@misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Selbstregulative Kompetenzen von Lehrkr{\"a}ften beim Umgang mit Mobbing}, series = {80. AEPF-Tagung}, journal = {80. AEPF-Tagung}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, pages = {104}, language = {de} } @misc{WachsWettsteinBilzetal., author = {Wachs, Sebastian and Wettstein, Alexander and Bilz, Ludwig and G{\´a}mez-Guadix, Manuel}, title = {Adolescents' motivations to perpetrate hate speech and links with social norms}, series = {Comunicar - Media Education Research Journal}, volume = {71}, journal = {Comunicar - Media Education Research Journal}, number = {2}, issn = {1134-3478}, doi = {10.3916/C71-2022-01}, abstract = {Hate speech has become a widespread phenomenon, however, it remains largely unclear why adolescents engage in it and which factors are associated with their motivations for perpetrating hate speech. To this end, we developed the multidimensional "Motivations for Hate Speech Perpetration Scale" (MHATE) and evaluated the psychometric properties. We also explored the associations between social norms and adolescents' motivations for hate speech perpetration. The sample consisted of 346 adolescents from Switzerland (54.6\% boys; Mage=14; SD=0.96) who reported engagement in hate speech as perpetrators. The analyses revealed good psychometric properties for the MHATE, including good internal consistency. The most frequently endorsed subscale was revenge, followed by ideology, group conformity, status enhancement, exhilaration, and power. The results also showed that descriptive norms and peer pressure were related to a wide range of different motivations for perpetrating hate speech. Injunctive norms, however, were only associated with power. In conclusion, findings indicate that hate speech fulfills various functions. We argue that knowing the specific motivations that underlie hate speech could help us derive individually tailored prevention strategies (e.g., anger management, promoting an inclusive classroom climate). Furthermore, we suggest that practitioners working in the field of hate speech prevention give special attention to social norms surrounding adolescents.}, language = {en} } @misc{WachsBilzWettsteinetal., author = {Wachs, Sebastian and Bilz, Ludwig and Wettstein, Alexander and Wright, Michelle F. and Krause, Norman and Ballaschk, Cindy and Kansok-Dusche, Julia}, title = {The Online Hate Speech Cycle of Violence: Moderating Effects of Moral Disengagement and Empathy in the Victim-to-Perpetrator Relationship}, series = {Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking}, volume = {25}, journal = {Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking}, number = {4}, issn = {2152-2715}, doi = {10.1089/cyber.2021.0159}, pages = {223 -- 229}, abstract = {Adolescents around the globe are increasingly exposed to online hate speech (OHS). And yet little is known about the varying roles of involvement and the determinants of adolescents' hate speech perpetration. Building on previous research, this study aims to test the cycle of violence hypothesis for OHS and to analyze whether moral disengagement (MD) and empathy moderate the victim-to-perpetrator relationship. The sample consists of 3,560 seventh to ninth graders (52.1 percent girls), recruited from 40 schools across Germany and Switzerland. Self-report questionnaires were administered to assess OHS involvement, MD, and empathy. Multilevel analyses revealed that victims of OHS were more likely to report OHS perpetration. In addition, victims of OHS were more likely to report OHS perpetration when they reported higher levels of MD than those with lower levels of MD. Finally, victims of OHS were less likely to report OHS perpetration when they reported higher levels of empathy than those with lower levels of empathy. The findings extend the cycle of violence hypothesis to OHS and highlight the need to address MD and empathy in hate speech prevention. Implications for future research will be discussed.}, language = {en} } @misc{LovisSchmidtBilzPahlkeetal., author = {Lovis-Schmidt, Avelina and Bilz, Ludwig and Pahlke, Kyra and Rindermann, Heiner}, title = {Physical Health Complaints in Adolescents: Findings From the 2018 Brandenburg HBSC Study}, series = {European Journal of Health Psychology}, volume = {29}, journal = {European Journal of Health Psychology}, number = {3}, issn = {2512-8442}, doi = {10.1027/2512-8442/a000090}, pages = {121 -- 133}, abstract = {Some of the physical health complaints adolescents have, such as headaches and stomachaches, cannot be explained on a somatic level. It is unclear which psychological factors can explain these complaints: stress and social support are often discussed, but emotions rarely are. Aims: This cross-sectional study aims to use social support, stress, the tendency toward negative emotions, and health behaviors to predict physical health complaints in adolescents. Method: The 2018 HBSC (Health Behavior in School-aged Children) data from the German state of Brandenburg was analyzed via structural equation and path modeling (N = 3,068, age M = 13.05). Results: Results showed that the tendency toward negative emotions seems to be a better predictor for health complaints (β = .35) than stress (β = .17), and even better suited than social support (β = -.08) or health behavior (β = -.06 to β = .16). In the analysis of specific emotions (anger, sadness, and fear), correlations were low and between sadness and complaints they were highest (average β = .19). Limitations: The present cross-sectional study could not examine long-term outcomes. In addition, the results are limited to only a few physical complaints. Future long-term studies should examine multiple disease symptoms in adolescence. Conclusion: The investigated tendency toward negative emotions demonstrated promising results to better understand the relationship between psychological factors and physical health complaints. As negative emotions were particularly important in predicting physical health, prevention programs for adolescents should focus on dealing with negative emotions to improve their health.}, language = {en} } @misc{WettsteinCastellanosBilzetal., author = {Wettstein, Alexander and Castellanos, Melisa and Bilz, Ludwig and Wachs, Sebastian}, title = {Die Verbreitung von Hatespeech an Schulen in Deutschland und der Schweiz aus Sch{\"u}ler:innen- und Lehrer:innenperspektive}, series = {Bildung im digitalen Wandel. 9. GEBF-Tagung Bamberg}, journal = {Bildung im digitalen Wandel. 9. GEBF-Tagung Bamberg}, publisher = {Otto-Friedrich-Universit{\"a}t Bamberg}, address = {Bamberg}, pages = {78}, language = {de} } @misc{KrauseWachsBilzetal., author = {Krause, Norman and Wachs, Sebastian and Bilz, Ludwig and Schubarth, Wilfried}, title = {„Ich glaube, es gibt auch einige Kollegen, die es sich nicht zutrauen". Eine qualitative Studie zu Gr{\"u}nden aus- bleibender Intervention p{\"a}dagogischen Schulpersonals bei Hatespeech unter Sch{\"u}ler:innen}, series = {Bildung im digitalen Wandel. 9. GEBF Tagung Bamberg}, journal = {Bildung im digitalen Wandel. 9. GEBF Tagung Bamberg}, publisher = {Otto-Friedrich-Universit{\"a}t Bamberg}, address = {Bamberg}, pages = {78}, language = {de} } @misc{KansokDuscheBilzFischeretal., author = {Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Bilz, Ludwig and Fischer, Saskia M. and Wachs, Sebastian}, title = {Lehrpersoneninterventionen bei Hatespeech: Dimensionalit{\"a}t, Messinvarianz und Kriteriumsvalidit{\"a}t einer neuen Skala}, series = {Bildung im digitalen Wandel. 9. GEBF Tagung Bamberg}, journal = {Bildung im digitalen Wandel. 9. GEBF Tagung Bamberg}, publisher = {Otto-Friedrich-Universit{\"a}t Bamberg}, address = {Bamberg}, pages = {78}, language = {de} } @misc{WachsBilzWettsteinetal., author = {Wachs, Sebastian and Bilz, Ludwig and Wettstein, Alexander and Wright, Michelle F. and Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Krause, Norman and Ballaschk, Cindy}, title = {Associations Between Witnessing and Perpetrating Online Hate Speech Among Adolescents: Testing Moderation Effects of Moral Disengagement and Empathy}, series = {Psychology of Violence}, volume = {12}, journal = {Psychology of Violence}, number = {6}, issn = {2152-0828}, doi = {10.1037/vio0000422}, pages = {371 -- 381}, abstract = {Objective: The open expression of hatred, hostility, and violence against minorities has become a common online phenomenon. Adolescents are at particular risk of being involved in different hate speech roles (e.g., witness, perpetrator). However, the correlates of their involvement as perpetrators and the mechanisms that might explain their involvement in hate speech across different roles have not yet been thoroughly investigated. To this end, this study investigates moral disengagement and empathy as correlates of online hate speech perpetration and the moderation effects of empathy and moral disengagement in the relationship between witnessing and perpetrating online hate speech. Method: The sample consists of 3,560 7th to 9th graders from 40 schools in Germany and Switzerland. Self-report questionnaires were utilized to assess online hate speech involvement, moral dis- engagement, and empathy. Results: Multilevel regression analyses revealed that moral disengagement and witnessing online hate speech were positively associated with online hate speech perpetration, while empathy was negatively associated with it. The findings also showed that the positive relationship between witnessing and perpetrating online hate speech was stronger at higher levels of moral disengagement and weaker when moral disengagement was low. The association between witnessing and perpetrating online hate speech was weaker when adolescents had higher rather than lower levels of empathy. Conclusions: The findings underscore the need for prevention efforts to accelerate moral engagement and empathy as critical future directions in hate speech prevention. This study also contributes to our understanding of underlying mechanisms that explain adolescents' involvement across different roles in hate speech.}, language = {en} } @misc{KimCraigKingetal., author = {Kim, Samuel S. and Craig, Wendy M. and King, Nathan and Bilz, Ludwig and Cosma, Alina and Molcho, Michal and Qirjako, Gentiana and Matos, Margarida G. de and Augustine, Lilly and Šmigelskas, Kastytis and Pickett, William}, title = {Bullying, Mental Health, and the Moderating Role of Supportive Adults: A Cross-National Analysis of Adolescents in 45 Countries}, series = {International Journal of Public Health}, volume = {67}, journal = {International Journal of Public Health}, issn = {1661-8564}, doi = {10.3389/ijph.2022.1604264}, pages = {10}, abstract = {Objectives: Relationships with supportive adults during adolescence may be a protective factor that lowers the risks associated with bullying. The current study aimed to examine the moderating role of supportive adults in the associations between bullying involvement (in-person and cyber) and mental health problems (psychological symptoms and low life satisfaction). Methods: Data from 45 countries and regions taking part in the 2017/18 Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children study (N = 230,757) were used. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate relative risks of bullying on mental health. Effect estimates were compared across the number of supportive adults to examine a possible cumulative protective effect of relationships with supportive adults. Results: Bullying involvement was consistently associated with poor mental health across the 45 countries. Risk of mental health problems associated with bullying involvement was greatest among students reporting relationships with multiple supportive adults. This was true for all indicators of bullying involvement. Conclusion: Bullying remains a prevalent and harmful experience for youth worldwide. Merely having supportive adults is not sufficient in protecting youth from experiencing the mental health risks associated with bullying.}, language = {en} } @misc{DadaczynskiRathmannSchrickeretal., author = {Dadaczynski, Kevin and Rathmann, Katharina and Schricker, Julia and Bilz, Ludwig and Sudeck, Gorden and Fischer, Saskia M. and Janiczek, Oliver and Quilling, Eike}, title = {Digitale Gesundheitskompetenz von Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern. Auspr{\"a}gung und Assoziationen mit dem Bewegungs- und Ern{\"a}hrungsverhalten}, series = {Bundesgesundheitsblatt}, journal = {Bundesgesundheitsblatt}, issn = {1436-9990}, doi = {10.1007/s00103-022-03548-5}, pages = {11}, abstract = {Hintergrund. W{\"a}hrend vermehrt Studienbefunde zur allgemeinen Gesundheitskompetenz (GK) vorliegen, mangelt es an Erkenntnissen zur digitalen GK im Jugendalter und deren Assoziationen mit Indikatoren des Gesundheitsverhaltens. Methodik. Empirische Basis bildet eine von Oktober 2019 bis Februar 2020 im Bundesland Hessen durchgef{\"u}hrte Querschnittstudie mit 490 Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern der Klassenstufe 8 und 9. Die digitale GK wurde mithilfe von 5 Subskalen des Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI) erfasst, w{\"a}hrend der Verzehr von Obst, Gem{\"u}se und Softdrinks sowie die k{\"o}rperliche Aktivit{\"a}t als Indikatoren des Gesundheitsverhaltens herangezogen wurden. Als soziales Merkmal wurde neben dem Geschlecht und der Klassenstufe der subjektive Sozialstatus (SSS) ber{\"u}cksichtigt. Die Datenauswertung erfolgte uni-, bi- und multivariat, wobei bin{\"a}rlogistische Regressionen f{\"u}r das Geschlecht und den SSS adjustiert wurden. Ergebnisse. {\"U}ber alle Items hinweg berichten 15,3-37,5 \% der befragten Jugendlichen Schwierigkeiten bei der Beschaffung von und im Umgang mit digitalen Informationen. Differenziert nach sozialen Merkmalen finden sich f{\"u}r 2 Dimensionen der digitalen GK Unterschiede zuungunsten der M{\"a}dchen sowie durchgehend ein sozialer Gradient zuungunsten von Befragten mit niedrigem SSS. Jugendliche mit mittlerer und geringer digitaler GK weisen ein h{\"o}heres Maß an geringer k{\"o}rperlicher Aktivit{\"a}t, nichtt{\"a}glichem Obstverzehr und t{\"a}glichem Konsum von zuckerhaltigen Getr{\"a}nken auf. Diskussion. Die Befunde weisen auf einen Interventionsbedarf zur F{\"o}rderung der digitalen GK insbesondere bei Jugendlichen mit geringem SSS hin. Die differenziellen Zusammenhangsmuster mit dem Gesundheitsverhalten bieten Ansatzpunkte f{\"u}r die Entwicklung spezifischer Interventionen. Als Lehr- und Lernort stellt die Schule u. a. aufgrund der Passung mit verpflichtenden Strategien der schulischen Medienkompetenzbildung ein geeignetes Setting dar.}, language = {de} } @misc{BallaschkSchulzeReicheltBilzetal., author = {Ballaschk, Cindy and Schulze-Reichelt, Friederike and Bilz, Ludwig and Wachs, Sebastian}, title = {„Ist das (schon) Hatespeech?" Grenzziehungen von Sch{\"u}ler_innen und schulischem Personal zwischen legitimen {\"A}ußerungen und Hatespeech}, series = {28. DGfE-Kongress "Entgrenzungen"}, journal = {28. DGfE-Kongress "Entgrenzungen"}, address = {Bremen}, abstract = {Der Vortrag pr{\"a}sentiert erste Forschungsergebnisse zu Grenzziehungspraktiken in Bezug auf das Begriffsverst{\"a}ndnis von Hatespeech. Daf{\"u}r wurden Sch{\"u}ler*inen (n = 55), Lehrkr{\"a}fte (n = 18) und Sozialp{\"a}dagog_innen (n = 16) leitfadengest{\"u}tzt interviewt. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Befragten die Grenze zwischen sozial akzeptiertem Verhalten und Hatespeech entlang folgender Fragen verhandeln: Welche Gruppen sind das Ziel von Hatespeech, wie wird Hatespeech ausge{\"u}bt und wo findet sie statt? Die Interviewten ziehen die Grenze zwischen legitimen Meinungs{\"a}ußerungen und Hatespeech sehr verschieden. Bei der Frage, welche Gruppen von Hatespeech betroffen sind, wird deutlich, dass abwertende {\"A}ußerungen gegen behinderte Sch{\"u}ler_innen eher als Hatespeech eingeordnet werden als Abwertungen gegen transgeschlechtliche Sch{\"u}ler_innen. In Bezug auf die Frage, wie Hatespeech ausge{\"u}bt wird, wird die Grenze zu Hatespeech h{\"a}ufig als {\"u}berschritten gesehen, wenn sie im Zusammenhang mit Gewalt und Mobbing auftritt. Hinsichtlich der Frage wo Hatespeech auftritt, gaben die Befragten an, Hatespeech vorrangig als Online-Ph{\"a}nomen wahrzunehmen, wobei auch diverse F{\"a}lle von Hatespeech in der Schule beschrieben werden. Schlussfolgernd l{\"a}sst sich ein Bedarf erkennen, Sch{\"u}ler_innen und p{\"a}dagogisches Schulpersonal f{\"u}r unterschiedliche Zielgruppen, Ausdrucksformen und F{\"a}lle von Hatespeech in der Schule zu sensibilisieren, um Schule als einen diskriminierungskritischen Raum zu gestalten.}, language = {de} } @misc{KansokDuscheWachsBilz, author = {Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Wachs, Sebastian and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Systematisches Review zu Hatespeech bei Kindern und Jugendlichen: Definition, Verbreitung und {\"U}berlappung mit verwandten Ph{\"a}nomenen}, series = {28. DGfE-Kongress "Entgrenzungen"}, journal = {28. DGfE-Kongress "Entgrenzungen"}, address = {Bremen}, abstract = {Die wissenschaftliche Auseinandersetzung mit der Verbreitung von Hatespeech (HS) bei Heranwachsenden sowie mit den {\"U}berschneidungen z.B. mit Mobbing hat im deutschsprachigen Raum erst begonnen (z.B. Wachs et al., 2021). Der geplante Vortrag pr{\"a}sentiert die Ergebnisse eines systematischen Reviews des internationalen Forschungsstandes. Hierbei waren die folgenden Fragen leitend: 1. Wie wird HS in Studien mit Kindern und Jugendlichen (5-21 Jahre) definiert? 2. Wie stark ist HS in dieser Altersgruppe verbreitet? 3. Wie wird HS von verwandten Formen der Gewalt definitorisch abgegrenzt und wie hoch ist die empirische {\"U}berlappung? Eine String-Suche in sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenbanken erbrachte insgesamt 1.850 Publikationen. Die Einschlusspr{\"u}fung stufte davon 18 Publikationen aus zehn Studien als relevant ein. Zwei Kodiererinnen werteten die Publikationen kriteriengeleitet aus (κ =.80) und ermittelten ihre Qualit{\"a}t. Alle Studien (USA, Europa, Asien) basierten auf Jugendstichproben, keine Studie untersuchte Kinder. Die identifizierten HS-Definitionen, Messinstrumente und Abgrenzungskriterien variierten erheblich. Jugendliche erleben HS am h{\"a}ufigsten aus der Beobachter*innenperspektive (31-69\%), gefolgt von Opfererfahrungen (7\%-23\%) und T{\"a}ter*innenschaft (5\%-11\%). Mobbing und HS korrelieren miteinander (r =.15 - .47). Der Vortrag endet mit praktischen Implikationen f{\"u}r zuk{\"u}nftige Forschungen (z.B. Vorschlag einer breiten HS-Definition).}, language = {de} } @misc{KrauseBilzWachs, author = {Krause, Norman and Bilz, Ludwig and Wachs, Sebastian}, title = {Dem Hass entgeg(n)en - Eine qualitative Studie zu Interventionsmaßnahmen von p{\"a}dagogischem Schulpersonal bei Hatespeech in der Schule}, series = {28. DGfE-Kongress "Entgrenzungen"}, journal = {28. DGfE-Kongress "Entgrenzungen"}, address = {Bremen}, abstract = {Hatespeech-Erfahrungen k{\"o}nnen sich negativ auf das Wohlbefinden auswirken (Krause et al., 2021). Als h{\"a}ufig erste Erwachsene, an die sich Sch{\"u}ler*innen hilfesuchend wenden k{\"o}nnen, liegt es in der Verantwortung des p{\"a}dagogischen Schulpersonals, eine Intervention zu initiieren. Bisher wurde jedoch nicht untersucht, welche Interventionsmaßnahmen in Bezug auf Hatespeech in der Schulpraxis durchgef{\"u}hrt werden. Aus diesem Grund werden in dem vorliegenden Beitrag Interviews von Sch{\"u}ler*innen (n=21) und P{\"a}dagog*innen (n=27) zum Interventionshandeln des p{\"a}dagogischen Schulpersonals bei Hatespeech ausgewertet. Die Ergebnisse weisen auf verschiedene Interventionsziele (Aufl{\"o}sen der beobachteten Hatespeech-Situation als kurzfristiges Prim{\"a}rziel sowie verhaltensbezogene und einstellungsbezogene Sekund{\"a}rziele) hin. Weiterhin konnten zwei Interventionsstrategien unterschieden werden: direktiv-disziplinierende Interventionen (z.B. Bestrafungen, Instruktionen) und partizipativ-verhandelnde Interventionen (z.B. kompromissorientierte Mediationen, integrativ-konsensorientierte Verhandlungen). Insgesamt zeigt sich, dass Lehrkr{\"a}fte auf {\"a}hnliche Strategien zur{\"u}ckgreifen wie bei anderen Gewaltph{\"a}nomenen. Bei einstellungsmotivierter Hatespeech st{\"o}ßt eine rein verhaltenskonditionierende Interventionslogik jedoch an ihre Grenzen, woraus sich Forderungen nach Fortbildungsmaßnahmen f{\"u}r das Schulpersonal und Maßnahmen zur St{\"a}rkung einer Werteerziehung f{\"u}r die Sch{\"u}ler*innen ableiten lassen.}, language = {de} } @misc{Bilz, author = {Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Macht Schule krank?}, series = {14. Jahrestagung der Politischen Kindermedizin}, journal = {14. Jahrestagung der Politischen Kindermedizin}, address = {Salzburg}, language = {de} } @incollection{BilzMelzer, author = {Bilz, Ludwig and Melzer, Wolfgang}, title = {Schulschwierigkeiten}, series = {Fachlexikon der Sozialen Arbeit}, booktitle = {Fachlexikon der Sozialen Arbeit}, edition = {9., vollst{\"a}ndig {\"u}berarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage}, publisher = {Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8487-7131-8}, pages = {751 -- 752}, language = {de} } @misc{BilzFischerHoppeHerfurthetal., author = {Bilz, Ludwig and Fischer, Saskia M. and Hoppe-Herfurth, Anne-Cathrin and John, Nancy}, title = {A Consequential Partnership. The Association Between Teachers' Well-Being and Students' Well-Being and the Role of Teacher Support as a Mediator}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychologie}, volume = {230}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychologie}, number = {3}, issn = {2151-2604}, doi = {10.1027/2151-2604/a000497}, pages = {264 -- 275}, abstract = {Many studies have focused on the effects of teachers' well-being on the development of students, in particular their academic achievement. To date, little is known about the association between teachers' well-being and students' well-being. In the present study, we analyzed this relationship and examined the mediating role of teacher support using linked data from 2,686 students and 805 teachers from 48 schools in Germany. Multilevel regression analyses showed a relationship between teachers' emotional exhaustion and students' subjective health complaints and between teachers' psychological well-being and students' satisfaction with school. The latter association was mediated by teacher support as perceived by students. This study extends current knowledge about the relevance of teachers' well-being to their students' socio-emotional development and the mechanisms that underlie this association. Implications for promoting of mental health in schools and for future research are discussed.}, language = {en} } @misc{KansokDuscheBallaschkKrauseetal., author = {Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Ballaschk, Cindy and Krause, Norman and Zeißig, Anke and Seemann-Herz, Lisanne and Wachs, Sebastian and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {A Systematic Review on Hate Speech among Children and Adolescents: Definitions, Prevalence, and Overlap with Related Phenomena}, series = {Trauma, Violence, \& Abuse}, volume = {24(2023)}, journal = {Trauma, Violence, \& Abuse}, number = {4}, issn = {1524-8380}, doi = {10.1177/15248380221108070}, pages = {2598 -- 2615}, abstract = {Little is known about the current state of research on the involvement of young people in hate speech. Thus, this systematic review presents findings on a) the prevalence of hate speech among children and adolescents and on hate speech definitions that guide prevalence assessments for this population; and b) the theoretical and empirical overlap of hate speech with related concepts. This review was guided by the Cochrane approach. To be included, publications were required to deal with real-life experiences of hate speech, to provide empirical data on prevalence for samples aged 5 to 21 years and they had to be published in academic formats. Included publications were full-text coded using two raters (κ = .80) and their quality was assessed. The string-guided electronic search (ERIC, SocInfo, Psycinfo, Psyndex) yielded 1,850 publications. Eighteen publications based on 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and their findings were systematized. Twelve publications were of medium quality due to minor deficiencies in their theoretical or methodological foundations. All studies used samples of adolescents and none of younger children. Nine out of 10 studies applied quantitative methodologies. Eighteen publications based on 10 studies were included. Results showed that frequencies for hate speech exposure were higher than those related to victimization and perpetration. Definitions of hate speech and assessment instruments were heterogeneous. Empirical evidence for an often theorized overlap between hate speech and bullying was found. The paper concludes by presenting a definition of hate speech, including implications for practice, policy, and research.}, language = {en} } @misc{BilzFischerHoppeHerfurthetal., author = {Bilz, Ludwig and Fischer, Saskia M. and Hoppe-Herfurth, Anne-Cathrin and John, Nancy}, title = {A consequential partnership. The association between teachers' well-being and students' well-being and the role of teacher support as a mediator}, series = {26th Biennal Meeting of the ISSBD}, journal = {26th Biennal Meeting of the ISSBD}, publisher = {International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development}, address = {Rhodos, Greece}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.2.35890.48324}, pages = {1}, language = {en} } @misc{SeemannHerzKansokDuscheDixetal., author = {Seemann-Herz, Lisanne and Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Dix, Alexandra and Wachs, Sebastian and Krause, Norman and Ballaschk, Cindy and Schulze-Reichelt, Friederike and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Schulbezogene Programme zum Umgang mit Hatespeech - Eine kriteriengeleitete Bestandsaufnahme}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Bildungsforschung}, volume = {12}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Bildungsforschung}, number = {3}, issn = {2190-6890}, doi = {10.1007/s35834-022-00348-4}, pages = {597 -- 614}, abstract = {Der vorliegende Beitrag informiert {\"u}ber 14 deutschsprachige Programme zur Pr{\"a}vention und Intervention bei Hatespeech unter Kindern und Jugendlichen (Jahrgangsstufen 5-12). Inhalte und Durchf{\"u}hrungsmodalit{\"a}ten derProgramme sowie Ergebnisse einer kriteriengeleiteten Qualit{\"a}tseinsch{\"a}tzung anhand von f{\"u}nf Kriterien werden im Hinblick auf deren Anwendung in der schulischen Praxis beschrieben und er{\"o}rtert. Der {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber Schwerpunkte, St{\"a}rken und Entwicklungspotentiale schulbezogener Hatespeech-Programme erm{\"o}glicht Leser*innen eine informierte Entscheidung {\"u}ber den Einsatz der Programme in der Schule sowie in der offenen Kinder- und Jugendarbeit.}, language = {de} } @misc{CosmaBjereldElgaretal., author = {Cosma, Alina and Bjereld, Ylva and Elgar, Frank J. and Richardson, Clive and Bilz, Ludwig and Craig, Wendy M. and Augustine, Lilly and Molcho, Michal and Malinowska-Cieślik, Marta and Walsh, Sophie D.}, title = {Gender Differences in Bullying Reflect Societal Gender Inequality: A Multilevel Study With Adolescents in 46 Countries}, series = {Journal of Adolescent Health}, volume = {71}, journal = {Journal of Adolescent Health}, number = {5}, issn = {1054-139X}, doi = {10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.05.015}, pages = {601 -- 608}, abstract = {Purpose. Social patterns in bullying show consistent gender differences in adolescent perpetration and victimization with large cross-national variations. Previous research shows associations between societal gender inequality and gender differences in some violent behaviors in adolescents. Therefore, there is a need to go beyond individual associations and use a more social ecological perspective when examining gender differences in bullying behaviors. The aim of the present study was twofold: (1) to explore cross-national gender differences in bullying behaviors and (2) to examine whether national-level gender inequality relates to gender differences in adolescent bullying behaviors. Methods. Traditional bullying and cyberbullying were measured in 11-year-olds to 15-year-olds in the 2017/18 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study (n = 200,423). We linked individual data to national gender inequality (Gender Inequality Index, 2018) in 46 countries and tested their association using mixed-effects (multilevel) logistic regression models. Results. Large cross-national variations were observed in gender differences in bullying. Boys had higher odds of perpetrating both traditional and cyberbullying and victimization by traditional bullying than girls. Greater gender inequality at country level was associated with heightened gender differences in traditional bullying. In contrast, lower gender inequality was associated with larger gender differences for cyber victimization. Discussion. Societal gender inequality relates to adolescents' involvement in bullying and gendered patterns in bullying. Public health policy should target societal factors that have an impact on young people's behavior.}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerDadaczynskiSudecketal., author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Dadaczynski, Kevin and Sudeck, Gorden and Rathmann, Katharina and Paakkari, Olli and Paakkari, Leena and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Measuring Health Literacy in Childhood and Adolescence with the Scale Health Literacy in School-Aged Children - German Version}, series = {Diagnostica}, volume = {68}, journal = {Diagnostica}, number = {4}, issn = {0012-1924}, doi = {10.1026/0012-1924/a000296}, pages = {184 -- 196}, abstract = {Health literacy can help explain health inequalities in childhood and adolescence. However, suitable instruments for assessing health literacy in this age group are rare, especially in the German-speaking countries. One economical measure is the 10-item Health Literacy in School-Aged Children (HLSAC) scale, developed and reviewed as part of the WHO Child and Adolescent Health Study (HBSC, Health Behavior in School-Aged Children). In the present study, we tested dimensionality, measurement invariance, and associations with health-related measures of the German version of the scale (HLSAC-German), using data from the 2018 national German HBSC study (N = 4,347 students aged 11, 13, and 15 years). We also tested HLSAC-German with 11-year-olds, representing an expansion of the original scale. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses consistently demonstrated the unidimensionality of the scale (α = .88). Complete scalar measurement invariance was found for sex and partial scalar measurement invariance for age groups and school type, allowing for the comparison of means. Associations with indicators of health and health behavior further demonstrate the construct validity of the scale. The analyses show that the scale is suitable for the economic measurement of a general factor of health literacy in 11- as well as in 13- and 15-year-olds.}, language = {en} } @misc{WachsCastellanosWettsteinetal., author = {Wachs, Sebastian and Castellanos, Melisa and Wettstein, Alexander and Bilz, Ludwig and G{\´a}mez-Guadix, Manuel}, title = {Associations Between Classroom Climate, Empathy, Self-Efficacy, and Countering Hate Speech Among Adolescents: A Multilevel Mediation Analysis}, series = {Journal of Interpersonal Violence}, volume = {38}, journal = {Journal of Interpersonal Violence}, number = {5-6}, issn = {0886-2605}, doi = {10.1177/08862605221120905}, pages = {5067 -- 5091}, abstract = {Although hate speech is widely recognized as an online phenomenon, very few studies have investigated hate speech among adolescents in offline settings (e.g., schools). At the same time, not much is known about countering hate speech (counterspeech) among adolescents and which factors are associated with it. To this end, the present study used the socio- ecological framework to investigate the direct and indirect links among one contextual factor (i.e., classroom climate) and two intrapersonal factors (i.e.,empathy for victims of hate speech, self-efficacy regarding intervention in hate speech) to understand counterspeech among adolescents. The sample is based on self-reports of 3,225 students in Grades 7 to 9 (51.7\% self- identified as female) from 36 schools in Germany and Switzerland. Self- report questionnaires were administered to measure classroom climate, empathy, self-efficacy, and counterspeech. After controlling for adolescents' grade, gender, immigrant background, and socioeconomic status (SES), the 2-(1-1)-1 multilevel mediation analysis showed that classroom climate (L2), empathy for victims of hate speech (L1), and self-efficacy toward intervention in hate speech (L1) had a positive effect on countering hate speech (L1). Classroom climate (L2) was also positively linked to empathy for victims of hate speech (L1), and self-efficacy toward intervention in hate speech (L1). Furthermore, classroom climate (L2) was indirectly associated with countering hate speech (L1) via greater empathy (L1) and self-efficacy (L1). The findings highlight the need to focus on contextual and intrapersonal factors when trying to facilitate adolescents' willingness to face hate speech with civic courage and proactively engage against it.}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerDadaczynskiSudecketal., author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Dadaczynski, Kevin and Sudeck, Gorden and Rathmann, Katharina and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {„Health Literacy in School-Aged Children-German": Vorstellung eines Messinstruments zur Erhebung der Gesundheitskompetenz im Kindes- und Jugendalter}, series = {52. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Psychologie. Programm.}, journal = {52. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Psychologie. Programm.}, address = {Hildesheim}, pages = {51}, abstract = {Gesundheitskompetenz ist ein international relevanter Forschungsgegenstand, der bereits im Kindes- und Jugendalter mit dem Gesundheitszustand, der Aus{\"u}bung gesundheitsbezogenen Risikoverhaltens und gesundheitlicher Ungleichheit zusammenh{\"a}ngt. Dennoch steht die Erforschung der Gesundheitskompetenz in Deutschland insbesondere im Kindes- und Jugendalter im internationalen Vergleich noch weitgehend am Anfang. Ein {\"o}konomisches Instrument zur Erhebung der Gesundheitskompetenz Heranwachsender stellt die 10-Item-Skala „Health Literarcy in School-Aged Children-German" (HLSAC-German) dar. Dabei handelt es sich um die deutsche Version der Skala HLSAC, welche in der international durchgef{\"u}hrten HBSC-Studie eingesetzt wird. In diesem Beitrag werden die Skala selbst sowie Befunde zur Dimensionalit{\"a}t, zur Messinvarianz in Bezug auf Geschlecht, Alter und Schulform und zu Zusammenh{\"a}ngen zu Indikatoren der Gesundheit und des Gesundheitsverhaltens vorgestellt. Die {\"U}berpr{\"u}fung der Skala erfolgt anhand der Daten der deutschen HBSC-Studie 2018 (N = 4 347 Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}ler im Alter von 11, 13 und 15 Jahren). Die {\"U}berpr{\"u}fung in der Gruppe der 11-J{\"a}hrigen stellt dabei eine Erweiterung des Einsatzbereiches der Skala im internationalen Vergleich dar. Explorative und konfirmatorische Faktorenanalysen belegen die Eindimensionalit{\"a}t der Skala. Konfirmatorische Faktorenanalysen in multiplen Gruppen zeigen vollst{\"a}ndige skalare Messinvarianz bez{\"u}glich des Geschlechts und partielle skalare Messinvarianz bez{\"u}glich Altersgruppen und Schulform. Erwartungsgem{\"a}ß zeigen sich negative Zusammenh{\"a}nge zu subjektiv eingesch{\"a}tzten psychischen Gesundheitsproblemen und positive Zusammenh{\"a}nge zur k{\"o}rperlichen Aktivit{\"a}t. Die Ergebnisse weisen insgesamt auf eine eindimensionale Skala hin, mit welcher Mittelwertsvergleiche zul{\"a}ssig sind. Der Einsatz der Skala in der Gruppe der 11-j{\"a}hrigen ist m{\"o}glich, wobei punktuelle Schwierigkeiten bei der Beantwortung der Items und eine h{\"o}here Non-Response-Quote in dieser Altersgruppe erwartet werden m{\"u}ssen.}, language = {de} } @misc{WolgastFischerBilz, author = {Wolgast, Anett and Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Teachers' Empathy for Bullying Victims, Understanding of Violence, and Likelihood of Intervention}, series = {Journal of School Violence}, volume = {21}, journal = {Journal of School Violence}, number = {4}, issn = {1538-8220}, doi = {10.1080/15388220.2022.2114488}, pages = {491 -- 503}, abstract = {Relational bullying is still underappreciated by teachers. Based on the theoretical model of teachers' intervention competence in bullying, the aim of the current research was to gain insights into the concurrent relationships between teachers' empathy, understanding of violence, and likelihood of intervention. In this study, n = 556 teachers (79.4\% female, Mage = 50.6) indicated on a questionnaire their empathy, understanding of relational violence, and likelihood of intervention in a relational bullying situation. The relationships were simultaneously estimated in a structural equation model. The results suggest significantly positive concurrent relations between these variables. We conclude that the effectiveness of teacher trainings could be increased through such elements as cognitive empathy training, raising awareness of violence, and teaching appropriate interventions in relational bullying situations.}, language = {en} } @misc{Bilz, author = {Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {The Association Between Teachers' Well-Being and Students' Well-Being and the Role of Teacher Support as a Mediator}, series = {EARA 2022 Conference "Diverse \& Digital" Dublin August 24-27}, journal = {EARA 2022 Conference "Diverse \& Digital" Dublin August 24-27}, publisher = {University College Dublin}, address = {Dublin}, language = {en} } @misc{KansokDuscheWettsteinWachsetal., author = {Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Wettstein, Alexander and Wachs, Sebastian and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Der Zusammenhang zwischen {\"U}berzeugungen von Lehrpersonen und ihrer Wahrnehmung von Hatespeech unter Sch{\"u}ler:innen}, series = {52. DGPs-Kongress in Hildesheim}, journal = {52. DGPs-Kongress in Hildesheim}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Hildesheim}, address = {Hildesheim}, pages = {86}, language = {de} } @misc{FischerMacaulayBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Macaulay, Peter J. R. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Broadening the contextual perspective on bullying: Direct and cross-level interaction effects between staff communication climate, classroom climate, and students' bullying experiences}, series = {26th Workshop on Aggression. The Nature and Prevention of Political Violence.}, journal = {26th Workshop on Aggression. The Nature and Prevention of Political Violence.}, pages = {1}, abstract = {Research on the development of bullying is often based upon Bronfenbrenner's socioecological model (Swearer \& Hymel, 2015). Thus, various relevant contextual variables have been identified, including classroom climate and school climate (Thornberg et al., 2018; Zych et al., 2019). School climate has been defined in different ways, mostly including relationships between people in the school environment (Wang et al., 2016). Empirically, only the relationships between students (also summarised within the class as classroom climate) and between teachers and pupils are usually considered. However, teachers have been identified as particularly significant in the bullying process and as role models for students (Colpin et al., 2021). Because of this, it is assumed that relationships among teachers can also be significant risk factors for student bullying. In this study, we investigate communication climate among teachers as part of the school climate and its associations to student bullying. In addition, we follow Bronfenbrenner's idea of interactions among contextual levels by considering both school climate and classroom climate and investigating moderation effects. Data was collected from more than 550 teachers and 2,000 students in 114 classes at 24 schools in Germany. The analyses involved three-level hierarchical binary regression analyses and cross-level interaction models. Findings suggest that staff communication climate is not associated directly with students' experiences with bullying, but that the worse staff communication climate, the more students bully others in classrooms with high rates of rivalry (cross-level moderation). The associations will further be analysed under consideration of relevant control variables. Final results will be presented at the conference. The study broadens the contextual perspective on bullying by including more than one level at once and supports the importance of a whole-school perspective on bullying.}, language = {en} } @misc{DadaczynskiRathmannSchrickeretal., author = {Dadaczynski, Kevin and Rathmann, Katharina and Schricker, Julia and Bilz, Ludwig and Sudeck, Gorden and Fischer, Saskia M. and Janiczek, Oliver and Quilling, Eike}, title = {Digital health literacy and health behaviors of eighth and ninth graders from Germany}, series = {European Journal of Public Health}, volume = {32}, journal = {European Journal of Public Health}, number = {Supplement 3}, issn = {1101-1262}, doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckac129.322}, pages = {1}, abstract = {Background: Due to the high availability and use of digital media, health- related information is increasingly shifting into the digital space. While there are increasing empirical findings on general health literacy (HL), there is a lack of evidence on digital HL in adolescence and its association with health behavior. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 490 secondary school students (grades eight and nine) from the federal state of Hesse was conducted from October 2019 to February 2020. Digital HL was assessed using five subscales of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI), while consumption of fruits, vegetables, soft drinks, and weekly physical activity were used as indicators of health behavior. In addition to gender and grade level, subjective social status (SSS) was used as a social characteristic. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were performed, with binary-logistic regression adjusted for gender and SSS. Results: Across all items, the percentage of adolescents reporting difficulties in acquiring and dealing with digital health information ranges from 15.3 \% to 37.5 \%. Stratified by social characteristics, gender and socioeconomic differences were found with girls and respondents reporting a lower SSS more often showing a limited digital HL. Adolescents with moderate and low digital HL report higher levels of low physical activity, non-daily fruit and daily soft drink consumption. Depending on the health behavior, different relationship patterns can be observed for the dimensions of digital HL. Conclusions: The findings suggest a need for interventions to promote digital HL among adolescents, particularly for those of low SSS. In this context, the differential relationship patterns with health behaviors provide an avenue for the development of specific interventions.}, language = {en} } @misc{KansokDuscheWettsteinBilzetal., author = {Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Wettstein, Alexander and Bilz, Ludwig and Wachs, Sebastian and Castellanos, Melisa}, title = {Associations between Social Competence, Perceived Parents' Prosocial Educational Goals and Adolescents' Hate Speech Perpetration in School}, series = {The Nature and Prevention of Political Violence : 26th Workshop on Aggression, 10th-12th November 2022, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany}, journal = {The Nature and Prevention of Political Violence : 26th Workshop on Aggression, 10th-12th November 2022, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany}, pages = {14}, language = {de} } @misc{BallaschkSchulzeReicheltWachsetal., author = {Ballaschk, Cindy and Schulze-Reichelt, Friederike and Wachs, Sebastian and Krause, Norman and Wettstein, Alexander and Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Bilz, Ludwig and Schubarth, Wilfried}, title = {Ist das (schon) Hatespeech? - Eine qualitative Untersuchung zum Verst{\"a}ndnis von Hatespeech unter p{\"a}dagogischem Schulpersonal}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Bildungsforschung}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Bildungsforschung}, issn = {2190-6890}, doi = {10.1007/s35834-022-00367-1}, pages = {17}, abstract = {Hatespeech ist ein gesellschaftliches Ph{\"a}nomen, das auch die Lebenswelt Schule betrifft. Was jedoch p{\"a}dagogisches Schulpersonal unter Hatespeech versteht, ist unklar und daher Thema der vorliegenden Interviewstudie mit Lehrkr{\"a}ften (n = 18) und Sozialp{\"a}dagog_innen (n = 16). Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Hatespeech als Herabsetzung verschiedener strukturell unterdr{\"u}ckter Gruppen verstanden wird (z. B. Transpersonen, Homosexuelle, j{\"u}dische Personen). Die Befragten erkennen subtilere Formen von Hatespeech oft nicht als Problem an und verstehen Hatespeech vorranging als Online-Ph{\"a}nomen, obwohl auch Vorf{\"a}lle in Schulen berichtet werden. Es l{\"a}sst sich schlussfolgern, dass p{\"a}dagogisches Schulpersonal f{\"u}r Offline-Hatespeech und subtilere Formen sensibilisiert werden muss, um ihre Interventionsbereitschaft zu steigern.}, language = {de} } @misc{ReissBehnErhartetal., author = {Reiß, Franziska and Behn, Steven and Erhart, Michael and Strelow, Lisa and Kaman, Anne and Ottov{\´a}-Jordan, Veronika and Bilz, Ludwig and Moor, Irene and Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike}, title = {Subjective health and psychosomatic complaints of children and adolescents in Germany: Results of the HBSC study 2009/10 - 2022}, series = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, number = {1}, issn = {2511-2708}, doi = {10.25646/11868}, pages = {7 -- 22}, abstract = {Background: Subjective health and well-being are important health indicators in childhood and adolescence. This article shows current results and trends over time between 2009/10 and 2022. Methods: The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study examined subjective health, life satisfaction and psychosomatic complaints of N = 21,788 students aged 11 to 15 years in the school years 2009/10, 2013/14, 2017/18 and in the calendar year 2022. Multivariate regression analyses show the associations between sociodemographic characteristics and well-being in 2022, as well as trends since 2009/10. Results: The majority of children and adolescents indicate a good subjective health and high life satisfaction. About half of the girls and one third of the boys report multiple psychosomatic health complaints, with a clear increase over time. Older adolescents, girls and gender diverse adolescents are at an increased risk of poor well-being. Subjective health and life satisfaction varied between 2009/10 and 2022, with a significant deterioration between 2017/18 and 2022. Conclusions: The high proportion of children and adolescents with psychosomatic complaints, as well as the observed gender and age differences, underline the need for target group-specific prevention, health promotion and continuous health monitoring.}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Traditional bullying and cyberbullying at schools in Germany: Results of the HBSC study 2022 and trends from 2009/10 to 2022}, series = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, number = {1}, issn = {2511-2708}, doi = {10.25646/11872}, pages = {42 -- 61}, abstract = {Background: Bullying is a form of violence that is carried out repeatedly, with the intention of causing harm and with an imbalance of power between those involved. Bullying has serious negative effects on the mental health of adolescents and thus represents a significant health risk in childhood and adolescence. Methods: Based on data from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study from the survey year 2022 in Germany (N = 6,475), the prevalence of school bullying and cyberbullying among 11-, 13- and 15-year-olds in Germany was analysed. In addition, the prevalence of school bullying and cyberbullying was analysed as a trend from 2009/10 to 2022 (bullying) and from 2017/18 to 2022 (cyberbullying). Results: Around 14 \% of the learners surveyed reported direct experience of bullying at school, and around 7 \% reported cyberbullying experiences as bullied and/or bullying victims. Adolescents who identified as gender diverse were particularly likely to report bullying experiences. School bullying decreased over time, but remained stable between 2017/18 and 2022. Cyberbullying, on the other hand, increased in 2022 compared to 2017/18. Conclusions: Experiencing bullying at school and online is an everyday experience for many children and young people, so there is still a need for the broad implementation of effective anti-bullying measures in schools.}, language = {en} } @misc{MoorHerkeMarkertetal., author = {Moor, Irene and Herke, Max and Markert, Jenny and B{\"o}hm, Marie and Reiß, Franziska and Bilz, Ludwig and Sudeck, Gorden and Winter, Kristina}, title = {Trends in health inequalities in childhood and adolescence in Germany: Results of the HBSC study 2009/10 - 2022}, series = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, number = {1}, issn = {2511-2708}, doi = {10.25646/11876}, pages = {79 -- 98}, abstract = {Background: Many studies have identified health inequalities in childhood and adolescence. However, it is unclear how these have developed in recent years, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Analyses are based on the German data from the international Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study from 2009/10 (n = 5,005), 2013/14 (n = 5,961), 2017/18 (n = 4,347), and 2022 (n = 6,475). A total of 21,788 students aged approximately between 11 and 15 years were included. Socioeconomic status (SES) was assessed using the Family Affluence Scale (FAS). Several health indicators were analysed stratified by gender using bivariate and multivariate analysis methods. Results: In 2022, there are clear socioeconomic inequalities in life satisfaction, self-rated health, fruit and vegetable consumption, and physical activity. These inequalities remained largely constant or increased between 2009/10 and 2022. Between 2017/18 and 2022, no significant changes in inequalities were found. Conclusions: Health inequalities are persistent and reduce the chances of growing up healthy. There is no evidence that inequalities in the analysed outcomes have changed during the pandemic period (between 2017/18 and 2022). Rather, the changes in the health indicators seem to affect all adolescents in a similar way.}, language = {en} } @misc{WinterMoorMarkertetal., author = {Winter, Kristina and Moor, Irene and Markert, Jenny and Bilz, Ludwig and Bucksch, Jens and Dadaczynski, Kevin and Fischer, Saskia M. and Helmchen, Ronja M. and Kaman, Anne and M{\"o}ckel, Juliane and Rathmann, Katharina and Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike and Reiß, Franziska and Schierl, Theresa and Sch{\"u}tz, Raphael and Sendatzki, Saskia and St{\"u}rmer, Elisabeth and Sudeck, Gorden and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Concept and methodology of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study - Insights into the current 2022 survey and trends in Germany}, series = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, number = {1}, issn = {2511-2708}, doi = {10.25646/11878}, pages = {99 -- 117}, abstract = {Background: Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) is one of the largest international studies on child and adolescent health and cooperates with the World Health Organization (WHO). In Germany, adolescents aged 11, 13 and 15 are surveyed every four years about their health, health behaviour and social conditions. This article describes the HBSC study and in particular the methodology of the current 2022 survey and prior surveys conducted between 2009/10 and 2017/18. Method: 174 schools with a total of 6,475 students participated in the 2022 survey. The survey was conducted using questionnaires and covered a wide range of topics (including mental health, physical activity, bullying experiences, social determinants of health and experiences related to COVID-19). The 2022 survey was complemented by a school principal survey (N = 160). In addition to the current sample, the samples of the three previous surveys with representative data for Germany are presented: 2009/10 (N = 5,005), 2013/14 (N = 5,961) and 2017/18 (N = 4,347). Discussion: The health of children and adolescents is of great public health importance. The HBSC study makes a substantial contribution by providing internationally comparable results, analysing trends, and providing stakeholders with comprehensive and representative health monitoring data.}, language = {en} } @misc{BilzWachsWettstein, author = {Bilz, Ludwig and Wachs, Sebastian and Wettstein, Alexander}, title = {Symposium: Der Umgang mit Hatespeech in der Schule: Reaktionsweisen von Sch{\"u}ler:innen und Lehrkr{\"a}ften}, series = {Alles auf Anfang? Bildung im digitalen Wandel. 9. GEBF-Tagung, 9. bis 11. M{\"a}rz 2022, Bamberg}, journal = {Alles auf Anfang? Bildung im digitalen Wandel. 9. GEBF-Tagung, 9. bis 11. M{\"a}rz 2022, Bamberg}, edition = {Aktualisierte Version, Stand: 9.3.22}, publisher = {Leibniz-Institut f{\"u}r Bildungsverl{\"a}ufe}, address = {Bamberg}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.2.19248.78089}, abstract = {Das Ph{\"a}nomen Hatespeech (dt. Hassrede) wird momentan weltweit als Problem wahrgenommen, das sich parallel mit der zunehmenden Nutzung sozialer Medien ausbreitet und den sozialen Zusammenhalt von Gesellschaften gef{\"a}hrdet. Hiervon zeugen l{\"a}nder{\"u}bergreifende Initiativen zur Eind{\"a}mmung von Hatespeech, z.B. der Vereinten Nationen oder der Europ{\"a}ischen Kommission. Zumeist werden unter Hatespeech {\"A}ußerungen verstanden, durch die Menschen auf der Grundlage bestimmter Gruppenmerkmale (z.B. ethnische Zugeh{\"o}rigkeit, Geschlecht, sexuelle Orientierung) abgewertet werden. Spezifischere Definitionen betonen zudem, dass eine Sch{\"a}digungsabsicht sowie ein Sch{\"a}digungspotenzial auf verschiedenen Ebenen (z. B. individuell, gesellschaftlich) vorliegen m{\"u}ssen. Kinder und Jugendliche gelten als besonders anf{\"a}llig f{\"u}r die sch{\"a}dlichen Auswirkungen von Hatespeech. J{\"u}ngste Forschungen zeigen, dass Personen, die Cyberhate ausgesetzt sind, h{\"a}ufig Gef{\"u}hle von Wut, Scham und Schuld sowie ein vermindertes Vertrauen erleben (UK Safer Internet Centre, 2016; Reichelmann et al., 2020; Krause et al., 2021; N{\"a}si et. al, 2015). Die Konfrontation mit Hatespeech kann auch Prozesse der politischen Radikalisierung beg{\"u}nstigen (Bilewicz \& Soral, 2020). Somit stellt Hatespeech auch f{\"u}r die Schule eine besondere Herausforderung dar. Zum einen machen Kinder und Jugendliche auch in dieser Lebenswelt Erfahrungen mit Hatespeech, zum anderen ist die Schule der Ort, an dem diesen Entwicklungen durch Demokratie- und Medienerziehung sowie Soziales Lernen entgegengewirkt werden kann (Wachs et al., 2021). Die empirische Basis hierf{\"u}r ist jedoch {\"a}ußerst schmal. Es liegen weder zur Verbreitung von Erfahrungen mit Hatespeech im Kindes- und Jugendalter noch zu den Ursachen oder wirksamen Interventions- und Pr{\"a}ventionsstrategien Studienbefunde vor. Auch bez{\"u}glich der Schnittmenge mit verwandten Ph{\"a}nomenen, wie z.B. Mobbing, gibt es bisher kaum Erkenntnisse. An diesen Forschungsl{\"u}cken setzt das geplante Symposium an. Aus der Mobbingforschung ist bekannt, dass die Reaktionen des Umfeldes eine wichtige Rolle bei der Eind{\"a}mmung von Gewalt spielen. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden in den drei Einzel-Beitr{\"a}gen Forschungsergebnisse zur Verbreitung von Hatespeech und zu den Reaktionen von Sch{\"u}ler:innen und Lehrkr{\"a}ften vorgestellt, die sowohl auf qualitativen als auch auf quantitativen Zug{\"a}ngen beruhen. Entstanden sind sie im Rahmen eines aktuellen DFG-Forschungsprojektes mit erziehungswissenschaftlichen und psychologischen Forschungsteams in Deutschland und der Schweiz. Befragt wurden {\"u}ber 3.600 Sch{\"u}ler:innen und fast 500 Lehrkr{\"a}fte in beiden L{\"a}ndern. Im Rahmen des Symposiums sollen die Ergebnisse diskutiert und Implikationen f{\"u}r weitere Forschungen im Rahmen dieses Projekts sowie dar{\"u}ber hinaus abgeleitet werden.}, language = {de} } @misc{BilzWachs, author = {Bilz, Ludwig and Wachs, Sebastian}, title = {Symposium: Hass kennt keine Grenzen: Empirische Studien zu Hatespeech-Erfahrungen von Jugendlichen in der Schule und im Internet}, series = {Entgrenzungen, 28. DGfE-Kongress, 14. M{\"a}rz 2022}, journal = {Entgrenzungen, 28. DGfE-Kongress, 14. M{\"a}rz 2022}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}t Bremen}, address = {Bremen}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.2.15893.33761}, abstract = {In den letzten Jahren ist digitales Hassmaterial zu einem gewissen Alltagserleben in der Onlinewelt geworden. Ein Fachbegriff, der diese verrohte Kommunikationskultur zum Ausdruck bringt, ist Hatespeech. Hatespeech beschreibt kommunikative {\"A}ußerungen, mit dem Ziel gewisse Personengruppen (z.B. aufgrund der nationalen Herkunft, Religionszugeh{\"o}rigkeit, sexuellen Orientierung) {\"o}ffentlich und mit Absicht auszugrenzen, abzuwerten oder zu dem{\"u}tigen (Wachs et al., 2020). Hatespeech ist jedoch nicht auf die Onlinewelt beschr{\"a}nkt, auch in der Schule werden Sch{\"u}ler*innen und p{\"a}dagogisches Schulpersonal damit konfrontiert (Ballaschk et al., in press; Krause et al., 2021). Dabei kommt der Schule eine besondere Rolle zu. Sie ist nicht nur ein Ort der demokratischen Wissensvermittlung, sondern auch demokratischer Erfahrungsraum f{\"u}r Heranwachsende, dessen Aufgabe darin besteht, diskriminierenden und demokratiefeindlichen Tendenzen, zu denen auch Hatespeech gez{\"a}hlt werden kann, entgegenzuwirken (KMK, 2018). Bis heute liegt jedoch nur sehr wenig empirisch abgesichertes Wissen {\"u}ber Hatespeech unter Heranwachsenden und dem Umgang damit in der Schule vor. Hier setzt das vorliegende Symposium an, in dem empirische Beitr{\"a}ge basierend auf qualitativen und quantitativen Studien pr{\"a}sentiert werden und Implikationen f{\"u}r die zuk{\"u}nftige Forschung und die p{\"a}dagogische Praxis abgeleitet werden.}, language = {de} } @misc{KamanOttovaJordanBilzetal., author = {Kaman, Anne and Ottov{\´a}-Jordan, Veronika and Bilz, Ludwig and Sudeck, Gorden and Moor, Irene and Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike}, title = {Subjektive Gesundheit und Wohlbefinden von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland - Querschnittergebnisse der HBSC-Studie 2017/18}, series = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, volume = {5}, journal = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, number = {3}, issn = {2511-2708}, doi = {10.25646/6891}, pages = {7 -- 21}, abstract = {Subjektive Gesundheit wird als multidimensionales Konstrukt verstanden, welches k{\"o}rperliche, seelische und soziale Dimensionen des Wohlbefindens einer Person umfasst. Die F{\"o}rderung der subjektiven Gesundheit und des Wohlbefindens von Kindern und Jugendlichen ist von hoher Public-Health-Relevanz, da gesundheitliche Beeintr{\"a}chtigungen oftmals mit langfristigen Gesundheitsproblemen im sp{\"a}teren Erwachsenenalter einhergehen. Informationen {\"u}ber m{\"o}gliche Risikofaktoren und Ressourcen sind daher von zentraler Bedeutung. In diesem Beitrag werden aktuelle Pr{\"a}valenzen zum subjektiven Gesundheitszustand, zur Lebenszufriedenheit und zu psychosomatischen Beschwerden von 11-, 13- und 15-j{\"a}hrigen Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland aus der „Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC)"-Studie 2017/18 berichtet (N=4.347, 53,0 \% M{\"a}dchen). Zudem werden soziodemografische und psychosoziale Einflussfaktoren des subjektiven Wohlbefindens untersucht. Die meisten Kinder und Jugendlichen sch{\"a}tzten ihre Gesundheit und Lebenszufriedenheit positiv ein. Dennoch litt etwa ein Drittel der M{\"a}dchen und ein F{\"u}nftel der Jungen unter mehreren (multiplen) psychosomatischen Beschwerden. Beeintr{\"a}chtigungen im subjektiven Wohlbefinden zeigten sich vor allem bei M{\"a}dchen, {\"a}lteren Jugendlichen, Jugendlichen mit niedrigerem famili{\"a}ren Wohlstand sowie bei hoher schulischer Belastung. Eine hohe famili{\"a}re Unterst{\"u}tzung war hingegen mit einem besseren subjektiven Wohlbefinden assoziiert. Die Ergebnisse verdeutlichen die Notwendigkeit zielgruppenspezifischer Angebote der Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung, um die subjektive Gesundheit und das Wohlbefinden von Kindern und Jugendlichen zu f{\"o}rdern.}, language = {de} } @misc{MoorWinterBilzetal., author = {Moor, Irene and Winter, Kristina and Bilz, Ludwig and Bucksch, Jens and Finne, Emily and John, Nancy and Kolip, Petra and Paulsen, Lisa and Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike and Schlattmann, Marina and Sudeck, Gorden and Brindley, Catherina and Kaman, Anne and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Die Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)-Studie 2017/18 - Methodik der Kinder- und Jugendgesundheits­studie der Weltgesundheitsorganisation}, series = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, volume = {5}, journal = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, number = {3}, issn = {2511-2708}, doi = {10.25646/6896}, pages = {93 -- 108}, abstract = {Die „Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC)"-Studie ist ein international kooperatives Forschungsprojekt, das von der Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO) seit {\"u}ber 35 Jahren unterst{\"u}tzt wird. HBSC ist die weltweit gr{\"o}ßte Studie zur Kinder- und Jugendgesundheit und f{\"u}r die WHO eine der wichtigsten Datengrundlagen zur international vergleichenden Gesundheitsberichterstattung. Im vierj{\"a}hrigen Turnus werden Daten zur Gesundheit und zum Gesundheitsverhalten von Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern im Alter von 11, 13 und 15 Jahren sowie zu den Rahmenbedingungen f{\"u}r ein gesundes Aufwachsen erhoben. Insgesamt geh{\"o}ren 50 L{\"a}nder dem HBSC-Netzwerk an, an dem Survey 2017/18 beteiligten sich insgesamt 45 L{\"a}nder. Deutschland beteiligt sich seit 1993/94 an der HBSC-Studie. F{\"u}r die aktuelle Erhebung 2017/18 in Deutschland wurden Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}ler an 146 Schulen befragt (Responserate Schulen: 15,6 \%). Insgesamt konnte f{\"u}r Deutschland eine Netto-Stichprobe von n=4.347 M{\"a}dchen und Jungen (Responserate: 52,7 \%) erzielt werden. Die freiwillige Teilnahme an der Befragung erfolgte in ganzen Schulklassen der Jahrgangsstufen f{\"u}nf, sieben und neun. Mit Hilfe einer Gewichtung sind repr{\"a}sentative Aussagen zur gesundheitlichen Lage von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland m{\"o}glich. Die HBSC-Studie leistet einen wichtigen Beitrag f{\"u}r die Gesundheitsberichterstattung und bietet wichtige Ansatzpunkte f{\"u}r die Identifikation von Bedarfen, Risikogruppen und Handlungsfeldern, um gezielte und bedarfsorientierte Maßnahmen zur Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung im Setting Schule zu initiieren.}, language = {de} } @misc{SchuetzBilz, author = {Sch{\"u}tz, Raphael and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Die HBSC-Studie in Brandenburg: Ein Beitrag zum Gesundheitsmonitoring und zur schulischen Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung in Brandenburg}, series = {Satellitenveranstaltung zum Kongress Armut und Gesundheit 2024 Die Gesundheit von Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern in Deutschland: Von Ergebnissen und Trends der HBSC-Studie zur Public Health-Praxis}, journal = {Satellitenveranstaltung zum Kongress Armut und Gesundheit 2024 Die Gesundheit von Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern in Deutschland: Von Ergebnissen und Trends der HBSC-Studie zur Public Health-Praxis}, publisher = {Kooperationsverbund Gesundheitliche Chancengleichheit}, address = {Berlin}, pages = {30}, language = {de} } @misc{BallaschkSchulzeReicheltWachsetal., author = {Ballaschk, Cindy and Schulze-Reichelt, Friederike and Wachs, Sebastian and Krause, Norman and Wettstein, Alexander and Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Bilz, Ludwig and Schubarth, Wilfried}, title = {Erratum zu: Ist das (schon) Hatespeech? - Eine qualitative Untersuchung zum Verst{\"a}ndnis vonHatespeech unter p{\"a}dagogischem Schulpersonal}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Bildungsforschung}, volume = {13}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Bildungsforschung}, number = {1}, issn = {2190-6890}, doi = {10.1007/s35834-022-00377-z}, pages = {189 -- 190}, language = {de} } @misc{KansokDuscheWettsteinWachsetal., author = {Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Wettstein, Alexander and Wachs, Sebastian and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Politikdidaktische {\"U}berzeugungen von Lehrkr{\"a}ften und ihr Umgang mit Hatespeech in der Schule}, series = {11. Tagung der Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Empirische Bildungsforschung (GEBF) - Bildung verstehen • Partizipation erreichen • Transfer gestalten, Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, Potsdam, Deutschland.}, journal = {11. Tagung der Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Empirische Bildungsforschung (GEBF) - Bildung verstehen • Partizipation erreichen • Transfer gestalten, Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, Potsdam, Deutschland.}, doi = {10.17605/OSF.IO/2SJEX}, language = {de} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Mobbing und Cybermobbing an Schulen in Deutschland: Ergebnisse der HBSC-Studie 2022 und Trends von 2009/10 bis 2022}, series = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, number = {1}, issn = {2511-2708}, doi = {10.25646/11871}, pages = {46 -- 67}, abstract = {Hintergrund: Mobbing ist eine Form der Gewalt, die wiederholt, mit der Absicht zu sch{\"a}digen und mit einem Machtungleichgewicht zwischen den Beteiligten ausge{\"u}bt wird. Mobbing hat schwerwiegende negative Auswirkungen auf die psychische Gesundheit Heranwachsender und stellt damit ein bedeutsames Gesundheitsrisiko im Kindes- und Jugendalter dar. Methode: Basierend auf den Daten der „Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)"-Studie aus dem Erhebungsjahr 2022 in Deutschland (N=6.475) wurde analysiert, wie verbreitet schulisches Mobbing und Cybermobbing in Deutschland unter 11-, 13- und 15-J{\"a}hrigen waren. Zudem wurde die Verbreitung von schulischem Mobbing und Cybermobbing im Trendverlauf von 2009/10- 2022 (Mobbing) bzw. von 2017/18-2022 (Cybermobbing) analysiert. Ergebnisse: Rund 14\% der befragten Lernenden gaben direkte Erfahrungen mit schulischem Mobbing an, rund 7\% berichteten Cybermobbingerfahrungen als Gemobbte und/oder Mobbende. Heranwachsende, die sich als gender-divers identifizierten, gaben besonders h{\"a}ufig Mobbingerfahrungen an. Schulisches Mobbing nahm im Zeitverlauf ab, blieb zwischen 2017/18 und 2022 aber stabil. Cybermobbing nahm 2022 im Vergleich zu 2017/18 dagegen zu. Schlussfolgerungen: Mobbingerfahrungen in der Schule und online sind f{\"u}r viele Kinder und Jugendliche eine allt{\"a}gliche Erfahrung, sodass weiterhin Bedarf f{\"u}r eine breite Implementierung wirksamer Anti-Mobbing-Maßnahmen an Schulen besteht.}, language = {de} } @misc{WinterMoorMarkertetal., author = {Winter, Kristina and Moor, Irene and Markert, Jenny and Bilz, Ludwig and Bucksch, Jens and Dadaczynski, Kevin and Fischer, Saskia M. and Helmchen, Ronja M. and Kaman, Anne and M{\"o}ckel, Juliane and Rathmann, Katharina and Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike and Reiß, Franziska and Schierl, Theresa and Sch{\"u}tz, Raphael and Sendatzki, Saskia and St{\"u}rmer, Elisabeth and Sudeck, Gorden and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Konzept und Methodik der Studie Health Behaviour in Schoolaged Children (HBSC) - Einblicke in den aktuellen Survey 2022 und die Entwicklung in Deutschland}, series = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, number = {1}, issn = {2511-2708}, doi = {10.25646/11877}, pages = {108 -- 127}, abstract = {Hintergrund: „Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)" ist eine der gr{\"o}ßten internationalen Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitsstudien und kooperiert mit der Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO). In Deutschland werden im vierj{\"a}hrigen Turnus jeweils Heranwachsende im Alter von 11, 13 und 15 Jahren zur Gesundheit, zum Gesundheitsverhalten und zu sozialen Rahmenbedingungen befragt. Der Beitrag widmet sich der Beschreibung der HBSC-Studie und speziell der Methodik des aktuellen Surveys 2022 sowie der vorherigen Erhebungen von 2009/10 bis 2017/18. Methode: Am Survey 2022 beteiligten sich 174 Schulen mit insgesamt 6.475 Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern. Die Erhebung erfolgte mittels Fragebogen und erfasst ein breites Themenspektrum (u. a. mentale Gesundheit, Bewegungsverhalten, Mobbingerfahrungen, soziale Determinanten der Gesundheit sowie Erfahrungen im Zusammenhang mit COVID-19). Erg{\"a}nzt wurde die Erhebung 2022 um eine Schulleitungsbefragung (N = 160). Neben der aktuellen Stichprobe werden auch die Stichproben der vorangegangenen drei Surveys mit repr{\"a}sentativen Angaben f{\"u}r Deutschland vorgestellt: 2009/10 (N = 5.005), 2013/14 (N = 5.961) und 2017/18 (N = 4.347). Diskussion: Die Kinder- und Jugendgesundheit hat eine hohe Public-Health-Relevanz. Dazu leistet die HBSC-Studie einen elementaren Beitrag, denn sie liefert international vergleichbare Ergebnisse, erm{\"o}glicht die Analyse von Trendentwicklungen und stellt umfangreiche, repr{\"a}sentative Daten zum Gesundheitsmonitoring f{\"u}r Stakeholder bereit.}, language = {de} } @misc{ReissBehnErhartetal., author = {Reiß, Franziska and Behn, Steven and Erhart, Michael and Strelow, Lisa and Kaman, Anne and Ottov{\´a}-Jordan, Veronika and Bilz, Ludwig and Moor, Irene and Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike}, title = {Subjektive Gesundheit und psychosomatische Beschwerden von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland: Ergebnisse der HBSC-Studie 2009/10 - 2022}, series = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, number = {1}, issn = {2511-2708}, doi = {10.25646/11867}, pages = {7 -- 24}, abstract = {Hintergrund: Die subjektive Gesundheit und das Wohlbefinden stellen wichtige Gesundheitsindikatoren im Kindes- und Jugendalter dar. Der vorliegende Beitrag zeigt aktuelle Ergebnisse sowie zeitliche Trends zwischen 2009/10 und 2022. Methode: Die „Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)"-Studie erfasste in den Schuljahren 2009/10, 2013/14, 2017/18 und im Kalenderjahr 2022 bei N = 21.788 Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern im Alter von 11 bis 15 Jahren deren subjektive Gesundheit, Lebenszufriedenheit und psychosomatische Beschwerden. Multivariate Regressionsanalysen zeigen die Zusammenh{\"a}nge zwischen soziodemografischen Merkmalen und dem Wohlbefinden f{\"u}r 2022 sowie Trendverl{\"a}ufe seit 2009/10. Ergebnisse: Der Großteil der Kinder und Jugendlichen berichtet eine gute subjektive Gesundheit und eine hohe Lebenszufriedenheit. Etwa die H{\"a}lfte der M{\"a}dchen und ein Drittel der Jungen berichten multiple psychosomatische Gesundheitsbeschwerden, mit einem deutlichen Anstieg im zeitlichen Verlauf. {\"A}ltere Jugendliche, M{\"a}dchen und Genderdiverse haben ein erh{\"o}htes Risiko f{\"u}r ein geringes Wohlbefinden. Zwischen 2009/10 und 2022 variierten die subjektive Gesundheit und die Lebenszufriedenheit mit einer deutlichen Verschlechterung von 2017/18 zu 2022. Schlussfolgerungen: Der hohe Anteil von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit psychosomatischen Beschwerden sowie die aufgezeigten Geschlechts- und Altersdiskrepanzen verdeutlichen den Bedarf an zielgruppenspezifischer Pr{\"a}vention, Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung und einem kontinuierlichen Gesundheitsmonitoring.}, language = {de} } @misc{MoorHerkeMarkertetal., author = {Moor, Irene and Herke, Max and Markert, Jenny and B{\"o}hm, Marie and Reiß, Franziska and Bilz, Ludwig and Sudeck, Gorden and Winter, Kristina}, title = {Die zeitliche Entwicklung gesundheitlicher Ungleichheit im Kindes- und Jugendalter in Deutschland: Ergebnisse der HBSC-Studie 2009/10 - 2022}, series = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of Health Monitoring}, number = {1}, issn = {2511-2708}, doi = {10.25646/11875}, pages = {86 -- 107}, abstract = {Hintergrund: Viele Studien berichten von gesundheitlichen Ungleichheiten im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Unklar ist, wie sich diese in den letzten Jahren, insbesondere vor dem Hintergrund der COVID-19-Pandemie, entwickelt haben. Methode: Die Analysen basieren auf den deutschen Daten der internationalen HBSC-Studie (Health Behaviour in Schoolaged Children) von 2009/10 (n = 5.005), 2013/14 (n = 5.961), 2017/18 (n = 4.347) und 2022 (n = 6.475). Insgesamt wurden 21.788 Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}ler im Alter von ca. 11 bis 15 Jahren ber{\"u}cksichtigt. Der sozio{\"o}konomische Status (SES) wurde mithilfe der Family Affluence Scale (FAS) erhoben. Verschiedene Gesundheitsindikatoren wurden mittels bi- und multivariaten Analysemethoden stratifiziert nach Geschlecht ausgewertet. Ergebnisse: 2022 zeigen sich deutliche sozio{\"o}konomische Ungleichheiten in der Lebenszufriedenheit, der subjektiven Gesundheit, im Obst- und Gem{\"u}sekonsum sowie im Bewegungsverhalten. Diese Ungleichheiten sind im Zeitverlauf von 2009/10 bis 2022 {\"u}berwiegend konstant geblieben oder haben sich vergr{\"o}ßert. Zwischen 2017/18 und 2022 sind keine signifikanten {\"A}nderungen bez{\"u}glich der betrachteten Ungleichheiten zu erkennen. Schlussfolgerungen: Gesundheitliche Ungleichheiten zeigen sich kontinuierlich und reduzieren die Chancen auf ein gesundes Aufwachsen. Es gibt keine Hinweise darauf, dass sich die Ungleichheiten w{\"a}hrend des Pandemie-Zeitraums (zwischen 2017/18 und 2022) ver{\"a}ndert haben. Die Ver{\"a}nderungen in den betrachteten Gesundheitsindikatoren betreffen vielmehr alle Heranwachsende in {\"a}hnlicher Weise.}, language = {de} } @misc{KansokDuscheWachsWettsteinetal., author = {Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Wachs, Sebastian and Wettstein, Alexander and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Teachers' Political Didactical Beliefs and Their Handling of Hate Speech in School}, series = {Annual Conference of the International Association for Intercultural Education, DEIB+ in Education to Transform Society, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.}, journal = {Annual Conference of the International Association for Intercultural Education, DEIB+ in Education to Transform Society, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.}, doi = {10.17605/OSF.IO/8Q4UT}, pages = {24}, language = {en} } @misc{ZeissigKansokDuscheFischeretal., author = {Zeißig, Anke and Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Fischer, Saskia M. and M{\"o}ller, Julia and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {The association between boredom and creativity in educational contexts: A scoping review on research approaches and empirical findings}, series = {Review of Education}, volume = {12}, journal = {Review of Education}, number = {1}, issn = {2049-6613}, doi = {10.1002/rev3.3470}, abstract = {Assumptions around the association between boredom and creativity are contentious. Although studies suggest positive effects of boredom, it is also considered a negative predictor of creativity. Researchers also assume that creativity reduces boredom, but boredom can also occur during creative tasks. In this review, we identify and systematise the empirical evidence available to date on the association between creativity and boredom in educational contexts. The string-guided electronic search yielded 2849 publications. Nineteen publications based on 27 empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers extracted definitions, theories, methods, operationalisations, measurement instruments, and outcomes from the studies using a coding scheme. We identified a range of different theoretical and methodological approaches. The largest cache of empirical evidence was obtained from experimental and quasi-experimental studies (five positive associations, four negative, two contradictory, and three insignificant results). Correlation studies identified three negative, one contradictory, and seven insignificant correlations between boredom and creativity. In addition, two studies with exploratory, statistically not relevant results contributed to the body of research. The results from the identified and evaluated studies argue both for and against the sensitivity of creative processes in relation to boredom—but a clear causal, positive or negative effect of boredom on creativity is not currently supported by the empirical evidence available. Previous research has also not yet demonstrated an apparent effect of creative states or traits on academic boredom. Future research should aim to explore under what circumstances different relationships between boredom and creativity can be observed and reliably replicated.}, language = {en} } @misc{WachsWettsteinBilzetal., author = {Wachs, Sebastian and Wettstein, Alexander and Bilz, Ludwig and Espelage, Dorothy L. and Wright, Michelle F. and G{\´a}mez-Guadix, Manuel}, title = {Individual and Contextual Correlates of Latent Bystander Profiles toward Racist Hate Speech: A Multilevel Person-centered Approach}, series = {Journal of Youth and Adolescence}, volume = {53}, journal = {Journal of Youth and Adolescence}, number = {6}, publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, issn = {0047-2891}, doi = {10.1007/s10964-024-01968-x}, pages = {1271 -- 1286}, abstract = {Prior research into bystander responses to hate speech has utilized variable-centered analyses — such approaches risk simplifying the complex nature of bystander behaviors. Hence, the present study used a person-centered analysis to investigate latent hate speech bystander profiles. In addition, individual and classroom-level correlates associated with the various profiles were studied. The sample included 3225 students in grades 7-9 (51.7\% self-identified as female; 37.2\% with immigrant background) from 215 classrooms in Germany and Switzerland. The latent profile analysis revealed that four distinct profiles could be distinguished: Passive Bystanders (34.2\%), Defenders (47.3\%), Revengers (9.8\%), and Contributors (8.6\%). Multilevel logistic regression models showed common and distinct correlates. For example, students who believed that certain social groups are superior were more likely to be Revengers and Contributors than Passive Bystanders, students who felt more connected with teachers were more likely to be Defenders, and students who were more open to diversity were less likely to be Contributors than Passive Bystanders. Students were less likely Defenders and more likely Revengers and Contributors than Passive Bystanders in classrooms with high rates of hate speech perpetration. Further, in classrooms with high hate speech intervention, students were more likely to be Defenders and less likely to be Contributors than Passive Bystanders. In classrooms with stronger cohesion, students were more likely to be Defenders and less likely to be Contributors than Passive Bystanders. In conclusion, the findings add to our understanding of bystander profiles concerning racist hate speech and the relevance of individual and classroom-level factors in explaining various profiles of bystander behavior.}, language = {en} } @misc{Bilz, author = {Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Aufwachsen in Krisenzeiten: Die HBSC-Gesundheitsstudie in Brandenburg}, series = {Sicherheit im Wandel. 29. Deutscher Pr{\"a}ventionstag}, journal = {Sicherheit im Wandel. 29. Deutscher Pr{\"a}ventionstag}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.2.23128.92162}, pages = {22}, language = {de} } @misc{BilzFischerKansokDuscheetal., author = {Bilz, Ludwig and Fischer, Saskia M. and Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Wachs, Sebastian and Wettstein, Alexander}, title = {Teachers' intervention strategies for handling hate-speech incidents in schools}, series = {Social Psychology of Education}, journal = {Social Psychology of Education}, issn = {1381-2890}, doi = {10.1007/s11218-024-09929-9}, pages = {24}, abstract = {Despite ongoing global efforts to combat discrimination, hate speech is a growing problem in many countries. Hate speech is also widespread among young people and thus also affects schools. Because of the negative consequences of hate speech for the targeted individuals and for society in general, schools and teachers are generally encouraged to moderate hate speech. This binational study examines intervention strategies for hate speech in schools using the newly developed Hate-Speech Interventions Scale for Teachers. Data from German and Swiss teachers (N = 486) were analyzed. Self-reported strategies were best described using a three-factor structure. Teachers primarily direct their interventions at those directly involved in hate speech and frequently employ teaching-oriented strategies. In comparison, external partners and colleagues are relatively rarely involved. Measurement invariance testing supported the scales' construct validity. A link was found between the use of these strategies, teachers' task-specific self-efficacy, gender, and professional experience. These results indicate that schools should play an important role in moderating hate speech and that increasing teachers' confidence in their own ability to address this phenomenon could be an important element of teacher training.}, language = {en} }