@misc{SchillingSchneiderKarlheimetal., author = {Schilling, Laura and Schneider, Sven and Karlheim, Christoph and Maul, Holger and Tallarek, Marie and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Perceived threats, benefits and barriers of e-cigarette use during pregnancy. A qualitative analysis of risk perception within existing threads in online discussion forums}, series = {Midwifery}, volume = {79}, journal = {Midwifery}, issn = {0266-6138}, doi = {10.1016/j.midw.2019.102533}, pages = {8}, abstract = {Objective Previous studies have shown that e-cigarettes are perceived as being less harmful than tobacco cigarettes by pregnant women and might be used to quit smoking during pregnancy. Our aim was to further explore and characterise perceived threats, benefits and barriers of e-cigarette use during pregnancy. Methods Our STudy on E-cigarettes and Pregnancy (STEP) was, among others, based on a netnographic approach of analysing existing threads in German-speaking online discussion forums dealing with perceived threats and benefits of e-cigarette use during pregnancy. For the analysis, we used an inductive-deductive qualitative content analysis. Findings Based on 25 online discussion threads containing 1552 posts, we identified perceived threats, perceived benefits and perceived barriers to e-cigarette use during pregnancy, among others, as main themes. Subthemes identified within the main theme perceived threats were severe nicotine related health risks, potential health risks of additional ingredients, relative risks and lack of knowledge and research studies. As perceived benefits, we identified possibility and facilitation of smoking cessation, harm reduction and financial benefits. Perceived barriers were lack of satisfaction and social stigma. Conclusion Our qualitative results suggest that the perception of the health threats related to e-cigarette use during pregnancy varies according to the nicotine content and the perception of relative risks compared with tobacco cigarettes. In addition to this, risk perception is defined through further health and non-health related barriers and benefits (e.g. suitability of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid, social stigma).}, language = {en} } @incollection{TallarekMlinarićSpallek, author = {Tallarek, Marie and Mlinarić, Martin and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Migration - Bedeutung und Implikationen f{\"u}r die Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung}, series = {Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung. Springer Reference Pflege - Therapie - Gesundheit}, booktitle = {Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung. Springer Reference Pflege - Therapie - Gesundheit}, editor = {Tiemann, Michael and Mohokum, Melvin}, edition = {1}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Berlin, Heidelberg}, isbn = {978-3-662-55793-8}, issn = {2662-6942}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-662-55793-8_28-1}, pages = {1 -- 13}, abstract = {Die Bev{\"o}lkerungsgruppe der Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund umfasst fast ein Viertel der Gesamtbev{\"o}lkerung in Deutschland und ist h{\"o}chst heterogen. Pauschalisierende Aussagen zum Gesundheitsstatus dieser Gruppe sind daher nicht m{\"o}glich. Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund sind nicht grunds{\"a}tzlich ges{\"u}nder oder kr{\"a}nker als die Mehrheitsbev{\"o}lkerung. Allerdings k{\"o}nnen sie sich aufgrund von Expositionen vor, w{\"a}hrend und nach der Migration in ihren Gesundheitschancen und -risiken von der Mehrheitsbev{\"o}lkerung unterscheiden. Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung sollten daraus resultierende spezifische Bedarfe ebenso ber{\"u}cksichtigen wie die Diversit{\"a}t der Bev{\"o}lkerung insgesamt. Erfolgversprechend ist eine Kombination aus diversit{\"a}tssensiblen, f{\"u}r die Gesamtbev{\"o}lkerung zug{\"a}nglichen Angeboten und migrationsspezifischen Ans{\"a}tzen in besonders risikoreichen Situationen. Kommunale, settingorientierte sowie soziokulturell angepasste Angebote verbessern die Erreichbarkeit der Zielgruppen maßgeblich.}, language = {de} } @techreport{BozorgmehrHintermeierRazumetal., author = {Bozorgmehr, Kayvan and Hintermeier, Maren and Razum, Oliver and Mohsenpour, Amir and Biddle, Louise and Oertelt-Prigione, Sabine and Spallek, Jacob and Tallarek, Marie and Jahn, Rosa}, title = {SARS-CoV-2 in Aufnahmeeinrichtungen und Gemeinschaftsunterk{\"u}nften f{\"u}r Gefl{\"u}chtete: Epidemiologische und normativ-rechtliche Aspekte}, doi = {10.4119/UNIBI/2943665}, pages = {37}, abstract = {Ziel des Factsheets ist es, das „Ausbreitungspotential" (als kumulatives Inzidenzrisiko) von SARSCoV- 2 in Aufnahmeeinrichtungen und Gemeinschaftsunterk{\"u}nften bei Auftreten eines Falls zu ermitteln, Zusammenh{\"a}nge mit Einrichtungstyp und Strategie des Ausbruchsmanagements zu explorieren und normativ-rechtliche Aspekte zu diskutieren. Zusammengefasst kann gesagt werden: - Das Risiko, mit dem weitere Bewohner*innen nach einem ersten nachgewiesenen Fall von SARS-CoV-2 (mittels PCR) positiv getestet werden ist in Aufnahmeeinrichtungen und Gemeinschaftsunterk{\"u}nften mit durchschnittlich 17\% als hoch einzusch{\"a}tzen, wobei es eine große Varianz zwischen den Einrichtungen gibt. - Eine Kollektivquarant{\"a}ne hat bezogen auf das Infektionsrisiko der unter Quarant{\"a}ne gestellten Bewohner*innen gegen{\"u}ber anderen Strategien keinen messbaren Vorteil. Ist innerhalb der Quarant{\"a}ne eine physische Distanzierung nur bedingt m{\"o}glich, ist von einer Erh{\"o}hung des Infektionsrisikos f{\"u}r die nicht-infizierten Bewohner*innen auszugehen. Studien zur Quarant{\"a}ne unter den vergleichsweisen g{\"u}nstigen Bedingungen von Kreuzfahrtschiffen best{\"a}tigen dies. Es gibt keine Daten dar{\"u}ber, ob die Kollektivquarant{\"a}ne einen gesundheitlichen Nutzen f{\"u}r die Bev{\"o}lkerung außerhalb der Einrichtung bedeutet. Da sie allerdings erhebliche normativ-rechtliche Probleme birgt, ist die Kollektivquarant{\"a}ne nach aktuellem Kenntnisstand zu vermeiden. - Die Unterbringung von Gefl{\"u}chteten sollte grunds{\"a}tzlich coronaschutzkonform erfolgen, d.h. m{\"o}glichst dezentral bzw. bei zentralen Einrichtungen m{\"o}glichst in Einzelunterbringung in kleinen Wohneinheiten, damit bei Auftreten eines Falls eine rasche Ausbreitung vermieden wird und eine ad{\"a}quate Kontaktnachverfolgung m{\"o}glich ist. - Nationale Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit SARS-CoV-2 in Aufnahmeeinrichtungen und Gemeinschaftsunterk{\"u}nften unter Ber{\"u}cksichtigung der bisher vor Ort entwickelten Pr{\"a}ventions- und L{\"o}sungsans{\"a}tze sowie epidemiologischer und normativ-rechtlicher {\"U}berlegungen sind dringend notwendig, um die beteiligten Akteur*innen in ihrem Engagement f{\"u}r die Gesundheit der Bewohner*innen zu unterst{\"u}tzen. Dieses Papier richtet sich an: Politikverantwortliche sowie Akteur*innen der Fl{\"u}chtlingsversorgung und der Wissenschaft.}, language = {de} } @misc{SchillingSpallekMauletal., author = {Schilling, Laura and Spallek, Jacob and Maul, Holger and Tallarek, Marie and Schneider, Sven}, title = {Active and Passive Exposure to Tobacco and e-Cigarettes During Pregnancy}, series = {Maternal and Child Health Journal}, volume = {25}, journal = {Maternal and Child Health Journal}, number = {4}, issn = {1092-7875}, doi = {10.1007/s10995-020-03037-8}, pages = {656 -- 665}, abstract = {Objectives Active and passive exposure to tobacco cigarettes during pregnancy is associated with multiple negative health outcomes for the fetus. In addition, exposure to e-cigarettes has been progressively discussed as a new threat to fetal health. Until now, there has been a lack of studies examining active and passive exposure to tobacco and e-cigarettes among pregnant women. The objective of our current STudy on E-cigarettes and Pregnancy (STEP) was to advance and complement the current knowledge regarding active and passive exposure to tobacco and e-cigarettes before pregnancy and during early and late pregnancy. Methods One element of the STEP study was a quantitative cross-sectional design: A sample of 540 pregnant women recruited at an obstetrician clinic in Hamburg from April 2018 to January 2019 were surveyed once via a standardized questionnaire and provided complete information regarding their consumption of tobacco and e-cigarettes. We performed a descriptive analysis of tobacco and e-cigarette use before pregnancy and during early and late pregnancy, as well as bivariate analysis of these variables with sociodemographic determinants. Passive exposure was assessed by asking the participating pregnant women about the consumption of tobacco and e-cigarettes by their partners, in general, and in their homes. Results Before pregnancy, 20.0\% of the participants used tobacco cigarettes exclusively, 1.3\% used e-cigarettes exclusively, and 6.5\% were dual users. Educational level was significantly associated with tobacco cigarette use (p < 0.001) and dual use (p = 0.047) before pregnancy. During early (late) pregnancy, 8.7\% (2.8\%) used tobacco cigarettes and 0.4\% (0.0\%) used e-cigarettes exclusively. Twenty-point nine percent of women's partners consumed tobacco cigarettes exclusively, 2.7\% consumed e-cigarettes exclusively, and 2.7\% consumed both. A total of 8.5\% (16.7\%) of the partners who consumed tobacco cigarettes exclusively (e-cigarettes exclusively) did so in the women's homes. Conclusions for Practice Among pregnant women, the use of tobacco cigarettes remains prominent before and during pregnancy, while e-cigarette use predominately occurs before pregnancy. Our study shows that pregnant women are frequently exposed to their partners' tobacco and e-cigarette use within their homes. Strategies to reduce such exposure should be further intensified. Significance In the last decade, e-cigarettes have become popular, and e-cigarette use has been increasing, even among pregnant women. However, there is a lack of knowledge concerning the exposure to e-cigarettes before pregnancy and during early and late pregnancy, as well as studies comparing e-cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes. The current study found that active exposure to e-cigarettes before pregnancy is high, while exposure during pregnancy is marginal. In contrast, exposure to tobacco cigarettes before and in early pregnancy is high but decreases during late pregnancy. In addition, the results of our study show that pregnant women are passively exposed to tobacco and e-cigarettes at home. Pregnant women should be advised against exposing themselves, actively or passively, to tobacco and e-cigarette smoke.}, language = {en} } @misc{TallarekBozorgmehrSpallek, author = {Tallarek, Marie and Bozorgmehr, Kayvan and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Towards inclusionary and diversity-sensitive public health: the consequences of exclusionary othering in public health using the example of COVID-19 management in German reception centres and asylum camps}, series = {BMJ Global Health}, volume = {5}, journal = {BMJ Global Health}, number = {12}, issn = {2059-7908}, doi = {10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003789}, pages = {9}, abstract = {The German government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been predominantly considered wellfounded. Still, the practice of mass quarantine in reception centres and asylum camps has been criticised for its discrimination of refugees and asylum seekers. Building on the concept of othering, this article argues that processes of othering are structurally anchored in German asylum regulations and they have further pervaded public health measures against COVID-19. The practice of mass quarantine made the negative consequences of exclusionary othering for public health particularly noticeable. In the light of recent data indicating this measure to be epidemiologically, legally and ethically insufficient, we apply the concept of othering to public health and discuss (1) exclusionary, (2) inclusionary and (3) diversity-sensitive approaches to public health. We finally conclude that a shift of perspective from exclusion to inclusion, from subordination to empowerment and from silencing to participation is urgently required.}, language = {en} } @misc{HintermeierGencerKajikhinaetal., author = {Hintermeier, Maren and Gencer, Hande and Kajikhina, Katja and Rohleder, Sven and Santos-H{\"o}vener, Claudia and Tallarek, Marie and Spallek, Jacob and Bozorgmehr, Kayvan}, title = {SARS-CoV-2 among migrants and forcibly displaced populations: a rapid systematic review}, series = {medRxiv}, journal = {medRxiv}, doi = {10.1101/2020.12.14.20248152}, pages = {27}, abstract = {The economic and health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic pose a particular threat to vulnerable groups, such as migrants, particularly forcibly displaced populations. The aim of this review is (i) to synthesise the evidence on risk of infection and transmission among migrants, refugees, asylum seekers and internally displaced populations, and (ii) the effect of lockdown measures on these populations. We searched MEDLINE and WOS, preprint servers, and pertinent websites between 1st December 2019 and 26th June 2020. The included studies showed a high heterogeneity in study design, population, outcome and quality. The incidence risk of SARS-CoV-2 varied from 0.12\% to 2.08\% in non-outbreak settings and from 5.64\% to 21.15\% in outbreak settings. Migrants showed a lower hospitalisation rate compared to non-migrants. Negative impacts on mental health due to lockdown measures were found across respective studies. However, findings show a tenuous and heterogeneous data situation, showing the need for more robust and comparative study designs.}, language = {en} } @misc{TallarekSpallek, author = {Tallarek, Marie and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Inclusionary und diversit{\"a}tssensibles Public Health in der Pandemie}, series = {Public Health Forum}, volume = {29}, journal = {Public Health Forum}, number = {1}, issn = {1876-4851}, doi = {10.1515/pubhef-2020-0112}, pages = {22 -- 26}, abstract = {Othering beschreibt die Markierung von Menschen als „anders" oder „nicht zugeh{\"o}rig". Ausgehend von den Konzepten des exclusionary und inclusionary Othering diskutiert dieser Beitrag drei Ans{\"a}tze zu i) exclusionary Public Health, ii) inclusionary Public Health und iii) diversit{\"a}tssensiblem Public Health. Die Implikationen der Ans{\"a}tze werden am Beispiel des Umgangs mit der COVID-19 Pandemie bei schutzsuchenden Menschen in Aufnahmeeinrichtungen und Sammelunterk{\"u}nften in Deutschland aufgezeigt.}, language = {de} } @incollection{TallarekJacobiWankeSchimboeck, author = {Tallarek, Marie and Jacobi-Wanke, Heike and Schimb{\"o}ck, Florian}, title = {Interkulturelle Kompetenz in der beruflichen Pflegeausbildung: Herausforderungen und Empfehlungen f{\"u}r die p{\"a}dagogische Praxis}, series = {Handbuch Migration und Gesundheit : Grundlagen, Perspektiven und Strategien}, booktitle = {Handbuch Migration und Gesundheit : Grundlagen, Perspektiven und Strategien}, editor = {Spallek, Jacob and Zeeb, Hajo}, edition = {1}, publisher = {Hogrefe AG}, address = {Bern}, isbn = {978-3-456-85995-8}, pages = {181 -- 193}, abstract = {Die Diversit{\"a}t der Auszubildenden, Lehrkr{\"a}fte und Praxisanleiter*innen in der Pflegeausbildung nimmt zu. Interkulturelle Kompetenzen sollten deshalb bereits in die pflegep{\"a}dagogische und pflegerische Ausbildung integriert werden. Eine kulturell kompetente Pflegeausbildung basiert auf der Wertsch{\"a}tzung aller Beteiligten in ihrer kulturellen Vielfalt. Sie bedarf der steten Reflexion "eigener" un "fremder" Pr{\"a}gungen und der eigenen kulturellen Befangenheit und Begrenztheit. Machtasymmetrien, Kollektiverfahrungen, Fremdbilder und differente Kulturmuster k{\"o}nnen zu kommunikativen Herausforde-rungen in der interkulturellen Begegnung f{\"u}hren. {\"U}ber die individuelle Selbstreflexion hinaus ist es entscheidend, die sozialen, rechtlichen, {\"o}konomischen, institutionel-len und organisationalen Rahmenbedingungen des Lernens und Lehrens zu verbessern. F{\"u}r die Pflegeausbildung empfehlenswert sind - die Integration interkultureller Kompetenzen in die Ausbildung von Lehrenden, - die Entwicklung kultursensibler Pflege-curricula, - die F{\"o}rderung von (Selbst-)reflexion in kollegialen Fallberatungen, - das Antworten auf Vielfalt durch entsprechende Leitungs- und Anstellungsstrategien, - der reflektierte und verst{\"a}ndnisvolle Umgang mit unterschiedlichen Sprachkennt-nissen, - das Nutzen entzerrter, dialogischer und kooperativer Lernstrukturen sowie - die Begleitung von Lernenden durch So-zialarbeiter*innen.}, language = {de} } @incollection{YildirimTallarek, author = {Yildirim, T{\"u}lan and Tallarek, Marie}, title = {Buchteil VI: Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung. Einf{\"u}hrung}, series = {Handbuch Migration und Gesundheit : Grundlagen, Perspektiven und Strategien}, booktitle = {Handbuch Migration und Gesundheit : Grundlagen, Perspektiven und Strategien}, editor = {Spallek, Jacob and Zeeb, Hajo}, edition = {1}, publisher = {Hogrefe AG}, address = {Bern}, isbn = {978-3-456-85995-8}, pages = {419 -- 420}, language = {de} } @incollection{ErginAkkoyunMlinarićMohammadzadehetal., author = {Ergin-Akkoyun, Emine and Mlinarić, Martin and Mohammadzadeh, Zahra and Samkange-Zeeb, Florence and Tallarek, Marie and Ulusoy, Nazan and Yildirim, T{\"u}lan}, title = {Zur partizipativen Entstehung dieses Handbuchs: R{\"u}ckblick und Empfehlungen}, series = {Handbuch Migration und Gesundheit : Grundlagen, Perspektiven und Strategien}, booktitle = {Handbuch Migration und Gesundheit : Grundlagen, Perspektiven und Strategien}, editor = {Spallek, Jacob and Zeeb, Hajo}, edition = {1}, publisher = {Hogrefe AG}, address = {Bern}, isbn = {978-3-456-85995-8}, pages = {473 -- 474}, language = {de} }