@misc{KochGuppyAmelungetal., author = {Koch, Maximilian and Guppy, Christopher and Amelung, Wulf and Gypser, Stella and Bol, Roland and Seidel, Sabine and Siebers, Nina}, title = {Insights into ³³phosphorus utilisation from Fe- and A-hydroxides in Luvisol and Ferralsol subsoils}, series = {Soil Research}, volume = {57}, journal = {Soil Research}, number = {5}, issn = {1838-6768}, doi = {10.1071/SR18223}, pages = {447 -- 458}, abstract = {There is currently relatively little available information on subsoil phosphorus (P) use for crop production as a function of soil order. In this study, a rhizobox experiment was performed using subsoils of two reference soil groups, an Orthic Ferralsol and a Haplic Luvisol. To evaluate the immediate P uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) from different subsoil P pools during 14 days of growth, subsoil bands were spiked with KH₂PO₄ solution associated to Fe-hydroxide (³³P-Fe), to Al-hydroxide (³³P-Al), in free form (³³P-OrthoP), or in trace amounts without any additional ³¹P (³³P-NoP). At the beginning of the experiment, the soil water content was set at 75\% of water-holding capacity, corresponding to an initial soil matric potential of -12 ± 1 kPa. During plant growth, soil moisture decreased in both soils, but soil matric potentials in both soils did not drop below field capacity (-33 kPa; pF 2.5). The shoot dry weights of the Ferralsol were 1.2 to 1.8 times those of the Luvisol. Despite elevated soil P availability in the Luvisol, shoot P concentrations did not differ between the two soils. The amount of ³³P taken up by the shoots from the oxide phases was 15\% to 40\% greater in the Ferralsol treatments than in those in the Luvisol treatments. It was concluded that the more favourable physical soil conditions facilitated ³³P uptake from both oxidic phases from the Ferralsol subsoil relative to the Luvisol subsoil, despite better P phytoavailability in the latter.}, language = {en} }