@book{GrandemangeHuebelOrsinietal., author = {Grandemange, J. M. and H{\"u}bel, Hartwig and Orsini, M. and Schramm, K. and Smith, N. G.}, title = {Improved Design-by-Analysis Procedures for LWR Design Codes}, publisher = {Commission of the European Communities}, address = {Luxembourg}, isbn = {92-828-4191-X}, pages = {VII, 89}, abstract = {The European Fast Reactor (EFR) collaboration with the EFR Associates Design and Construction Rules Committee, and the R\&D Agreement (AGT9B) produced significant developments in design-by-analysis procedures for high temperature plant. Many of these developments are judged to be relevant to the non-creep conditions of LWR plant, and for this reason, the CEC DGXI Working Group Codes and Standards supported this study to review and make recommendations on their potential application for improving LWR design code procedures. The topics considered are judged to be those where the most significant and relevant developments have been made and the list, although not exhaustive, is as follows: - Negligible creep criteria - Design-by-analysis procedures for weldments - Shakedown design rules - Design-by-analysis methods for tubeplates - Buckling rules - Interaction diagrams for assessing ratcheting - Rules for the prevention of elastic follow-up in piping - Strain range enhancement - Constitutive equations for inelastic analysis - Margins on Level D criteria - Zarka's method}, language = {en} } @misc{BieniussaReckHuebel, author = {Bieniussa, Klaus W. and Reck, Hans and H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Determination of more realistic Ke,r-factors for simplified elastic-plastic analysis}, series = {Nuclear Engineering and Design}, volume = {174}, journal = {Nuclear Engineering and Design}, number = {3}, issn = {0029-5493}, pages = {343 -- 352}, abstract = {According to the relevant KTA-Rules, e.g. KTA 3201.2, strain correction factors — Ke-factors — have to be used in the fatigue analysis of pressurised components if the strain intensity ranges are determined by elastic analyses, and if in this case the range of primary plus secondary stress intensity exceeds a certain limit. This limit is three times the design stress intensity value, Sm, and thus approximately corresponds to twice the value of the 0.2\% strain limit. The relations given in the above-mentioned rules to determine the Ke-factors for considering plastification have proved to be very conservative in many cases compared with the strain intensity ranges that were determined by complete elastic-plastic analyses. In order to improve the validity of the fatigue analysis, the topic of `Performance of fundamental work to prepare concrete proposals for realistic Ke,r-factors (strain correction factors) to consider plastification at large strain amplitudes' was one of the subjects of the BMU project SR 2063. In summary, the result was that the proposed realistic Ke,r-factors present a real alternative to the Ke-factors of the regulations; the latter serve a mostly conservative registration of the observed elastic-plastic strain but cannot be explained in terms of physics and are not formulated in a manner adequately specific of any material. The exemplary verification calculations that have been performed so far show, furthermore, that the proposed realistic Ke,r-factors can be easily determined and also deliver sufficiently conservative results. This new method therefore has great potential which, however, still has to continue to be verified by further calculations before it can be included in the KTA-Rules.}, language = {en} } @techreport{Huebel, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Ermittlung realistischer Ke-Faktoren (Plastizierungsfaktoren) als Grundlage f{\"u}r die Pr{\"a}zisierung des kerntechnischen Regelwerkes hinsichtlich der Erm{\"u}dungsanalyse}, publisher = {grm, Merkel}, address = {Dossenheim}, pages = {137}, abstract = {Es werden drei vereinfachte Methoden zur Berechnung elastisch-plastischer Dehnschwingbreiten infolge zyklischer Belastung von Komponenten der Kerntechnik vorgestellt. Es handelt sich um die Methoden von Roche, Seshadri und Zarka. Diese werden mit dem Faktor Ke des KTA-Regelwerks sowie dem im Vorhaben SR 2063 unterbreiteten Vorschlag zu seiner Modifikation verglichen. Die ihnen zugrunde liegenden Annahmen werden kritisch durchleuchtet. Ihre Anforderungen an das Werkstoffgesetz im plastischen Bereich sowie der erforderliche Berechnungsaufwand werden herausgestellt. Einfache Beispielrechnungen zeigen, durch Gegen{\"u}berstellung mit den exakten Werten, die erzielbare Genauigkeit.}, language = {de} } @book{MaierComiCoriglianoetal., author = {Maier, Giulio and Comi, Claudia and Corigliano, Alberto and Perego, Umberto and H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Bounds and Estimates on Inelastic Deformations}, publisher = {Commission of the European Communities}, address = {Luxembourg}, isbn = {92-827-5006-X}, pages = {286}, abstract = {Design codes require to demonstrate that certain limits of inelastic deformation are not exceeded during the service life of a structure. If the loading is cyclic, inelastic strains may accumulate cycle by cycle and may exceed specified allowables after a number of cycles before a stationary state (elastic or plastic shakedown) is achieved, or the inelastic strains may grow unboundedly due to a ratchetting mechanism. In principle, inelastic deformations can be calculated by performing evolutive (step-by-step) inelastic analyses. These require specific information, which is, however, not always available, such as detailed constitutive modelling and loading history. Furthermore, evolutive inelastic analyses are very costly. Therefore, simplified inelastic analyses are desirable to provide at least partial information about structural behaviour: more specifically, upper bounds on, or estimates of, elastic-plastic-creep deformations. Some simplified methods are envisaged by design codes (as pointed out in Chapter 2). However, they are based on specific configurations of geometry and loading or they adopt heuristic assumptions, the reasonability of which is not always evident for general applicability within the scope of these codes. Accordingly, design codes seem to require improvements. Several simplified methods are reviewed in the present Report and might serve as alternatives to those suggested by design codes. Simplified methods can be grouped in two classes: (a ) procedures intended to determine a safety factor against a critical event of the global structure (such as collapse); (b ) techniques apt to provide information on local quantities (such as inelastic strain) associated to inelastic structural responses. Procedures of class (a ) and some of their recent extensions are briefly surveyed in Chapter 3. Subclasses of category (b ) are discussed in the subsequent Chapters, with emphasis on their operative peculiarities and on their practical usefulness or potentialities. Upper bounds in plasticity (Chapter 4 and Appendix A) can be computed by various approaches, basically by satisfying a set of equations and inequalities and by carrying out some optimisation procedure. To within the consequences of modelling errors, residual post shakedown quantities are guaranteed to be bounded from above: this circumstance is referred to by the adjective "rigorous". A number of bounding inequalities can be proved. Usually, the better (lower) the bound, the more expensive is its computation. However, computational advantages over other simplified approaches can hardly be ascertained in general. Upper bounds in creep (Chapter 5) are based on general rigorous mechanical foundations, but the applications available mostly concern particular cases employing "ad hoc" imaginative, sometimes heuristic assumptions which are not easy to transfer to other cases. Mostly, elastic-perfectly plastic material behaviour and the Bailey-Orowan creep model are assumed. Some simplified methods, such as the British shakedown method (Chapter 6), intend to estimate residual stress fields after elastic shakedown (the British method also, in certain circumstances, after plastic shakedown). They adopt empirically corroborated conjectures, rather than rigorous arguments. Material hardening is neglected. Zarka's method (Chapter 7 and 8 and Appendix B) provides estimates of the mean strain in case of elastic shakedown and, in addition, a lower and an upper estimate of strain range in case of plastic shakedown, by adopting some heuristic assumptions. The validity of these assumptions is difficult to assess in practical applications. Material hardening is required. The method developed by Ladev{\`e}ze and coworkers (Chapter 9 and Appendix C) is not, strictly speaking, a simplified method, in the sense that it provides the same kind of information as rigorous evolutive analyses. The simplification lies in the solution process, which can be stopped after a few iterations since each one of these concern the whole time interval of interest. Thus estimates are achieved of the structural inelastic response over a large time interval (much larger than the time step in an evolutive analysis). General material models are admitted. None of the simplified methods reviewed in the present Report can directly be recommended for general practical use in nuclear design situations. However, some of them seem to have at least no less potentialities than the methods mentioned so far by design codes. Further work is necessary to clarify the conditions under which they are advantageous.}, language = {en} } @misc{Huebel, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Basic Conditions for Material and Structural Ratcheting}, series = {Nuclear Engineering and Design}, volume = {162}, journal = {Nuclear Engineering and Design}, number = {1}, issn = {0029-5493}, doi = {10.1016/0029-5493(95)01136-6}, pages = {55 -- 65}, abstract = {This paper is intended to provide an overview of different aspects of ratcheting under cyclic loading below the creep range. It distinguishes between material ratcheting and structural ratcheting, each being characterized by several different phenomena which appear in different configurations of materials, states of stress, structural geometries and loadings. The systematic compilation of these phenomena presented in the paper may help to improve understanding between material researches, developers of inelastic methods of analysis, structural analysts and design code committees. Above all, a certain degree of knowledge about the different mechanisms of ratchetting is important for a structural analyst to be able to choose an appropriate analytical method for assessing the ratcheting phenomena involved in a specific design problem.}, language = {en} } @book{HuebelZeibig, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig and Zeibig, H.}, title = {State-of-the-Art of Simplified Methods to Account for Elastic Follow-up in Creep}, publisher = {Commission of the European Communities}, address = {Luxembourg}, isbn = {92-827-5009-4}, pages = {103}, abstract = {Engineering structures exposed to high temperature environment exhibit time dependent behaviour due to time dependent material behaviour. In order to avoid full inelastic analyses, simplified inelastic analysis methods are desirable. The concept of elastic follow-up was introduced to allow determination of quantities serving as measure for life assessment of structures subjected to creep conditions without performing full time dependent structural analyses. Various simplified methods are described in the literature to estimate enhancement of creep strain and of creep damage arising from the fact that so-called secondary stresses caused by displacement-controlled loading do not necessarily relax with time in the same way as stresses do that are caused by strain-controlled loading, but rather show some characteristics of stress-controlled loading. After providing a definition of elastic follow-up, the fundamental principles of elastic follow-up are compiled. A parameter "q" is introduced as a measure of elastic follow-up and is derived for some examples. Effects of non-uniform temperature distribution are discussed as well as effects resulting from multiaxial stress states. A number of methods to quantify elastic follow-up by simplified methods adopted by design codes or proposed in the literature are reviewed for general structures (Part I) and for piping (Part II).}, language = {en} } @book{Huebel, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Simplified Elastic-Plastic Fatigue Analysis of Smooth Structures}, publisher = {Publ. of the European Communities}, address = {Luxembourg}, isbn = {92-826-9833-5}, pages = {178}, abstract = {Engineering structures subjected to high cyclic straining necessitating fatigue analysis play an important role in many industries. If the proportionality limit of the material is exceeded, nonlinearity of the material behaviour is to be taken into account. The structural response can then be calculated using either rigorous inelastic analysis methods, where stresses and strains are calculated on a step-by-step basis throughout a given load history, or by employing simplified methods of analysis. In the latter case a plastic strain range enhancement factor Ke is often used to obtain an elastic-plastic strain range based on fictitious elastic stress analyses. Plastic behaviour of simple academic and practical structures is investigated to identify the basic features which determine the factor Ke: (a) geometry of the structure (b) kind of loading (c) load level (d) material behaviour. The factor Ke is quantified for different geometries and kinds of loading. Parameter studies are performed to quantify the effects of load level, material models and hardening characteristics. The background of some factors Ke established in Nuclear Design Codes or proposed in the literature is reviewed. The behaviour of plastic structures can be attributed to global, localised and multiaxiality effects. Global structural effects comprise uniform reduction and redistribution of section forces and moments due to plasticity, including redistribution of stress across a section. Localised effects are concentrated to a very small volume of the material not affecting section forces and moments (e.g. notch effects). Multiaxiality effects arise from different Poisson's ratio associated with elastic and plastic behaviour. Emphasis is laid on global structural effects rather than localised effects due to notches and fillets. Therefore structures exhibiting geometric stiffness discontinuities are considered to be "smooth" in the sense that the specific geometry of the transition between parts of different stiffnesses is disregarded.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BieniussaReckHuebel, author = {Bieniussa, Klaus W. and Reck, Hans and H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Ermittlung realistischer Ke,r-Faktoren f{\"u}r vereinfachte elasto-plastische Analyse}, series = {Sicherheit und Verf{\"u}gbarkeit in der Anlagentechnik mit dem Schwerpunkt Maßnahmen zur Absicherung des Langzeitbetriebes von Kernkraftwerken, 21. MPA-Seminar, Stuttgart, 1995, Band 2}, booktitle = {Sicherheit und Verf{\"u}gbarkeit in der Anlagentechnik mit dem Schwerpunkt Maßnahmen zur Absicherung des Langzeitbetriebes von Kernkraftwerken, 21. MPA-Seminar, Stuttgart, 1995, Band 2}, publisher = {MPA}, address = {Stuttgart}, pages = {S. 49}, abstract = {Es werden Ke,r-Faktoren als Dehnungserh{\"o}hungsfaktoren f{\"u}r vereinfachte elastisch-plastische Erm{\"u}dungsanalysen vorgeschlagen, die realistischer sind als in Regelwerken vorhandene Ke-Faktoren. Letztere dienen einer meistens konservativen Erfassung der auftretenden elasto-plastischen Dehnungen, sie sind aber weder physikalisch nachvollziehbar, noch werkstoffgerecht formuliert. Die bisher exemplarisch durchgef{\"u}hrten Verifikationsrechnungen belegen, dass die vorgeschlagenen realistischen Ke,r-Faktoren leicht bestimmbar sind und zudem ausreichend konservative Ergebnisse liefern. Somit liegt mit dieser neuen Methode ein beachtenswertes Potential vor, das jedoch noch durch weitere Verifikationsrechnungen abgesichert werden muss, bevor es in das KTA-Regelwerk eingebunden werden kann.}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{Huebel, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Numerical Examples to Compare Zarka's Method with Evolutive Analyses}, series = {ECCM-2001, 2nd European Conference on Computational Mechanics, Cracow, Poland, June 26 - 29, 200, proceedings}, booktitle = {ECCM-2001, 2nd European Conference on Computational Mechanics, Cracow, Poland, June 26 - 29, 200, proceedings}, publisher = {Vesalius}, address = {Cracow}, abstract = {Life assessment of a structure subject to cyclic loading rests on quantifying strain accumulated prior to shakedown and the strain range experienced after plastic shakedown has been achieved. Few methods exist to predict these quantities. Zarka's method is one of these methods. It is evaluated by analyzing several examples of structures and comparing the quality of the results obtained and the numerical effort required with evolutive analyses by using a commercial Finite Element program.}, language = {en} } @techreport{Huebel, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Anwendung der Vereinfachten Fließzonentheorie auf der Grundlage der Zarka-Methode mit einem Finite-Elemente-Programm}, pages = {38}, abstract = {Die Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie dient der Berechnung der elastisch-plastischen Beanspruchungen einer Struktur infolge monotoner oder zyklischer Belastung auf der Basis der Zarka-Methode. Sie wurde bereits in den Vorhaben SR 2221, SR 2226 und in fr{\"u}heren Unterauftr{\"a}gen zum Vorhaben SR 2298 vorgestellt und ihre Leistungsf{\"a}higkeit durch umfangreiche Beispielrechnungen relativ einfacher Strukturen mittels Handrechnung belegt. F{\"u}r realistische und somit kompliziertere Konfigurationen von Bauteilgeometrie und Belastung ist dagegen eine Implementierung der Vereinfachten Fließzonentheorie in ein Finite-Elemente-Programm erforderlich. Dies setzt eine Anpassung der Theorie an diskrete anstelle kontinuierlicher Systeme voraus. Das anzuwendende Finite-Elemente-Programm muß bestimmte Anforderungen erf{\"u}llen, um eine Implementierung zu gestatten. Anhand beispielhafter Anwendungen wird gezeigt, dass die Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie auch auf Finite-Elemente-Modelle anwendbar ist.}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{Huebel, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie mit ANSYS}, series = {1. Lausitzer FEM-Symposium, Cottbus, 12. November 1999}, booktitle = {1. Lausitzer FEM-Symposium, Cottbus, 12. November 1999}, pages = {10}, abstract = {Es wird die Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie als Weiterentwicklung der Zarka-Methode vorgestellt sowie ihre Implementierung in das FE-Programm ANSYS. Anwendungsbeispiele belegen die gute Ergebnisqualit{\"a}t bei gleichzeitig geringem Berechnungsaufwand f{\"u}r die Ermittlung der plastischen Dehnschwingbreite und der akkumulierten plastischen Verzerrungen bei zyklischer Belastung.}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{Huebel, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie f{\"u}r Erm{\"u}dungs- und Ratcheting-Nachweise}, series = {25. MPA-Seminar, Stuttgart, 7. und 8. Oktober 1999}, booktitle = {25. MPA-Seminar, Stuttgart, 7. und 8. Oktober 1999}, pages = {20}, abstract = {Die Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie gestattet bei zyklischer Belastung die n{\"a}herungsweise Ermittlung der elastisch-plastischen Dehnungsschwingbreite und der durch einen Ratcheting-Mechanismus akkumulierten Verzerrungen sowie aller daraus ableitbaren Gr{\"o}ßen wie etwa Verformungen im elastischen und plastischen Einspielzustand. Sie beruht auf der Zarka-Methode. Im Gegensatz zu den in den technischen Regelwerken der Anlagentechnik zugelassenen vereinfachten Berechnungsmethoden (wie etwa die Anwendung des Faktors Ke) kann sie neben der Werkstoffverfestigung auch den Einfluß der individuellen Konfiguration von Bauteilgeometrie und Belastungsart auf das plastische Verhalten der Struktur erfassen. Sie ist gleichermaßen geeignet, globale Struktureffekte, lokale Kerbeffekte und Einfl{\"u}sse aus der unterschiedlichen Querdehnungszahl im Elastischen und im Plastischen zu ber{\"u}cksichtigen. Als Berechnungsaufwand fallen lediglich einige modifizierte linear elastische Analysen sowie „lokale" Berechnungen an. Eine Reihe von Beispielen zeigt, daß sowohl die Dehnungsschwingbreite als auch die akkumulierten Verzerrungen mit geringem Berechnungsaufwand in guter N{\"a}herung abgesch{\"a}tzt werden k{\"o}nnen.}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{Huebel, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie mit ANSYS}, series = {17. CAD-FEM Users' Meeting, 8. Oktober 1999 in Sonthofen (Allg{\"a}u)}, booktitle = {17. CAD-FEM Users' Meeting, 8. Oktober 1999 in Sonthofen (Allg{\"a}u)}, pages = {10}, abstract = {Die Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie beruht auf der Zarka-Methode und gestattet die n{\"a}herungsweise Ermittlung der elastisch-plastischen Verzerrungen, Spannungen und Verformungen bei monotoner oder zyklischer Belastung. Bei zyklischer Belastung wird sofort der Einspielzustand berechnet, ohne das Belastungshistogramm Zyklus f{\"u}r Zyklus inkrementell durchrechnen zu m{\"u}ssen. Als Berechnungsaufwand fallen lediglich einige modifizierte linear elastische Analysen sowie „lokale" Berechnungen an, so daß gegen{\"u}ber den herk{\"o}mmlichen inkrementellen Berechnungen nach der exakten Fließzonentheorie ein erheblicher Gewinn an Rechenzeit m{\"o}glich ist. Bei einigen Beispielrechnungen wurde nur etwa 1/10.000 der Rechenzeit ben{\"o}tigt, um sowohl die Dehnungsschwingbreite (zur Ermittlung der Erm{\"u}dungsausnutzung) als auch die akkumulierten Verzerrungen (f{\"u}r einen Ratcheting-Nachweis) in guter N{\"a}herung absch{\"a}tzen zu k{\"o}nnen. Die Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie wurde mittels einer user-subroutine und einigen Makros in ANSYS implementiert. Es werden die Grundlagen der Vereinfachten Fließzonentheorie dargestellt, ihre Implementierung in ANSYS und einige Beispielrechnungen.}, language = {de} } @techreport{StangeHuebel, author = {Stange, Maren and H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Verifikation der Vereinfachten Fließzonentheorie - bei Anwendung der Finite Elemente Methode (subroutine f{\"u}r ANSYS)}, publisher = {FH Lausitz}, address = {Cottbus}, pages = {5, 34, 42}, language = {de} } @techreport{Huebel, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Vereinfachte Fließzonentheorie zur Berechnung von Erm{\"u}dung und Ratcheting}, abstract = {Es wird der Stand der Entwicklung der Vereinfachten Fließzonentheorie dargestellt, und wie die VFZT konform mit dem KTA-Regelwerk angewendet bzw. weiter ausgebaut werden k{\"o}nnte. Dies betrifft die Ermittlung des Faktors Ke f{\"u}r vereinfachte Erm{\"u}dungsanalysen sowie die Ratcheting-Nachweisf{\"u}hrung, um erstmals bestehende L{\"u}cken im Regelwerk schließen zu k{\"o}nnen, weil die VFZT unabh{\"a}ngig ist von der speziellen Bauteilgeometrie und der Belastungsart.}, language = {de} } @misc{Huebel, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Erh{\"o}hungsfaktor Ke zur Ermittlung plastischer Dehnungen aus elastischer Berechnung}, series = {Technische {\"U}berwachung}, volume = {35}, journal = {Technische {\"U}berwachung}, number = {6}, issn = {1434-9728}, pages = {268 -- 278}, abstract = {Im Zuge einer Erm{\"u}dungsanalyse plastisch beanspruchter Komponenten von Kernkraftwerken werden Dehnungserh{\"o}hungsfaktoren Ke zur Ermittlung der plastischen Dehnschwingbreite aus elastisch berechneten Beanspruchungen verwendet. Ausgehend von einer Kritik an der derzeit {\"u}blichen Vorgehensweise nach ASME Code wird eine Modifikation vorgeschlagen. Der Vorschlag basiert wie der Ke-Faktor des ASME Code (der auch von diversen KTA-Regeln {\"u}bernommen worden ist) auf dem Konzept eines einfachen Faktors. Er beseitigt die potentielle Unkonservativit{\"a}t des ASME Code bei Kerben (Rundungsradien) und reduziert gleichzeitig dessen {\"U}berkonservativit{\"a}t in vielen anderen Anwendungsbereichen, indem drei unterschiedliche Effekte ber{\"u}cksichtigt und individuelles Werkstoffverhalten erfasst werden k{\"o}nnen. Zudem beruht er im Gegensatz zu Ke-ASME auf m{\"o}glichst realit{\"a}tsnahen Werkstoffdaten, die eher den Charakter von Mittel- als von Mindestwerten besitzen. Ferner ist die Anwendung dieses Vorschlages insofern einfacher als die des ASME Code, als die Suche nach der ung{\"u}nstigsten Orientierung eines Schnittes durch die Wand, die i. allg. nicht einfach zu identifizieren ist, entf{\"a}llt. Eine Reihe detaillierter elastisch-plastischer Vergleichsrechnungen f{\"u}r hinsichtlich Bauteilgeometrie und Belastung typische Problemstellungen bei schnellen und Leichtwasserreaktoren best{\"a}tigen die Konservativit{\"a}t des Vorschlages. Es wird ein Potential zur weiteren Reduzierung der Konservativit{\"a}t bei Anwendung auf Bauteile von Leichtwasserreaktoren im Rahmen eventueller zuk{\"u}nftiger Entwicklungsarbeiten aufgezeigt.}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{HuebelVollrath, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig and Vollrath, Bastian}, title = {Das Ph{\"a}nomen Ratcheting - Auswirkung plastischen Materialverhaltens bei ortsver{\"a}nderlicher Belastung}, series = {Baustatik - Baupraxis 13, 20.-21. M{\"a}rz 2017, Bochum}, booktitle = {Baustatik - Baupraxis 13, 20.-21. M{\"a}rz 2017, Bochum}, editor = {Meschke, G{\"u}nther and Freitag, Steffen and Birk, Carolin and Menkenhagen, Jochen and Ricken, Tim}, publisher = {Ruhr-Universit{\"a}t Bochum}, address = {Bochum}, isbn = {978-3-00-055827-6}, pages = {189 -- 196}, abstract = {Bei Belastungs{\"a}nderungen kann eine progressive Deformation (Ratcheting) auftreten, sobald plastische Beanspruchungen im Tragwerk existieren. Dann akkumulieren sich Dehnungen und Verformungen im Falle zyklischer Belastung in jedem Belastungszyklus. Dieser Vorgang begrenzt die Lebensdauer eines Tragwerks, ist aber unabh{\"a}ngig von einer eventuell ebenfalls auftretenden Erm{\"u}dungssch{\"a}digung als eigenst{\"a}ndige m{\"o}gliche Schadensursache zu betrachten. Bekannt als Ausl{\"o}ser von Ratcheting und in manchen Regelwerken bereits ber{\"u}cksichtigt sind Konfigurationen, bei denen ein Tragwerk mindestens zwei unterschiedlichen Belastungsarten unterworfen ist, n{\"a}mlich einer konstanten Belastung (der Prim{\"a}rlast) und einer {\"u}berlagerten zyklischen Belastung. Selbst wenn letztere klein ist und f{\"u}r sich alleine keine plastischen Deformationen hervorruft, kann sie durch Zusammenwirkung mit der Prim{\"a}rlast dennoch eine progressive Deformation in Gang setzen. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird ein weiterer, Ratcheting erzeugender Mechanismus vorgestellt, der allein auf ortsver{\"a}nderliche Wirkung einer einzelnen Lastgr{\"o}ße zur{\"u}ck zu f{\"u}hren ist. Im einfachsten Fall l{\"a}sst sich dieser erkl{\"a}ren durch die sukzessive Aktivierung von (gegebenenfalls unendlich vielen existierenden) Fließgelenken. Die Inkremente der Dehnungen und Verformungen k{\"o}nnen von Zyklus zu Zyklus ab- oder zunehmen, wenn die Verfestigung des Werkstoffs ber{\"u}cksichtigt wird, elastische Bettung vorliegt, die Formulierung des Gleichgewichts am verformten System erfolgt (Theorie II. Ordnung) oder die wahre Verformungsgeometrie (Theorie III. Ordnung) ber{\"u}cksichtigt wird.}, language = {de} } @misc{HuebelVollrath, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig and Vollrath, Bastian}, title = {Ratcheting caused by moving loads}, series = {International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering}, volume = {9}, journal = {International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering}, number = {2}, issn = {2008-6695}, pages = {139 -- 152}, abstract = {Progressive deformation (ratcheting) can occur as a response to variable loads as soon as the elastic limit is exceeded. If this is the case, strains and displacements accumulate in the event of cyclic loading in each load cycle. Widely known as triggers for ratcheting and already being considered in some design codes are configurations, in which a structure is subjected to at least two different types of load, namely a constant load (the primary load) and a superimposed cyclic load. In this paper, another mechanism that generates ratcheting is introduced. It can be attributed solely to the effect of a single load. In the simplest case, this can be explained by the successive activation of (an infinite number of) plastic hinges if a load of constant magnitude is moved in space. The increments of strains and displacements can decrease or increase from cycle to cycle, when the material is hardening, or if elastic foundation is present, or if the equilibrium condition is formulated for the deformed system (second-order theory) or if "large" rotations are taken into account (third-order theory).}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{VollrathHuebel, author = {Vollrath, Bastian and H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Determination of post-shakedown quantities of a pipe bend via the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones compared with load history dependent incremental analysis}, series = {22nd International Conference on Computer Methods in Mechanics, CMM2017}, booktitle = {22nd International Conference on Computer Methods in Mechanics, CMM2017}, editor = {Burczynski, Tadeusz}, address = {Lublin}, isbn = {978-83-7947-264-2}, pages = {MS11-1 -- MS11-2}, abstract = {The Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones (STPZ) may be used to determine post-shakedown quantities such as strain ranges and accumulated strains. The principles of the method are summarized succinctly and the practical applicability is shown by the example of a pipe bend subjected to internal pressure and cyclic in-plane bending.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{VollrathHuebel, author = {Vollrath, Bastian and H{\"u}bel, Hartwig}, title = {Determination of post-shakedown quantities of a pipe bend via the simplified theory of plastic zones compared with load history dependent incremental analysis}, series = {Computer methods in mechanics (CMM2017), proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computer Methods in Mechanics, Lublin, Poland, 13-16 September 2017}, booktitle = {Computer methods in mechanics (CMM2017), proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computer Methods in Mechanics, Lublin, Poland, 13-16 September 2017}, editor = {Podg{\´o}rski, Jerzy and Borowa, Ewa-Błazik and Be̜c, Jarosław}, publisher = {AIP Publishing}, address = {Melville, New York}, isbn = {978-0-7354-1614-7}, doi = {10.1063/1.5019119}, abstract = {The Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones (STPZ) may be used to determine post-shakedown quantities such as strain ranges and accumulated strains at plastic or elastic shakedown. The principles of the method are summarized. Its practical applicability is shown by the example of a pipe bend subjected to constant internal pressure along with cyclic inplane bending or/and cyclic radial temperature gradient. The results are compared with incremental analyses performed step-by-step throughout the entire load history until the state of plastic shakedown is achieved.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{HuebelVollrath, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig and Vollrath, Bastian}, title = {Simplified Analysis of Strains Accumulated in the State of Elastic Shakedown Considering Multi-Parameter Loadings}, series = {ASME 2018 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Volume 3B: Design and Analysis, Prague, Czech Republic, July 15-20, 2018}, booktitle = {ASME 2018 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Volume 3B: Design and Analysis, Prague, Czech Republic, July 15-20, 2018}, publisher = {ASME}, address = {New York, NY}, isbn = {978-0-7918-5163-0}, doi = {10.1115/PVP2018-84070}, pages = {10}, abstract = {In case of cyclic loading, strain may accumulate due to a ratcheting mechanism until the state of shakedown is possibly achieved. Design Codes frequently require strain limits to be satisfied at the end of the specified lifetime of the structure. However, this requirement is sometimes tied to misleading prerequisites, and little guidance is provided on how the strains accumulated in the state of shakedown can be calculated. Incremental elastic-plastic analyses which require to go step-by-step through many cycles of a given load histogram are rather costly in terms of engineering time and numerical effort. As an alternative, the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones (STPZ) is used in the present paper. Being a direct method, effects from load history are disregarded. The theory is described shortly and exemplarily applied to a simplification of a pipe bend and a straight pipe, both subjected to combinations of several loads which vary independently from each other so that a multidimensional load domain is represented. It is shown that the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones is well suited to provide reasonable estimates of strains accumulated in the state of elastic shakedown at the cost of few linear elastic analyses.}, language = {en} } @misc{HuebelVollrath, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig and Vollrath, Bastian}, title = {Simplified determination of accumulated strains to satisfy design code requirements}, series = {International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping}, volume = {171}, journal = {International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping}, issn = {0308-0161}, doi = {10.1016/j.ijpvp.2019.01.014}, pages = {92 -- 103}, abstract = {In case of cyclic loading, strain may accumulate due to a ratcheting mechanism until the state of shakedown is possibly achieved. Design Codes frequently require strain limits to be satisfied at the end of the specified lifetime of the structure. In addition, the strain range is required for performing fatigue analyses in case of plastic shakedown. However, little guidance is usually provided by Design Codes on how the accumulated strains and strain ranges are to be calculated, and some of the guidelines implemented in Design Codes are not well founded and may therefore be misleading. This is, for example, true for the ASME B\&PV Code, Section III. Of course, strains and strain ranges can be determined by means of incremental elastic-plastic analyses, which require to go step-by-step through many cycles of a given load histogram until the state of shakedown is reached. This is rather costly in terms of engineering time and numerical effort. As an alternative, simplified methods can be adopted, e.g. the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones (STPZ) as used in the present paper. Being a direct method, effects from load history are disregarded. The theory is described shortly and illustrated by some examples. It is shown that the Simplified Theory of Plastic Zones is well suited to provide reasonable estimates of strains accumulated in the state of elastic and plastic shakedown at the cost of few linear elastic analyses.}, language = {en} } @misc{HuebelVollrath, author = {H{\"u}bel, Hartwig and Vollrath, Bastian}, title = {Limited Versus Unlimited Strain Accumulation Due to Ratcheting Mechanisms}, series = {Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology}, volume = {141}, journal = {Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1115/1.4042853}, pages = {031206-1 -- 031206-10}, abstract = {After distinguishing material ratcheting and structural ratcheting, different phenomena related to structural ratcheting are gathered. Ratcheting of elastic-plastic structures observed with stationary position of loads is distinguished from ratcheting with moving loads. Both categories are illustrated by examples. The effect of evolution laws for the internal variables describing kinematic hardening on the accumulation of strain due to a ratcheting mechanism, and whether the ratcheting mechanism ceases with the number of cycles so that the accumulated strains are limited, is discussed. Some conditions are shown, under which the Chaboche model can lead to shakedown. Scenarios where shakedown is guaranteed at every load level, or where it may or may not occur at a specific load level, or where it definitely cannot occur at any load level, are distinguished. Correspondingly, the usefulness of shakedown analyses, which are searching for maximum load factors assuring shakedown, or direct (or simplified) methods to obtain postshakedown quantities by avoiding incremental cyclic analyses is discussed.}, language = {en} }