@misc{FischerSchubarthBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Schubarth, Wilfried and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Wie k{\"o}nnen Lehrkr{\"a}fte zur Reduzierung von Mobbing beitragen? Interventionsmaßnahmen und Interventionskompetenzen von Lehrkr{\"a}ften}, series = {Schulverwaltung aktuell. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Schulentwicklung und Schulmanagement}, volume = {9}, journal = {Schulverwaltung aktuell. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Schulentwicklung und Schulmanagement}, number = {2}, issn = {2195-335X}, pages = {39 -- 41}, abstract = {Obwohl seit vielen Jahr bekannt ist, dass Lehrkr{\"a}fte f{\"u}r die Reduzierung von Mobbing wichtig sind, bestehen insbesondere in der deutschsprachigen Mobbingforschung viele L{\"u}cken zu der Frage, wie Lehrkr{\"a}fte bei Mobbing eingreifen und was sie brauchen, um erfolgreich intervenieren zu k{\"o}nnen. Der folgende Beitrag gibt einen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber den aktuellen Stand der Forschung.}, language = {de} } @misc{FischerWoodsBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Woods, Heather A. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Class teachers' bullying-related self-efficacy and their students' bullying victimization, bullying perpetration, and combined victimization and perpetration}, series = {Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment \& Trauma}, journal = {Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment \& Trauma}, issn = {1092-6771}, doi = {10.1080/10926771.2021.1933290}, pages = {20}, abstract = {Teachers' responses to incidents of bullying among students can be important for bullying dynamics. Theoretical models of teachers' intervention competence and the theory of planned behavior suggest that teachers' bullying intervention self-efficacy may be associated with teachers' responses to bullying and students' bullying behavior and bullying victimization experiences. Several studies report an association between teachers' self-efficacy and their intervention behavior in incidents of bullying. However, the possible association with student bullying perpetration has rarely been examined so far. The current study explores the association between class teachers' self-efficacy and students' bullying victimization, perpetration, and combined bully-victim behavior in a sample of 2,071 students and their 93 class teachers in Germany. The results suggest an association between class teachers' self-efficacy and students' perpetration behavior. The higher teachers' bullying intervention self-efficacy, the fewer students seem to bully other students. In contrast, teachers' self-efficacy was not associated with students' victimization experiences and students' bully-victim behavior. Possible underlying mechanisms, as well as limitations of the present results, are discussed. Further research is needed to substantiate the findings.}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Mobbing und Cybermobbing bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland - Querschnittergebnisse der HBSC-Studie 2017/2018 und Trends}, series = {DGMP/DGMS Kongress 2021 - Psychosoziale Medizin in Zeiten des Umbruchs}, journal = {DGMP/DGMS Kongress 2021 - Psychosoziale Medizin in Zeiten des Umbruchs}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf}, address = {Hamburg}, abstract = {Mobbing ist eine spezifische Form der Gewalt, die mit vielf{\"a}ltigen und langfristigen negativen gesundheitlichen Auswirkungen einhergehen kann. Obwohl eine starke mediale Fokussierung insbesondere auf Cybermobbing zu beobachten ist, liegen nur wenige repr{\"a}sentative Befunde zur H{\"a}ufigkeit von (Cyber-)Mobbing in Deutschland vor. In diesem Beitrag wird untersucht, wie verbreitet Mobbing und Cybermobbing an Schulen in Deutschland ist, welche Unterschiede zwischen M{\"a}dchen und Jungen, verschiedenen Altersgruppen und Schulformen vorliegen und wie sich die Verbreitung von Mobbing von 2002 bis 2018 entwickelt hat. Dazu werden Daten der deutschen Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)-Studie 2017/2018 (N = 4.347 Lernende, 53,0 \% weiblich) sowie der vorangegangenen Erhebungswellen analysiert. Jungen {\"u}bten 2018 insgesamt mehr Mobbing aus als M{\"a}dchen, wurden aber genauso h{\"a}ufig wie M{\"a}dchen gemobbt. 15-J{\"a}hrige mobbten andere h{\"a}ufiger als 11- und 13-J{\"a}hrige, wurden aber seltener selbst gemobbt. Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}ler an Gymnasien waren am seltensten in Mobbing involviert. Nur wenige Kinder und Jugendliche berichteten von Cybermobbing. Im Vergleich zu allen vorherigen Erhebungsjahren berichteten 2018 die wenigsten Heranwachsenden davon, andere zu mobben. Die H{\"a}ufigkeit der Erfahrung, gemobbt zu werden, hat sich dagegen kaum ver{\"a}ndert. Die Befunde verdeutlichen die Notwendigkeit pr{\"a}ventiver Anti-Mobbing-Bem{\"u}hungen und von Interventionsmaßnahmen an allen allgemeinbildenden Schulformen.}, language = {de} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Interventionskompetenzen von Lehrkr{\"a}ften bei Mobbing: Der Stellenwert der motivationalen Orientierung}, series = {Tagung der Fachgruppe P{\"a}dagogische Psychologie}, journal = {Tagung der Fachgruppe P{\"a}dagogische Psychologie}, publisher = {P{\"a}dagogische Hochschule Heidelberg}, address = {Heidelberg}, language = {de} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Teachers' motivational orientations: Associations between teachers' self-efficacy, self-regulation, empathy, and interventions in bullying}, series = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2021}, journal = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2021}, address = {Stockholm}, abstract = {Introduction Teachers must have sufficient intervention competence to intervene successfully in bullying situations. In addition to knowledge and beliefs, motivational orientations are considered important components in teacher competence models (Kunter et al., 2013). Motivation can include all aspects that influence if, with which intensity, and how people act. In the context of bullying intervention, this includes self-efficacy, empathy, and self-regulation. However, while self-efficacy is one of the most investigated motivational aspects of teachers (Fischer et al., 2020; Kunter, 2013, Lauermann et al., 2020), the other aspects - self-regulation and empathy - have only been seldomly investigated in the context of student bullying (Berkovich, 2020; Fischer \& Bilz, 2019). Method Based on findings from published single studies as well as unpublished analyses, the associations between teachers' motivational orientations (self-efficacy, self-regulation, empathy) and their likelihood of intervention (reported by teachers and students) as well as their students' bullying experiences (as bullies, victims, and bully-victims) will be presented. All analyses are based on a study that was conducted in Germany with more than 2,000 students and 556 teachers at 24 schools. Teachers' likelihood of intervention was assessed in bullying situations that have been reported retrospectively by students and teachers. Logistic regression analyses (multilevel analyses when appropriate) have been conducted. Results Findings show that teachers' self-efficacy was associated with teachers' likelihood of intervention from the teachers' perspectives. Also, students whose teachers reported higher self-efficacy and a higher tendency to reflect their behaviours thoroughly and choose wisely (a component of self-regulation) reported fewer bullying experiences. The students' perspective on the teachers' likelihood of intervention was associated with experiences as bullies, bullied, and bully-victims, but could not be explained by teachers' motivational orientations. Conclusion Possible underlying pathways and areas requiring further research as well as practical and theoretical implications will be discussed.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Fischer, author = {Fischer, Saskia M.}, title = {Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, Selbstregulation und Empathie als Facetten der Interventionskompetenz von Lehrkr{\"a}ften bei Mobbing: Zusammenh{\"a}nge zum Interventionshandeln von Lehrkr{\"a}ften und den Mobbingerfahrungen der Lernenden}, publisher = {BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg}, address = {Cottbus}, doi = {10.26127/BTUOpen-5694}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:co1-opus4-56946}, pages = {308}, abstract = {Lehrkr{\"a}ften und ihrem Interventionshandeln kann bei der Entstehung von Mobbing eine besondere Rolle zukommen, wobei eine ausreichend ausgepr{\"a}gte Interventionskompetenz bedeutsam ist. Aus welchen Komponenten diese Interventionskompetenz aber konkret besteht, ist nicht eindeutig gekl{\"a}rt. Aus der Literatur ist ein Modell bekannt, welches vorschl{\"a}gt, dass sich Interventionskompetenz aus den Bereichen Wissen, {\"U}berzeugung, Motivation und Selbstregulation zusammensetzt. Zur Motivation k{\"o}nnen dabei alle Aspekte gez{\"a}hlt werden, die Intensit{\"a}t und Art eines Verhaltens beschreiben. Dazu geh{\"o}ren die Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung und die Empathie der Lehrkr{\"a}fte. Auch die Selbstregulation kann unter der international anschlussf{\"a}higen Perspektive von Prozessen der Zielauswahl und -verfolgung der Motivation zugeordnet werden. Damit kommt der motivationalen Orientierung eine besondere Bedeutung als nicht-kognitiver Teil der Interventionskompetenz zu. Ausgehend von diesen Annahmen wurde in der vorliegenden Arbeit der Kompetenzbereich der Motivation als Teil der Interventionskompetenz von Lehrkr{\"a}ften bei Mobbing n{\"a}her untersucht. Dazu wurde ein spezifisches Kompetenzstrukturmodell entwickelt. Mit den Befunden von f{\"u}nf Publikationen sowie erg{\"a}nzenden Analysen wurde dieses theoretisch abgeleitete Modell empirisch {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft. Es wurde untersucht, welche Zusammenh{\"a}nge zwischen mobbingbezogener Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, Selbstregulation (operationalisiert durch die zwei Dimensionen Locomotion und Assessment) und Empathie und dem Interventionshandeln von Lehrkr{\"a}ften sowie den Mobbingerfahrungen der Sch{\"u}ler:innen bestehen. Zun{\"a}chst erfolgte eine systematische Untersuchung des vergleichsweise umfangreichen Forschungsstandes zur Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung von Lehrkr{\"a}ften im Mobbingkontext. Anschließend wurden Daten von 556 Lehrkr{\"a}ften und 2.071 Sch{\"u}ler:innen aus einer 2014 durchgef{\"u}hrten Querschnittstudie in Sachsen analysiert. Das Interventionshandeln der Lehrkr{\"a}fte wurde dabei auf retrospektiv berichtete Mobbingsituationen bezogen, welche von den Lehrkr{\"a}ften und den Sch{\"u}ler:innen geschildert wurden. Logistische, zum Teil mehrebenenanalytische Regressionsanalysen wurden durchgef{\"u}hrt. Die Befunde zeigten, dass nur die Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung der Lehrkr{\"a}fte mit einer h{\"o}heren Interventionswahrscheinlichkeit aus Selbstsicht der Lehrkr{\"a}fte in Verbindung stand. Sch{\"u}ler:innen, deren Klassenlehrkr{\"a}fte eine h{\"o}here Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung und eine h{\"o}here Neigung zu {\"u}berlegtem, selbstevaluierendem Verhalten (Assessment-Orientierung des Selbstregulation) zeigten, berichteten geringere Mobbingerfahrungen. Sch{\"u}ler:innen, deren Lehrkr{\"a}fte schnell und weniger {\"u}berlegt handelten (Locomotion-Orientierung der Selbstregulation), berichteten dagegen von st{\"a}rkerem Mobbingaufkommen. Als besonders bedeutsam f{\"u}r die Mobbingerfahrungen der Sch{\"u}ler:innen zeigte sich zudem die Sicht der Sch{\"u}ler:innen auf die Interventionswahrscheinlichkeit der Lehrkr{\"a}fte.}, language = {de} } @misc{FischerAalstPaljakka, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Aalst, Danelien van and Paljakka, Antonia}, title = {Research on teachers' role in tackling bullying: How can be facilitate connections and cooperation among researchers and practitioners in this field?}, series = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2021}, journal = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2021}, address = {Stockholm}, pages = {485}, abstract = {Bullying research has been conducted worldwide for decades, with ever-increasing frequency and intensity. Nevertheless, some areas of bullying research have not been very well studied so far. One of these areas is the role of teachers in preventing and reducing bullying, including, for example, their intervention strategies and effectiveness in tackling bullying, and supportive or hindering teacher competencies. Recently, studies in this area seem to be increasing. A special issue in the European Journal of Developmental Psychology and a Current Research Topic in Frontiers of Psychology show growing research interest in the role of teachers in student bullying. It seems that we are at the beginning of increasing research interest, which provides us with the opportunity to identify research priorities and to advance appropriate networking. This could facilitate cooperation and connection between researchers and studies, which would be beneficial for the growth of knowledge and enable more rapid findings relevant to practice. We, the founders of the newly established and currently growing European Young Researchers Network on Teachers' Role in School Bullying, would like to talk about connecting researchers and research. Purpose The workshop is aimed at researchers who study teachers in the bullying context as well as practitioners who identified research needs. Central questions of the workshop will be: Which research questions need to be addressed to understand the role of teachers in bullying better? What helps us or what hinders us to exchange and cooperate? How can we create networks that are beneficial and accessible for everyone who wants to participate? Which research projects would be suitable for comparative research or replication in another country? The workshop aims to develop creative ideas that can be implemented in the newly established network or other cooperation opportunities to advance research on the role of the teacher.}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerAalstPaljakka, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Aalst, Danelien van and Paljakka, Antonia}, title = {Introducing the European Young Researchers Network on Teachers' Role in School Bullying}, series = {Bullying Research Symposium Vienna 2020}, journal = {Bullying Research Symposium Vienna 2020}, address = {Wien}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerBilzWachs, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig and Wachs, Sebastian}, title = {Teachers' empathy and the likelihood that they will intervene in bullying: Differences between students' and teachers' perspectives}, series = {Bullying Research Symposium 2020}, journal = {Bullying Research Symposium 2020}, abstract = {Teachers play a crucial role in bullying interventions. Recent research has suggested that empathy is particularly important for this. But two important limitations arise. Firstly, all of these findings are based on artificial bullying scenarios presented in vignettes. Secondly, the likelihood that teachers will intervene is assessed solely from the teacher's perspective. Based on data from 2,071 German students and their 93 teachers, the connection between teachers' self-reported empathy and the likelihood that they will intervene in bullying was assessed using a bullying vignette as well as a retrospectively reported bullying situation that had been experienced by the teachers or the students in question. The associations were analysed in multilevel regression models from the teachers' and the students' perspective. Results showed that teachers who are more empathic are more likely to report that they would intervene in a hypothetical relational bullying situation. However, this finding could not be replicated when using real, remembered bullying situations. In addition, when based on students' perspectives, no significant associations between teachers' empathy and their actual or intended intervention behaviour were found. In this presentation we will discuss implications for the validity of existing research and for future research.}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerJohnBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and John, Nancy and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Teachers' bullying-related self-efficacy: A systematic review on connections to bullying interventions}, series = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2019}, journal = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2019}, address = {Dublin}, pages = {1}, abstract = {Recent research indicates that teacher self-efficacy as a belief to have enough capabilities to accomplish a given task successfully (Bandura, 1994) is an important competence for successful bullying prevention and intervention (e.g., Boulton, 2014; Bradshaw, Sawyer \& O'Brennan, 2007; Yoon \& Bauman, 2014). But studies vary concerning the definition and specificity of self-efficacy and concerning the samples used. Therefore, the findings differ greatly. Empirical studies on teacher self-efficacy in the context of student bullying were searched in relevant databases. 36 relevant publications were identified in a multi-staged process. Quality criteria were adapted from the Cochrane Collaboration. Most publications report consistently that teachers feel not very confident in dealing with bullying in general and feel least confident when dealing with cyberbullying. Results on differences according to gender, work experience and school type are very heterogeneous. Consistent findings are reported concerning the likelihood of intervention: Teachers who are more confident are more likely to intervene in bullying. But no consistent findings arise for the choice of specific intervention strategies. The heterogeneity of the findings can be explained by different types of self-efficacy, by differences in the measures, and by different educational contexts. In the presentation, this information will be combined to understand differences better and to integrate the existing results. Results indicate that the more specific self-efficacy is assessed, the more connections between self-efficacy and bullying interventions can be found.}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Bullying among students in the context of staff conflicts and class climate: Are there spillover effects?}, series = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2017}, journal = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2017}, address = {Stockholm}, abstract = {Bullying is a prevalent aggressive behavior with severe negative social and health consequences. It emerges from complex social interactions (Saarento, Garandeau, \& Salmivalli, 2015). To understand the causes of bullying, different levels of the school environment and their interactions need to be considered. Bronfenbrenner's ecological theory is an appropriate model for this (see figure 1). From analyses of children's behaviors in the family context, spillover effects are known (e.g., Lux \& Hudecek, 2015). Similar patterns may occur in schools: Conflicts at the staff level may serve as negative role models, may reduce teachers' alliance and cooperation, and limit long-term interventions. These long-term interventions are especially important in reducing bullying (Bilz, Schubarth, Dudziak, Fischer, Niproschke, \& Ulbricht, in press). Following the assumption of reciprocity, the occurrence of bullying may, at the same time, work as a stressor and increase staff conflicts. Connections between bullying occurrence and class climate are already known in the literature (Saarento et al., 2015), but have not yet been analyzed with staff conflicts simultaneously. Cross-sectional data of 556 teachers and 2,071 students will be analyzed as individual data and as aggregated data using multilevel structure equation modeling. Analyses are not finished yet, but will be presented and discussed at the conference presentation.}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Professionswissen und Lehrerhandeln in realen Mobbingsituationen}, series = {Tagung der AEPF in Rostock (18.-21.09.2016)}, journal = {Tagung der AEPF in Rostock (18.-21.09.2016)}, address = {Rostock}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.2.33063.14240}, language = {de} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Handeln oder Abw{\"a}gen? Die Bedeutung der Selbstregulation f{\"u}r das Interventionshandeln von Lehrkr{\"a}ften bei Gewalt und Mobbing}, series = {25. DGfE-Kongress}, journal = {25. DGfE-Kongress}, publisher = {TransferZentrum f{\"u}r Neurowissenschaften und Lernen}, address = {Kassel}, pages = {41}, language = {de} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Selbstregulative Kompetenzen von Lehrkr{\"a}ften beim Umgang mit Mobbing}, series = {80. AEPF-Tagung}, journal = {80. AEPF-Tagung}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, pages = {104}, language = {de} } @misc{KansokDuscheBilzFischeretal., author = {Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Bilz, Ludwig and Fischer, Saskia M. and Wachs, Sebastian}, title = {Lehrpersoneninterventionen bei Hatespeech: Dimensionalit{\"a}t, Messinvarianz und Kriteriumsvalidit{\"a}t einer neuen Skala}, series = {Bildung im digitalen Wandel. 9. GEBF Tagung Bamberg}, journal = {Bildung im digitalen Wandel. 9. GEBF Tagung Bamberg}, publisher = {Otto-Friedrich-Universit{\"a}t Bamberg}, address = {Bamberg}, pages = {78}, language = {de} } @misc{DadaczynskiRathmannSchrickeretal., author = {Dadaczynski, Kevin and Rathmann, Katharina and Schricker, Julia and Bilz, Ludwig and Sudeck, Gorden and Fischer, Saskia M. and Janiczek, Oliver and Quilling, Eike}, title = {Digitale Gesundheitskompetenz von Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern. Auspr{\"a}gung und Assoziationen mit dem Bewegungs- und Ern{\"a}hrungsverhalten}, series = {Bundesgesundheitsblatt}, journal = {Bundesgesundheitsblatt}, issn = {1436-9990}, doi = {10.1007/s00103-022-03548-5}, pages = {11}, abstract = {Hintergrund. W{\"a}hrend vermehrt Studienbefunde zur allgemeinen Gesundheitskompetenz (GK) vorliegen, mangelt es an Erkenntnissen zur digitalen GK im Jugendalter und deren Assoziationen mit Indikatoren des Gesundheitsverhaltens. Methodik. Empirische Basis bildet eine von Oktober 2019 bis Februar 2020 im Bundesland Hessen durchgef{\"u}hrte Querschnittstudie mit 490 Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern der Klassenstufe 8 und 9. Die digitale GK wurde mithilfe von 5 Subskalen des Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI) erfasst, w{\"a}hrend der Verzehr von Obst, Gem{\"u}se und Softdrinks sowie die k{\"o}rperliche Aktivit{\"a}t als Indikatoren des Gesundheitsverhaltens herangezogen wurden. Als soziales Merkmal wurde neben dem Geschlecht und der Klassenstufe der subjektive Sozialstatus (SSS) ber{\"u}cksichtigt. Die Datenauswertung erfolgte uni-, bi- und multivariat, wobei bin{\"a}rlogistische Regressionen f{\"u}r das Geschlecht und den SSS adjustiert wurden. Ergebnisse. {\"U}ber alle Items hinweg berichten 15,3-37,5 \% der befragten Jugendlichen Schwierigkeiten bei der Beschaffung von und im Umgang mit digitalen Informationen. Differenziert nach sozialen Merkmalen finden sich f{\"u}r 2 Dimensionen der digitalen GK Unterschiede zuungunsten der M{\"a}dchen sowie durchgehend ein sozialer Gradient zuungunsten von Befragten mit niedrigem SSS. Jugendliche mit mittlerer und geringer digitaler GK weisen ein h{\"o}heres Maß an geringer k{\"o}rperlicher Aktivit{\"a}t, nichtt{\"a}glichem Obstverzehr und t{\"a}glichem Konsum von zuckerhaltigen Getr{\"a}nken auf. Diskussion. Die Befunde weisen auf einen Interventionsbedarf zur F{\"o}rderung der digitalen GK insbesondere bei Jugendlichen mit geringem SSS hin. Die differenziellen Zusammenhangsmuster mit dem Gesundheitsverhalten bieten Ansatzpunkte f{\"u}r die Entwicklung spezifischer Interventionen. Als Lehr- und Lernort stellt die Schule u. a. aufgrund der Passung mit verpflichtenden Strategien der schulischen Medienkompetenzbildung ein geeignetes Setting dar.}, language = {de} } @misc{BilzFischerHoppeHerfurthetal., author = {Bilz, Ludwig and Fischer, Saskia M. and Hoppe-Herfurth, Anne-Cathrin and John, Nancy}, title = {A Consequential Partnership. The Association Between Teachers' Well-Being and Students' Well-Being and the Role of Teacher Support as a Mediator}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychologie}, volume = {230}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Psychologie}, number = {3}, issn = {2151-2604}, doi = {10.1027/2151-2604/a000497}, pages = {264 -- 275}, abstract = {Many studies have focused on the effects of teachers' well-being on the development of students, in particular their academic achievement. To date, little is known about the association between teachers' well-being and students' well-being. In the present study, we analyzed this relationship and examined the mediating role of teacher support using linked data from 2,686 students and 805 teachers from 48 schools in Germany. Multilevel regression analyses showed a relationship between teachers' emotional exhaustion and students' subjective health complaints and between teachers' psychological well-being and students' satisfaction with school. The latter association was mediated by teacher support as perceived by students. This study extends current knowledge about the relevance of teachers' well-being to their students' socio-emotional development and the mechanisms that underlie this association. Implications for promoting of mental health in schools and for future research are discussed.}, language = {en} } @misc{BilzFischerHoppeHerfurthetal., author = {Bilz, Ludwig and Fischer, Saskia M. and Hoppe-Herfurth, Anne-Cathrin and John, Nancy}, title = {A consequential partnership. The association between teachers' well-being and students' well-being and the role of teacher support as a mediator}, series = {26th Biennal Meeting of the ISSBD}, journal = {26th Biennal Meeting of the ISSBD}, publisher = {International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development}, address = {Rhodos, Greece}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.2.35890.48324}, pages = {1}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerDadaczynskiSudecketal., author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Dadaczynski, Kevin and Sudeck, Gorden and Rathmann, Katharina and Paakkari, Olli and Paakkari, Leena and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Measuring Health Literacy in Childhood and Adolescence with the Scale Health Literacy in School-Aged Children - German Version}, series = {Diagnostica}, volume = {68}, journal = {Diagnostica}, number = {4}, issn = {0012-1924}, doi = {10.1026/0012-1924/a000296}, pages = {184 -- 196}, abstract = {Health literacy can help explain health inequalities in childhood and adolescence. However, suitable instruments for assessing health literacy in this age group are rare, especially in the German-speaking countries. One economical measure is the 10-item Health Literacy in School-Aged Children (HLSAC) scale, developed and reviewed as part of the WHO Child and Adolescent Health Study (HBSC, Health Behavior in School-Aged Children). In the present study, we tested dimensionality, measurement invariance, and associations with health-related measures of the German version of the scale (HLSAC-German), using data from the 2018 national German HBSC study (N = 4,347 students aged 11, 13, and 15 years). We also tested HLSAC-German with 11-year-olds, representing an expansion of the original scale. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses consistently demonstrated the unidimensionality of the scale (α = .88). Complete scalar measurement invariance was found for sex and partial scalar measurement invariance for age groups and school type, allowing for the comparison of means. Associations with indicators of health and health behavior further demonstrate the construct validity of the scale. The analyses show that the scale is suitable for the economic measurement of a general factor of health literacy in 11- as well as in 13- and 15-year-olds.}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerDadaczynskiSudecketal., author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Dadaczynski, Kevin and Sudeck, Gorden and Rathmann, Katharina and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {„Health Literacy in School-Aged Children-German": Vorstellung eines Messinstruments zur Erhebung der Gesundheitskompetenz im Kindes- und Jugendalter}, series = {52. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Psychologie. Programm.}, journal = {52. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Psychologie. Programm.}, address = {Hildesheim}, pages = {51}, abstract = {Gesundheitskompetenz ist ein international relevanter Forschungsgegenstand, der bereits im Kindes- und Jugendalter mit dem Gesundheitszustand, der Aus{\"u}bung gesundheitsbezogenen Risikoverhaltens und gesundheitlicher Ungleichheit zusammenh{\"a}ngt. Dennoch steht die Erforschung der Gesundheitskompetenz in Deutschland insbesondere im Kindes- und Jugendalter im internationalen Vergleich noch weitgehend am Anfang. Ein {\"o}konomisches Instrument zur Erhebung der Gesundheitskompetenz Heranwachsender stellt die 10-Item-Skala „Health Literarcy in School-Aged Children-German" (HLSAC-German) dar. Dabei handelt es sich um die deutsche Version der Skala HLSAC, welche in der international durchgef{\"u}hrten HBSC-Studie eingesetzt wird. In diesem Beitrag werden die Skala selbst sowie Befunde zur Dimensionalit{\"a}t, zur Messinvarianz in Bezug auf Geschlecht, Alter und Schulform und zu Zusammenh{\"a}ngen zu Indikatoren der Gesundheit und des Gesundheitsverhaltens vorgestellt. Die {\"U}berpr{\"u}fung der Skala erfolgt anhand der Daten der deutschen HBSC-Studie 2018 (N = 4 347 Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}ler im Alter von 11, 13 und 15 Jahren). Die {\"U}berpr{\"u}fung in der Gruppe der 11-J{\"a}hrigen stellt dabei eine Erweiterung des Einsatzbereiches der Skala im internationalen Vergleich dar. Explorative und konfirmatorische Faktorenanalysen belegen die Eindimensionalit{\"a}t der Skala. Konfirmatorische Faktorenanalysen in multiplen Gruppen zeigen vollst{\"a}ndige skalare Messinvarianz bez{\"u}glich des Geschlechts und partielle skalare Messinvarianz bez{\"u}glich Altersgruppen und Schulform. Erwartungsgem{\"a}ß zeigen sich negative Zusammenh{\"a}nge zu subjektiv eingesch{\"a}tzten psychischen Gesundheitsproblemen und positive Zusammenh{\"a}nge zur k{\"o}rperlichen Aktivit{\"a}t. Die Ergebnisse weisen insgesamt auf eine eindimensionale Skala hin, mit welcher Mittelwertsvergleiche zul{\"a}ssig sind. Der Einsatz der Skala in der Gruppe der 11-j{\"a}hrigen ist m{\"o}glich, wobei punktuelle Schwierigkeiten bei der Beantwortung der Items und eine h{\"o}here Non-Response-Quote in dieser Altersgruppe erwartet werden m{\"u}ssen.}, language = {de} } @misc{WolgastFischerBilz, author = {Wolgast, Anett and Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Teachers' Empathy for Bullying Victims, Understanding of Violence, and Likelihood of Intervention}, series = {Journal of School Violence}, volume = {21}, journal = {Journal of School Violence}, number = {4}, issn = {1538-8220}, doi = {10.1080/15388220.2022.2114488}, pages = {491 -- 503}, abstract = {Relational bullying is still underappreciated by teachers. Based on the theoretical model of teachers' intervention competence in bullying, the aim of the current research was to gain insights into the concurrent relationships between teachers' empathy, understanding of violence, and likelihood of intervention. In this study, n = 556 teachers (79.4\% female, Mage = 50.6) indicated on a questionnaire their empathy, understanding of relational violence, and likelihood of intervention in a relational bullying situation. The relationships were simultaneously estimated in a structural equation model. The results suggest significantly positive concurrent relations between these variables. We conclude that the effectiveness of teacher trainings could be increased through such elements as cognitive empathy training, raising awareness of violence, and teaching appropriate interventions in relational bullying situations.}, language = {en} }