@incollection{BilzSudeckBuckschetal., author = {Bilz, Ludwig and Sudeck, Gorden and Bucksch, Jens and Klocke, Andreas and Kolip, Petra and Melzer, Wolfgang and Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Der vierte deutsche Jugendgesundheitssurvey „Health Behaviour in School-aged Children"}, series = {Schule und Gesundheit : Ergebnisse des WHO-Jugendgesundheitssurveys "Health behaviour in school-aged children"}, booktitle = {Schule und Gesundheit : Ergebnisse des WHO-Jugendgesundheitssurveys "Health behaviour in school-aged children"}, editor = {Bilz, Ludwig and Sudeck, Gorden and Bucksch, Jens and Klocke, Andreas and Kolip, Petra and Melzer, Wolfgang and Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike and Richter, Matthias}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-7799-1991-9}, pages = {7 -- 15}, language = {de} } @incollection{BuckschFinneGohresetal., author = {Bucksch, Jens and Finne, Emily and Gohres, Hannah and Bilz, Ludwig and Moor, Irene and Richter, Matthias and Kolip, Petra}, title = {Die Methodik des HBSC-Surveys 2013/14}, series = {Schule und Gesundheit : Ergebnisse des WHO-Jugendgesundheitssurveys "Health behaviour in school-aged children"}, booktitle = {Schule und Gesundheit : Ergebnisse des WHO-Jugendgesundheitssurveys "Health behaviour in school-aged children"}, editor = {Bilz, Ludwig and Sudeck, Gorden and Bucksch, Jens and Klocke, Andreas and Kolip, Petra and Melzer, Wolfgang and Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike and Richter, Matthias}, publisher = {Beltz Juventa}, address = {Weinheim}, isbn = {978-3-7799-1991-9}, pages = {35 -- 46}, language = {de} } @misc{RathmannBilzHurrelmannetal., author = {Rathmann, Katharina and Bilz, Ludwig and Hurrelmann, Klaus and Kiess, Wieland and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Is being a "small fish in a big pond" bad for students´ psychosomatic health? A multilevel study on the role of class-level school performance}, series = {BMC Public Health}, volume = {18}, journal = {BMC Public Health}, issn = {1471-2458}, doi = {10.1186/s12889-018-5977-5}, pages = {13}, abstract = {Background. Features of schools and classes are closely related to students´ health and wellbeing. However, class composition (e.g. in terms of school performance) has rarely been examined in relation to students´ health and wellbeing. This study focuses on the so called Big-Fish-Little-Pond-Effect (BFLPE), by investigating whether the level of high-performing students in classroom is negatively associated with psychosomatic complaints of students who perceive themselves as poor performers. Methods. Data were derived from the German sample of the WHO-Collaborative "Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)" study 2013/2014. The sample included 5226 11-, 13- and 15-year-old students. Individual perceived school performance (PSP) was included (very good/good vs. average/below average PSP) at the individual student-level. At the class-level, school performance in class was generated by aggregating the share (in percentage) of students who report a very good/good PSP to the class-level, indicating the percentage of students with good/very good PSP in classroom. Using multilevel regression models, the association between class-level school performance (in percentage of students with very good/good PSP) and individual psychosomatic complaints were analyzed, stratified by students´ individual PSP. Results. Students who report average/below average PSP showed higher likelihoods of psychosomatic complaints (Odds Ratio: 1.75; 95\% Confidence Interval: 1.52-2.03) compared to counterparts with very good/good PSP. The aggregated class-level PSP was not significantly associated with psychosomatic complaints. However, in line with the BFLPE, results further revealed that students with average/below average PSP, who attend classes with a higher percentage of students who report very good/good PSP, had higher likelihoods of psychosomatic complaints (Odds Ratio: 1.91; 95\% Confidence Interval: 1.01-4.01) compared to classmates with very good/good PSP. Conclusions. This study revealed that class composition in terms of PSP was differentially associated with students´ psychosomatic complaints, depending on their individual PSP. Findings highlight the vulnerability of students with poor PSP placed in classes with a higher percentage of students with good PSP. Results of this study therefore indicate a need for initiatives for low performing students from teachers and school staff in class.}, language = {en} } @misc{RathmannHerkeBilzetal., author = {Rathmann, Katharina and Herke, Max and Bilz, Ludwig and Rimpel{\"a}, Arja and Hurrelmann, Klaus and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Class-level school performance and life satisfaction: Differential sensitivity for low- and high-performing school-aged children}, series = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}, volume = {15}, journal = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health}, number = {12}, issn = {1660-4601}, doi = {10.3390/ijerph15122750}, pages = {17}, abstract = {This study investigates whether class-level school performance affects students' life satisfaction and if there are differential effects for high- and low-performing students. Data were derived from the National Educational Panel Study, including n = 5196 students (49.6\% girls), nested in 478 classes and 250 secondary schools. School performance in class was measured by aggregating individual grade point average in Mathematics and German. The study could not reveal the "big-fish-little-pond"-effect regarding students' life satisfaction but found differential effects for high- vs. low performing students. There was no significant association for low-performing students attending classes with higher class-level performance However, low-performing students revealed the lowest life satisfaction. High-performing students placed in classes with higher average performance reported lower life satisfaction compared to high-performing students in classes with lower average performance. This study provides evidence for the impact of the learning environment in class on school-aged children's life satisfaction, by highlighting the differential sensitivity of high-performing students when placed in classes with higher or lower average performance.}, language = {en} } @misc{MoorWinterBilzetal., author = {Moor, Irene and Winter, Kristina and Bilz, Ludwig and Bucksch, Jens and Finne, Emily and John, Nancy and Kolip, Petra and Paulsen, Lisa and Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike and Schlattmann, Marina and Sudeck, Gorden and Brindley, Catherina and Kaman, Anne and Richter, Matthias}, title = {The 2017/18 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study - Methodology of the World Health Organization's child and adolescent health study}, series = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, volume = {5}, journal = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, number = {3}, issn = {2511-2708}, doi = {10.25646/6904}, pages = {88 -- 102}, abstract = {The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study is an international research project in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) for over 35 years. HBSC is the largest study on child and adolescent health and one of the most important sources of data for the WHO's international comparative health monitoring. Every four years, data on the health and health behaviour of students aged 11, 13 and 15, as well as the social contexts and conditions for growing up healthy, are collected. A total of 50 countries belong to the HBSC network, with 45 countries taking part in the 2017/18 survey. Germany has contributed to the HBSC surveys since 1993/94. For the most recent 2017/18 cycle, students at 146 schools in Germany were interviewed (response rate of schools: 15.6\%). A net sample of n = 4,347 girls and boys was achieved for Germany (response rate: 52.7\%). Participation was voluntary and the survey was conducted in German school years five, seven and nine (corresponding to ages 11, 13 and 15). A weighting procedure was applied to allow for representative findings on the health of children and adolescents in Germany. HBSC offers a valuable contribution to health monitoring and provides numerous starting points to identify needs, risk groups and fields of action to initiate targeted and actual needs-based measures of prevention and health promotion in the school setting.}, language = {en} } @misc{WinterMoorMarkertetal., author = {Winter, Kristina and Moor, Irene and Markert, Jenny and Bilz, Ludwig and Bucksch, Jens and Dadaczynski, Kevin and Fischer, Saskia M. and Helmchen, Ronja M. and Kaman, Anne and M{\"o}ckel, Juliane and Rathmann, Katharina and Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike and Reiß, Franziska and Schierl, Theresa and Sch{\"u}tz, Raphael and Sendatzki, Saskia and St{\"u}rmer, Elisabeth and Sudeck, Gorden and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Concept and methodology of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study - Insights into the current 2022 survey and trends in Germany}, series = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, number = {1}, issn = {2511-2708}, doi = {10.25646/11878}, pages = {99 -- 117}, abstract = {Background: Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) is one of the largest international studies on child and adolescent health and cooperates with the World Health Organization (WHO). In Germany, adolescents aged 11, 13 and 15 are surveyed every four years about their health, health behaviour and social conditions. This article describes the HBSC study and in particular the methodology of the current 2022 survey and prior surveys conducted between 2009/10 and 2017/18. Method: 174 schools with a total of 6,475 students participated in the 2022 survey. The survey was conducted using questionnaires and covered a wide range of topics (including mental health, physical activity, bullying experiences, social determinants of health and experiences related to COVID-19). The 2022 survey was complemented by a school principal survey (N = 160). In addition to the current sample, the samples of the three previous surveys with representative data for Germany are presented: 2009/10 (N = 5,005), 2013/14 (N = 5,961) and 2017/18 (N = 4,347). Discussion: The health of children and adolescents is of great public health importance. The HBSC study makes a substantial contribution by providing internationally comparable results, analysing trends, and providing stakeholders with comprehensive and representative health monitoring data.}, language = {en} } @misc{MoorWinterBilzetal., author = {Moor, Irene and Winter, Kristina and Bilz, Ludwig and Bucksch, Jens and Finne, Emily and John, Nancy and Kolip, Petra and Paulsen, Lisa and Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike and Schlattmann, Marina and Sudeck, Gorden and Brindley, Catherina and Kaman, Anne and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Die Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)-Studie 2017/18 - Methodik der Kinder- und Jugendgesundheits­studie der Weltgesundheitsorganisation}, series = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, volume = {5}, journal = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, number = {3}, issn = {2511-2708}, doi = {10.25646/6896}, pages = {93 -- 108}, abstract = {Die „Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC)"-Studie ist ein international kooperatives Forschungsprojekt, das von der Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO) seit {\"u}ber 35 Jahren unterst{\"u}tzt wird. HBSC ist die weltweit gr{\"o}ßte Studie zur Kinder- und Jugendgesundheit und f{\"u}r die WHO eine der wichtigsten Datengrundlagen zur international vergleichenden Gesundheitsberichterstattung. Im vierj{\"a}hrigen Turnus werden Daten zur Gesundheit und zum Gesundheitsverhalten von Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern im Alter von 11, 13 und 15 Jahren sowie zu den Rahmenbedingungen f{\"u}r ein gesundes Aufwachsen erhoben. Insgesamt geh{\"o}ren 50 L{\"a}nder dem HBSC-Netzwerk an, an dem Survey 2017/18 beteiligten sich insgesamt 45 L{\"a}nder. Deutschland beteiligt sich seit 1993/94 an der HBSC-Studie. F{\"u}r die aktuelle Erhebung 2017/18 in Deutschland wurden Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}ler an 146 Schulen befragt (Responserate Schulen: 15,6 \%). Insgesamt konnte f{\"u}r Deutschland eine Netto-Stichprobe von n=4.347 M{\"a}dchen und Jungen (Responserate: 52,7 \%) erzielt werden. Die freiwillige Teilnahme an der Befragung erfolgte in ganzen Schulklassen der Jahrgangsstufen f{\"u}nf, sieben und neun. Mit Hilfe einer Gewichtung sind repr{\"a}sentative Aussagen zur gesundheitlichen Lage von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland m{\"o}glich. Die HBSC-Studie leistet einen wichtigen Beitrag f{\"u}r die Gesundheitsberichterstattung und bietet wichtige Ansatzpunkte f{\"u}r die Identifikation von Bedarfen, Risikogruppen und Handlungsfeldern, um gezielte und bedarfsorientierte Maßnahmen zur Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung im Setting Schule zu initiieren.}, language = {de} } @misc{WinterMoorMarkertetal., author = {Winter, Kristina and Moor, Irene and Markert, Jenny and Bilz, Ludwig and Bucksch, Jens and Dadaczynski, Kevin and Fischer, Saskia M. and Helmchen, Ronja M. and Kaman, Anne and M{\"o}ckel, Juliane and Rathmann, Katharina and Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike and Reiß, Franziska and Schierl, Theresa and Sch{\"u}tz, Raphael and Sendatzki, Saskia and St{\"u}rmer, Elisabeth and Sudeck, Gorden and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Konzept und Methodik der Studie Health Behaviour in Schoolaged Children (HBSC) - Einblicke in den aktuellen Survey 2022 und die Entwicklung in Deutschland}, series = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, number = {1}, issn = {2511-2708}, doi = {10.25646/11877}, pages = {108 -- 127}, abstract = {Hintergrund: „Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)" ist eine der gr{\"o}ßten internationalen Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitsstudien und kooperiert mit der Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO). In Deutschland werden im vierj{\"a}hrigen Turnus jeweils Heranwachsende im Alter von 11, 13 und 15 Jahren zur Gesundheit, zum Gesundheitsverhalten und zu sozialen Rahmenbedingungen befragt. Der Beitrag widmet sich der Beschreibung der HBSC-Studie und speziell der Methodik des aktuellen Surveys 2022 sowie der vorherigen Erhebungen von 2009/10 bis 2017/18. Methode: Am Survey 2022 beteiligten sich 174 Schulen mit insgesamt 6.475 Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern. Die Erhebung erfolgte mittels Fragebogen und erfasst ein breites Themenspektrum (u. a. mentale Gesundheit, Bewegungsverhalten, Mobbingerfahrungen, soziale Determinanten der Gesundheit sowie Erfahrungen im Zusammenhang mit COVID-19). Erg{\"a}nzt wurde die Erhebung 2022 um eine Schulleitungsbefragung (N = 160). Neben der aktuellen Stichprobe werden auch die Stichproben der vorangegangenen drei Surveys mit repr{\"a}sentativen Angaben f{\"u}r Deutschland vorgestellt: 2009/10 (N = 5.005), 2013/14 (N = 5.961) und 2017/18 (N = 4.347). Diskussion: Die Kinder- und Jugendgesundheit hat eine hohe Public-Health-Relevanz. Dazu leistet die HBSC-Studie einen elementaren Beitrag, denn sie liefert international vergleichbare Ergebnisse, erm{\"o}glicht die Analyse von Trendentwicklungen und stellt umfangreiche, repr{\"a}sentative Daten zum Gesundheitsmonitoring f{\"u}r Stakeholder bereit.}, language = {de} } @misc{DadaczynskiKamanRavensSiebereretal., author = {Dadaczynski, Kevin and Kaman, Anne and Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike and Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig and Sendatzki, Saskia and Helmchen, Ronja M. and Rathmann, Katharina and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Problematische Nutzung digitaler Medien und Gesundheitskompetenz von Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern in Deutschland : Befunde der HBSC-Studie 2022}, series = {Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz}, journal = {Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz}, publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, issn = {1436-9990}, doi = {10.1007/s00103-025-04008-6}, pages = {11}, abstract = {Hintergrund Der digitale Alltag von Kindern und Jugendlichen ist durch eine hohe Nutzung sozialer Medien und digitaler Spiele gepr{\"a}gt. Bisherige Forschung konnte gesundheitsabtr{\"a}gliche Konsequenzen einer problematischen Mediennutzung aufzeigen. Hingegen wurden Zusammenh{\"a}nge mit der Gesundheitskompetenz kaum untersucht, obgleich Rahmenmodelle Gesundheitskompetenz als Determinante des Gesundheitsverhaltens nahelegen. Methoden Dieser Beitrag greift auf Daten der repr{\"a}sentativen Studie „Health Behaviour in School-aged Children" (HBSC) in Deutschland aus dem Jahr 2022 mit n = 6475 Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern zur{\"u}ck. Es wurden Zusammenh{\"a}nge zwischen der problematischen Nutzung von sozialen Medien und der Videospielintensit{\"a}t sowie der Gesundheitskompetenz unter Ber{\"u}cksichtigung soziodemografischer und -{\"o}konomischer Merkmale bivariat und multivariat untersucht. Ergebnisse Die Pr{\"a}valenz der problematischen Nutzung sozialer Medien betrug 11,1 \% und etwa ein Drittel gab an, mehr als 9 h pro Woche mit digitalen Spielen zu verbringen. Eine geringe Gesundheitskompetenz stand mit beiden Formen der Mediennutzung in signifikantem Zusammenhang. Zudem war die problematische Nutzung sozialer Medien mit einer weiblichen und genderdiversen Geschlechtszugeh{\"o}rigkeit, dem Alter von 13 Jahren, dem Vorliegen eines Migrationshintergrunds und der Zugeh{\"o}rigkeit zu einer anderen Schulform als das Gymnasium verbunden. Eine hohe Spielintensit{\"a}t war mit einer m{\"a}nnlichen und genderdiversen Geschlechtszuordnung, der Zugeh{\"o}rigkeit zu den Altersgruppen der 13- und 15-J{\"a}hrigen und einem geringen famili{\"a}ren Wohlstand assoziiert. Diskussion Die Ergebnisse liefern nicht nur Hinweise f{\"u}r die Identifikation von Heranwachsenden mit besonderem Pr{\"a}ventionsbedarf, sondern betonen auch die Relevanz, die der Gesundheitskompetenz f{\"u}r das Mediennutzungsverhalten zukommt. Exemplarische Empfehlungen werden unter R{\"u}ckgriff auf die internationale Literatur aufgegriffen.}, language = {de} }