@misc{Bilz, author = {Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {On the accuracy of German teachers' identification of pupils involved in bullying}, series = {31st International Congress of Psychology, 24-29 July 2016, Yokohama, Japan}, journal = {31st International Congress of Psychology, 24-29 July 2016, Yokohama, Japan}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Chichester [u.a.]}, doi = {10.1002/ijop.12313}, pages = {S. 462}, abstract = {The subject of this study is the accuracy of teacher judgements regarding identification of perpetration and victimisation behaviour in German schools. We examine whether the portion of involved pupils is overestimated or underestimated, the agreement among pupils' and teachers' perceptions at the individual level, and factors influencing the accuracy of teacher judgements. Participants were n = 85 class teachers and n = 1401 pupils. Results indicate that teachers are overestimating the number of pupils involved in bullying as victims or bullies slightly, while agreement between pupils' and teachers' judgements is low at the individual level. Teachers' judgements of perpetration behaviour are influenced by pupils' school performance. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for handling bullying in schools and for teacher education and training.}, language = {en} } @misc{ZeissigMoellerBilz, author = {Zeißig, Anke and M{\"o}ller, Julia and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Scoping Review: Langeweile und Kreativit{\"a}t - Gegensatz oder Zusammenhang?}, series = {Tagung der Fachgruppe P{\"a}dagogische Psychologie}, journal = {Tagung der Fachgruppe P{\"a}dagogische Psychologie}, publisher = {P{\"a}dagogische Hochschule Heidelberg}, address = {Heidelberg}, language = {de} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Mobbing und Cybermobbing bei Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland - Querschnittergebnisse der HBSC-Studie 2017/2018 und Trends}, series = {DGMP/DGMS Kongress 2021 - Psychosoziale Medizin in Zeiten des Umbruchs}, journal = {DGMP/DGMS Kongress 2021 - Psychosoziale Medizin in Zeiten des Umbruchs}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf}, address = {Hamburg}, abstract = {Mobbing ist eine spezifische Form der Gewalt, die mit vielf{\"a}ltigen und langfristigen negativen gesundheitlichen Auswirkungen einhergehen kann. Obwohl eine starke mediale Fokussierung insbesondere auf Cybermobbing zu beobachten ist, liegen nur wenige repr{\"a}sentative Befunde zur H{\"a}ufigkeit von (Cyber-)Mobbing in Deutschland vor. In diesem Beitrag wird untersucht, wie verbreitet Mobbing und Cybermobbing an Schulen in Deutschland ist, welche Unterschiede zwischen M{\"a}dchen und Jungen, verschiedenen Altersgruppen und Schulformen vorliegen und wie sich die Verbreitung von Mobbing von 2002 bis 2018 entwickelt hat. Dazu werden Daten der deutschen Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)-Studie 2017/2018 (N = 4.347 Lernende, 53,0 \% weiblich) sowie der vorangegangenen Erhebungswellen analysiert. Jungen {\"u}bten 2018 insgesamt mehr Mobbing aus als M{\"a}dchen, wurden aber genauso h{\"a}ufig wie M{\"a}dchen gemobbt. 15-J{\"a}hrige mobbten andere h{\"a}ufiger als 11- und 13-J{\"a}hrige, wurden aber seltener selbst gemobbt. Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}ler an Gymnasien waren am seltensten in Mobbing involviert. Nur wenige Kinder und Jugendliche berichteten von Cybermobbing. Im Vergleich zu allen vorherigen Erhebungsjahren berichteten 2018 die wenigsten Heranwachsenden davon, andere zu mobben. Die H{\"a}ufigkeit der Erfahrung, gemobbt zu werden, hat sich dagegen kaum ver{\"a}ndert. Die Befunde verdeutlichen die Notwendigkeit pr{\"a}ventiver Anti-Mobbing-Bem{\"u}hungen und von Interventionsmaßnahmen an allen allgemeinbildenden Schulformen.}, language = {de} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Interventionskompetenzen von Lehrkr{\"a}ften bei Mobbing: Der Stellenwert der motivationalen Orientierung}, series = {Tagung der Fachgruppe P{\"a}dagogische Psychologie}, journal = {Tagung der Fachgruppe P{\"a}dagogische Psychologie}, publisher = {P{\"a}dagogische Hochschule Heidelberg}, address = {Heidelberg}, language = {de} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Teachers' motivational orientations: Associations between teachers' self-efficacy, self-regulation, empathy, and interventions in bullying}, series = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2021}, journal = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2021}, address = {Stockholm}, abstract = {Introduction Teachers must have sufficient intervention competence to intervene successfully in bullying situations. In addition to knowledge and beliefs, motivational orientations are considered important components in teacher competence models (Kunter et al., 2013). Motivation can include all aspects that influence if, with which intensity, and how people act. In the context of bullying intervention, this includes self-efficacy, empathy, and self-regulation. However, while self-efficacy is one of the most investigated motivational aspects of teachers (Fischer et al., 2020; Kunter, 2013, Lauermann et al., 2020), the other aspects - self-regulation and empathy - have only been seldomly investigated in the context of student bullying (Berkovich, 2020; Fischer \& Bilz, 2019). Method Based on findings from published single studies as well as unpublished analyses, the associations between teachers' motivational orientations (self-efficacy, self-regulation, empathy) and their likelihood of intervention (reported by teachers and students) as well as their students' bullying experiences (as bullies, victims, and bully-victims) will be presented. All analyses are based on a study that was conducted in Germany with more than 2,000 students and 556 teachers at 24 schools. Teachers' likelihood of intervention was assessed in bullying situations that have been reported retrospectively by students and teachers. Logistic regression analyses (multilevel analyses when appropriate) have been conducted. Results Findings show that teachers' self-efficacy was associated with teachers' likelihood of intervention from the teachers' perspectives. Also, students whose teachers reported higher self-efficacy and a higher tendency to reflect their behaviours thoroughly and choose wisely (a component of self-regulation) reported fewer bullying experiences. The students' perspective on the teachers' likelihood of intervention was associated with experiences as bullies, bullied, and bully-victims, but could not be explained by teachers' motivational orientations. Conclusion Possible underlying pathways and areas requiring further research as well as practical and theoretical implications will be discussed.}, language = {en} } @misc{KansokDuscheBallaschkKrauseetal., author = {Kansok-Dusche, Julia and Ballaschk, Cindy and Krause, Norman and Seemann-Herz, Lisanne and Zeißig, Anke and Schulze-Reichelt, Friederike and Wachs, Sebastian and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {A systematic review on hate speech among children and adolescents: Definitions, frequencies and overlap with bullying}, series = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2021, Stockholm}, journal = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2021, Stockholm}, address = {Stockholm}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.2.10336.61448}, pages = {1}, abstract = {Hate speech is unequivocally seen as harmful to individuals and communities (United Nations, 2019), but little is yet known about the current state of research on the frequency of hate speech among children and adolescents. Evidence suggests that definitional ambiguities of hate speech exist in academic research (e.g., Brown, 2017). But without a precise theoretical definition of hate speech, standardized assessment methods and the ability to soundly differentiate it from related phenomena, empirical research may lack validity and comparability. For research on children and adolescents in particular, hate speech needs to be differentiated from bullying (e.g., Lehmann, 2019). In a systematic review, we thus identified and systematized empirical studies on hate speech.}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerBilzWachs, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig and Wachs, Sebastian}, title = {Teachers' empathy and the likelihood that they will intervene in bullying: Differences between students' and teachers' perspectives}, series = {Bullying Research Symposium 2020}, journal = {Bullying Research Symposium 2020}, abstract = {Teachers play a crucial role in bullying interventions. Recent research has suggested that empathy is particularly important for this. But two important limitations arise. Firstly, all of these findings are based on artificial bullying scenarios presented in vignettes. Secondly, the likelihood that teachers will intervene is assessed solely from the teacher's perspective. Based on data from 2,071 German students and their 93 teachers, the connection between teachers' self-reported empathy and the likelihood that they will intervene in bullying was assessed using a bullying vignette as well as a retrospectively reported bullying situation that had been experienced by the teachers or the students in question. The associations were analysed in multilevel regression models from the teachers' and the students' perspective. Results showed that teachers who are more empathic are more likely to report that they would intervene in a hypothetical relational bullying situation. However, this finding could not be replicated when using real, remembered bullying situations. In addition, when based on students' perspectives, no significant associations between teachers' empathy and their actual or intended intervention behaviour were found. In this presentation we will discuss implications for the validity of existing research and for future research.}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerJohnBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and John, Nancy and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Teachers' bullying-related self-efficacy: A systematic review on connections to bullying interventions}, series = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2019}, journal = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2019}, address = {Dublin}, pages = {1}, abstract = {Recent research indicates that teacher self-efficacy as a belief to have enough capabilities to accomplish a given task successfully (Bandura, 1994) is an important competence for successful bullying prevention and intervention (e.g., Boulton, 2014; Bradshaw, Sawyer \& O'Brennan, 2007; Yoon \& Bauman, 2014). But studies vary concerning the definition and specificity of self-efficacy and concerning the samples used. Therefore, the findings differ greatly. Empirical studies on teacher self-efficacy in the context of student bullying were searched in relevant databases. 36 relevant publications were identified in a multi-staged process. Quality criteria were adapted from the Cochrane Collaboration. Most publications report consistently that teachers feel not very confident in dealing with bullying in general and feel least confident when dealing with cyberbullying. Results on differences according to gender, work experience and school type are very heterogeneous. Consistent findings are reported concerning the likelihood of intervention: Teachers who are more confident are more likely to intervene in bullying. But no consistent findings arise for the choice of specific intervention strategies. The heterogeneity of the findings can be explained by different types of self-efficacy, by differences in the measures, and by different educational contexts. In the presentation, this information will be combined to understand differences better and to integrate the existing results. Results indicate that the more specific self-efficacy is assessed, the more connections between self-efficacy and bullying interventions can be found.}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Bullying among students in the context of staff conflicts and class climate: Are there spillover effects?}, series = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2017}, journal = {World Anti-Bullying Forum 2017}, address = {Stockholm}, abstract = {Bullying is a prevalent aggressive behavior with severe negative social and health consequences. It emerges from complex social interactions (Saarento, Garandeau, \& Salmivalli, 2015). To understand the causes of bullying, different levels of the school environment and their interactions need to be considered. Bronfenbrenner's ecological theory is an appropriate model for this (see figure 1). From analyses of children's behaviors in the family context, spillover effects are known (e.g., Lux \& Hudecek, 2015). Similar patterns may occur in schools: Conflicts at the staff level may serve as negative role models, may reduce teachers' alliance and cooperation, and limit long-term interventions. These long-term interventions are especially important in reducing bullying (Bilz, Schubarth, Dudziak, Fischer, Niproschke, \& Ulbricht, in press). Following the assumption of reciprocity, the occurrence of bullying may, at the same time, work as a stressor and increase staff conflicts. Connections between bullying occurrence and class climate are already known in the literature (Saarento et al., 2015), but have not yet been analyzed with staff conflicts simultaneously. Cross-sectional data of 556 teachers and 2,071 students will be analyzed as individual data and as aggregated data using multilevel structure equation modeling. Analyses are not finished yet, but will be presented and discussed at the conference presentation.}, language = {en} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Professionswissen und Lehrerhandeln in realen Mobbingsituationen}, series = {Tagung der AEPF in Rostock (18.-21.09.2016)}, journal = {Tagung der AEPF in Rostock (18.-21.09.2016)}, address = {Rostock}, doi = {10.13140/RG.2.2.33063.14240}, language = {de} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Handeln oder Abw{\"a}gen? Die Bedeutung der Selbstregulation f{\"u}r das Interventionshandeln von Lehrkr{\"a}ften bei Gewalt und Mobbing}, series = {25. DGfE-Kongress}, journal = {25. DGfE-Kongress}, publisher = {TransferZentrum f{\"u}r Neurowissenschaften und Lernen}, address = {Kassel}, pages = {41}, language = {de} } @misc{FischerBilz, author = {Fischer, Saskia M. and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {Selbstregulative Kompetenzen von Lehrkr{\"a}ften beim Umgang mit Mobbing}, series = {80. AEPF-Tagung}, journal = {80. AEPF-Tagung}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, pages = {104}, language = {de} }