@misc{SteinbergSofkaPeetersetal., author = {Steinberg, Philip J. and Sofka, Wolfgang and Peeters, Thijs and Procher, Vivien D. and Urbig, Diemo}, title = {Providing Contract Research Services and Firms' Own Product Innovation Performance}, series = {Academy of Management Proceedings}, volume = {Vol. 2019}, journal = {Academy of Management Proceedings}, number = {1}, issn = {2151-6561}, doi = {10.5465/AMBPP.2019.19667abstract}, abstract = {Extant literature has largely assumed that firms providing research services to other firms as an inventor-for-hire will do so at the expense of developing their own product innovations. Given this assumption, it is surprising that many firms provide research services to other firms without compromising their own flow of product innovations. In this study, we provide a systematic logic that connects the inventor-for-hire services that firms provide to others with the firms' own product innovation performance. We hypothesize that opportunistic gains from providing contract research eventually enable firms to increase their product innovation performance. Furthermore, we suggest that this increase will be stronger for technology leaders and will be weaker for firms with a strong engagement in basic research. We test our hypotheses on a panel of 1,006 firms over 2005 to 2013 and find support for our hypotheses.}, language = {en} } @misc{SteinbergUrbigProcheretal., author = {Steinberg, Philip J. and Urbig, Diemo and Procher, Vivien D. and Volkmann, Christine}, title = {Knowledge transfer and home-market innovativeness: A comparison of emerging and advanced economy multinationals}, series = {Journal of International Management}, volume = {27}, journal = {Journal of International Management}, number = {4}, issn = {1075-4253}, doi = {10.1016/j.intman.2021.100873}, abstract = {Emerging market multinational enterprises (EMNEs) increasingly access foreign technology and knowledge by internationalizing their R\&D activities. Since technological laggardness hinders efficient knowledge transfer, a successful catch-up with advanced-economy multinational enterprises (AMNEs) requires EMNEs to transfer foreign knowledge across national boundaries more effectively. However, we lack a clear understanding of how EMNEs manage this knowledge transfer and integration and to what extent the employment and effectiveness of corresponding facilitation mechanisms may differ from AMNEs. Adopting a sender-recipient model and drawing on arguments from learning theory and transaction costs economics, we suggest that EMNEs benefit more from and, consequently, are more likely to engage in mechanisms to increase recipient capabilities and sender motivation. In a comparative analysis of Chinese, Indian, German, and U.S. MNEs and focusing on frequent international exchange of R\&D personnel regarding recipient capabilities and the governance of foreign R\&D activities regarding sender motivation, we observe positive relationships with home-market innovation for EMNEs, but not for AMNEs. Moreover, we observe that EMNEs exploit this positive effect and are more likely to use these mechanisms when focusing on technology- than on market-seeking.}, language = {en} } @misc{UrbigProcherSteinbergetal., author = {Urbig, Diemo and Procher, Vivien D. and Steinberg, Philip J. and Volkmann, Christine}, title = {The role of firm-level and country-level antecedents in explaining emerging versus advanced economy multinationals' R\&D internationalization strategies}, series = {International Business Review}, volume = {31}, journal = {International Business Review}, number = {3}, issn = {0969-5931}, doi = {10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101954}, pages = {1 -- 14}, abstract = {We examined firm-level and country-level antecedents of R\&D internationalization strategies, focusing on differences between enterprises in emerging and advanced economies. Previous research often focuses on the relative importance of home-base-exploiting versus home-base-augmenting knowledge transfer strategies. We suggest that country-level and firm-level effects differ for the two strategies, and hence, we examined each strategy independently. Collecting data in China, India, the United States, and Germany, we demonstrated that firms' relative technological position as a firm-level characteristic can explain differences in home-base-exploiting strategies between emerging and advanced economies. In contrast, home-base-augmenting is more closely related to exploratory institutional environments, a country-level factor. Thus, either firm- or country-level antecedents can gain a dominant role, depending on the strategy implemented.}, language = {en} } @misc{SteinbergUrbigProcher, author = {Steinberg, Philip J. and Urbig, Diemo and Procher, Vivien D.}, title = {Too much or too little of R\&D offshoring: The impact of captive offshoring and contract offshoring on innovation performance}, series = {Research Policy}, volume = {46}, journal = {Research Policy}, number = {10}, issn = {1873-7625}, doi = {10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.008}, pages = {1810 -- 1823}, abstract = {Innovating firms may acquire foreign knowledge and improve their innovation performance by offshoring their R\&D activities to their own foreign affiliates (captive offshoring) as well as by contracting out their R\&D to external foreign parties (contract offshoring). This study examines the impact of both R\&D offshoring strategies on innovation performance. Based on a panel dataset of 2421 R\&D-active firms in Germany, we demonstrate that captive offshoring and contract offshoring differ fundamentally in their impact on firm innovation performance. At low degrees of offshoring, contract offshoring positively affects innovation performance and is preferable over captive offshoring. At larger degrees of offshoring, captive offshoring becomes more beneficial while contract offshoring is disadvantageous. Both offshoring strategies eventually harm innovation performance when excessively employed. Furthermore, the R\&D offshoring-performance relationship is leveraged by R\&D intensity, such that firms with a larger knowledge stock benefit stronger from both captive and contract offshoring.}, language = {en} }