Refine
Language
- Bulgarian (3)
- Catalan (1)
- German (65)
- English (163)
- French (1)
- Serbocroatic (1)
- Indonesian (1)
- Italian (21)
- Korean (3)
- Polish (3)
- Portuguese (4)
- Spanish (17)
- Chinese (51)
Document Type
- Articles (240)
- Reviews (33)
- Dissertations (25)
- Books (21)
- Forewords (6)
- Collections (3)
- Event Reports (3)
- Interviews (2)
- dissertatopm (1)
Year of publication
- 2006 (334) (remove)
Editorial
(2006)
Editorial
(2006)
Ill-health in Sweden 2005: Discontent in a modern welfare society and its relation to globalization
(2006)
Three waves of challenges may be perceived from within psychoanalysis to its reductionist attitude to religion and spirit. These historical challenges from within psychoanalysis are an important context for reading the many papers now being published on spirituality and psychotherapy, and increasingly, spirituality and psychoanalysis. The 1st wave began with some of Freud's contemporaries, among them his friend, the psychoanalyst and pastor Oscar Pfister; the Nobel Laureate Romain Rolland, and the poet T. S. Eliot. Challenges continued after Freud's death: In Britain from psychoanalysts such as Rickman and Guntrip, and in America initially by the European immigrants, Erikson and Fromm. British independent psychoanalysts initiated what may be considered to be the 3rd wave, whose momentum is now swelling to a sea change.
Considerando a crítica de Adorno à indústria cultural, a qual torna a cultura um meio de produção do comportamento de consumo, tentamos demonstrar como a gramática da perversão tende a monopolizar as formas de prazer na pósmodernidade. De acordo com nossa hipótese, a produção de consumo recodifica o recalcamento originário concebido por Freud: tal gramática suprime a satisfação libidinal de forma análoga à repressão primária, contudo, ao invés de utilizar as tensões insatisfeitas da libido para o trabalho, ela direciona a satisfação erotica para o prazer de consumir. Desta forma, ela formata a satisfação perversa para que esta se coadune com os interesses da economia.
Agresión y destructividad
(2006)
Girls, their fathers, and their mothers: Patterned links to ambition and prohibition in women
(2006)
The subjectivity of the mother in the mother–son relationship. Attachment, separation, and autonomy
(2006)
Arbeiter und Angestellte am Vorabend des Dritten Reiches. Eine sozialpsychologische Untersuchung.
(2006)
La >tolerancia< es un valor que se puede entender como inclusión entusiasta del otro en el propio mundo. Partimos de esta visión, resaltan do que, desde ella, sertoleranterequeriríatenerla capacidad y la posibilidad de escuchar. Aludimos, en este sentido, tanto a una disposición interior del sujeto como a una estructuración social determinada que permitan esta escucha, pero enfatizamos en especial la necesidad de una configuración psíquica apropiada, que denominamos >horizontalidad<. Seguimos en especial los planteamientos de Erich Fromm y Paulo Freire, entre otros, para describir dicha >horizontalidad tolerante< y terminar hallando en ella la salud y la reconciliación del hombre consigo mismo.
L’autor exposa i valora les idees principals de la filosofia de Horst-Eberhard Richter i de la seva l’empresa intel·lectual en el seu intent d’eixamplar les bases i els límits de la psicoanàlisi fins abastar el conjunt de les ciències de la cultura, camí que ja havien iniciat també altres autors com ara Erich Fromm, Herbert Marcuse, Bruno Bettelheim, Alexander Mitscherlich, Paul Ricoeur, entre d’altres.
爱是一个古老而常新的研究课题,在这个灾难深重的现代社会,很多人渴望爱、渴望知音、抱怨真爱难求、知音难遇。美籍德裔犹太学者埃利希•弗洛姆(Erich Fromm 1900-1980),指出人们追求爱的一个最大的误区,在于把爱看作一个外在的对象,把爱的获得雷同于物的拥有。事实上爱是一种人的主动能力,爱是进化了人的一种能力,是一种使人的本质丰富并且上升的能力,在某种情况下这种能力与艺术的能力类似。弗洛姆的理论是一种关于>生活艺术<的应用科学,并且力图把它付诸实践,建立理想中的>健全的社会<,需要不断从自己的心灵上提升境界。无论是兄弟之爱、母爱、性爱、自爱、以及信仰之爱,都是通向人格完整、灵魂救赎的人生实践。如果不努力发展自己的全部人格并以此达到一种倾向性,那么每种爱的试图都会失败;如果没有爱他人的能力,不能真正谦恭地、勇敢地、真诚地和有纪律地爱他人,那么人们在自己的爱情生活中也永远得不到满足。弗洛姆认为爱的顶点是给予而不是索取,他把爱看作是人类对自己生存问题的回答,是人与人之间合作统一的巨大力量。因此,爱既不是一种飘落在人身上的力量,也不是一种强加在人身上的责任;它是人自己的力量,凭借这种力量,人使自己和世界联系在一起,并使世界真正成为他的世界。所以,一无所知的人什么都不爱,一无所能的人什么都不懂,什么都不懂的人毫无价值。但是懂得很多的人却能爱、有见识、有眼光……对一件事了解得越深,爱的程度也越深。如果有人认为,所有的水果都同草莓一起成熟,那他对葡萄就一无所知。弗洛姆认为,现代资本主义社会的生产过程、消费过程、政治生活和社会关系各个方面存
Il segno tragico
(2006)
In distinguishing between negative and positive freedom, Isaiah Berlin expressed a preference for negative freedom. Given the track record of those who in the past have advocated positive freedom, this is not surprising. But advocates of positive freedom do not accept that tyranny necessarily results from embracing their conception of freedom, and they are convinced that a commitment to negative freedom is never enough to defend “freedom” against tyrants. They do, however, share one thing in common with those who favor negative freedom: both equate their conception of freedom with >true freedom,< and treat the other as either false or incomplete. This might suggest that Berlin's distinction is more a partisan's tool than a tool of analysis. I disagree. But rather than reducing it to a distinction between >freedom from< and >freedom to,< we need to expand it. Not only will this enable us to move beyond an important criticism of Berlin's conception of freedom, it will also provide a better explanation for why negative freedom is as likely as positive freedom to diminish “true freedom” and why positive freedom is as likely as negative freedom to increase it.
Doble validez de Erich Fromm
(2006)
Introductory commentary
(2006)