Refine
Language
- Arabic (24)
- Bulgarian (3)
- Czech (11)
- German (314)
- Greek (1)
- English (87)
- Farsi, Persian (3)
- Finnish (4)
- French (10)
- Serbocroatic (6)
- Hungarian (2)
- Italian (27)
- Japanese (4)
- Korean (6)
- Dutch (1)
- Turkish (5)
- Polish (12)
- Portuguese (9)
- Romany (1)
- Russian (1)
- Slovakian (1)
- Slovenian (1)
- Spanish (35)
- Serbian (2)
- Swedish (1)
- Chinese (2)
Document Type
- Articles (386)
- Forewords (94)
- Interviews (46)
- Books (33)
- Reviews (10)
- Dissertations (2)
- Event Reports (2)
Erich Fromm was not only one of the founders of IFPS in the 1960s, but also one of the forerunners of the intersubjective tradition in psychoanalysis. Trained at the Berlin Institute, he started in the 1930s, after emigrating to the USA, to reformulate psychoanalytic theory by focusing on man’s need to be related to reality, to others, and to him- or herself. Similarly to Sullivan, Fromm looked at man primarily as a social being. But in contrast to Sullivan, Fromm stressed much more man’s being molded by societal requirements and by an intersubjectivity that is determined by strivings originating in the structure of his social character. Because of Fromm’s ‘‘societal’’ orientation, his approach to psychoanalysis is still of relevance to understanding how the intersubjective and intrapsychic are interwoven in each individual. Beyond that, his approach enables insights into what is going on psychically in society and how these changes can influence the individual’s welfare or suffering.
Particularly due to technical innovations, we are witnessing an unbounding of reality that increasingly is reflected in an inner striving to get rid of the limitations and boundaries of our own personality by reconstructing it anew. This pursuit of de-limitation, dissolution and blurring of boundaries is seen as a central character trait of the Ego-oriented social character. Such a fabrication of a limitless per-sonality doubtless results in a weakening of such psychic abilities as experiencing one’s self as a consistent and ambiguous entity, being emotionally attached to oneself and to others, feeling one’s own strivings, affects and emotions, and being guided by one’s internalized norms and values. Lastly, the impact of this character formation is discussed in regard to clinical and therapeutic issues.