@misc{RudolphAchoucheKrausetal., author = {Rudolph, Matthias and Achouche, M. and Kraus, S. and Spitzbart, Th. and Kurpas, Paul and Rentner, D. and Brunner, F. and Richter, E. and Bergunde, T. and Heymann, Peter and Wolter, P. and Wittrich, H. and Weyers, M. and W{\"u}rfl, Joachim and Tr{\"a}nkle, G{\"u}nther}, title = {InGaP/GaAs Power HBTs for L-Band Applications}, language = {en} } @misc{TwiningBlancoDuttonetal., author = {Twining, Cornelia W. and Blanco, Andreu and Dutton, Christopher and Kainz, Martin J. and Harvey, Eric and Kowarik, Carmen and Kraus, Johanna M. and Razavi, N. Roxanna and Martin-Creuzburg, Dominik and Parmar, Tarn Preet and Richoux, Nicole and Saboret, Gregoire and Sarran, Charlie and Schmidt, Travis S. and Shipley, J. Ryan and Subalusky, Amanda L.}, title = {Integrating the bright and dark sides of aquatic resource subsidies—a synthesis}, series = {Ecology letters}, volume = {28}, journal = {Ecology letters}, number = {4}, publisher = {Wiley}, issn = {1461-0248}, doi = {10.1111/ele.70109}, pages = {1 -- 20}, abstract = {Aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems are linked through the reciprocal exchange of materials and organisms. Aquatic-to-terrestrial subsidies are relatively small in most terrestrial ecosystems, but they can provide high contents of limiting resources that increase consumer fitness and ecosystem production. However, they also may carry significant contaminant loads, particularly in anthropogenically impacted watersheds. Global change processes, including land use change, climate change and biodiversity declines, are altering the quantity and quality of aquatic subsidies, potentially shifting the balance of costs and benefits of aquatic subsidies for terrestrial consumers. Many global change processes interact and impact both the bright and dark sides of aquatic subsidies simultaneously, highlighting the need for future integrative research that bridges ecosystem as well as disciplinary boundaries. We identify key research priorities, including increased quantification of the spatiotemporal variability in aquatic subsidies across a range of ecosystems, greater understanding of the landscape-scale extent of aquatic subsidy impacts and deeper exploration of the relative costs and benefits of aquatic subsidies for consumers.}, language = {en} }