@misc{HoffmannSpallek, author = {Hoffmann, Stephanie and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Migration, Gesundheit und soziale Lage}, series = {Public Health Forum}, volume = {26}, journal = {Public Health Forum}, number = {4}, issn = {1876-4851}, doi = {10.1515/pubhef-2018-0107}, pages = {345 -- 348}, abstract = {Das Zusammenspiel zwischen Migration, Gesundheit und sozialer Lage ist durch verschiedene Wirkmechanismen gekennzeichnet. Die soziale Lage beeinflusst gesundheitliche Chancen und Risiken sowie die Migration selbst und tr{\"a}gt dazu bei, ob migrationsbedingte Einfl{\"u}sse auf die Gesundheit verst{\"a}rkt oder abgeschw{\"a}cht werden. Migration ist bedeutend f{\"u}r die Erkl{\"a}rung gesundheitlicher Ungleichheit, obgleich Verzerrungen und Messartefakte bei Interpretationen ber{\"u}cksichtigt werden m{\"u}ssen.}, language = {de} } @incollection{ZeebHuebnerSpallek, author = {Zeeb, Hajo and H{\"u}bner, W. and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Migration und gesundheitliche Ungleichheit}, series = {Diversit{\"a}t und gesundheitliche Chancengleichheit}, booktitle = {Diversit{\"a}t und gesundheitliche Chancengleichheit}, editor = {Pundt, Johanna and Cacace, Mirella}, edition = {1. Auflage}, publisher = {APOLLON University Press}, address = {Bremen}, isbn = {978-3-943001-40-2}, language = {de} } @misc{RederBerensSpalleketal., author = {Reder, Maren and Berens, Eva-Maria and Spallek, Jacob and Kolip, Petra}, title = {Development of the Informed Choice in Mammography Screening Questionnaire (IMQ): factor structure, reliability, and validity}, series = {BMC Psychology}, volume = {7}, journal = {BMC Psychology}, number = {1}, issn = {2050-7283}, doi = {10.1186/s40359-019-0291-2}, pages = {12}, abstract = {Background: Informed choice is of ethical and practical importance in mammography screening. To assess the level to which decisions regarding such screening are informed is thus imperative, but no specific instrument has been available to measure informed choice in the German mammography screening programme. The aims of this study were to develop the Informed Choice in Mammography Screening Questionnaire (IMQ) and to find first evidence for the factor structure, reliability and validity of its different components. Methods: The IMQ was sent to 17.349 women aged 50 in Westphalia-Lippe, Germany. The instrument has been developed after consideration of (1) the results of qualitative interviews on decision making in the mammography screening programme, (2) relevant literature on other informed choice instruments and (3) a qualitative study on influencing factors. The IMQ comprises 3 scales (attitude, norms, and barriers), 1 index (knowledge) and singular items covering intention to participate and sociodemographic variables. To assess the psychometric properties of the components of the IMQ, confirmatory factor and item response theory analyses were conducted. Additionally, reliability, validity and item statistics were assessed. Results: 5.847 questionnaires were returned (response rate 33.7\%). For attitude, the confirmatory factor analysis supported a one-factor structure. For norms, the model fit was not acceptable. Reliability levels were good with a Cronbach's α of.793 for attitude (4 items) and.795 for norms (5 items). For barriers, 9 items were deleted because of low discrimination indices; 6 items remained. The hypothesised assumption-subscale and the importance-subscale were confirmed, but these subscales showed poor reliabilities with Cronbach's α=.525 (4 items) and.583 (2 items). For the knowledge index, item response theory analysis showed that 6 out of 7 items were suitable. Hypotheses concerning the correlations between the different components were confirmed, which supported their convergent and divergent validity. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that the IMQ is a multidimensional instrument. Further development of the barriers and norms scales is necessary. The IMQ can be utilised to assess the level of informed choices as well as influencing factors.}, language = {en} } @misc{BerensKaucherEckertetal., author = {Berens, Eva-Maria and Kaucher, Simone and Eckert, Sandra van and Reder, Maren and Kolip, Petra and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Knowledge about mammography screening in Germany by education and migrant status - results of a cross-sectional study (InEMa)}, series = {Applied Cancer Research}, volume = {39}, journal = {Applied Cancer Research}, number = {6}, issn = {1980-5578}, doi = {10.1186/s41241-019-0076-1}, pages = {8}, abstract = {Background: The population-based mammography screening program (MSP) is aimed to reduce breast cancer mortality, to detect breast cancer at an early stage, and to allow for less invasive treatment. However, it also has some potential harms, such as overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Therefore, it is necessary that women receive sufficient and balanced information to enable informed decision-making. We examined knowledge about benefits and harms of the MSP in Germany among first-time invitees of different socio-demographic backgrounds. Methods: This observational study assessed knowledge about benefits and harms of the MSP among women who were invited to the MSP for the first time by six multiple choice items, using a postal survey. We investigated (i) single items of knowledge, (ii) the distribution of sufficient knowledge stratified by education, migration status and invitation, and (iii) possible determinants of sufficient knowledge by analyzing Odds Ratios (ORs) using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: In total, 5397 women included in the analyses. 46.1\% of the study population had sufficient knowledge about benefits and harms of the MSP. However, women with low educational level and migration background had higher proportions of insufficient knowledge and used most frequently the option "don't know". Women had the most difficulties answering the numeric question and the question about the target group correctly. Results from the logistic regression showed that the odds of having sufficient knowledge were higher among well-educated women (OR 3.84, 95\%CI 3.24-4.55), among women who already received the MSP invitation (OR 1.38, 95\%CI 1.20-1.59) and lowest among Turkish women (OR 0.14, 95\%CI 0.07-0.25). Conclusions: Women with low education and migration background need adapted information regarding benefits and harms of the MSP and are important target groups for further developing the information material about mammography screening to reduce disparities in knowledge and enable informed decision-making.}, language = {en} } @misc{ScholaskeBroseSpalleketal., author = {Scholaske, Laura and Brose, Annette and Spallek, Jacob and Entringer, Sonja}, title = {Perceived discrimination and risk of preterm birth among Turkish immigrant women in Germany}, series = {Social Science \& Medicine}, volume = {236}, journal = {Social Science \& Medicine}, issn = {0277-9536}, doi = {10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112427}, pages = {7}, abstract = {Background: Health disparities, including adverse birth outcomes, exist between Turkish immigrants and the autochthonous population in Germany. The state of research on the risk of preterm birth (PTB, defined as <37 weeks of gestation), the leading cause of infant mortality and morbidity, among Turkish immigrant women is mixed. Perceived discrimination is discussed in the context of health disparities related to migration. We examined whether PTB risk is also increased in Turkish immigrant women in Germany and whether perceived discrimination due to origin contributes to this risk. Methods: We selected a sample from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) study of German autochthonous and Turkish immigrant women who recently gave birth (between 2002 and 2016) (N = 2,525, incl. n = 217 Turkish immigrant women of which n = 111 completed an item on perceived discrimination). The included variables of central interest were immigrant status, perceived discrimination, gestational age, and socioeconomic situation. Results: Logistic regression models indicated that PTB risk was significantly higher for Turkish immigrant women than autochthonous women (OR: 2.75, 95\% CI [1.79-4.16]), even when adjusting for socioeconomic status. Within the subsample of Turkish immigrant women, perceived discrimination was related to a significantly higher PTB risk (OR: 4.91, 95\% CI [1.76-15.06]). Conclusions: Our study provides evidence for a higher PTB risk in Turkish immigrant women compared to autochthonous women in Germany. Perceived discrimination may contribute to this higher risk. The findings represent an important first step towards developing targeted interventions to improve pregnancy and birth outcomes in minority groups.}, language = {en} } @misc{LoefflerGrosserMianietal., author = {L{\"o}ffler, Antje and Grosser, Angelique and Miani, Celine and Doyle, Ina-Merle and Razum, Oliver and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Einflussfaktoren auf die Einf{\"u}hrung von Beikost bei S{\"a}uglingen - Ergebnisse der BaBi-Geburtskohorte in Deutschland}, series = {Gesundheitswesen 2019}, volume = {81}, journal = {Gesundheitswesen 2019}, number = {08/09}, publisher = {Georg Thieme Verlag KG}, address = {Stuttgart}, doi = {10.1055/s-0039-1694423}, pages = {686 -- 686}, abstract = {Hintergrund: Im ersten Lebensjahr erfolgt ein schrittweiser {\"U}bergang von Muttermilch bzw. S{\"a}uglingsmilchnahrung zur Familienkost, wobei die erste Gabe von Beikost zwischen 5. und 7. Lebensmonat erfolgen soll. Es ist wenig bekannt {\"u}ber soziodemographische bzw. klinische Einflussfaktoren auf die Beikosteinf{\"u}hrung. Methodik: Datengrundlage der vorliegenden Untersuchung waren Baseline und erstes Follow-Up der Bielefelder Geburtskohorte BaBi (2013 - 2016, n = 777). Angaben zur Stilldauer, Einf{\"u}hrung von Beikost sowie der Getr{\"a}nkegabe vor und w{\"a}hrend der Einf{\"u}hrung von Beikost wurden telefonisch erhoben, als die S{\"a}uglinge zwischen neun und 12 Monaten alt waren. Einflussfaktoren auf die Beikosteinf{\"u}hrung wurden mittels bi-und multivariater Datenanalyse untersucht. Ergebnisse: Bei Einf{\"u}hrung der Beikost waren die S{\"a}uglinge im Mittel 5,4 ± 1,2 Monate alt. 2,6\% der S{\"a}uglinge waren j{\"u}nger als vier Monate, 12,5\% der S{\"a}uglinge waren {\"a}lter als 6,5 Monate. Lineare Regressionsanalysen zeigten eine direkte Assoziation zwischen der ausschließlichen Stilldauer bzw. dem S{\"a}uglingsalter bei letzter Mutter-/S{\"a}uglingsmilchgabe und dem Beikostbeginn (b = 0,31 [95\%KI = 0,26 - 0,36; p ≤ 0,001; b = 0,12 [95\% KI 0,07 - 0,18], p ≤ 0,001). M{\"u}tterliche Determinanten wie Alter, Bildungsstatus, Migrationsstatus, Familienstand, Parit{\"a}t, pr{\"a}nataler BMI und Rauchstatus vor und w{\"a}hrend der Schwangerschaft hatten keinen Einfluss auf den Beginn der Beikostgabe. 73,6\% der befragten Frauen gaben an, schon einmal Probleme mit dem F{\"u}ttern seit Beginn der Beikosteinf{\"u}hrung gehabt zu haben. Diskussion: In der vorliegenden Analyse erfolgte der Beikostbeginn unabh{\"a}ngig von soziodemographischen und klinischen Parametern, jedoch f{\"u}hrte l{\"a}ngeres ausschließliches Stillen bzw. l{\"a}ngere Mutter-/S{\"a}uglingsmilchgabe zu einem sp{\"a}teren Beikostbeginn. Weitere Untersuchungen sind notwendig, um Art, Umfang und m{\"o}gliche Auswirkungen berichteter Probleme bei der Beikosteinf{\"u}hrung bzw. eines verz{\"o}gerten Beikostbeginns auf Mutter und Kind zu quantifizieren.}, language = {de} } @misc{SchneiderSpallekMauletal., author = {Schneider, Sven and Spallek, Jacob and Maul, Holger and Schilling, Laura}, title = {Schwangere, Nikotin und E-Zigaretten}, series = {Gesundheitswesen 2019}, volume = {81}, journal = {Gesundheitswesen 2019}, number = {08/09}, publisher = {Georg Thieme Verlag KG}, address = {Stuttgart}, doi = {10.1055/s-0039-1694440}, pages = {691 -- 691}, abstract = {Einleitung: In Deutschland raucht noch immer etwa jede f{\"u}nfte junge Frau Tabakzigaretten. Gleichzeitig erfreuen sich E-Zigaretten auch in Deutschland insbesondere unter jungen Erwachsenen zunehmender Beliebtheit. Maternaler Nikotinkonsum birgt schwerwiegende Risiken f{\"u}r die Schwangere und das Kind. Das Ziel dieser Studie war es, den Konsum von Tabak- und E-Zigaretten sowie die Risikowahrnehmung bez{\"u}glich E-Zigaretten unter Schwangeren zu erfassen. Methode: In der STudy on E-cigarettes and Pregnancy (STEP) wurden im Rahmen eines quantitativen Studienteils f{\"u}r 575 Schwangere an einer Geburtsklinik in Hamburg von April 2018 bis Januar 2019 die Tabak- und die E-Zigarettennutzung erfasst. In einem qualitativen netnographischen Studienteil wurden insgesamt {\"u}ber 1.000 Posts in webbasierten Schwangerschaftsforen inhaltsanalytisch ausgewertet. Ergebnisse: Unmittelbar vor der Schwangerschaft nutzten 26,9\% der Schwangeren Tabakzigaretten und 7,8\% E-Zigaretten. Die Pr{\"a}valenzen reduzierten sich dann im ersten Trimenon auf 9,0\% f{\"u}r Tabakzigaretten und 0,5\% f{\"u}r E-Zigaretten. Am Ende der Schwangerschaft rauchten noch 3,1\% aller Befragten Tabakzigaretten - darunter jede Vierte mehr als 10 Zigaretten/Tag - und 0,2\% nutzten durchg{\"a}ngig E-Zigaretten. Die netnographische Analyse zeigte eine große Verunsicherung bei Schwangeren hinsichtlich der Risiken der E-Zigarettennutzung. Diskussion: Die Ergebnisse zeigten f{\"u}r das hier untersuchte Kollektiv, dass noch immer etwa jede zehnte Schwangere zu Beginn der Schwangerschaft Tabakzigaretten raucht. Dagegen ist E-Zigarettenkonsum in der Schwangerschaft nur wenig verbreitet, wenngleich er im Internet teilweise als unsch{\"a}dlich, harmlos und als Alternative zur Tabakzigarette diskutiert wird. Im Rahmen der Pr{\"a}vention sollten die potenziellen Gesundheitsgefahren und die umstrittene Wirksamkeit der E-Zigarette als Tabakentw{\"o}hnungshilfe thematisiert und von der E-Zigarettennutzung in der Schwangerschaft dringend abgeraten werden.}, language = {de} } @misc{SchroederHoebelSpalleketal., author = {Schr{\"o}der, Sara Lena and Hoebel, Jens and Spallek, Jacob and Knesebeck, Olaf von dem and Richter, M.}, title = {Sozio{\"o}konomische Unterschiede in der Inanspruchnahme haus- und fach{\"a}rztlicher Versorgung - Ergebnisse einer systematischen Literaturrecherche}, series = {Gesundheitswesen 2019}, volume = {81}, journal = {Gesundheitswesen 2019}, number = {08/09}, publisher = {Georg Thieme Verlag KG}, address = {Stuttgart}, doi = {10.1055/s-0039-1694561}, pages = {730 -- 730}, abstract = {Hintergrund: Sozio{\"o}konomische Ungleichheiten in der gesundheitlichen Versorgung werden h{\"a}ufig krankheitsspezifisch untersucht, w{\"a}hrend die Evidenz zu Unterschieden in der Inanspruchnahme in der Gesamtbev{\"o}lkerung bislang unzureichend ist. Ziel der Arbeit ist es, den internationalen Stand zum Zusammenhang zwischen dem Sozialstatus und der Inanspruchnahme von Haus- und Fach{\"a}rzten systematisch aufzubereiten. Methode: In den Datenbanken Medline und Web of Science wurde eine systematische Literaturrecherche durchgef{\"u}hrt, um quantitative Studien aus den Jahren 2003 bis 2018 zu identifizieren. Von 1214 Treffern werden aktuell 69 Volltexte in Hinblick auf die Einschlusskriterien {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft. Ergebnisse: Die Inanspruchnahme wird entweder als „Anzahl der Arztkontakte" gemessen oder zwischen Nutzung und Nicht-Nutzung eines Haus- oder Facharztes in einem bestimmten Zeitraum unterschieden. Die bisher gesichteten Studien deuten darauf hin, dass sich die sozio{\"o}konomischen Ungleichheiten in der Inanspruchnahme der haus- und fach{\"a}rztlichen Versorgung unterscheiden. W{\"a}hrend Fach{\"a}rzte seltener von Menschen mit niedrigem Sozialstatus aufgesucht werden, sind die Ungleichheiten bei Haus{\"a}rzten geringer und die Studien konnten entweder keine sozio{\"o}konomischen Unterschiede aufzeigen oder fanden, dass Menschen mit niedrigem Sozialstatus h{\"a}ufiger eine Prim{\"a}rversorgung in Anspruch nehmen. Diskussion: Sozio{\"o}konomische Unterschiede zu Ungunsten der sozial benachteiligten Bev{\"o}lkerung bestehen m{\"o}glicherweise deutlicher bei Fach{\"a}rzten im Vergleich zu Haus{\"a}rzten. Gerade in der Inanspruchnahme von Fach{\"a}rzten besteht daher Handlungsbedarf zur Verringerung der Ungleichheiten, um eine bedarfsgerechte Inanspruchnahme der Versorgung zu gew{\"a}hrleisten. M{\"o}gliche Gr{\"u}nde f{\"u}r die Unterschiede sollen bei einem Vergleich der Studien untersucht werden, um Implikationen f{\"u}r eine Verbesserung der Versorgung abzuleiten.}, language = {de} } @misc{RichterDraganoLampertetal., author = {Richter, M. and Dragano, Nico and Lampert, Thomas and Schneider, Sven and Spallek, Jacob and Sundmacher, Leonie}, title = {Understanding the institutional context of health inequalities among young people: Study protocol for a multi-center research unit}, series = {Gesundheitswesen 2019}, volume = {81}, journal = {Gesundheitswesen 2019}, number = {08/09}, publisher = {Georg Thieme Verlag KG}, address = {Stuttgart}, doi = {10.1055/s-0039-1694623}, pages = {750 -- 751}, abstract = {Background: While health inequalities among young people are well described, the underlying mechanisms have been explored far less. Compositional and contextual characteristics of institutional contexts (e.g. kindergartens, schools) are likely to shape health inequalities among young people and may have an impact above and beyond individual-level determinants. The general research objectives of the research unit are to empirically study if characteristics of different institutional contexts are associated with the emergence of individual-level inequalities in health and c) to integrate findings from different life stages into a comprehensive theoretical model about the key mechanisms at individual and contextual levels. Methods and analysis: Building upon reviews of the existing evidence, each of the five subprojects of the research unit will analyse secondary data (cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys). The subprojects will focus on institutional contexts that serve as major socialization agents in society, such as the family, kindergarten, school, tertiary education/work, as well as the health care system. Linear or logistic multilevel modelling will be applied in order to examine the role of institutional characteristics for young people's health and health inequalities at the individual level. Ethics and dissemination: The dissemination activities include the publication of results in peer-reviewed journals, at international and national scientific conferences, as well as press releases in written and broadcast media to inform relevant stakeholders and the lay public. In the first funding stage, the research unit only uses secondary data of existing datasets. Therefore, ethical approval is not required.}, language = {en} } @misc{WandschneiderSauzetBreckenkampetal., author = {Wandschneider, Lisa and Sauzet, Odile and Breckenkamp, J{\"u}rgen and Spallek, Jacob and Razum, Oliver}, title = {Kleinr{\"a}umige Merkmale und ihr Einfluss auf ein niedriges Geburtsgewicht - eine theoriegeleitete Analyse}, series = {14. Jahrestagung der DGEpi, 11-13. September, Ulm}, journal = {14. Jahrestagung der DGEpi, 11-13. September, Ulm}, pages = {113 -- 113}, abstract = {Hintergrund: Der Wohnort kann eine Dimension sozialer Ungleichheiten darstellen, und es gibt Hinweise daf{\"u}r, dass sich dieser bereits auf die perinatale Entwicklung auswirken k{\"o}nnte. Die zugrunde liegenden Wirkmechanismen sind nach wie vor unbekannt; theorie-basierte und hypothesengeleitete Analysen fehlen. Um diesen Herausforderungen zu begegnen, untersucht diese Studie, inwieweit kleinr{\"a}umige Merkmale zu einem niedrigen Geburtsgewicht beitragen, unabh{\"a}ngig von individuellen Merkmalen. Auf der Grundlage eines konzeptionellen Modells1 wurden kleinr{\"a}umige Merkmale ausgew{\"a}hlt, erhoben und deren Auswirkungen auf niedriges Geburtsgewicht analysiert. Methoden: Die Individualdaten stammen aus der Geburtskohortenstudie „Gesundheit von Babys und Kindern in Bielefeld". Die Stichprobe besteht aus 958 Frauen und ihren S{\"a}uglingen, verteilt auf 80 statistische Bezirke in Bielefeld. Kleinr{\"a}umige Daten wurden anhand von lokalen L{\"a}rmkarten, dem Emissionskataster, Google Street View und dem Melderegister erhoben. Zur Quantifizierung des Einflusses kleinr{\"a}umiger Merkmale wurde eine lineare Mehrebenenanalyse mit einer Zwei-Ebenen-Struktur (Individuen, die in statistische Bezirke eingebettet sind) durchgef{\"u}hrt. Ergebnisse: Insgesamt sind die Auswirkungen der ausgew{\"a}hlten kleinr{\"a}umigen Merkmale gering bis nicht existent, es zeigen sich keine signifikanten Effekten f{\"u}r niedriges Geburtsgewicht. Tendenziell weisen Neugeborene aus {\"a}sthetisch weniger ansprechenden und subjektiv unsicher wahrgenommenen Stadtteilen einen h{\"o}heren Anteil an niedrigem Geburtsgewicht auf. Schlussfolgerungen: Die Analyse liefert keine eindeutigen Hinweise auf negative Auswirkungen kleinr{\"a}umiger Faktoren auf ein niedriges Geburtsgewicht. Auf methodischer Seite best{\"a}tigt die Studie, dass ein angemessener Stichprobenumfang, eine zuverl{\"a}ssige Expositionsabsch{\"a}tzung und die Operationalisierung des kleinr{\"a}umigen Kontextes mit Blick auf die verf{\"u}gbaren Daten die zentralen Herausforderungen des Forschungsfeldes darstellen.}, language = {de} } @misc{SchillingSpallekMauletal., author = {Schilling, Laura and Spallek, Jacob and Maul, Holger and Schneider, Sven}, title = {E-Zigaretten und Tabakzigaretten in der Schwangerschaft - eine Analyse von aktiver und passiver Exposition und Einstellung unter Schwangeren in Deutschland}, series = {14. Jahrestagung der DGEpi, 11.-13. Septmeber 2019, Ulm}, journal = {14. Jahrestagung der DGEpi, 11.-13. Septmeber 2019, Ulm}, pages = {117 -- 117}, abstract = {Hintergrund: In Deutschland greift ein Zehntel der Schwangeren zur Tabakzigarette. Gleichzeitig verbreiten sich E-Zigaretten insbesondere unter jungen Erwachsenen in Deutschland zunehmend. Das Ziel dieser Studie war es, die aktive und passive Exposition durch E-Zigaretten- und Tabakzigaretten sowie die Einstellung zur E-Zigarette unter Schwangeren in Deutschland zu erforschen. Methoden: Im Rahmen der STEP (STudy on E-cigarettes and Pregnancy) beantworteten 575 Schwangere an einer Geburtsklinik in Hamburg von April 2018 bis Januar 2019 Fragen zur E-Zigaretten- und Tabakzigarettenexposition sowie ihren Einstellungen zur E-Zigarette. Ergebnisse: Insgesamt nutzten 1,2\% der Befragten ausschließlich E-Zigaretten, 6,7\% E- und Tabakzigaretten und 20,3\% ausschließlich Tabakzigaretten vor der Schwangerschaft. In der Schwangerschaft nutzten 0,5\% E-Zigaretten und 9,1\% Tabakzigaretten. 86,9\% aller Schwangeren waren der Ansicht, dass E-Zigaretten nicht als Alternative zu Tabakzigaretten genutzt werden sollten. Befragte, die die Tabakzigarette w{\"a}hrend der Schwangerschaft nutzten, vertraten seltener diese Einstellung als Nichtnutzer (78,0\% vs. 88,0\%; p=0,045). Der aktuelle Konsum der E-Zigarette (bzw. Tabakzigarette) durch den Partner erfolgte bei 5,5\% (bzw. 24,4\%) der Befragten. 18,5\% (bzw. 9,3\%) der Partner mit E-Zigarettenkonsum (bzw. Tabakzigarettenkonsum) konsumierten zuhause. Schlussfolgerungen: Die aktive E-Zigarettenexposition ist - im Gegensatz zur aktiven Tabakzigarettenexposition - in der Schwangerschaft bisher gering. Gleichzeitig kommt eine passive Exposition durch den konsumierenden Partner von Schwangeren h{\"a}ufiger bei der E-Zigarette vor. Die Ergebnisse betonen die Wichtigkeit der weiterf{\"u}hrenden Tabakpr{\"a}vention und der Erforschung der Gesundheitsrisiken des Passivdampfes in der Schwangerschaft.}, language = {de} } @misc{GrosserDoyleLoeffleretal., author = {Grosser, Angelique and Doyle, Ina-Merle and L{\"o}ffler, Antje and Breckenkamp, J{\"u}rgen and Spallek, Jacob and Razum, Oliver and Miani, Celine}, title = {The impact of psychosocial factors on breastfeeding duration in the BaBi-Study. Analysis of a birth cohort study in Germany}, series = {Gesundheitswesen 2019}, volume = {81}, journal = {Gesundheitswesen 2019}, number = {08/09}, publisher = {Georg Thieme Verlag}, address = {Stuttgart}, doi = {10.1055/s-0039-1694422}, pages = {686 -- 686}, abstract = {Background: Breastfeeding is beneficial for both mother and child. In Germany, national guidelines recommend fully breastfeeding for at least 4 months, which has only been reached by 34\% in 2012. The WHO's aim of exclusively breastfeeding for six months was reached by 19\% only. Socio-economic status and migration background have been identified to be associated with duration of breastfeeding but little is known about the impact of psychosocial factors e.g. personality traits and social support. We hypothesized that there are differences in the psychosocial profiles of mothers regarding the duration of breastfeeding. Methods: Baseline and follow up data of the Bielefeld BaBi birth cohort (2013 - 16) were analysed. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed in order to identify psychosocial determinants for fully breastfeeding for four and six months. Results: Out of 780 BaBi study participants, 548 fully breastfeed for four months (70.3\%) and 279 continued until at least six months (35.8\%). Logistic regression analyses shows that fully breastfeeding for at least four or six months is independently associated with the intention to breastfeed (OR 7.3 [C.I. 4.54.-11.21) and the attendance of antenatal class (OR 1.4 [C.I. 1.01.-2.06). Personality characteristics, social status und migration background showed no significant association with breastfeeding duration. Conclusion: Our study results suggest to promote individuals' breastfeeding intention and the attendance of antenatal classes to increase breastfeeding duration. Since differences in breastfeeding practices have the potential to create inequalities in mother and child health, more efforts are needed to intensify research on modifiable factors influencing breastfeeding duration.}, language = {en} } @misc{SchillingSchneiderKarlheimetal., author = {Schilling, Laura and Schneider, Sven and Karlheim, Christoph and Maul, Holger and Tallarek, Marie and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Perceived threats, benefits and barriers of e-cigarette use during pregnancy. A qualitative analysis of risk perception within existing threads in online discussion forums}, series = {Midwifery}, volume = {79}, journal = {Midwifery}, issn = {0266-6138}, doi = {10.1016/j.midw.2019.102533}, pages = {8}, abstract = {Objective Previous studies have shown that e-cigarettes are perceived as being less harmful than tobacco cigarettes by pregnant women and might be used to quit smoking during pregnancy. Our aim was to further explore and characterise perceived threats, benefits and barriers of e-cigarette use during pregnancy. Methods Our STudy on E-cigarettes and Pregnancy (STEP) was, among others, based on a netnographic approach of analysing existing threads in German-speaking online discussion forums dealing with perceived threats and benefits of e-cigarette use during pregnancy. For the analysis, we used an inductive-deductive qualitative content analysis. Findings Based on 25 online discussion threads containing 1552 posts, we identified perceived threats, perceived benefits and perceived barriers to e-cigarette use during pregnancy, among others, as main themes. Subthemes identified within the main theme perceived threats were severe nicotine related health risks, potential health risks of additional ingredients, relative risks and lack of knowledge and research studies. As perceived benefits, we identified possibility and facilitation of smoking cessation, harm reduction and financial benefits. Perceived barriers were lack of satisfaction and social stigma. Conclusion Our qualitative results suggest that the perception of the health threats related to e-cigarette use during pregnancy varies according to the nicotine content and the perception of relative risks compared with tobacco cigarettes. In addition to this, risk perception is defined through further health and non-health related barriers and benefits (e.g. suitability of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid, social stigma).}, language = {en} } @misc{LoefflerHoffmannFischeretal., author = {L{\"o}ffler, Antje and Hoffmann, Stephanie and Fischer, Stefanie and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Ambulante Haus- und Facharztversorgung im l{\"a}ndlichen Raum in Deutschland - Wie stellt sich die Versorgungssituation aus Sicht {\"a}lterer Einwohner im Landkreis Oberspreewald-Lausitz dar?}, series = {Das Gesundheitswesen}, volume = {83 (2021)}, journal = {Das Gesundheitswesen}, number = {1}, issn = {0941-3790}, doi = {10.1055/a-1010-6277}, pages = {47 -- 52}, abstract = {Ziel der Studie: Die medizinische Versorgung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland ist von Verteilungsproblemen gepr{\"a}gt. Vor allem in l{\"a}ndlichen Regionen droht Unterversorgung. In dieser Studie wurde untersucht, wie {\"a}ltere Bewohner des Landkreises Oberspreewald-Lausitz (OSL) des Bundeslandes Brandenburg ihre derzeitige medizinische Versorgungssituation einsch{\"a}tzen und welche W{\"u}nsche und Bedenken sie hinsichtlich deren zuk{\"u}nftigen Entwicklung im Jahr 2030 haben. Methodik: In der vorliegenden Querschnitterhebung wurden 3006 Einwohner im Alter von 50-56 Jahren und von 65-71 Jahren des Landkreises OSL befragt. Ein Fragebogen mit geschlossenem und offenem Antwortformat wurde zur Erfassung der Zielstellung eingesetzt. Ergebnisse: In der vorliegenden Untersuchung {\"a}ußerten sich die Einwohner des Landkreises OSL aktuell zufrieden oder sehr zufrieden mit der haus{\"a}rztlichen (93,1\%) und der fach{\"a}rztlichen Versorgung (83,3\%). Innerhalb des Landkreises zeigen sich in einigen Regionen Defizite. Im Gebiet Lauchhammer/Schwarzheide {\"a}ußerten sich insbesondere zur fach{\"a}rztlichen Versorgung 27,1\% der Befragten unzufrieden oder sehr unzufrieden. Alternative und erg{\"a}nzende Versorgungsangebote wie die Community Nurse sind akzeptierte, jedoch derzeit unterrepr{\"a}sentierte Maßnahmen zur Sicherstellung der zuk{\"u}nftigen medizinischen Versorgung. Schlussfolgerung: Derzeit zeigen sich Bewohner des l{\"a}ndlichen, metropolenfernen Landkreises OSL zufrieden mit der ambulanten medizinischen Versorgung, jedoch stellen sich in einigen Regionen Defizite, insbesondere bei der zuk{\"u}nftigen Facharztversorgung dar. Alternative Versorgungsangebote wie Telemedizin sind seitens der Bewohner gew{\"u}nschte Maßnahmen zur Erg{\"a}nzung und Sicherstellung der zuk{\"u}nftigen medizinischen Versorgung im l{\"a}ndlichen Raum.}, language = {de} } @misc{MianiLudwigBreckenkampetal., author = {Miani, Celine and Ludwig, A. and Breckenkamp, J{\"u}rgen and Sauzet, Odile and Doyle, Ina-Merle and H{\"o}ller-Holtrichter, Chantal and Spallek, Jacob and Razum, Oliver}, title = {Socioeconomic and migration status as predictors of emergency caesarean section: a birth cohort study}, series = {BMC pregnancy and childbirth}, volume = {20}, journal = {BMC pregnancy and childbirth}, issn = {1471-2393}, doi = {10.1186/s12884-020-2725-5}, pages = {7}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: Women with a migration background are reportedly at a higher risk of emergency caesarean section. There is evidence that this is due in part to suboptimal antenatal care use and quality of care. Despite the fact that migrant women and descendants of migrants are often at risk of socioeconomic disadvantage, there is, in comparison, scarce and incomplete evidence on the role of socioeconomic position as an independent risk factor for emergency caesarean delivery. We therefore investigate whether and how migration background and two markers of socioeconomic position affect the risk of an emergency caesarean section and whether they interact with each other. METHODS: In 2013-2016, we recruited women during the perinatal period in Bielefeld, Germany, collecting data on health and socioeconomic and migration background, as well as routine perinatal data. We studied associations between migration background (1st generation migrant, 2nd/3rd generation woman, no migration background), socioeconomic status (educational attainment and net monthly household income), and the outcome emergency caesarean section. RESULTS: Of the 881 participants, 21\% (n = 185) had an emergency caesarean section. Analyses showed no association between having an emergency caesarean section and migration status or education. Women in the lowest (< 800€/month) and second lowest (between 800 and 1750€/month) income categories were more likely (aOR: 1.96, CI: 1.01-3.81; and aOR: 2.36, CI: 1.27-4.40, respectively) to undergo an emergency caesarean section than women in the higher income groups. CONCLUSIONS: Migration status and education did not explain heterogeneity in mode of birth. Having a low household income, however, increased the chances of emergency caesarean section and thereby contributed towards producing health disadvantages. Awareness of these findings and measures to correct these inequalities could help to improve the quality of obstetric care.}, language = {en} } @misc{SchillingSchneiderMauletal., author = {Schilling, Laura and Schneider, Sven and Maul, Holger and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {STudy on E-Cigarettes and Pregnancy (STEP)-Study Protocolof a Mixed Methods Study on Risk Perception of E-Cigarette UseDuring Pregnancy and Sample Description}, series = {Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde}, volume = {80}, journal = {Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde}, number = {01}, issn = {1438-8804}, doi = {10.1055/a-1061-7288}, pages = {66 -- 75}, abstract = {Introduction: During pregnancy, the motherʼs healthy life-style is crucial for the health of the fetus. Potential risk factorsfor maternal and child health should therefore be identifiedand reduced as early as possible. The consumption of e-ciga-rettes represents one of these potential risk factors. Exploringrisk perceptions about e-cigarette use during pregnancy canprovide early indications of possible user motives. Therefore,our mixed methodsSTudy onE-cigarettes andPregnancy(STEP) aimed to comprehensively analyze risk perceptionsabout e-cigarette use during pregnancy based on anInte-gratedHealthBeliefModel (IHBM). This paper describes thestudy design, methods, sample population and limitations ofSTEP. Methods: Our sequential mixed methods study combinedqualitative and quantitative approaches. In the qualitativesection of the study which preceded the quantitative part ofthe study, we aimed to characterize risk perceptions aboute‑cigarette use during pregnancy. We used a netnographic re-search approach which analyzed discussion threads in onlineforums dealing with e-cigarette use during pregnancy. Theanalysis was based on an IHBM. Identified themes were incor-porated in the questionnaire which was developed for the quantitative part of the study. The quantitative section aimedto quantify, among other things, perceived threats, barriersand benefits and to explore differences in risk perception ac-cording to sociodemographic characteristics and tobacco ande-cigarette usage. Results: In the qualitative section, 1552 posts in 25 online dis-cussion threads dealing, inter alia, with e-cigarette use duringpregnancy were identified. The quantitative part looked atthe responses in the questionnaires handed in by 575 preg-nant women who attended a hospital in Hamburg (Germany)from April 2018 to January 2019 (response rate: 27.5\%). Conclusion: Data collection was successful for both the qual-itative and quantitative parts of the study. When interpretingthe results of STEP, different limitations should be taken intoaccount. The results of STEP provide starting points for thedevelopment of tailored preventive measures for pregnantwomen.}, language = {en} } @incollection{TallarekMlinarićSpallek, author = {Tallarek, Marie and Mlinarić, Martin and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Migration - Bedeutung und Implikationen f{\"u}r die Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung}, series = {Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung. Springer Reference Pflege - Therapie - Gesundheit}, booktitle = {Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung. Springer Reference Pflege - Therapie - Gesundheit}, editor = {Tiemann, Michael and Mohokum, Melvin}, edition = {1}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Berlin, Heidelberg}, isbn = {978-3-662-55793-8}, issn = {2662-6942}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-662-55793-8_28-1}, pages = {1 -- 13}, abstract = {Die Bev{\"o}lkerungsgruppe der Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund umfasst fast ein Viertel der Gesamtbev{\"o}lkerung in Deutschland und ist h{\"o}chst heterogen. Pauschalisierende Aussagen zum Gesundheitsstatus dieser Gruppe sind daher nicht m{\"o}glich. Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund sind nicht grunds{\"a}tzlich ges{\"u}nder oder kr{\"a}nker als die Mehrheitsbev{\"o}lkerung. Allerdings k{\"o}nnen sie sich aufgrund von Expositionen vor, w{\"a}hrend und nach der Migration in ihren Gesundheitschancen und -risiken von der Mehrheitsbev{\"o}lkerung unterscheiden. Pr{\"a}vention und Gesundheitsf{\"o}rderung sollten daraus resultierende spezifische Bedarfe ebenso ber{\"u}cksichtigen wie die Diversit{\"a}t der Bev{\"o}lkerung insgesamt. Erfolgversprechend ist eine Kombination aus diversit{\"a}tssensiblen, f{\"u}r die Gesamtbev{\"o}lkerung zug{\"a}nglichen Angeboten und migrationsspezifischen Ans{\"a}tzen in besonders risikoreichen Situationen. Kommunale, settingorientierte sowie soziokulturell angepasste Angebote verbessern die Erreichbarkeit der Zielgruppen maßgeblich.}, language = {de} } @misc{MianiRazumSpallek, author = {Miani, C{\´e}line and Razum, Oliver and Spallek, Jacob}, title = {Health of the offspring of immigrants: the BaBi birth cohort study}, series = {Public Health Forum}, volume = {27}, journal = {Public Health Forum}, number = {4}, issn = {1876-4851}, doi = {10.1515/pubhef-2019-0062}, pages = {298 -- 300}, abstract = {Children with a migration background are more at risk of health-related problems than those without a migration background. The German health system still does not adequately meet the challenges of on increasingly heterogeneous population, not least due to a lack of adequate epidemiological data and models. The BaBi study contributes to gaining new insights in the development of health inequalities due to cultural diversity in Germany, with a focus on pregnancy and early childhood.}, language = {en} } @misc{GrosserDoyleLoeffleretal., author = {Grosser, Angelique and Doyle, Ina-Merle and L{\"o}ffler, Antje and Breckenkamp, J{\"u}rgen and Spallek, Jacob and Razum, Oliver and Miani, Celine}, title = {The impact of psychosocial factors on breastfeeding duration in the BaBi cohort study, Germany}, series = {European Journal of Public Health}, volume = {29}, journal = {European Journal of Public Health}, number = {4}, issn = {1464-360X}, doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.122}, pages = {2}, abstract = {Background: Breastfeeding is considered beneficial for both mother and child. In Germany, national guidelines recommend fully breastfeeding for at least 4 months, a goal reached by only 34\% of mothers in 2012. The WHO's recommendation of exclusively breastfeeding for six months was met by 19\% only. Hardly modifiable factors such as socio-economic status and migration background have been associated with duration of breastfeeding but little is known about the impact of psychosocial factors such as personality traits and social support. We hypothesise that there are differences in the psychosocial profiles of mothers regarding the duration of breastfeeding. Methods: We analyse baseline and follow-up data of the Bielefeld BaBi birth cohort (2013-16). They include detailed migration and socio-economic backgrounds, as well as three measures of psychological characteristics: the optimism scale, the Big Five inventory and the locus of control scales. We perform bivariate and multivariate analyses in order to identify psychosocial determinants of fully breastfeeding for four and six months. Results: Out of 780 BaBi study participants, 548 fully breastfed for four months (70.3\%), of which 279 continued until at least six months (35.8\%). Logistic regression analyses show that fully breastfeeding for at least four or six months is independently associated with the intention to breastfeed and the attendance of antenatal class during this or previous pregnancies. Personality characteristics, social status and migration background show however no significant association with breastfeeding duration. Conclusions: Our study results support the promotion of individuals' breastfeeding intention and attendance to antenatal classes to increase breastfeeding duration. Since differences in breastfeeding practices have the potential to create inequalities in maternal and child health, more efforts are needed to intensify research on modifiable factors influencing breastfeeding duration.}, language = {en} } @misc{SauzetZolitschkaSpalleketal., author = {Sauzet, Odile and Zolitschka, Kim Alexandra and Spallek, Jacob and Breckenkamp, J{\"u}rgen and Razum, Oliver}, title = {An ego-centred approach for the evaluation of health inequalities in urban areas}, series = {European Journal of Public Health}, volume = {29}, journal = {European Journal of Public Health}, number = {4}, issn = {1101-1262}, doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.243}, pages = {1}, abstract = {Background: Neighbourhood possesses attributes, structural, physical and social, for which pathways to health inequalities could be hypothesized. Hence, neighbourhood is a complex mixture of factors which cannot be simply defined by a delineation on a map, making common definitions of neighbourhood (e.g. administrative borders) problematic. We present a new concept for the evaluation of contextual health inequalities in an urban setting. Methods: An ego-centred approach to neighbourhood effects on health allows to establish to what degree the health outcomes of a person are on average correlated to the health outcomes of his/her neighbours. This approach does not necessitate the definition of what a neighbourhood is, or of its boundaries. Using data from the BaBi birth cohort following up 958 mother-child pairs in Bielefeld/Germany we illustrate how the method provides information about the spatial structure of a possible association between unmeasured neighbourhood factors and birthweight. Spatially correlated birthweight indicates a neighbourhood effect on maternal health. Results: A parametric model of the correlation structure gives two indicators: a distance after which health outcomes are no longer correlated (practical range), and the strength of correlation (RSV). We modelled birthweight directly and residuals after controlling for (spatially correlated) covariates. After adjusting for the mother's demographics and neighbourhood characteristics, birthweights remained spatially correlated with RSV of 11\% and a practical range of 128 m. Conclusions: Modelling the spatial correlation of a health outcome provides a measure of the degree of health correlation, thus offering new evidence on the production of health inequalities while incorporating current modelling approaches. Moreover, it measures heterogeneity in a city. This could be used as an indicator for policy makers or town planners to identify areas in need of socioeconomic investment.}, language = {en} } @misc{SchroederHoebelRoicketal., author = {Schr{\"o}der, Sara Lena and Hoebel, Jens and Roick, Julia and Markert, Jenny and Spallek, Jacob and Knesebeck, Olaf von dem and Richter, Matthias}, title = {Inequalities in the utilisation of primary and specialist physicians in Europe - a systematic review}, series = {European Journal of Public Health}, volume = {29}, journal = {European Journal of Public Health}, number = {4}, issn = {1101-1262}, doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.377}, abstract = {Background: The evidence on inequalities in health clearly shows that people with lower socioeconomic status (SES) have poorer health and higher mortality. Nevertheless, generalized evidence for inequalities in healthcare is lacking. So far, the international literature was only summarised with regard to inequalities in the utilisation of disease-specific treatment. Therefore, our aim was to synthetize the literature on socioeconomic inequalities in the utilisation of primary and specialist physicians in the general population. Methods: This systematic review searched Medline und Web of Science from 2004 to 2018. Articles that reported quantitative data on the association of SES with utilisation of primary or specialist physicians in Europe were included. Title and abstract screening were performed by two independent researchers and 50 full texts are currently sifted whether they fulfil the inclusion criteria. Results: The studies analysed utilisation of physicians in terms of probability or frequency. The initial check of the studies indicates that socioeconomic inequalities in the utilisation of physicians differ between primary and specialist care. Specialist physicians were found to be visited with a higher probability and more often by the least disadvantaged in most studies. Inequalities in the utilisation of primary physicians revealed to be more diverse with a weak pattern of equally distributed probability of GP visits and more frequent utilisation by the disadvantaged. Conclusions: The preliminary results indicate that pro-rich utilisation seems to be more pronounced in visiting specialists compared to primary health care. Aiming to reduce inequalities in healthcare, public health actions might primarily focus on reaching a needs-based consultation of specialist physicians.}, language = {en} } @misc{ScholaskeRodriguezSarietal., author = {Scholaske, Laura and Rodriguez, Norma and Sari, Nida Emel and Spallek, Jacob and Ziegler, Matthias and Entringer, Sonja}, title = {The German Version of the Multidimensional Acculturative Stress Inventory (MASI) for Turkish-Origin Immigrants. Measurement Invariance of Filter Questions and Validation}, series = {European Journal of Psychological Assessment}, volume = {36}, journal = {European Journal of Psychological Assessment}, number = {5}, issn = {2151-2426}, doi = {10.1027/1015-5759/a000567}, pages = {889 -- 900}, abstract = {The Multidimensional Acculturative Stress Inventory (MASI) is an established measure of acculturative stress for people of Mexican origin living in the USA that has been associated with mental health outcomes in this population. We translated the MASI into German and adapted it for use with Turkish-origin immigrants in Germany. The MASI includes filter questions asking if a potentially stressful event had actually occurred before reporting the stress appraisal of these situations. Measurement invariance testing has become a standard practice to evaluate questionnaire translations, however, measurement invariance of filter questions has been scarcely studied. In Study 1, we evaluated measurement invariance of the filter questions between a German-based Turkish sample (N = 233) and the Mexican-origin sample from the original study (N = 174) and could show partial strong factorial invariance for three of the four factors. In Study 2, a validation study, relations between the German MASI scores and measures of acculturation and stress indicated discriminant validity. This study contributes to research on measurement invariance of filter questions, thereby providing a measure of acculturative stress that can be used in future research to understand the etiology of health disparities in Turkish-origin immigrants in Germany.}, language = {en} } @misc{SpallekScholaskeKurtetal., author = {Spallek, Jacob and Scholaske, Laura and Kurt, Medlin and Lindner-Matthes, Denise and Entringer, Sonja}, title = {Intergenerational transmission of health disparities among Turkish-origin immigrants in Germany: study protocol of a multi-centric cohort study (BaBi-stress and BaBeK study)}, series = {BMC pregnancy and childbirth}, volume = {20}, journal = {BMC pregnancy and childbirth}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1186/s12884-020-2853-y}, pages = {158}, abstract = {Background: Immigrants in Germany exhibit higher levels of social disadvantage when compared to the non-immigrated population. Turkish-origin immigrants constitute an important immigrant group in Germany and show disparities in some health domains that are evident from birth onwards. Several studies have shown the mechanisms by which social disadvantage is biologically embedded to affect health over the lifespan. Relatively little, however, is still known about if and how the maternal social situation is transmitted to the next generation. This study therefore aims to analyse the effects of maternal socioeconomic status and migration status on stress-related maternal-placental-fetal (MPF) biological processes during pregnancy on infant birth and health outcomes. Methods: This longitudinal cohort study of N = 144 child-mother dyads is located at two study sites in Germany and includes pregnant women of Turkish origin living in Germany as well as pregnant German women. During pregnancy, MPF stress biology markers from maternal blood and saliva samples, maternal socio-economic and migration-related information, medical risk variables and psychological well-being are assessed. After birth, infant anthropometric measures and developmental outcomes are assessed. The same measures will be assessed in and compared to Turkish pregnant women based on a collaboration with BABIP study in Istanbul. Discussion: This is the first study on intergenerational transmission of health disparities in Germany with a focus on women of Turkish-origin. The study faces similar risks of bias as other birth cohorts do. The study has implemented various measures, e.g. culturally sensitive recruitment strategies, attempt to recruit and follow-up as many pregnant women as possible independent of their social or cultural background. Nevertheless, the response rate among lower-educated families is lower. The possibility to compare results with a cohort from Turkey is a strength of this study. However, starting at different times and with slightly different recruitment strategies and designs may result in cohort effects and may affect comparability of the sub-cohorts.}, language = {en} }