@misc{LiuDongZhangetal., author = {Liu, Wen-Cai and Dong, Jie and Zhang, Ping and Jin, Li and Zhai, Chun-Quan and Ding, Wen-Jiang}, title = {Fatigue behavior of hot-extruded Mg-10Gd-3Y magnesium alloy}, series = {Journal of materials research}, volume = {25}, journal = {Journal of materials research}, number = {4}, issn = {2044-5326}, pages = {784 -- 792}, language = {en} } @misc{HuaYangQietal., author = {Hua, Pei and Yang, Wenyu and Qi, Xiaochen and Jiang, Shanshan and Xie, Jiaqiang and Guf, Xianyong and Li, Honghao and Zhang, Jin and Krebs, Peter}, title = {Evaluating the effect of urban flooding reduction strategies in response to design rainfall and low impact development}, series = {Journal of Cleaner Production}, volume = {Volume 242}, journal = {Journal of Cleaner Production}, issn = {0959-6526}, doi = {10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118515}, pages = {13}, abstract = {Rapid urbanisation and climate change-induced watershed hydrologic alteration have increased urban flooding risks. As a strategy for urban flood control, low impact development (LID) practices focus on promoting the infiltration and detention of stormwater runoff. A modelling-based study was conducted to analyse LID performance in urban flooding reduction. Two-dimensional simulations were conducted to visualise the flood risk under different precipitation scenarios and LID schemes. An integrated evaluation system based on life-cycle cost analysis, the analytic hierarchy process, and regret decision theory were applied to assess the LID performance in multiple aspects. The results indicated that the LID practices achieved runoff control and flood mitigation to some extent, especially under mild rainfall events. According to the integrated evaluation, urban flooding risk could be sufficiently reduced with the LID combination of bioretention, infiltration trenches, and rain barrels in the given area.}, language = {en} } @misc{YamadaXueLietal., author = {Yamada, Yuki and Xue, Jin and Li, Panpan and Ruiz-Fern{\´a}ndez, Susana and {\"O}zdoğru, Asil Ali and Sar{\i}, Şahsenem and Torres, Sergio C. and Hinojosa, Jos{\´e} A. and Montoro, Pedro R. and AlShebli, Bedoor and Bolatov, Aidos K. and McGeechan, Grant J. and Zloteanu, Mircea and Razpurker-Apfeld, Irene and Samekin, Adil and Tal-Or, Nurit and Tejada, Julian and Freitag, Raquel and Khatin-Zadeh, Omid and Banaruee, Hassan and Robin, Nicolas and Brise{\~n}o-Sanchez, Guillermo and Barrera-Causil, Carlos J. and Marmolejo-Ramos, Fernando}, title = {Where the 'bad' and the 'good' go : a multi-lab direct replication report of Casasanto (2009, Experiment 1)}, series = {Memory \& Cognition}, volume = {2024}, journal = {Memory \& Cognition}, publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, issn = {0090-502X}, doi = {10.3758/s13421-024-01637-1}, pages = {1 -- 7}, abstract = {Casasanto (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351-367, 2009) conceptualised the body-specificity hypothesis by empirically finding that right-handed people tend to associate a positive valence with the right side and a negative valence with the left side, whilst left-handed people tend to associate a positive valence with the left side and negative valence with the right side. Thus, this was the first paper that showed a body-specific space-valence mapping. These highly influential findings led to a substantial body of research and follow-up studies, which could confirm the original findings on a conceptual level. However, direct replications of the original study are scarce. Against this backdrop and given the replication crisis in psychology, we conducted a direct replication of Casasanto's original study with 2,222 participants from 12 countries to examine the aforementioned effects in general and also in a cross-cultural comparison. Our results support Casasanto's findings that right-handed people associate the right side with positivity and the left side with negativity and vice versa for left-handers.}, language = {en} }