@misc{MaierKuhnBeisegeletal., author = {Maier, Isidor Konrad and Kuhn, Johannes and Beisegel, Jesse and Huber-Liebl, Markus and Wolff, Matthias}, title = {Minimalist Grammar: Construction without Overgeneration}, series = {arXiv}, journal = {arXiv}, doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2311.01820}, pages = {51}, abstract = {In this paper we give instructions on how to write a minimalist grammar (MG). In order to present the instructions as an algorithm, we use a variant of context free grammars (CFG) as an input format. We can exclude overgeneration, if the CFG has no recursion, i.e. no non-terminal can (indirectly) derive to a right-hand side containing itself. The constructed MGs utilize licensors/-ees as a special way of exception handling. A CFG format for a derivation A_eats_B↦∗peter_eats_apples, where A and B generate noun phrases, normally leads to overgeneration, e.\,g., i_eats_apples. In order to avoid overgeneration, a CFG would need many non-terminal symbols and rules, that mainly produce the same word, just to handle exceptions. In our MGs however, we can summarize CFG rules that produce the same word in one item and handle exceptions by a proper distribution of licensees/-ors. The difficulty with this technique is that in most generations the majority of licensees/-ors is not needed, but still has to be triggered somehow. We solve this problem with ϵ-items called \emph{adapters}.}, language = {en} } @misc{MaierKuhnDuckhornetal., author = {Maier, Isidor Konrad and Kuhn, Johannes and Duckhorn, Frank and Kraljevski, Ivan and Sobe, Daniel and Wolff, Matthias and Tsch{\"o}pe, Constanze}, title = {Word Class Based Language Modeling: A Case of Upper Sorbian, LREC 2022, Marseille}, series = {Language Resources and Evaluation Conference 2022 (LREC 2022), Marseille, 2022-06-13}, journal = {Language Resources and Evaluation Conference 2022 (LREC 2022), Marseille, 2022-06-13}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.7501145}, pages = {1}, language = {en} } @misc{MaierKuhnDuckhornetal., author = {Maier, Isidor Konrad and Kuhn, Johannes Ferdinand Joachim and Duckhorn, Frank and Kraljevski, Ivan and Sobe, Daniel and Wolff, Matthias and Tsch{\"o}pe, Constanze}, title = {Word Class Based Language Modeling: A Case of Upper Sorbian}, series = {Proceedings of The Workshop on Resources and Technologies for Indigenous, Endangered and Lesser-resourced Languages in Eurasia within the 13th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Marseille, France}, journal = {Proceedings of The Workshop on Resources and Technologies for Indigenous, Endangered and Lesser-resourced Languages in Eurasia within the 13th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Marseille, France}, publisher = {European Language Resources Association}, isbn = {978-2-493814-07-4}, pages = {28 -- 35}, abstract = {In this paper we show how word class based language modeling can support the integration of a small language in modern applications of speech technology. The methods described in this paper can be applied for any language. We demonstrate the methods on Upper Sorbian. The word classes model the semantic expressions of numerals, date and time of day. The implementation of the created grammars was realized in the form of finite-state-transducers (FSTs) and minimalists grammars (MGs). We practically demonstrate the usage of the FSTs in a simple smart-home speech application, that is able to set wake-up alarms and appointments expressed in a variety of spontaneous and natural sentences. While the created MGs are not integrated in an application for practical use yet, they provide evidence that MGs could potentially work more efficient than FSTs in built-on applications. In particular, MGs can work with a significantly smaller lexicon size, since their more complex structure lets them generate more expressions with less items, while still avoiding wrong expressions.}, language = {en} } @misc{HertelGibhardtMartienssenetal., author = {Hertel, Robert and Gibhardt, Johannes and Martienssen, Marion and Kuhn, Ramona and Commichau, Fabian M.}, title = {Molecular mechanisms underlying glyphosate resistance in bacteria}, series = {Environmental Microbiology}, volume = {23}, journal = {Environmental Microbiology}, number = {6}, issn = {1462-2920}, doi = {10.1111/1462-2920.15534}, pages = {2891 -- 2905}, abstract = {Glyphosate is a nonselective herbicide that kills weeds and other plants competing with crops. Glyphosate specifically inhibits the 5-enolpyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate (EPSP) synthase, thereby depleting the cell of EPSP serving as a precursor for biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids. Glyphosate is considered to be toxicologically safe for animals and humans. Therefore, it became the most-important herbicide in agriculture. However, its intensive application in agriculture is a serious environmental issue because it may negatively affect the biodiversity. A few years after the discovery of the mode of action of glyphosate, it has been observed that bacteria evolve glyphosate resistance by acquiring mutations in the EPSP synthase gene, rendering the encoded enzyme less sensitive to the herbicide. The identification of glyphosate-resistant EPSP synthase variants paved the way for engineering crops tolerating increased amounts of the herbicide. This review intends to summarize the molecular mechanisms underlying glyphosate resistance in bacteria. Bacteria can evolve glyphosate resistance by (i) reducing glyphosate sensitivity or elevating production of the EPSP synthase, by (ii) degrading or (iii) detoxifying glyphosate and by (iv) decreasing the uptake or increasing the export of the herbicide. The variety of glyphosate resistance mechanisms illustrates the adaptability of bacteria to anthropogenic substances due to genomic alterations.}, language = {en} }