@book{BeckerHuebnerSchonaueretal., author = {Becker, Carlo W. and H{\"u}bner, Sven and Schonauer, Juliane and Kirchner, Stefanie and Winkler-K{\"u}hlken, B{\"a}rbel and Hebecker, Jan and Breuer, Bernd and Golderbauer, Evi}, title = {Integrierte Stadtquartiersentwicklung am Wasser}, publisher = {Bundesamt f{\"u}r Bauwesen und Raumordnung}, address = {Bonn}, isbn = {978-3-87994-978-6}, pages = {128}, language = {de} } @misc{KhanSidorczukBeckeretal., author = {Khan, Muhammad Moman and Sidorczuk, Katarzyna and Becker, Juliane and Aleksandrowicz, Adrianna and Baraniewicz, Karolina and Ludwig, Christina and Ali, Aamir and Kingsley, Robert A. and Schierack, Peter and Kolenda, Rafał}, title = {Characterization of clumpy adhesion of Escherichia coli to human cells and associated factors influencing antibiotic sensitivity}, series = {Microbiology Spectrum}, journal = {Microbiology Spectrum}, issn = {2165-0497}, doi = {10.1128/spectrum.02606-23}, abstract = {Escherichia coli intestinal infection pathotypes are characterized by distinct adhesion patterns, including the recently described clumpy adhesion phenotype. Here, we identify and characterize the genetic factors contributing to the clumpy adhesion of E. coli strain 4972. In this strain, the transcriptome and proteome of adhered bacteria were found to be distinct from planktonic bacteria in the supernatant. A total of 622 genes in the transcriptome were differentially expressed in bacteria present in clumps relative to the planktonic bacteria. Seven genes targeted for disruption had variable distribution in different pathotypes and nonpathogenic E. coli, with the pilV and spnT genes being the least frequent or absent from most groups. Deletion (Δ) of five differentially expressed genes, flgH, ffp, pilV, spnT, and yggT, affected motility, adhesion, or antibiotic stress. ΔflgH exhibited 80\% decrease and ΔyggT depicted 184\% increase in adhesion, and upon complementation, adhesion was significantly reduced to 13\%. ΔflgH lost motility and was regenerated when complemented, whereas Δffp had significantly increased motility, and reintroduction of the same gene reduced it to the wild-type level. The clumps produced by Δffp and ΔspnT were more resistant and protected the bacteria, with ΔspnT showing the best clump formation in terms of ampicillin stress protection. ΔyggT had the lowest tolerance to gentamicin, where the antibiotic stress completely eliminated the bacteria. Overall, we were able to investigate the influence of clump formation on cell surface adhesion and antimicrobial tolerance, with the contribution of several factors crucial to clump formation on susceptibility to the selected antibiotics.}, language = {en} } @misc{HoffmannSchulzeLoeffleretal., author = {Hoffmann, Stephanie and Schulze, Susanne and L{\"o}ffler, Antje and Becker, Juliane and Gremmels, Heinz-Detlef and Holmberg, Christine and Rapp, Michael A. and Entringer, Sonja and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Did the COVID-19 pandemic affect depressive symptoms? Longitudinal analysis of health worker data}, series = {European Journal of Public Health,16th European Public Health Conference 2023 Our Food, Our Health, Our Earth: A Sustainable Future for Humanity Dublin, Ireland 8-11 November 2023}, volume = {33}, journal = {European Journal of Public Health,16th European Public Health Conference 2023 Our Food, Our Health, Our Earth: A Sustainable Future for Humanity Dublin, Ireland 8-11 November 2023}, number = {2}, issn = {1101-1262}, doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.334}, abstract = {Background Health workers play a vital role in response to outbreaks under pandemic circumstances, but are also highly vulnerable to stress-related mental health issues (e.g., due to pandemic workload). There are knowledge gaps regarding temporal development of the emergence of depressive symptoms among health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and their determinants. This study examined the trajectory of depressive symptoms and their association with a) stress perception, b) own COVID-19 infection and c) COVID-19 exposure at work. Methods This cohort study with 91 health workers (90\% female, x⎯⎯=45 years) from a German general hospital included (1) medical, nursing and therapeutic staff and (2) administrative staff. Data were collected longitudinally every month from July to December 2020. Linear multilevel models were used to evaluate associations between trajectories of depression scores (German 'General Depression Scale') with perceived stress ('Perceived Stress Scale'). Laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection was tested as a moderator of depressive symptom development. Trajectoires of depressive symptom modalities (e.g., somatic, emotional) were analysed stratified by COVID-19 exposure at work. Results Depression scores increased across the study period (b=.03, .02-.05). Perceived stress was associated with depression scores (b=.12, .10-.14). The presence of health workers' own COVID-19 infection was associated with a higher increase (b=.06, .01-.10). Somatic symptoms of depression increased over time only among health workers directly exposed to COVID-19 patients at work (b=.25, .13-.38). Conclusions The increase in depressive symptomatology among health workers exposed to COVID-19 in the workplace points to the need for further research. Since the infection with COVID-19 is associated with an increase of depressive symptoms across time, awareness should be raised about measures to protect against virus transmission, especially during a pandemic. Exposure to COVID-19 in the workplace is associated with increased somatic depressive symptoms.}, language = {en} } @misc{HoffmannSchulzeLoeffleretal., author = {Hoffmann, Stephanie and Schulze, Susanne and L{\"o}ffler, Antje and Becker, Juliane and Hufert, Frank and Gremmels, Heinz-Detlef and Holmberg, Christine and Rapp, Michael A. and Entringer, Sonja and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Did the prevalence of depressive symptoms change during the COVID-19 pandemic? A multilevel analysis on longitudinal data from healthcare workers}, series = {International Journal of Social Psychiatry}, volume = {70}, journal = {International Journal of Social Psychiatry}, number = {1}, issn = {0020-7640}, doi = {10.1177/00207640231196737}, pages = {87 -- 98}, abstract = {Background: Healthcare workers (HCW) are at high risk to develop mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic because of additional work load, perceived stress, and exposure to patients with COVID-19. Currently, there are few studies on change over time in the prevalence of depressive symptoms during pandemic start among HCW. Thus, the aims of the current study were to examine whether depressive symptoms increased during the pandemic and were associated with perceived stress and own COVID-19 infection and workplace exposure to virus-infected patients. Methods: The cohort study used longitudinal data from HCW collected monthly (July 2020 till December 2020) during the first year of the pandemic before vaccination became available. The sample of n = 166 was drawn from a German hospital and included medical (e.g. nurses, therapists, and physicians) and administrative staff. Using multilevel models, we analyzed the change in depressive symptoms [assessed with General Depression Scale (GDS), a validated German version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)] and its association with perceived stress across the study period. Laboratory-confirmed own infection was tested as a potential moderator in this context. Subscales of the GDS were used to examine change over time of depressive symptom modalities (e.g. emotional, somatic, and social interactions (β, 95\% confidence interval). Results: Depression scores increased significantly during the study period (β = .03, 95\% CI [0.02, 0.05]). Perceived stress was associated with depressive symptoms (β = .12, 95\% CI [0.10, 0.14]) but did not change over time. Exposure to COVID-19 infection was associated with a higher increase of depressive symptoms (β = .12, 95\% CI [0.10, .14]). Somatic symptoms of depression increased among medical HCW with workplace exposure to COVID-19 (β = .25, 95\% CI [0.13, 0.38]), but not in administrators (β = .03, 95\% CI [-0.04, 0.11]). Conclusion: Research is needed to identify factors that promote the reduction of depressive symptoms in medical HCW with exposition to COVID-19 patients. Awareness of infection protection measures should be increased.}, language = {en} } @misc{HoffmannSchulzeLoeffleretal., author = {Hoffmann, Stephanie and Schulze, Susanne and L{\"o}ffler, Antje and Becker, Juliane and Hufert, Frank and Gremmels, Heinz-Detlef and Holmberg, Christine and Rapp, Michael A. and Entringer, Sonja and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Depressive Symptome bei Besch{\"a}ftigten im Gesundheitswesen w{\"a}hrend der COVID-19-Pandemie: Ergebnisse einer Kohortenstudie in einem Krankenhaus der Regelversorgung in Deutschland}, series = {Gesundheitswesen}, volume = {85}, journal = {Gesundheitswesen}, number = {809}, doi = {10.1055/s-0043-1770597}, abstract = {Einleitung Bisher liegen in Deutschland wenig empirische Ergebnisse zu den Auswirkungen der COVID-19 Pandemie auf die seelische Gesundheit von Besch{\"a}ftigten im Gesundheitswesen vor. In dieser Studie wird die zeitliche Entwicklung depressiver Symptome und der Zusammenhang mit a) der Stresswahrnehmung, b) der eigenen COVID-19-Infektion und c) der arbeitsplatzbezogenen COVID-19-Exposition untersucht. Methoden Die Kohortenstudie mit 91 Besch{\"a}ftigten (90\% wbl, x̅=45 Jr) eines Krankenhauses schloss (1) medizinisches, pflegerisches und therapeutisches sowie (2) administratives Personal im Zeitraum von Juli 2020 bis Dezember 2020 ein. Gemischte Modelle analysierten zeitliche Depressionswerte ('Allg. Depressionsskala') mit wahrgenommenem Stress ('Perceived Stress Scale'). Eine eigene COVID-19-Infektion (Laborbefund) wurde als Moderator getestet. Die zeitliche Entwicklung von Symptommodalit{\"a}ten (u.a. somatisch) wurde nach beruflicher Exposition analysiert. Ergebnisse Die Depressionswerte stiegen insgesamt w{\"a}hrend des Studienzeitraums an (b=.03, .02-.05). Stressempfinden war mit depressiven Symptomen assoziiert (b=.12, .10-.14). Eine eigene Infektion war mit einem h{\"o}heren Anstieg assoziiert (b=.06, .01-.10). Somatische Depressionssymptome nahmen nur bei beruflichem Kontakt mit COVID-19 zu (b=.25, .13-.38). Schlussfolgerung Die Zunahme somatischer depressiver Symptome bei Besch{\"a}ftigten mit beruflichem Kontakt zu COVID-19 zeigt einen Bedarf an Forschung {\"u}ber und Ressourcen f{\"u}r Gesundheitsschutz und -f{\"o}rderung. Das Bewusstsein f{\"u}r Schutzmaßnahmen sollte gest{\"a}rkt werden.}, language = {de} }