@misc{Gross, author = {Groß, Steffen}, title = {The Neglected Programme of Aesthetics}, series = {The British Journal of Aesthetics}, volume = {42}, journal = {The British Journal of Aesthetics}, issn = {0007-0904}, pages = {403 -- 414}, language = {en} } @misc{Gross, author = {Groß, Steffen}, title = {Der Mehrwert des Hybriden. Die hybridologische Forschungsperspektive im Kontrast zum Ansatz der Bikulturalit{\"a}t}, series = {Letopis. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r sorbische Sprache, Geschichte und Kultur}, volume = {63}, journal = {Letopis. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r sorbische Sprache, Geschichte und Kultur}, number = {1}, pages = {89 -- 96}, language = {de} } @incollection{Gross, author = {Groß, Steffen}, title = {Postmoderne - Ambivalenz und Widerstreit}, series = {Die Postmoderne - intellektuelle Mode oder Kulturzeichen der Gegenwart?}, booktitle = {Die Postmoderne - intellektuelle Mode oder Kulturzeichen der Gegenwart?}, isbn = {978-3-89597-258-4}, pages = {43 -- 59}, language = {de} } @misc{GrossKuehnert, author = {Groß, Steffen and K{\"u}hnert, Uwe}, title = {Strukturwandel und Arbeitsmarkt in der Region Oder-Spree}, series = {Arbeit und Arbeitsrecht}, volume = {50}, journal = {Arbeit und Arbeitsrecht}, number = {11}, issn = {0323-4568}, pages = {366 -- 369}, language = {de} } @incollection{Gross, author = {Groß, Steffen}, title = {Im Menschlichen ist immer nur die Mischung sch{\"o}pferisch. Zur philosophisch-anthropologischen Fundierung der hybridologischen Forschungsperspektive}, series = {Das Reine und das Vermischte}, booktitle = {Das Reine und das Vermischte}, editor = {Keller, Ines and Jacobs, Fabian}, publisher = {Waxmann}, address = {M{\"u}nster}, isbn = {978-3-8309-3255-0}, pages = {379 -- 392}, language = {de} } @incollection{Gross, author = {Groß, Steffen}, title = {Technik als Erkenntnis- und Formprozeß}, series = {Technik denken : philosophische Ann{\"a}herungen, Festschrift f{\"u}r Klaus Kornwachs}, booktitle = {Technik denken : philosophische Ann{\"a}herungen, Festschrift f{\"u}r Klaus Kornwachs}, editor = {Friedrich, Volker}, publisher = {Franz Steiner Verlag}, address = {Stuttgart}, isbn = {978-3-515-12039-5}, pages = {263 -- 270}, language = {de} } @misc{Gross, author = {Groß, Steffen}, title = {Can Cultural Property Protection Be an Effective Counter-Terrorism Instrument?}, series = {The Journal of Art Crime}, volume = {19}, journal = {The Journal of Art Crime}, issn = {1947-5926}, pages = {47 -- 59}, language = {en} } @misc{Gross, author = {Groß, Steffen}, title = {Der Schutz von Kulturg{\"u}tern als {\"o}konomische, rechtliche und sicherheitspolitische Herausforderung}, series = {Leibniz Online. Zeitschrift der Leibniz-Soziet{\"a}t}, volume = {32}, journal = {Leibniz Online. Zeitschrift der Leibniz-Soziet{\"a}t}, issn = {1863-3285}, pages = {1 -- 17}, language = {de} } @incollection{Gross, author = {Groß, Steffen}, title = {Weder rein nomothetisch noch allein idiographisch. Philosophische Gr{\"u}nde f{\"u}r die Bestimmung der {\"O}konomie als Kulturwissenschaft}, series = {Spiel-R{\"a}ume des Denkens}, booktitle = {Spiel-R{\"a}ume des Denkens}, editor = {Graupe, Silja and {\"O}tsch, Walter Otto and Rommel, Florian}, publisher = {Metropolis}, address = {Marburg}, isbn = {978-3-7316-1379-4}, pages = {181 -- 218}, language = {de} } @misc{Gross, author = {Groß, Steffen}, title = {On the Regulation of the International Exchange of Cultural Property}, series = {ORDO : Jahrbuch f{\"u}r die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft}, volume = {70}, journal = {ORDO : Jahrbuch f{\"u}r die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft}, number = {1}, issn = {0048-2129}, pages = {166 -- 187}, abstract = {With its foundation in 1945, UNESCO declared as its main purpose the promotion of international cultural exchange1. A number of legal instruments (Conventions, Recommendations and Declarations) should duly help to substantiate that general purpose and make it work in practice. In this process, the regulation of the international exchange of cultural property plays a key role. However, the proper regulation of cultural property exchange has been a highly controversial issue. This paper focus on UNESCO's guiding ideas and conceptions of cultural property, international exchange and regulation. The central question is: Are the regulations codified in UNESCO's Conventions and Recommendations helpful in encouraging international cultural exchange or are we faced, due to the neglect of private agents and the roles they play in cultural exchange, with some sort of one-sided regulation running counter to that aim? The author argues that UNESCO's legal instruments are driven by and express a strong anti-private and anti-market bias, which produce problematic economic incentives in the art and antiquities world to the disadvantage of the international exchange of cultural property.}, language = {en} }