Refine
Language
- German (18)
- English (112)
- Serbocroatic (3)
- Portuguese (1)
- Spanish (32)
Document Type
- Articles (139)
- Books (17)
- Ebooks (4)
- Interviews (3)
- Reviews (3)
Year of publication
- 2021 (3)
- 2020 (2)
- 2019 (1)
- 2018 (2)
- 2017 (3)
- 2015 (2)
- 2014 (1)
- 2011 (1)
- 2009 (2)
- 2007 (1)
- 2002 (2)
- 2000 (1)
- 1997 (2)
- 1996 (7)
- 1995 (6)
- 1994 (2)
- 1993 (1)
- 1992 (1)
- 1990 (1)
- 1989 (1)
- 1988 (3)
- 1987 (1)
- 1985 (8)
- 1984 (1)
- 1982 (4)
- 1981 (3)
- 1980 (3)
- 1979 (1)
- 1978 (5)
- 1977 (4)
- 1976 (2)
- 1975 (8)
- 1974 (7)
- 1973 (1)
- 1972 (5)
- 1971 (9)
- 1970 (17)
- 1969 (9)
- 1968 (1)
- 1967 (3)
- 1966 (6)
- 1965 (1)
- 1964 (6)
- 1963 (2)
- 1962 (8)
- 1961 (1)
On Culture and Equivalence I
(1966)
Über Kultur und Äquivalenz
(1971)
Erich Fromm
(1980)
Work and Human Development
(1980)
Erich FROMM's strategy of social change was based on reform, with the institutions of alienated society changing in response to increased public commitment to humanistic values. While Herbert Marcuse did not reject reformist strategies outright, and even insisted that every opportunity on that level should be taken advantage of, he distrusted >controlled democracies< and their tendency to manipulate consciousness. The two thinkers did not differ in their advocacy of humanistic values and reformist strategies but in their respective estimates of their efficacy; Marcuse tended to believe that extralegal and politically revolutionary steps would ultimately be required to bring about meaningful social change.
Über Kultur und Äquivalenz
(1971)
On Culture and Equivalence I
(1966)
Leadership in Context
(2021)
My studies of leadership build on the work of Sigmund Freud, Erich Fromm, and Erik Erikson. Those psychoanalysts described leaders of large groups, their personalities and relations with their followers. In my studies of leaders and experience with them, I have found that leadership is a relationship in a particular context. There are different kinds of leaders, and someone can be a leader in one context, but not in another. Furthermore, different leadership roles and different cultures call for different personality types and leadership behavior. People follow leaders for different reasons, and leaders can influence why and how they are followed. While Freud, Fromm, and Erikson only described male leaders, women are increasingly filling leadership roles, sometimes more effectively than men.
Las aportaciones científicas de Erich Fromm se basaron en su teoría del carácter social y los métodos que él desarrolló para ponerla a prueba. El carácter social describe las actitudes emocionales bien enraizadas en personas criadas en una misma cultura. La familia, la escolaridad, el trabajo y el juego conforman el carácter social de modo que las personas están dispuestas a hacer lo que tengan que hacer para prosperar económica y socialmente en una cultura determinada. El primer estudio de Fromm sobre empleados y trabajadores alemanes antes del surgimiento de Hitler mostró que, a pesar de suscribir una ideología democrática, la mayoría de ellos apoyaría a quienquiera que llegara al poder. El segundo estudio de campesinos de un pueblo mexicano generó resultados estadísticamente significativos que demostraron que el carácter social explicaba tanto la productividad como la psicopatología. Estos hallazgos se vieron confirmados por los resultados de estudios posteriores. El núcleo del carácter social está conformado por los tipos de caracteres psicoanalíticos descubiertos por Freud y modificados por Fromm. Esta teoría aprovecha los conocimientos de la economía, la sociología, la antropología y la historia. Maccoby ha proseguido la tarea, mostrando la importancia del concepto de carácter social para comprender el liderazgo y la motivación en el trabajo.
Mainstream social science has been blindsided by the rise of Trumpism and broader growth of authoritarian populism. We make the case that Frommian work is desperately needed inside the core of contemporary social science theorizing by examining social character theory up against and alongside the concept of habitus developed by French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. Both Fromm and Bourdieu were concerned with the human costs of social change and economic development, Fromm with his writings on advanced capitalism in The Sane Society (1955a) and on Mexican village life in Social Character in a Mexican Village (with Michael Maccoby, 1970b), and Bourdieu with his extended studies of peasants in Algeria during the French colonial war of the 1950s and early 1960s. We will compare and contrast the theory of social character developed in the Mexican study with Bourdieu's concept of habitus, and discuss what Fromm's ideas can add to Bourdieu-influenced critical social science.
Germany and the Cold War
(1964)
Germany and the Cold War
(1964)
The Psychoanalytic Study of the American Public: Biophilia vs. Necrophilia, 32 pp. (Typoscript)
(1969)
On Humanizing Work.
(1970)
To fully develop a science of social character, three aspects of Fromm's social character theory need to be clarified. The first has to do with the difference between individual and social character. Fromm expanded on Freud's description of normal types: erotic (receptive), obsessive (hoarding) and narcissistic (exploitative). Besides the concept of social character, Fromm made three major contributions to the psychoanalytic theory of character: the concept of productiveness, sociopolitical modes of relationship, and the marketing character. Social character is an interac-tion between internalized culture (values) and individual character. This interaction results in variations in social character and helps explain the Secon issue, how so-cial character changes. The concept of social selection explains how narcissistic en-trepreneurs restructure social institutions to shape a new social character. The third issue concerns how social character develops throughout the life cycle. Fromm never offered a developmental theory. Erik Erikson's model of development fit the social character of America at the mid-century. A revision of this model provides a useful construct for understanding changes in the kind of problems being brought to psychoanalysis at the start of the 21st century and also changes in psychoanalytic practice.
The Leaders We Need And What Makes Us Follow, Boston (Harvard Business School Press) 2007, 249 p.
(2007)
Psychoanalytical methodology and sociological theory are combined to produce a sociopsychoanalytic approach in the study of social character of groups. An overview of sociopsychoanalytical research is presented, based on E. FROMM's 2 major contributions to the discipline: the sociopolitical study of German workers in the Hitler era, and a later project concerned with social pathology in a small Mexican village. In the former study, efforts were made to determine the degree of authoritarianism in the character of those workers who were pro-Nazi, and of those who held socialistic and democratic values. In the latter study, focus was on the high incidence of violence and alcoholism among a specific group of Mexican peasants, and whether these were symptoms related to social conditions or were negative characteristics shared by a social group. Interpretive questionnaire's were employed in both studies. Sociopsychoanalysis has much to contribute to the traditional methods of studying man and society that are presently used by social anthropologists and sociologists.