Refine
Document Type
- Articles (78)
- Reviews (60)
- Interviews (27)
- Excerpts (8)
- Dissertations (4)
- Books (3)
- Journals (3)
- Forewords (2)
- event Report (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (186) (remove)
Year of publication
- 1974 (186) (remove)
Why Do Wé Crave Calamity?
(1974)
Review Fromm, E.: The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (1973a, German): Wer tötet, will töten
(1974)
Review Fromm, E.: The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (1973a, German): Der Mensch im Netz des Bösen
(1974)
Untersucht werden berufliche Werdegänge, gesellschaftliches Bewusstsein und familiare Sozialisationsbedingungen ehemaliger Industrielehrlinge. Zur Erfassung eines für die Fragestellung relevanten Persönlichkeitsmerkmals wurde das Autoritarismuskonzept gewählt. Autoritarismus wurde jedoch nicht als eine Art psychopathischen Extremverhaltens angesehen – diese Auffassung hatte sich in Nachfolgeuntersuchungen zu der Arbeit von Adorno und Mitarbeitern herausgebildet -, sondern im Rückgriff auf ältere Konzeptionen von FROMM und Reich als ein dem durchschnittlichen Individuum zukommendes Verhalten in der gegenwärtigen Gesellschaftsordnung (>basic personality<). Unterschieden wird weiterhin zwischen zwei Ausformungen: (1) dem >klassischen Autoritären<, bei dem die gesellschaftlichen Verhältnisse eine hierarchisch und straff organisierte Normanpassung erzwingen, und (2) als einer moderneren Variante dem >rigiden Konventionalisten<.
Erich Fromm
(1974)
Review Fromm, E.: The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (1973a, English): Necriphilous Nazis et al.
(1974)
Revista de Psicoanálisis, Psiquiatría y Psicología, México (Nueva Epoca No. 06, 1974), 84 pp.
(1974)
Revista de Psicoanálisis, Psiquiatría y Psicología, México (Nueva Epoca No. 05, 1974), 101 pp.
(1974)
Revista de Psicoanálisis, Psiquiatría y Psicología, México (Nueva Epoca No. 04, 1974), 85 pp.
(1974)
Review Fromm, E.: The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (1973a, German): Lust am Mord als Preis
(1974)
Review Fromm, E.: The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (1973a, German): Die Lust an der Gewalt
(1974)
Review Fromm, E.: The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (1973a, English): Analyzing Aggression
(1974)
Review Fromm, E.: The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (1973a, English): Society and Necrophilia
(1974)
Review Fromm, E.: The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (1973a, English): The Necrophilous Type
(1974)
Although works of individual writers such as T. Adorno, H. Marcuse, and E. FROMM, have been influential in the united states for the last 10 to 15 years, the Frankfurt School's critical theory as an overall approach has only recently received more widespread attention. Based on the german philosophical tradition, on freudian and marxian theories, the school presents a thoroughgoing critique of contemporary society, its effects on individuals, and of certain philosophies ie, positivism underpinning the contemporary social order. At the same time critical theory attempts to outline directions for social change more in line with its view of human nature. Basic themes as formulated by different critical theorists over the past 3 decades are presented.
Review Fromm, E.: The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (1973a, English): A Deadly Civilization
(1974)
Argues that interest in psychology is a potential threat to the church. One can either abdicate pastoral functions to counseling professions or value one's own counseling to the exclusion of priestly functions. The anthropology of FROMM and Skinner often excite more than Luther's or Augustine's. One must distinguish Christian theology as a `story' from psychological `models' of human nature. The pulpit must stay free of partisan models to draw through dialog with the value of each, while it does not neglect concerns for social and political justice.
L'ecole de Francefort. Dialectique de la particularite, Paris (éditions universitaires) 1994.
(1974)
Antworten auf Fromm
(1974)
Discusses the symbolism of dreams that derive from and relate to modern social and cultural contexts. Following E. FROMM, dreams are seen as expressing both individual and social attitudes. The particular symbols derived from modern technology may express individual desires and conflicts or may criticize current social values. A universal dream symbol, such as water, takes on a socially determined meaning depending on its socially related form.