Refine
Language
- Albanian (14)
- Arabic (108)
- Bulgarian (160)
- Catalan (14)
- Czech (79)
- Danish (45)
- German (9422)
- Greek (74)
- English (17979)
- Estonian (1)
- Euskara, Basqe (2)
- Farsi, Persian (26)
- Finnish (103)
- French (737)
- Gujaritic (3)
- Hebrew (52)
- Serbocroatic (292)
- Hungarian (103)
- Indonesian (68)
- Icelandish (1)
- Italian (1348)
- Japanese (182)
- Korean (197)
- Kurdish (1)
- Latin (1)
- Latvian (28)
- Lithuanian (10)
- Macedonian (2)
- Mongolian (1)
- Burmese (1)
- Dutch (75)
- nll (1)
- Norwegian (53)
- Turkish (102)
- Polish (429)
- Portuguese (256)
- Romansh (2)
- Romany (16)
- Roumain, Moldave (15)
- Russian (214)
- ser (2)
- Slovakian (14)
- Slovenian (29)
- Spanish (1963)
- Albanian (1)
- Serbian (26)
- Swedish (53)
- Ukrainian (8)
- Vietnamese (10)
- Sorbian (2)
- Chinese (1951)
Document Type
- Articles (24879)
- Books (4651)
- Reviews (2507)
- Dissertations (1091)
- Excerpts (778)
- Collections (738)
- Forewords (440)
- Ebooks (383)
- Interviews (353)
- Necrologues (236)
Year of publication
- 2024 (63)
- 2023 (189)
- 2022 (269)
- 2021 (256)
- 2020 (358)
- 2019 (299)
- 2018 (295)
- 2017 (429)
- 2016 (345)
- 2015 (349)
- 2014 (416)
- 2013 (375)
- 2012 (438)
- 2011 (418)
- 2010 (342)
- 2009 (398)
- 2008 (331)
- 2007 (284)
- 2006 (334)
- 2005 (388)
- 2004 (348)
- 2003 (343)
- 2002 (424)
- 2001 (351)
- 2000 (569)
- 1999 (381)
- 1998 (340)
- 1997 (454)
- 1996 (499)
- 1995 (622)
- 1994 (682)
- 1993 (638)
- 1992 (850)
- 1991 (768)
- 1990 (758)
- 1989 (586)
- 1988 (523)
- 1987 (386)
- 1986 (448)
- 1985 (392)
- 1984 (284)
- 1983 (381)
- 1982 (280)
- 1981 (492)
- 1980 (782)
- 1979 (452)
- 1978 (607)
- 1977 (648)
- 1976 (789)
- 1975 (876)
- 1974 (794)
- 1973 (753)
- 1972 (495)
- 1971 (501)
- 1970 (844)
- 1969 (580)
- 1968 (899)
- 1967 (732)
- 1966 (606)
- 1965 (615)
- 1964 (425)
- 1963 (434)
- 1962 (564)
- 1961 (370)
- 1960 (537)
- 1959 (289)
- 1958 (189)
- 1957 (218)
- 1956 (359)
- 1955 (295)
- 1954 (107)
- 1953 (130)
- 1952 (96)
- 1951 (170)
- 1950 (184)
- 1949 (180)
- 1948 (83)
- 1947 (111)
- 1946 (56)
- 1945 (39)
- 1944 (27)
- 1943 (74)
- 1942 (32)
- 1941 (131)
- 1940 (41)
- 1939 (56)
- 1938 (30)
- 1937 (53)
- 1936 (150)
- 1935 (53)
- 1934 (91)
- 1933 (65)
- 1932 (173)
- 1931 (92)
- 1930 (167)
- 1929 (104)
- 1928 (79)
- 1927 (83)
- 1926 (12)
- 1925 (16)
- 1924 (9)
- 1923 (31)
- 1922 (24)
- 1921 (11)
- 1920 (33)
- 1919 (13)
- 1918 (9)
- 1917 (5)
- 1916 (6)
- 1915 (16)
- 1914 (8)
- 1913 (7)
- 1912 (7)
- 1911 (8)
- 1910 (5)
- 1909 (8)
- 1908 (11)
- 1907 (1)
- 1906 (2)
- 1905 (5)
- 1903 (1)
- 1902 (15)
- 1901 (1)
- 1900 (4)
- 1899 (1)
- 1897 (1)
- 1896 (4)
- 1895 (7)
- 1894 (5)
- 1893 (6)
- 1892 (2)
- 1891 (2)
- 1889 (6)
- 1888 (2)
- 1887 (1)
- 1886 (3)
- 1885 (1)
- 1884 (1)
- 1882 (1)
- 1881 (1)
- 1880 (1)
- 1877 (2)
- 1872 (11)
- 1868 (2)
- 1865 (1)
- 1864 (1)
- 1863 (1)
- 1861 (1)
- 1856 (2)
- 1850 (1)
- 1849 (1)
- 1846 (1)
- 1843 (1)
- 1839 (1)
- 1838 (1)
- 1798 (1)
- 1776 (1)
- 1759 (1)
- 1725 (1)
- 1659 (1)
- 1644 (1)
Erich Fromm, the Mentor
(2021)
In the previous chapter, we examined numerous aspects of postwar American society that came into play in Riesman’s formulation of autonomy. Many factors carry weight when we consider what inspired him to write >The Lonely Crowd< and to offer his insightful analysis of conformity’s malaise. Among those who influenced Riesman intellectually, there can be little doubt that Erich Fromm played a major role. Although Riesman never accepted Fromm’s pessimistic view and radical approach to modernity in the West, we clearly see the impact of Fromm on Riesman’s ideas about social character, conformity, and especially autonomy. Thus, in order to better understand Riesman we must take a look at Fromm’s theories especially in some of his early books. Here we find several core ideas that heavily impacted Riesman’s theory of autonomy.
フロムとフランクル,両者には深い共通点がある.両者とも,人間の《実存的特質》から生まれる《生きる意味を欲する》という根源的欲求との関連で人間の抱える精神的病理を解明するという視点に立つ.共にこう主張する.生きる情熱は生きる意味を掴むことによって生まれ,生きる意味を感得することは他者と深い愛の関係性(愛し愛される)を結ぶこと,いいかえると深い《応答の絆》を結ぶことによってのみ可能になる,と.この両者の観点から,現代日本の若者の精神状況を振り返るなら,我々は深い憂慮を感じざるを得ない.昨今の「拡大自殺」と名づけられた病理,自殺念慮者の増加,我が子虐待,イジメ,等々は今日の精神的荒廃を語るキーワードである.だからこそ,フロムとフランクルは若者によって再発見されねばならないし,実は両者との出会いを若者は待っている.
Предмет исследования — рассмотрение нечеловеческого в человеке. Данная проблема имеет несколько аспектов. Во-первых, она связана с религиозной тематикой. В сакральной литературе человек рассматривается как греховное создание, впавшее в первородный грех. Во-вторых, тема нечеловеческого сопряжена с моральным аспектом. Здесь она трактуется как человеческая подверженность злу. В-третьих, нечеловеческое в человеке связано с постепенным разочарованием в нём как в божьей твари, получившим освещение в средневековой литературе. Это вызвало особый феномен, который Н.А. Бердяев назвал «умалением человека». Новый этап в раскрытии этой темы можно связать с психоаналитическими традициями. Психоанализ раскрывает феноменологию бессознательного, природу инстинктов, ведущих к агрессии и разрушительству. Фромм пишет специальную книгу «Анатомия человеческой деструктивности». Наконец, нечеловеческое становится сюжетом современной трансгуманистической философии. Речь идет о том, чтобы внедрить в человека нечто, позволяющее исправить человеческую природу, создать нового человека. Автор опирается на столь значимую методологию, как герменевтический и психоаналитический анализтекстов, позволяющий в данном случае раскрыть разные аспекты нечеловеческого. Новизна статьи в постановке самой темы, которая в отечественной литературе не была предметом самостоятельного анализа. Автор делает попытку проследить историко-философскую традицию, которая связана с этой проблемой. Накоплены многочисленные интуиции о том, какое место занимает в потомке Адама то, что не соответствует его изначальной природе. Однако данная тема не рассматривалась в целостном историко-философском ракурсе. Прослеживая осмысление этой проблемы от древности до на ших дней, мы видим, что она актуализирует самые неожиданные ходы исследовательской мысли. Особенно злободневно звучат в этой теме сюжеты духовности человека как особого рода сущего. Человеческое не может раскрыть себя, если оно не связано с нечеловеческим.
This bachelor thesis deals with conception of various human aspects according to Erich Fromm and Herbert Marcuse. These aspects are freedom, society and human. In introduction is shortly introduced the Frankfurt school, both authors were its members and this school form them. There is mentioned freedom and her economic, religious and anthropological development in culture. Below is here shown directly evolution of human. Fromm and Marcuse go from Sigmund Freud and Karl Marx. In one chapter Fromm shows us an evolution of human character and Marcuse analyses evolution of Ego, which has to fight with Id and Superego. Chapter about society more deal with capitalism and there authors go from aforementioned Karl Marx. Fromm presents his conception of mood to have and mood to be. Marcuse shows us a technical progress in industrial society. In conclusion will be compared theory of both philosophers and it will be examined their usability at the present time.
Sosyal Araştırmalar Enstitü’sü, eleştirel perspektifi daima göz önünde bulundurarak çalışmalarını yürüten, tarihsel süreç içerisinde birçok konu, olay ve sorun olarak gördükleri alanlarda çalışmalarda bulunan Almanya merkezli bir okuldur. Enstitü üyelerinin yayımlanan çalışmalarında tarih, sosyoloji, siyaset bilimi gibi başat alanlar göze çarpar niteliktedir. Psikanaliz konusundaki çalışmaları ise diğer alanlara göre oldukça sayılı fakat bir o kadar da incelenmeye değerdir. Bu çalışmada, Enstitü’ye katıldığı ilk dönemde kendisini NeoFreudcu olarak addeden Erich Fromm’dan yola çıkarak Enstitü üyelerinin psikanalizle ilgili çalışmaları incelenmiş ve üyelerin bu bilimsel alana olan olumlu-olumsuz görüşleri ele alınmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı, birçok alanda sosyal bilimler adına çok değerli çalışmalara imza atan bu kuramcıların psikanalize ve Freud’un kuramlarına bakış açılarını yansıtmak ve psikanalizi kendi çalışma larında nasıl kullandıklarını belirlemektir.
Tekstas skirtas postsekuliariai ir postfundamentaliai kitybės filosofijai. Siekiama rekonstruoti efektyvios kitybės filosofinę tradiciją ir pateikti jos teoriją. Homoseksualumas nagrinėjamas kaip efektyvus kitoniškumas. Analizuojamos dinamiškos religijos, atviros Kitam. Akcentuojamas judaizmas ir hebrajų Biblijos svetimo meilė. Apeliuojama į Bibliją, rabiniškąją literatūrą bei jų psichoanalitinę interpretaciją, pateiktą E. Frommo ir J. Kristevos. Biblijos ir Korano svetingumo idėją esą atnaujino J. Derrida, J. Kristeva, G. Pollockas ir G. H. Hartmanas. Pateikiama kultūros analizė ir žydų literatūros studijos sankirta, inspiruota E. van Alpheno, M. Balio, Ch. von Braun bei G. Pollock. Pabaigoje analizuojami vizualios kultūros, kuriai atstovauja Lenkijos ir Lietuvos menininkai, pavyzdžiai.
Individuality is the quality or character of a particular person that distinguishes them from others of the same kind. In other words, it is the mark which separates its existence from the rest of the group. According to Fromm, the process of individuality begins at infancy level when the child is separated from the mother. This then takes an emotional toll on the child as he suffers from loneliness and anxiety which stem from the prior separation. The child will henceforth acquire his individuality through the process of socialization which requires constant interaction with people in his life. For this paper, we have selected a novel, Faggots, authored by Larry Kramer, to be the main text for our research. This article argues that the characters in the text are conflicted with feelings of anxiety and loneliness as they embark on respective quest to eradicate the feeling of loneliness by looking for a potential life partner. However, these characters go through a series of promiscuous relationships by living an active sexual lifestyle on the ground that they are in search of the >right< one. Therefore, this paper will look into the sadistic and masochistic (sometimes both; otherwise known as sadomasochistic) tendency practiced by the characters in the novel in their quest to reclaim their lost individuality. This research draws in the concept of freedom, sadism, and masochism as proposed by Erich Fromm to further consolidate the findings.
In its broadest sense, hegemony is defined as a set of agreed ideologies practiced by prominent regimes and governments which influences people’s minds. One of the practices which can be observed in most societies is the exclusion and rejection of homosexuals of their fundamental rights as humans. As such, the issue will be magnified in this paper through a satirical play written by Larry Kramer, entitled >The Normal Heart<. Parallel with the dominant hegemony, the homosexual characters in the play are mistreated and isolated within their own society. To retaliate, these characters consider themselves as victims and intend to counter the situation by masochism. However, the attempt seems to backfire and reify the preexisting hegemony. As such, this paper explores >The Normal Heart< in light of Antonio Gramsci’s concept of hegemony as well as Erich Fromm’s masochism. To further specify, the paper examines the homosexual characters – their victimization and their fight against the dominant ideologies and how it all leads to their estrangement within the society.
This dissertation tries to prove that the so-called philosopher on the throne can be a better ruler not only than dictator but also than contemporary liberal democratic politician. Since the sixth century BC, when the human undertook a systematic and critical contemplation upon surrounding reality, she/he has begun to dream about political rulers to be guided in their doings by the imperative of reason. In principal, the higher level of spiritual culture characterized the rulers, the more likely their subjects were to live to a great age in relative peace. That is why for centuries it has been dreamed of a political system that is something like a kind of a sophocracy. The most complete picture of such a sovereign, which fulfilled dreams about a sage in the crown, was outlined by Plato in his State. In his point of view, as long as the lovers of wisdom will not have royal power in the states, or the rulers will not begin to love wisdom honestly, there is no help for states and for the human race. Nevertheless, over the centuries, authority was enforced mainly by physical strength and not by reason. It was not until the twentieth century that democracy brought freedom and equality of rights, thanks to which political power became more rational. Unfortunately, also contemporary liberal democracy is not free from fundamental contradictions that can bring about its collapse. The main contradiction is the increasingly smaller influence of citizens – who in the theory of democracy are the only legal sovereign – on political decision-making. This is accompanied by the enhancing influence of entities with no democratic legitimacy, e.g. global corporations that do not care about the common (public) good, but only about their own. These entities use the growing intellectual and ethical weakness of democratic politicians whose purpose is their own particular interest and not the happiness (good) of their citizens. This may indicate a slow system disintegration. For this reason liberal democracy needs politicians who are wise enough to realize this threat. Of all the people in the history of the world who led political communities, to the Platonic ideal in the highest degree (among others, like T. G. Masaryk and Á. Göncz) got closer the man who, paradoxically, never wanted to be a ruler. Václav Havel's thought is a critique of both Soviet post-totalitarianism and Western democracy. In his opinion both systems, though to a different degree, alienate a human trying to reduce her/him to the role of a machine's cog. Havel proposes that every citizen take individual and global responsibility for herself/himself and the whole world, because only in this way she/he can consciously exert real influence over political decisions. What is more, this is the only way to build a politics that aims – if possible – the happiness of every person. Havel realizes that in today's world this attitude is extremely impractical and very difficult to apply in everyday life. Nevertheless, he knows no better possibility.