@misc{ShresthaSeidelZeuchetal., author = {Shrestha, Krishna Prasad and Seidel, Lars and Zeuch, Thomas and Mauß, Fabian}, title = {Modeling for Nitromethane oxidation}, series = {1st International Conference on Smart Energy Carriers Napoli, 2019}, journal = {1st International Conference on Smart Energy Carriers Napoli, 2019}, abstract = {The diminishing availability of conventional fuels and stricter regulations on pollution control and CO2 emission targets have led scientist and engineers to look for alternative fuels. Recently nitromethane has slowly gained interest as alternative fuel over conventional fuel for internal combustion engines. In the past, it was mostly used as rocket propellant or as an explosives [1,2]. Nitromethane is an energetic compound with a wide variety of applications, including its use as a monopropellant, a liquid explosive, a solvent for chemical processing and analysis, and a highperformance fuel additive for internal combustion engines and pulsed detonation engines [3]. The chemical formula of nitromethane is CH3NO2. As the name suggests, the molecule is essentially methane with one of the four hydrogens replaced by a nitro group. In essence, it is the simplest of possible energetic CHON molecules that contain nitro groups, which is why it is often used in reaction studies as a prototype for more complex energetic materials. There is no reliable kinetic model for nitromethane combustion, which is validated over a wide range of experimental conditions. There are a few published studies [4-8] both numerically and experimentally focusing often on a single reactor at very specific conditions. The aim of the present work is to extend our recently published mechanism [9] for syngas, methane and ammonia oxidation to include CH3NO2 as fuel and validate against the available experimental data from the literature. The development and compilation strategy for our mechanism is described in our recent work [9] and this study is conducted in a similar manner. Rates are taken mainly from [7,10-16]. This makes the kinetic model more robust and reliable for combustion modelling.}, language = {en} } @misc{ShresthaSeidelMaussetal., author = {Shrestha, Krishna Prasad and Seidel, Lars and Mauß, Fabian and Zeuch, Thomas}, title = {Kinetic Modeling for NOx prediction with improved base Chemistry}, series = {COST 1404, SMARTCATs, Chemistry of smart energy carriers and technologies, 3rd General Meeting and Workshop on SECs in Industry of SMARTCATs Action}, journal = {COST 1404, SMARTCATs, Chemistry of smart energy carriers and technologies, 3rd General Meeting and Workshop on SECs in Industry of SMARTCATs Action}, language = {en} } @misc{ShresthaGiriSeideletal., author = {Shrestha, Krishna Prasad and Giri, Binod Raj and Seidel, Lars and Farooq, Aamir and Mauß, Fabian}, title = {A Kinetic Modeling Study for the Effect of NOx on Oxymethylene ethers (OMEn, n = 0 and 1) oxidation}, series = {10th European Combustion Meeting, Neapel}, journal = {10th European Combustion Meeting, Neapel}, address = {Neapel}, abstract = {We present a detailed kinetic model for the oxidation of dimethyl ether (OME0) and dimethoxymethane (OME1) in presence of NOx. We further explored the effect of NOx chemistry on the oxidation kinetics of the two OMEs. Our kinetic model is validated against the recent flow reactor data from Zhang et al. (Combust. Flame. 224 (2021) 94- 107). The results indicated that NO doping severely alters the oxidation kinetics of both fuels. The onset temperature for total fuel consumption is significantly shifted to lower temperatures for both fuels, which is in line with the experimental observation. We found that the addition of NO significantly inhibited the NTC behaviour of dimethyl ether. This inhibiting effect appears to stem from the competition between CH3OCH2O2 radical consumption by NO directly and the isomerization/dissociation reactions of CH3OCH2O2. Unlike dimethyl ether, dimethoxymethane does not exhibit a strong NTC behavior, and NO addition completely inhibited its weak NTC behavior.}, language = {en} } @misc{RakhiShresthaGuentheretal., author = {Rakhi, Rakhi and Shrestha, Krishna Prasad and G{\"u}nther, Vivien and Mauß, Fabian}, title = {Thermodynamic analysis to develop a detailed surface reaction mechanism}, series = {Fuel Science - From Production to Propulsion, Aachen, Germany, May 2022}, journal = {Fuel Science - From Production to Propulsion, Aachen, Germany, May 2022}, pages = {2}, abstract = {The reduction of greenhouse gasses such as CO2 and CH4 is becoming necessary due to global environmental problems. The reforming of light hydrocarbons is a particularly efficient process for producing synthesis gas, H2 and CO, from greenhouse gasses [1]. The steam reforming of methane is the most important method to produce syngas in industry by using a nickel catalyst. Nickel-based catalysts are the conventional catalysts in industrial applications due to their fast turnover rates, good availability, and low costs, however, limited by their tendency towards coke formation. In this study, a detailed surface reaction mechanism is developed for steam reform-ing of methane over nickel and results are compared with the reference data.}, language = {en} } @misc{FrankenSrivastavaLeeetal., author = {Franken, Tim and Srivastava, Vivek and Lee, Sung-Yong and Heuser, Benedikt and Shrestha, Krishna Prasad and Seidel, Lars and Mauß, Fabian}, title = {Numerical Analysis of the Combustion of Diesel, Dimethyl Ether, and Polyoxymethylene Dimethyl Ethers (OMEn, n=1-3) Using Detailed Chemistry}, series = {THIESEL 2022 : Conference on Thermo- and Fluid-Dynamics of Clean Propulsion Powerplants, 13th-16th September 2022 : conference proceedings}, journal = {THIESEL 2022 : Conference on Thermo- and Fluid-Dynamics of Clean Propulsion Powerplants, 13th-16th September 2022 : conference proceedings}, editor = {Xandra, Margot and Payri, Ra{\´u}l and Serrano, Jos{\´e} Ram{\´o}n}, publisher = {Editorial Universitat Polit{\`e}cnica de Val{\`e}ncia}, address = {Val{\`e}ncia}, isbn = {978-84-1396-055-5}, doi = {10.4995/Thiesel.2022.632801}, abstract = {New types of synthetic fuels are introduced in internal combustion engine applications to achieve carbon-neutral and ultra-low emission combustion. Dimethyl Ether (DME) and Polyoxymethylene Dimethyl Ethers (OMEn) belong to such kind of synthetic fuels. Recently, Shrestha et al. (2022) have developed a novel detailed chemistry model for OMEn (n=1-3) to predict the ignition delay time, laminar flame speed and species formation for various thermodynamic conditions. The detailed chemistry model is applied in the zero dimensional (0D) stochastic reactor model (DI-SRM) to investigate the non-premixed combustion in a 2-liter diesel engine. Further insights in the formation of unburned hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides during the combustion of OMEn fuels are obtained in this work. The combustion and emission formation of DME and OMEn (n=1-3) are investigated and compared to conventional Diesel combustion. The mixture formation is governed by an earlier vaporization of the DME and OMEn fuels, faster homogenization of the respective air-fuel mixture and higher reactivity. At the same injection pressure, the OMEn fuels obtain higher NOx but lower CO and HC emissions. High amounts of aromatics, ethene, methane formaldehyde and formic acid are found within the Diesel exhaust gas. The DME and OMEn exhaust gas contains higher fractions of formaldehyde and formic acid, and fractions of methane, methyl formate and nitromethane.}, language = {en} } @misc{FrankenShresthaSeideletal., author = {Franken, Tim and Shrestha, Krishna Prasad and Seidel, Lars and Mauß, Fabian}, title = {Effect of Gasoline-Ethanol-Water Mixtures on Auto-Ignition in a Spark Ignition Engine}, series = {International Conference on Knocking in Gasoline Engines}, journal = {International Conference on Knocking in Gasoline Engines}, editor = {Sens, Marc}, publisher = {expert}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, isbn = {978-3-8169-3544-5}, doi = {10.24053/9783816985440}, pages = {175 -- 222}, abstract = {The climate protection plan of the European Union requires a significant reduction of CO2 emissions from the transportation sector by 2030. Today ethanol is already blended by 10vol-\% in gasoline and further increase of the ethanol content to 20vol-\% is discussed. During the ethanol production process, distillation and molecular sieving is required to remove the water concentration to achieve high-purity ethanol. However, hydrous ethanol can be beneficial to suppress knock of spark ignition engines. The hygroscopic nature of ethanol can allow to increase the water content in gasoline - water emulsions even more, without adding additional surfactants, and improve the thermal efficiency by optimized combustion phasing, while keeping the system complexity low. Hence, the effect of gasoline - ethanol - water mixtures on the auto-ignition in a single-cylinder spark ignition engine is investigated by using multi-dimensional simulation and detailed chemistry. The gasoline - ethanol mixtures are defined to keep the Research Octane Number constant, while the Motored Octane Number is decreasing. In total five surrogates are defined and investigated: E10 (10vol-\% ethanol-in-gasoline), E20, E30, E70 and E100. The water content is determined according to experimentally defined ternary diagrams that evaluated stable gasoline - ethanol - water emulsion at different gasoline - ethanol blending ratios. The auto-ignition modes of the surrogates are analyzed using the diagram, which determines if hotspots are within harmless deflagration or harmful developing detonation regime. The strongest auto-ignition is observed for the E10 surrogate, while increasing ethanol content reduces the surrogate reactivity and increases the resonance parameter. No auto-ignition of the unburnt mixture is observed for the E70 and E100 surrogates. The addition of hydrous ethanol decreased the excitation time of the surrogates, especially at low ethanol content, wherefor the reactivity parameter is significantly increased. The hotspots for E10, E20 and E30 surrogates with hydrous ethanol are found within the developing detonation regime, while hotspots of the E70 surrogate with hydrous ethanol are found in the transition regime. For the hydrous E100 surrogate no auto-ignition is predicted because of reduced temperature of the unburnt mixture due to water vaporization, which outweighs the increased reactivity due to water vapor addition.}, language = {en} }