Refine
Language
- Albanian (14)
- Arabic (108)
- Bulgarian (160)
- Catalan (14)
- Czech (79)
- Danish (45)
- German (9422)
- Greek (74)
- English (17979)
- Estonian (1)
- Euskara, Basqe (2)
- Farsi, Persian (26)
- Finnish (103)
- French (737)
- Gujaritic (3)
- Hebrew (52)
- Serbocroatic (292)
- Hungarian (103)
- Indonesian (68)
- Icelandish (1)
- Italian (1348)
- Japanese (182)
- Korean (197)
- Kurdish (1)
- Latin (1)
- Latvian (28)
- Lithuanian (10)
- Macedonian (2)
- Mongolian (1)
- Burmese (1)
- Dutch (75)
- nll (1)
- Norwegian (53)
- Turkish (102)
- Polish (429)
- Portuguese (256)
- Romansh (2)
- Romany (16)
- Roumain, Moldave (15)
- Russian (214)
- ser (2)
- Slovakian (14)
- Slovenian (29)
- Spanish (1963)
- Albanian (1)
- Serbian (26)
- Swedish (53)
- Ukrainian (8)
- Vietnamese (10)
- Sorbian (2)
- Chinese (1951)
Document Type
- Articles (24879)
- Books (4651)
- Reviews (2507)
- Dissertations (1091)
- Excerpts (778)
- Collections (738)
- Forewords (440)
- Ebooks (383)
- Interviews (353)
- Necrologues (236)
Year of publication
- 2024 (63)
- 2023 (189)
- 2022 (269)
- 2021 (256)
- 2020 (358)
- 2019 (299)
- 2018 (295)
- 2017 (429)
- 2016 (345)
- 2015 (349)
- 2014 (416)
- 2013 (375)
- 2012 (438)
- 2011 (418)
- 2010 (342)
- 2009 (398)
- 2008 (331)
- 2007 (284)
- 2006 (334)
- 2005 (388)
- 2004 (348)
- 2003 (343)
- 2002 (424)
- 2001 (351)
- 2000 (569)
- 1999 (381)
- 1998 (340)
- 1997 (454)
- 1996 (499)
- 1995 (622)
- 1994 (682)
- 1993 (638)
- 1992 (850)
- 1991 (768)
- 1990 (758)
- 1989 (586)
- 1988 (523)
- 1987 (386)
- 1986 (448)
- 1985 (392)
- 1984 (284)
- 1983 (381)
- 1982 (280)
- 1981 (492)
- 1980 (782)
- 1979 (452)
- 1978 (607)
- 1977 (648)
- 1976 (789)
- 1975 (876)
- 1974 (794)
- 1973 (753)
- 1972 (495)
- 1971 (501)
- 1970 (844)
- 1969 (580)
- 1968 (899)
- 1967 (732)
- 1966 (606)
- 1965 (615)
- 1964 (425)
- 1963 (434)
- 1962 (564)
- 1961 (370)
- 1960 (537)
- 1959 (289)
- 1958 (189)
- 1957 (218)
- 1956 (359)
- 1955 (295)
- 1954 (107)
- 1953 (130)
- 1952 (96)
- 1951 (170)
- 1950 (184)
- 1949 (180)
- 1948 (83)
- 1947 (111)
- 1946 (56)
- 1945 (39)
- 1944 (27)
- 1943 (74)
- 1942 (32)
- 1941 (131)
- 1940 (41)
- 1939 (56)
- 1938 (30)
- 1937 (53)
- 1936 (150)
- 1935 (53)
- 1934 (91)
- 1933 (65)
- 1932 (173)
- 1931 (92)
- 1930 (167)
- 1929 (104)
- 1928 (79)
- 1927 (83)
- 1926 (12)
- 1925 (16)
- 1924 (9)
- 1923 (31)
- 1922 (24)
- 1921 (11)
- 1920 (33)
- 1919 (13)
- 1918 (9)
- 1917 (5)
- 1916 (6)
- 1915 (16)
- 1914 (8)
- 1913 (7)
- 1912 (7)
- 1911 (8)
- 1910 (5)
- 1909 (8)
- 1908 (11)
- 1907 (1)
- 1906 (2)
- 1905 (5)
- 1903 (1)
- 1902 (15)
- 1901 (1)
- 1900 (4)
- 1899 (1)
- 1897 (1)
- 1896 (4)
- 1895 (7)
- 1894 (5)
- 1893 (6)
- 1892 (2)
- 1891 (2)
- 1889 (6)
- 1888 (2)
- 1887 (1)
- 1886 (3)
- 1885 (1)
- 1884 (1)
- 1882 (1)
- 1881 (1)
- 1880 (1)
- 1877 (2)
- 1872 (11)
- 1868 (2)
- 1865 (1)
- 1864 (1)
- 1863 (1)
- 1861 (1)
- 1856 (2)
- 1850 (1)
- 1849 (1)
- 1846 (1)
- 1843 (1)
- 1839 (1)
- 1838 (1)
- 1798 (1)
- 1776 (1)
- 1759 (1)
- 1725 (1)
- 1659 (1)
- 1644 (1)
[Chinese abstract not available] >Ragtime<, published in 1975, is the fourth novel written by Jewish-American novelist E. L. Doctorow, for which he was awarded >the 1976 National Book Critics Circle Award<. Doctorow focused on the important figures in three families to explore the fate of different classes in the United States, and he didn’t try to write a grand history of the entire United States to reflect that time. He perfectly presented three very different American family freedom dilemmas in >Ragtime<: One was a wealthy middle-class white family, the other was a Jewish family from European immigrants, and the last was a black family, which genuinely reproduced the microcosm of all classes in that era. At present, some scholars have explored >Ragtime< from different angles such as feminist criticism and new historicism. Because of its unique writing style and ingenious narrative techniques, there are also many scholars studying the narrative strategy of the novel. However, there is a lack of comprehensive comments on the dilemma of freedom of the protagonists, the mechanism to negative freedom and how to realize positive freedom in the novel. From the perspective of Fromm’s freedom theory, we can find that the freedom dilemma of an individual in modern society makes people confused. So manipulation and being manipulated, a desire to destroy, automaton conformity, and other mechanisms of negative freedom come into being. As for Fromm, to be a complete human being, to be truly free must be achieved through the spontaneous love and creative labor of the individual. Based on Fromm’s view of freedom, the interpretation of >Ragtime< is of guiding significance for individuals in today’s society to move from freedom dilemma to positive freedom. Ultimately, the liberation and free and all-around development of human beings is the highest value orientation for realizing a community with a shared future for mankind, which promotes the human beings to move towards a better tomorrow.
This article focuses on the role that the notion of temporality can and should play in the tradition of Critical Theory. Following an overview of the critical analyses of time found in the works of Marx, Lukács, Weber, Adorno, Fromm, and Marcuse, the article analyzes Hartmut Rosa’s critique of social acceleration and argues that this critique lacks a firm normative basis. This basis is required, however, for one to claim why certain processes of social acceleration are wrong. It is shown that Rosa’s analyses of acceleration contain two suggestions for such a basis: autonomy understood as a narrative identity, and autonomy as defended by Honneth’s theory of recognition. After an exploration of both suggestions, in which the ideas of MacIntyre and Ricoeur are briefly discussed as well, it is argued that a combination of both may result in a specific, normative understanding of reification, which is defended against Honneth’s definition of this concept. Based on an interpretation of passages in Horkheimer and Adorno’s >Dialectic of Enlightenment< and Adorno’s notion of >working through the past<, the article claims that reification should be understood as a forgetting of the narratives that have shaped the self and the social structures under which this self is formed, and therefore as the inability to recognize the temporal dimensions of the autonomous self.
Nach diesem (eklektisch bleibenden) ideengeschichtlichen Überblick widmet sich das folgende Kapitel der Frage, wie ein humanistischer Produktivitätsbegriff aussehen könnte, der das Subjekt und dessen Selbst- und Weltbezug ins Zentrum stellt. Zu diesem Zweck soll in Kapitel drei auf die Theorien Erich Fromms und Hartmut Rosas zurückgegriffen werden, bevor in Kapitel vier Kriterien für einen humanistischen Produktivitätsbegriff definiert werden. Der Auswahl der Autoren liegt die These zugrunde, dass beide die Frage nach produktiver Selbstwerdung neu stellen und diese an der lebensweltlichen Erfahrung spiegeln.
The reunification of Germany took place in 1990. As an analyst brought up in the former West Germany, but practicing in Berlin, I have observed over and over again that patients who come from what used to be East Germany (German Democratic Republic) – even those born after 1990 – have a strong need to distinguish between East Germans and West Germans. In their minds, Germany seems still to be a divided country. A split identity appears to have been internalized, producing >West German< and >East German< racists who despise, in the >other< kind of German, a devalued aspect of what being German means. I have tried for many years to understand the hidden meanings of this defensive maneuver for the analytic couple, and beyond this for the relation between the East and West German societies. Here I discuss these unresolved shadows in German identity. Analyses in Germany may be dominated by the splits they provoke, which interfere with patients’ capacities to think. Patients may relate instead to a >German< object that is impersonal, nonempathic, and rejects the idea of an independent internal world. The defensive use of this object in the transference has to be continually worked through in the analysis.
Arbeiter und Angestellte am Vorabend des Dritten Reiches. Eine sozialpsychologische Untersuchung.
(2006)
Prefazione
(1984)
本稿の目的は、エーリッヒ・フロムの「自己実現」論を再構成し、その人間形成論的な可能性を提示することである。フロムはしばしば社会および人間を二つの位相に分けたうえで、片方を持ち上げてもう片方を非難するという論法を採用したが、従来それらは素朴な勧善懲悪的図式として理解される傾向にあった。だがその遺稿から明らかになったフロムによる初期マルクスへの直接的な参照は、そうしたフロムの方法論が決して単純な善悪二元論にはおさまらないことを示唆している。マルクスの言う私有財産の「止揚」プロセスとフロムの想定したこつの様式観が交わりあう過程とをそれぞれのテクストにより突き合わせていくことで、フロムの「自己実現」論は、発達の脱中心化を志向する近年の教育人間学的なモメントを理論レベルにおいて批判的に彫琢しうる、他とのつながりに開かれながらも「自己」へと再帰的に準拠する人間形成論として、新たに定位される。