Refine
Document Type
- Articles (116) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- no (116) (remove)
Year of publication
- 2015 (116) (remove)
法国哲学家米歇尔•福柯认为,>全景监狱<是信息社会的社会控制机器,社会管理者通过信息不对称的方式来实现低成本、高效率的社会治理。然而,随着传播技术的日新月异和媒介形态的层出不穷,信息资源分配方式的不断变革催生了以>围观<结构为主要特征的新型社会结构——>共景监狱<,它是众人对个体展开的集体>凝视和控制<。在互联网时代,网民是>共景监狱<场域中规范化监视的主体,他们在数量增长、信息消费、议程设置三大层面展现了自身>凝视与控制<社会的力量。本文基于>共景监狱<的场域特征,结合弗洛姆>社会性格<的相关理论,发现网民的>话语实践<在网络匿名机制的作用下既得到了极大释放,又增加了非理性的因素。因此在>话语实践<过程中,网民往往呈现出非理性狂欢、情绪燃点低、自我意识弱等社会性格的基本特征。
Проводится философско-культурологический анализ медицинской корпоративной культуры через призму одного из главных ее элементов любви. Автор отмечает процесс дегуманизации в современной системе оказания медицинской помощи и деонтологический кризис медицинской корпорации. Один из способов выхода из кризиса возвращение к этике любви врача к своему пациенту на новом уровне. Автором использован методологический подход Эриха Фромма, представляющий любовь как искусство, в котором необходимо совершенствоваться.
Working with text suggests a kind of dialogue between readers and authors, which is especially important in the educational process. Regardless of when the text was written, each new reading can create its new life. Regardless of the form of representation (on paper or digital) every time in the process of education, classic text (under careful reading) raises questions and creates the conditions of dialogue through the centuries, which is the main feature of educational environment. Texts on the same issue could be written in different times and can express different points of view. So, the task for both students and skilled researchers is the ability to correlate various positions, to join with them in an equal dialogue considering features of the epoch text writing and the era to which the reader belongs. It is important not only to learn and remember the text. Researchers should be able to form their own position by comparing all this discordance. The subject of my article is essence and methodology of questioning the text as a special kind of text-based communication in educational process of critical thinking development. For this purpose, I use the technique of analytic questioning, as well as methods of system and discourse analysis, formal and modal logic. Applying these methods, on the examples of creative works of Immanuil Kant, Erich Fromm, Osip Mandelshtam, Alexander Pushkin, and Marina Tsvetaeva, I show how the authors of classical humanitarian texts used the practice of questioning to establish and strengthen their communication with the readers (current and future). In my article, I analyze Mandelshtam’s, Pushkin’s and Fromm’s approach to questioning and compare their way of questioning with the Kantian one. On the example of Marina Tsvetaeva’s essay >My Pushkin<, I also show the effect of poetic questioning (questioning of the author of poetic text to its reader) on the young reader in the process of forming his own worldview. As a possible tool for dialogue with the text in the educational process, I propose to use the methodology of expert work that was developed by me earlier. This methodology is a tool of modern educational communications, the way to dialogue with author regardless of the time of writing the analyzed text. Under this methodology, the student fixes the results of text analysis in his analytical report, which is an analytical table (such tables initially presuppose consistent dialogue with the text). Analytical report (analytical table) contains the following sections: (i) List of the basic concepts presented in the text, and their most important characteristics; (ii) Questions to the text; (iii) Reflections and comments; (iv) Possible associations and analogies related to the professional activities of the author of the report. In the process of expert work, formulating questions, engaging in dialogue with the text, students gain a new vision of the investigated text and studied disciplines. This vision is refined in the process of group discussion influenced by questions of other participants of practical training. I conclude that this methodology allows the creation of conditions for the formation of a consistent dialogue with the text on a regular basis. [Taken from Scientific Library Cyberlenika: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dialog-skvoz-veka-obrazovatelnoe-kommunikativnoe-prostranstvo]
Entre 1949 y 1974 Erich Fromm vivió en México. Durante esos años tuvo una intensa actividad en la clínica psi-coanalítica y ejerció una notable influencia en el desarrollo del movimiento psicoanalítico mexicano. En torno suyo se orga-nizó un grupo de discípulos, principalmente de nacionalidad mexicana. No obstante, Fromm tuvo un discípulo colombiano: el psiquiatra y psicoanalista José Gutiérrez (1927-2008). Entre 1955 y 1961, Gutiérrez participó del círculo inmediato de Fromm, su psicoanalista y mentor. Esos años fueron determinantes en la formación y en el pensamiento psicoanalítico del colombiano. Al regresar a Colombia, Gutiérrez publicó >El método psicoanalítico de Erich Fromm< (1961), el primer trabajo crítico sobre el psicoanálisis humanista frommiano. Asimismo, Gutiérrez, con la colaboración de su esposa, la psicóloga y psicoanalista Magdalena Restrepo, organizó una escuela psicoanalítica y comenzó a entrenar a un grupo de profesionales.
This paper will explore ideologies of nature including the ‘Garden of Eden’ and >wildernesses<. It locates these ideologies as morphing to accommodate the later trajectory of the Enlightenment Project and its endorsement of modern Western scientific and technological principles. Beginning with the premise that nature is unknowable, this paper offers a critique of dominant Western cultural ideologies that function to domesticate and order nature. This goes hand in hand with ideologies and practices of domination and control in the name of scientific, technological and capitalist neo-liberal economic >development<. The assumption that the boundary between nature and humans is crossable through scientific and technological knowledge is one that can be explored and challenged by examining how such knowledge is from the outset ideologically constructed. This paper will look at the concept of alienation from nature (as expressed by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in >Emile< and Karl Marx) to explore how modern schooling and the capitalist economy shape human-nature relations.
>The Rocking-Horse Winner< is one of D. H. Lawrence’s greatest short stories. Taking Hester, the mother’s image as an example, Lawrence described the alienated human nature in industrial civilization and expressed his discontentment and criticism. Focusing on the alienation of the mother’s image from the perspective of Erich Fromm’s alienation theory, this paper analyzed the manifestation of the mother’s alienation and concluded it is the expanded crazy pursuit of money that destroys the beautiful, pure nature of human and finally alienates human nature.
This chapter elaborates the psychology of Nietzsche's motif of escape from self with the help of the views of Alfred Adler, Erich Fromm, and Karen Horney. It summarizes the root cause of failure of self-love on this Nietzschean psychology. The chapter alsThis chapter elaborates the psychology of Nietzsche's motif of escape from self with the help of the views of Alfred Adler, Erich Fromm, and Karen Horney. It summarizes the root cause of failure of self-love on this Nietzschean psychology. The chapter also focuses on four major types of distortion, which provide the main themes of the Genealogy of Morals. These are the perversion of cruelty, the neurosis of cruel punitivism, the neurosis of resentment, and the resignatory neurosis of the ascetic ideal. In all four areas, virtue can be understood as having at its core self-affirmation or self-love, and vice self-hate and escape from self. That is, at a depth psychological level, virtue can be seen as expressive of a self-loving attitude and vice the reverse. The existentialist motif of escape from self has in Nietzsche's hands been transformed into a characterological psychology at home in virtue ethics. [Taken from Publisher's Website http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com]
Today the concept of the interpersonal field, while seldom credited to those who created it, is widely used in psychoanalysis. After reviewing how the concept of the field defines interpersonal and relational psychoanalysis, I take up the rejection of the idea in American mainstream psychoanalysis in the decades just after it was proposed by Sullivan and Fromm, why that rejection took place, and how the entire discipline of psychoanalysis in North America might have fared if the idea had been widely recognized earlier than it was.