@misc{SpallekYilmazAslanKleinEllinghausetal., author = {Spallek, Lena and Yilmaz-Aslan, Y{\"u}ce and Klein-Ellinghaus, Funda and G{\"o}k, Ye{\c{s}}im and Zeeb, Hajo and Kolip, Petra and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Deficits in psycho-oncological care among Turkish immigrant women with breast cancer in Germany - an interview study}, series = {International Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research}, volume = {1}, journal = {International Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research}, number = {2}, issn = {2574-612X}, doi = {10.14302/issn.2574-612X.ijpr-17-1746}, pages = {1 -- 10}, language = {en} } @incollection{SpallekYilmazAslanSpalleketal., author = {Spallek, Jacob and Yilmaz-Aslan, Y{\"u}ce and Spallek, Lena and G{\"o}k, Yesim and Razum, Oliver}, title = {Interkulturelle Aspekte und Migration}, series = {Handbuch Psychoonkologie}, booktitle = {Handbuch Psychoonkologie}, editor = {Mehnert, Anja and Koch, Uwe}, publisher = {Hogrefe}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, isbn = {978-3-8017-2474-0}, pages = {444 -- 453}, language = {de} } @misc{SamkangeZeebSpallekZeeb, author = {Samkange-Zeeb, Florence and Spallek, Lena and Zeeb, Hajo}, title = {Awareness and knowledge of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) among school-going adolescents in Europe: a systematic review of published literature}, series = {BMC Public Health}, volume = {11}, journal = {BMC Public Health}, issn = {1471-2458}, doi = {10.1186/1471-2458-11-727}, pages = {727}, language = {en} } @techreport{BrzoskaVoigtlaenderReutinetal., author = {Brzoska, Patrick and Voigtl{\"a}nder, Sven and Reutin, Barbara and Yilmaz-Aslan, Y{\"u}ce and Barz, Irina and Starikow, Klara and Reiss, Katharina and Dr{\"o}ge, Angela and Hinz, Julia and Exner, Anne and Striedelmeyer, Lena and Krupa, Elzbieta and Spallek, Jacob and Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele and Schott, Thomas and Razum, Oliver}, title = {Rehabilitative Versorgung und gesundheitsbedingte Fr{\"u}hberentung von Personen mit Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland}, publisher = {Bundesministerium f{\"u}r Arbeit und Soziales}, address = {Bonn}, pages = {143}, language = {de} } @misc{SamkangeZeebSpallekKlugetal., author = {Samkange-Zeeb, Florence and Spallek, Lena and Klug, S. J. and Zeeb, Hajo}, title = {HPV infection awareness and self-reported HPV vaccination coverage in female adolescent students in two German cities}, series = {Journal of Community Health}, volume = {37}, journal = {Journal of Community Health}, number = {6}, issn = {0094-5145}, doi = {10.1007/s10900-012-9589-1}, pages = {1151 -- 1156}, language = {en} } @misc{SpallekKrilleReinersetal., author = {Spallek, Lena and Krille, L. and Reiners, Christoph and Schneider, R. and Yamashita, S. and Zeeb, Hajo}, title = {Adverse effects of iodine thyroid blocking: a systematic review}, series = {Radiation Protection Dosimetry}, volume = {150}, journal = {Radiation Protection Dosimetry}, number = {3}, issn = {0144-8420}, doi = {10.1093/rpd/ncr400}, pages = {266 -- 267}, language = {en} } @misc{SchroederHoebelRoicketal., author = {Schr{\"o}der, Sara Lena and Hoebel, Jens and Roick, Julia and Markert, Jenny and Spallek, Jacob and Knesebeck, Olaf von dem and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Inequalities in the utilisation of primary and specialist physicians in Europe - a systematic review}, series = {European Journal of Public Health}, volume = {29}, journal = {European Journal of Public Health}, number = {4}, issn = {1101-1262}, doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.377}, abstract = {Background: The evidence on inequalities in health clearly shows that people with lower socioeconomic status (SES) have poorer health and higher mortality. Nevertheless, generalized evidence for inequalities in healthcare is lacking. So far, the international literature was only summarised with regard to inequalities in the utilisation of disease-specific treatment. Therefore, our aim was to synthetize the literature on socioeconomic inequalities in the utilisation of primary and specialist physicians in the general population. Methods: This systematic review searched Medline und Web of Science from 2004 to 2018. Articles that reported quantitative data on the association of SES with utilisation of primary or specialist physicians in Europe were included. Title and abstract screening were performed by two independent researchers and 50 full texts are currently sifted whether they fulfil the inclusion criteria. Results: The studies analysed utilisation of physicians in terms of probability or frequency. The initial check of the studies indicates that socioeconomic inequalities in the utilisation of physicians differ between primary and specialist care. Specialist physicians were found to be visited with a higher probability and more often by the least disadvantaged in most studies. Inequalities in the utilisation of primary physicians revealed to be more diverse with a weak pattern of equally distributed probability of GP visits and more frequent utilisation by the disadvantaged. Conclusions: The preliminary results indicate that pro-rich utilisation seems to be more pronounced in visiting specialists compared to primary health care. Aiming to reduce inequalities in healthcare, public health actions might primarily focus on reaching a needs-based consultation of specialist physicians.}, language = {en} } @misc{SchroederHoebelSpalleketal., author = {Schr{\"o}der, Sara Lena and Hoebel, Jens and Spallek, Jacob and Knesebeck, Olaf von dem and Richter, M.}, title = {Sozio{\"o}konomische Unterschiede in der Inanspruchnahme haus- und fach{\"a}rztlicher Versorgung - Ergebnisse einer systematischen Literaturrecherche}, series = {Gesundheitswesen 2019}, volume = {81}, journal = {Gesundheitswesen 2019}, number = {08/09}, publisher = {Georg Thieme Verlag KG}, address = {Stuttgart}, doi = {10.1055/s-0039-1694561}, pages = {730 -- 730}, abstract = {Hintergrund: Sozio{\"o}konomische Ungleichheiten in der gesundheitlichen Versorgung werden h{\"a}ufig krankheitsspezifisch untersucht, w{\"a}hrend die Evidenz zu Unterschieden in der Inanspruchnahme in der Gesamtbev{\"o}lkerung bislang unzureichend ist. Ziel der Arbeit ist es, den internationalen Stand zum Zusammenhang zwischen dem Sozialstatus und der Inanspruchnahme von Haus- und Fach{\"a}rzten systematisch aufzubereiten. Methode: In den Datenbanken Medline und Web of Science wurde eine systematische Literaturrecherche durchgef{\"u}hrt, um quantitative Studien aus den Jahren 2003 bis 2018 zu identifizieren. Von 1214 Treffern werden aktuell 69 Volltexte in Hinblick auf die Einschlusskriterien {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft. Ergebnisse: Die Inanspruchnahme wird entweder als „Anzahl der Arztkontakte" gemessen oder zwischen Nutzung und Nicht-Nutzung eines Haus- oder Facharztes in einem bestimmten Zeitraum unterschieden. Die bisher gesichteten Studien deuten darauf hin, dass sich die sozio{\"o}konomischen Ungleichheiten in der Inanspruchnahme der haus- und fach{\"a}rztlichen Versorgung unterscheiden. W{\"a}hrend Fach{\"a}rzte seltener von Menschen mit niedrigem Sozialstatus aufgesucht werden, sind die Ungleichheiten bei Haus{\"a}rzten geringer und die Studien konnten entweder keine sozio{\"o}konomischen Unterschiede aufzeigen oder fanden, dass Menschen mit niedrigem Sozialstatus h{\"a}ufiger eine Prim{\"a}rversorgung in Anspruch nehmen. Diskussion: Sozio{\"o}konomische Unterschiede zu Ungunsten der sozial benachteiligten Bev{\"o}lkerung bestehen m{\"o}glicherweise deutlicher bei Fach{\"a}rzten im Vergleich zu Haus{\"a}rzten. Gerade in der Inanspruchnahme von Fach{\"a}rzten besteht daher Handlungsbedarf zur Verringerung der Ungleichheiten, um eine bedarfsgerechte Inanspruchnahme der Versorgung zu gew{\"a}hrleisten. M{\"o}gliche Gr{\"u}nde f{\"u}r die Unterschiede sollen bei einem Vergleich der Studien untersucht werden, um Implikationen f{\"u}r eine Verbesserung der Versorgung abzuleiten.}, language = {de} } @book{BrzoskaVoigtlaenderReutinetal., author = {Brzoska, Patrick and Voigtl{\"a}nder, Sven and Reutin, Barbara and Yilmaz-Aslan, Y{\"u}ce and Barz, Irina and Starikow, Klara and Reiss, Katharina and Dr{\"o}ge, Angela and Hinz, Julia and Exner, Anne and Striedelmeyer, Lena and Krupa, Elzbieta and Spallek, Jacob and Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele and Schott, Thomas and Razum, Oliver}, title = {Rehabilitative Versorgung und gesundheitsbedingte Fr{\"u}hberentung von Personen mit Migrationshintergrund in Deutschland : Abschlussbericht}, publisher = {Bundesministerium f{\"u}r Arbeit und Soziales}, address = {Bonn}, language = {de} } @misc{LueckmannHoebelRoicketal., author = {Lueckmann, Sara Lena and Hoebel, Jens and Roick, Julia and Markert, Jenny and Spallek, Jacob and Knesebeck, Olaf von dem and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Socioeconomic inequalities in primary-care and specialist physician visits: a systematic review}, series = {International journal for equity in health}, volume = {20}, journal = {International journal for equity in health}, issn = {1475-9276}, doi = {10.1186/s12939-020-01375-1}, pages = {19}, abstract = {Background Utilization of primary-care and specialist physicians seems to be associated differently with socioeconomic status (SES). This review aims to summarize and compare the evidence on socioeconomic inequalities in consulting primary-care or specialist physicians in the general adult population in high-income countries. Methods We carried out a systematic search across the most relevant databases (Web of Science, Medline) and included all studies, published since 2004, reporting associations between SES and utilization of primary-care and/or specialist physicians. In total, 57 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Results Many studies found socioeconomic inequalities in physician utilization, but inequalities were more pronounced in visiting specialists than primary-care physicians. The results of the studies varied strongly according to the operationalization of utilization, namely whether a physician was visited (probability) or how often a physician was visited (frequency). For probabilities of visiting primary-care physicians predominantly no association with SES was found, but frequencies of visits were higher in the most disadvantaged. The most disadvantaged often had lower probabilities of visiting specialists, but in many studies no link was found between the number of visits and SES. Conclusion This systematic review emphasizes that inequalities to the detriment of the most deprived is primarily a problem in the probability of visiting specialist physicians. Healthcare policy should focus first off on effective access to specialist physicians in order to tackle inequalities in healthcare.}, language = {en} }