@misc{MaderBirkhoferFiedleretal., author = {Mader, Viktoria and Birkhofer, Klaus and Fiedler, Daniela and Thorn, Simon and Wolters, Volkmar and Diehl, Eva}, title = {Land-use at different spatial scales alters the functional role of web-building spiders in arthropod food webs}, series = {Agriculture, Ecosystems \& Environment}, volume = {219}, journal = {Agriculture, Ecosystems \& Environment}, issn = {0167-8809}, doi = {10.1016/j.agee.2015.12.017}, pages = {152 -- 162}, language = {en} } @misc{BirkhoferDiehlAnderssonetal., author = {Birkhofer, Klaus and Diehl, Eva and Andersson, Jesper and Ekroos, Johan and Fr{\"u}h-M{\"u}ller, Andrea and Machnikowski, Franziska and Mader, Viktoria and Nilsson, Lovisa and Sasaki, Keiko and Rundl{\"o}f, Maj and Wolters, Volkmar and Smith, Henrik G.}, title = {Ecosystem services - current challenges and opportunities for ecological research}, series = {Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution}, volume = {2}, journal = {Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution}, issn = {2296-701X}, doi = {10.3389/fevo.2014.00087}, pages = {35}, language = {en} } @misc{BirkhoferArvidssonEhlersetal., author = {Birkhofer, Klaus and Arvidsson, Fredrik and Ehlers, D. and Mader, Viktoria and Bengtsson, Janne and Smith, Henrik G.}, title = {Landscape complexity and organic farming independently affect the biological control of hemipteran pests and yields in spring barley}, series = {Landscape Ecology}, volume = {31}, journal = {Landscape Ecology}, number = {3}, issn = {0921-2973}, doi = {10.1007/s10980-015-0263-8}, pages = {567 -- 579}, language = {en} } @misc{MaderDiehlFiedleretal., author = {Mader, Viktoria and Diehl, Eva and Fiedler, Daniela and Thorn, Simon and Wolters, Volkmar and Birkhofer, Klaus}, title = {Trade-offs in arthropod conservation between productive and non-productive agri-environmental schemes along a landscape complexity gradient}, series = {Insect Conservation and Diversity}, volume = {10}, journal = {Insect Conservation and Diversity}, number = {3}, issn = {1752-4598}, doi = {10.1111/icad.12220}, pages = {236 -- 247}, language = {en} } @misc{MaderDiehlWoltersetal., author = {Mader, Viktoria and Diehl, Eva and Wolters, Volkmar and Birkhofer, Klaus}, title = {Agri-environmental schemes affect the trophic niche size and diet of common carabid species in agricultural landscapes}, series = {Ecological Entomology}, volume = {43}, journal = {Ecological Entomology}, number = {6}, issn = {1365-2311}, doi = {10.1111/een.12671}, pages = {823 -- 835}, abstract = {1. Carabids are abundant in agroecosystems and provide biocontrol services by feeding on weed seeds and pests. We compare the effects of two fundamentally different agri-environmental schemes (AES) on the numeric and trophic responses of four common carabid species: Anchomenus dorsalis, Poecilus cupreus, Pseudoophonus rufipes and Pterostichus melanarius. 2. In six cereal fields under organic farming and six sown flowering fields, 10 290 individuals of the four species were sampled to quantify their numeric response. The activity density of all species was higher in organically managed cereal fields compared to flowering fields. 3. We analysed naturally occurring stable isotope ratios of carbon and nitrogen in 138 carabid individuals to quantify isotopic niches and the diet contribution of soil- versus plant-based resources. Resources from the soil ('brown') energy channel were more important than resources from the plant ('green') energy channel in the diet of all species, particularly in P. melanarius. 4. Isotopic niches were larger for P. rufipes and P. melanarius in flowering fields than in organically managed cereal fields. Moreover, differences between AES types were observed in the diet contribution derived from both energy channels: A. dorsalis and P. cupreus incorporated higher proportions of plant-based resources in organically managed cereal fields compared to flowering fields. 5. Similar numeric, but different trophic responses suggest that AES type may alter arthropod food webs beyond simple changes in carabid densities. Such 'hidden' modifications in the resource utilisation of generalist predators deserve more attention to adequately evaluate the ecological consequences of AES.}, language = {en} } @misc{BirkhoferEkroosMaderetal., author = {Birkhofer, Klaus and Ekroos, Johan and Mader, Viktoria and Tschumi, Matthias and Wu, Ai-ping and Smith, Henrik G.}, title = {Taxonomy, habitat and conservation status explain the diet composition of insectivorous birds in Europe}, series = {Biological conservation}, volume = {313}, journal = {Biological conservation}, publisher = {Elsevier BV}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0006-3207}, doi = {10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111566}, pages = {1 -- 11}, abstract = {Populations of European birds and insects are declining, with consequences for trophic interactions. Insectivorous birds are particularly vulnerable to losses of arthropods, yet the factors shaping their diet composition remain insufficiently understood. We conducted a quantitative review of the arthropod diets of 94 European insectivorous bird species and assessed how diet richness and composition relate to taxonomy, developmental stage, climate, conservation status, habitat, migration status, sampling intensity, and methodological approach. Taxonomy, habitat and conservation status (both population trend over time and current status) were the primary predictors of diet richness and composition. Species of population concern in Europe relied more on Coleoptera and Orthoptera prey, while species with declining population trends and species in agricultural, artificial and semi-natural habitats showed strong dependence on Coleoptera prey. Species in forests and of global population concern had a higher percentage of Arachnida prey, while birds in inland water habitats relied on Diptera prey. Anthropogenic activities such as the use of insecticides and changes in land use in agricultural and forest habitats negatively impact the abundance and diversity of arthropods, including Coleoptera and Arachnida. These declines will cascade up the food chain, ultimately diminishing both common and threatened bird species by limiting their prey. Species of global conservation concern may be particularly at risk, as they exhibit the lowest prey taxonomic richness. It is therefore crucial that future legislation and policy interventions consider these indirect impacts on bird diets, as these vulnerable species are at high risk of further losses in arthropod prey.}, language = {en} }