@incollection{WaetzoldHerzogMessneretal., author = {W{\"a}tzold, Frank and Herzog, F. and Messner, Frank and Klauer, Bernd and Kindler, A. and Horsch, Helga and Geyler, S.}, title = {Landnutzung, Ressourcenschutz und wirtschaftliche Entwicklung im l{\"a}ndlichen Raum: Fallstudie aus einer Region mit großr{\"a}umigen Trinkwasserschutzgebieten}, language = {de} } @misc{MewesWaetzoldApeldoornetal., author = {Mewes, Melanie and W{\"a}tzold, Frank and Apeldoorn, Rob van and Varjopuro, Riku and Chmielewski, Tadeusz Jan and Veeneklaas, Frank and Kosola, Marja-Leena}, title = {Cost-effectiveness of managing Natura 2000 sites: An exploratory study for Finland, Germany, the Netherlands and Poland}, doi = {10.1007/s10531-010-9825-x}, language = {en} } @misc{SchoettkerHuettJaukeretal., author = {Sch{\"o}ttker, Oliver and H{\"u}tt, Christoph and Jauker, Frank and Witt, Johanna and Bareth, Georg and W{\"a}tzold, Frank}, title = {Monitoring costs of result-based payments for biodiversity conservation: Will UAV-based remote sensing be the game-changer?}, series = {MPRA paper}, journal = {MPRA paper}, pages = {47}, language = {en} } @misc{WaetzoldJaukerKomaindaetal., author = {W{\"a}tzold, Frank and Jauker, Frank and Komainda, Martin and Sch{\"o}ttker, Oliver and Horn, Juliane}, title = {Harnessing virtual fencing for more effective and adaptive agri-environment schemes to conserve grassland biodiversity}, series = {Biological Conservation}, journal = {Biological Conservation}, number = {297}, issn = {0006-3207}, doi = {10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110736}, pages = {8}, language = {en} } @misc{SchoettkerHuettJaukeretal., author = {Sch{\"o}ttker, Oliver and H{\"u}tt, Christoph and Jauker, Frank and Witt, Johanna and Bareth, Georg and W{\"a}tzold, Frank}, title = {Monitoring costs of result-based payments for biodiversity conservation: Will UAV-assisted remote sensing be the game-changer?}, series = {Journal for Nature Conservation}, volume = {76}, journal = {Journal for Nature Conservation}, issn = {1617-1381}, doi = {10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126494}, language = {en} } @misc{GerwinRaabHinzetal., author = {Gerwin, Werner and Raab, Thomas and Hinz, Christoph and Letmathe, Peter and Leuchner, Michael and Roß-Nickoll, Martina and R{\"u}de, Thomas and Trachte, Katja and W{\"a}tzold, Frank and Lehmkuhl, Frank}, title = {Perspectives of lignite post‑mining landscapes under changing environmental conditions: what can we learn from a comparison between the Rhenish and Lusatian region in Germany?}, series = {Environmental Sciences Europe}, volume = {35}, journal = {Environmental Sciences Europe}, issn = {2190-4715}, doi = {10.1186/s12302-023-00738-z}, abstract = {Background The decision of the German federal government to cease lignite mining until 2038 or—if possible— already earlier until 2030, will cause manifold transition processes in the remaining lignite mining districts of Germany. The two largest districts are located in geographically opposite regions: The Rhineland in the western part and Lusatia in the east of Germany. As particularly these two mining districts will experience severe changes in their socioeconomic as well environmental conditions, the federal government has adopted comprehensive economic support measures. However, the environmental changes will also cause altered ecosystem functions and services to be provided by the future post-mining landscapes. Results In this paper, the two main lignite-producing regions of Germany are compared with regard to their natural and cultural settings. The economic situation and its history are reflected and differences are outlined. Part of the disparities in the cultural development can be explained by very different natural conditions, especially edaphic factors and climatic situation. Because of dissimilar geological settings, different mining technologies were developed and are in use in the two regions with distinct effects on the resulting post-mining landscapes. Conclusion The long-standing and manifold lignite mining activities have radically restructured the landscapes in Lusatia and the Rhineland. With the ongoing decline of the mining industry and its complete cessation, presumably within the next decade, both regions will alter their faces significantly. These changes offer both challenges but also opportunities with respect to the post-mining landscapes and their ecosystem services they are going to provide. The prerequisites for a positive socioeconomic development and for sustainable land-use concepts that also consider ecological aspects are different for both regions. However, or especially because of these differences, the knowledge exchange and experience transfer between both mining regions are pivotal for the success of this extensive transformation process.}, language = {en} } @misc{LehmkuhlGerwinRaabetal., author = {Lehmkuhl, Frank and Gerwin, Werner and Raab, Thomas and Birkhofer, Klaus and Hinz, Christoph and Letmathe, Peter and Leuchner, Michael and Roß-Nickoll, Martina and R{\"u}de, Thomas R. and Trachte, Katja and W{\"a}tzold, Frank}, title = {Perspectives for the lignite post-mining landscapes of the lignite mining landscapes under changing environmental conditions - what can we learn from a comparison between the Rhenish and the Lusatian regions in Germany? : EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria \& Online | 14-19 April 2024}, publisher = {Copernicus GmbH}, doi = {10.5194/egusphere-egu24-2791}, abstract = {The German government's decision to phase out lignite mining by 2038 or earlier, as recently 2030 has been agreed for the Rhineland, will trigger a number of transition processes in Germany's remaining lignite mining areas. The two largest lignite mining areas are located in geographically different regions: Rhineland in the west and Lusatia in the east. As the socio-economic and environmental conditions in these two mining areas are set to change dramatically, the German government has adopted extensive economic support measures. However, the environmental changes will also lead to changes in the ecosystem functions and services provided by the future post-mining landscapes. Gerwin et al. (2023) compare the two main lignite producing regions of Germany in terms of their natural and cultural environments. The economic situation and its history are reflected and differences are outlined. Part of the differences in cultural development can be explained by the natural conditions, especially the edaphic factors and the climatic situation. Because of the specific geological settings, tailored mining technologies were developed and used in the two regions, with different effects on the resulting post-mining landscapes. We conclude that the landscapes of Lusatia and the Rhineland have been radically restructured by the long and varied history of lignite mining. Both regions will change significantly as the mining industry continues to decline and is expected to cease altogether within the next decade. These changes in the post-mining landscapes and the ecosystem services will provide both challenges and opportunities. The preconditions for positive socio-economic development and for sustainable land use concepts that also consider ecological aspects are different for the two regions. The exchange of knowledge and experience between the two mining regions is crucial to the success of this major transformation process, despite, or perhaps because of, these differences. Gerwin, W., Raab, T., Birkhofer, K., Hinz, C., Letmathe, P., Leuchner, M., Ro\&\#223;-Nickoll, M., R\&\#252;de, T., Trachte, K., W\&\#228;tzold, F., Lehmkuhl, F. (2023): Perspectives of lignite post-mining landscapes under changing environmental conditions: what can we learn from a comparison between the Rhenish and Lusatian region in Germany? Environmental Sciences Europe 35:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-023-00738-z}, language = {en} } @misc{SvarstadPetersenRothmanetal., author = {Svarstad, Hanne and Petersen, Lars K. and Rothman, Dale and Siepel, Henk and W{\"a}tzold, Frank}, title = {Discursive Biases of the Environmental Research Framework DPSIR}, language = {en} } @misc{DrechslerJohstOhletal., author = {Drechsler, Martin and Johst, Karin and Ohl, Cornelia and W{\"a}tzold, Frank}, title = {Designing cost-effective payments for conservation measures to generate spatiotemporal habitat heterogeneity}, language = {en} } @misc{DrechslerWaetzoldJohstetal., author = {Drechsler, Martin and W{\"a}tzold, Frank and Johst, Karin and Bergmann, Holger and Settele, Josef}, title = {A model-based approach for designing cost-effective compensation payments for conservation of endangered species in real landscapes}, language = {en} } @misc{ThumWaetzold, author = {Thum, Randi and W{\"a}tzold, Frank}, title = {Artenschutz durch handelbare Zertifikate? Grundgedanke des Konzepts und potentielle Einsatzm{\"o}glichkeiten im deutschen Rechtssystem}, language = {en} } @misc{DrechslerGrimmMysiaketal., author = {Drechsler, Martin and Grimm, Volker and Mysiak, Jaroslav and W{\"a}tzold, Frank}, title = {Differences and similarities between economic and ecological models for biodiversity conservation}, language = {en} } @misc{DrechslerWaetzold, author = {Drechsler, Martin and W{\"a}tzold, Frank}, title = {Ecological-economic modelling for the sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity}, language = {en} } @misc{DrechslerWaetzold, author = {Drechsler, Martin and W{\"a}tzold, Frank}, title = {The optimal dynamic allocation of conservation funds under financial uncertainty}, language = {en} } @incollection{WaetzoldDrechslerUlbrichetal., author = {W{\"a}tzold, Frank and Drechsler, Martin and Ulbrich, Karin and Johst, Karin and Settele, Josef}, title = {A software tool for designing cost-effective compensation payments for species conservation}, language = {en} }