Refine
Language
- Serbian (26) (remove)
Document Type
- Articles (11)
- Books (9)
- Reviews (3)
- Forewords (2)
- Collections (1)
Сажетак. Интерпретација тумачења људског карактера Ериха Фрома. Анализа индивидуалног и друштвеног карактера, као и односа религије и карактера, симбиотичког одношења, повучености-деструктивности и љубави као односа социјализације. Истицање важности продуктивне и непродуктивне оријентације у односима асимилације. Осврт на типове непродуктивног карактера: прималачки, израбљивачки, згрталачки и тржишни карактер, као и ауторитарно садомазохистички и револуционарни карактер. Разматрање величине и значаја Фромове мисли са социолошког становишта: друштвени карактер за Фрома има етички и хеуристички значај. Људске страсти су укорењене у карактеру и представљају начин да се да смисао постојању, да се одговори на људску егзистенцијалну ситуацију. За Фрома, најважнији циљ друштава би требало да буде потпуни развитак човека.
Some theoretical and practical problems of suicide prevention in hospitalized psychotic patients
(1975)
Suicide rates in Yugoslavia of 12.4 in 1964 and 13.9 in 1969 are reported, with variations of 2.3 to 29.7 in different parts of the country. Stengal's view of committed and attempted suicide is critically examined as well as theories of Freud, K. Lorenz, and E. FROMM on aggression and destructiveness. Data are presented on 4,000 psychiatric patients, 625 with presuicidal syndrome, 226 of whom had attempted suicide before admission. Four out of 4,000 patients committed suicide. A liberal regime in psychiatric institutions is suggested as a means of preventing suicide by patients. In cases of severe depression ECT is needed.
The main subject of this paper is a comparative analysis of two theoretical presentations of deviance: structurally-functionalistic against the socio-antrophological and the establishment of the main points of theoretical differences. These theories are the crucial and most influential understandings of social deviance with all the characteristics of different and >rival< scientific paradigms within the deviance sociology. The starting point is that the comparative analysis of the understanding of the society, man and the individual-society relation presents the foundation stone for noticing essential differences which there are between the structurally functionalistic and socio-antrophological understandings of social deviance. The following issues are further topics of study: definition of what is socially normal; definition of what is socially deviant; criteria for telling deviant from normal- establishment of the point of view concerning the social deviance phenomenon- recognition of basic types of indicators of social deviance; understanding the causes of social deviance; understanding the character of social reaction to deviations and recognition of joint characteristics and scientific preoccupations of these theoretical paradigms. The main authors whose ideas are being analyzed are Talkot Parsons and Robert Merton for the structurally-functionalistic that is Erich Fromm for socio-antrophological theory.