Methodology The investigation of the suitability for the methods to carry out the FMEA and the documentation of the results is done through student experimentation and followed by a written survey. The suitability assessment of the method is been investigated through the influence of the group size and the nature of the FMEA. The students are divided into groups with one group testing a FMEA using the IQ-RM PRO 6.5 from APIS and the other group using the Excel template Flex-FMEA 2.0 from the Chair of Quality Management. The group size and the nature of the FMEA varies. The objects of observation in the FMEA are not very complex and everyday relatable so that every participant is actively involved. Findings and Value of Paper The results show the impact of group size and nature of the FMEA in relation to the suitability assessment of both methods. It is interesting to examine the influence of other factors, for example, the experience of the participants or the complexity of the objects of observation on the suitability assessment. Through the investigation, situational specific recommendations for both methods can be deduced.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{RichGoldmannWoll, author = {Rich, Beatrice Monique and Goldmann, Christine and Woll, Ralf}, title = {Analysis of the need for product audit improvements in companies}, series = {Proceedings of the 20th QMOD Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Helsingor (D{\"a}nemark)}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 20th QMOD Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, Helsingor (D{\"a}nemark)}, abstract = {Based on concepts, such as the Kano Model, it can be assumed that the customer needs for the same product, change over time. Furthermore, innovation and the continuous develop-ment of the state of the art change the demands on a product. This implies that it is neces-sary for companies to evaluate and develop their product audits. In a previous paper, the re-search need for product audit improvements based on changing customer requirements was investigated by a literature analysis and three expert interviews. The present study is the additional practice-oriented analysis of the need for further research. The objective of this study is to uncover the practice-oriented need for research in compa-nies in order to develop methods and procedures based on a theoretical and scientific level. Methodology/Approach: A questionnaire investigates the state of the art application-oriented problem in different industrial branches. Based on previous research the survey was developed online, which was sent to different companies, shared on social media platforms, and was available online for several month. Findings: The survey confirmed the theoretically determined need for research. Approximately 90 percent of the respondents have the opinion that product audits have to be developed contin-uously based on changing customer requirements. About 54 percent of the participants wish to receive methodological support because they do not know how to carry out an analysis of changing customer requirements. Research Limitation/implication: These findings are limited to the considered companies and industrial branches. Value of paper: The study shows the need for research of product audit improvement as well as the need for developing methods to compare quality scales of various target groups. This is the basis for feasibility investigations.}, language = {en} }