Refine
Language
- Japanese (74) (remove)
Document Type
- Articles (64)
- Books (3)
- Forewords (3)
- Reviews (3)
- Collections (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (74) (remove)
フロムとフランクル,両者には深い共通点がある.両者とも,人間の《実存的特質》から生まれる《生きる意味を欲する》という根源的欲求との関連で人間の抱える精神的病理を解明するという視点に立つ.共にこう主張する.生きる情熱は生きる意味を掴むことによって生まれ,生きる意味を感得することは他者と深い愛の関係性(愛し愛される)を結ぶこと,いいかえると深い《応答の絆》を結ぶことによってのみ可能になる,と.この両者の観点から,現代日本の若者の精神状況を振り返るなら,我々は深い憂慮を感じざるを得ない.昨今の「拡大自殺」と名づけられた病理,自殺念慮者の増加,我が子虐待,イジメ,等々は今日の精神的荒廃を語るキーワードである.だからこそ,フロムとフランクルは若者によって再発見されねばならないし,実は両者との出会いを若者は待っている.
The purpose of this study was to analyze problems related to the mechanism whereby students can accept corporal punishment during extracurricular sports activities with reference to the books Escape from Freedom and Man for Himself that were central to Erich Fromm's authority theory. Specifically, the author focused on the concepts of >authoritarian character,< >authoritarian ethics,< and >authoritarian conscience.< Fromm pointed out that anxiety prompted Germany's citizens to give up their freedom in order to obey authoritarian powers such as Hitler and the Nazis. Students taking part in extracurricular sports activities were considered from the viewpoint of Fromm's authority theory. It was revealed that students comply with a leader's authority in order to relieve anxiety, and have positive thoughts about corporal punishment. Furthermore, it was found that such acceptance of corporal punishment succeeded in eliminating conspicuous suffering, but not in removing any underlying conflicts. Fromm pointed that fear of anxiety was relieved by spontaneous activity. To achieve spontaneous activity by students, it was suggested that some form of measure that does not create the type of partnership that occurred between Germany's citizens and Hitler would be desirable for any relationship between the leader of extracurricular sports activities and the students.
エーリッヒ・フロムは、フランクフルト社会研究所在籍時に、権威主義に対する批判的考察を行っている。この考察は、フロム独自の自我理論と疎外‐ 物象化論として把握可能である。この権威主義研究の際、フロムはフロイト自我理論への批判を、フロイトの概念である超自我、自我、エスという自我三層構造論を踏襲しながら行っている。自我が弱い時、彼は、「内部世界と外部世界」を生活充足の対象とする人格的課題を、超自我が担うことを認めている。しかしこの時、超自我が精神を支配し、この過程内で抑圧という心的機制が生じる。この抑圧によって自己は消耗し、自我の能動的行為編成機能と現実検証機能が低下するのである。そして、この超自我は権威との相互的な再帰的構造化過程を形成する。超自我は、自己の精神的エネルギーを権威対象へ投影する。さらに投影、備給された精神的エネルギーが、権威の命令を内化することによって、超自我に回帰していく。この諸過程によって、権威への合理的批判は抑制され、自我機能の低下が起こる。さらに、これは社会的相互作用として成立しているため、社会文化領域での物象化が生じるのである。最終的に、この超自我による物象化‐ 疎外現象は、次の四つの具体的事象へと帰結する。それは①精神的なエネルギーの譲渡=疎外、②自己関係の疎外、③自己による自己産出過程の物象化された超自我と権威への譲渡=疎外、④自己関係内部にある、権威対象以外の他者からの疎外である。
本 稿 の 課 題 は, 1940 年 代 以 降 フ ラ ン ク フ ル ト学 派 か ら分 離 した エ ー リ ッヒ ・フ ロ ム の 社 会 心 理 学 を, 再 び 近 代 ・モ デ ル ネ 論 の 観 点 か ら再 構 成 す る こと に あ る 。 マ ル ク ー ゼ に 代 表 さ れ る多 く の 批 判 者 は, フ ロ ム の 倫 理 主 義 を,管 理 社 会 に お い て は 同 調 主 義 の イ デ オ ロ ギ ー に転 化 せ ざ る を え な い, と し て批 判 す る 。 しか し, フ ロ ム の 見 る 近 代 社 会 の 抑 圧 的 構 造 か ら解 放 さ れ る た めに は, 抑 圧 に 対 す る 「批 判 」 だ け で な く解 放 の た め の 「倫 理 」 が 不 可 避 的 に要 請 され ね ば な ら な い 。 そ れ ゆ え, ア ドル ノ=ホ ル ク ハ イ マ ー が 自 然 を 支 配す る 理 性 に 対 して 徹 底 し た 「批 判 」 理 論 を構想 し た の に 対 し, フ ロ ム は 病 理的 理 性(知 能)に 対 す る 批 判 と 同 時 に 理 性 の 「倫 理 」 学 を構 築 し た の で あ る。 フ ロ ム は, な に ゆ え 理 性 へ の 希 望 を堅 持 し え た の か, ま た 自 然 と理 性 の 関 係を ど の よ う に 捉 え て い た の か 。 本 稿 は, そ の 答 え を フ ロ ム が 依 拠 した ス ピノザ の 自然 的 理 性(自 然 の 光)1)の 働 き に 求 め る もの で あ る。キ ー ワ ー ド:批 判 と倫 理 自 然 と理 性 近 代 ・モ デ ル ネ
The purpose of this paper is to explore the potential connection between Consumer Education and Environmental Education for the purpose of avoiding the geo‐catastrophe of the human race. An educational approach has been made to examine this subject. I will examine Erich Fromm's thought, especially with reference to the ideas of >Social Character< and >the being mode of existence.< Hence an attempt to unite the two kinds of education will be made. The conclusion here is that a view of children's character formation dominated by >the being mode of existence< will be necessary.
The main purpose of this paper is to found an educational basis of consumer education in the Japanese school system. The basis will be formed by what is called >consumption ethics<. Recently it has been pointed out that society has to re-evaluate its value judgements of daily life. Education has the ability to influence future generations' global awareness. The steps towards improving our crisis situation must begin with a combination of consumer education and environmental education. The function of education cannot be emphasized enough in that it has the ability to alter morals, values, ways of thinking and the social system. But the goal of saving our lives cannot be actualized without real ideas. Hence there is a need to establish >consumer ethics<. These new ideas should be based on the establishment of >consumption ethics<.
私がここで試みるのは,フランクルとフロムとの対話を想像することである.実際には両者は対話を行っていない.しかし,両者は有意義な対話を生む十分な理由を持つ.二人は同時代のユダヤ人であり,反ナチスの勇敢な闘士であり,それぞれの仕方でフロイトの精神分析学から「実存的精神分析」を生みだそうとした思想家であった.二人は,人間が抱く根本的な欲求はリビドーではなく,自分の人生を有意義な人生として実現しようとする「意味への欲求」であると考えた.フランクルは言う.「人生が君に投げかける問いに一つ一つ真摯に応えようとする営為が君に人生の意味を発見させるだろう」と.フロムは言う.「責任感とは,《自分には応答する力がある,だから応答する,応答したい》という自発的意識にほかならない」と.そして,フロムは指摘した.生き生きした豊かな応答関係の再生,これこそ今日の精神的課題である,と.
September 9/11 shocked the Japanese. It also reminded me of the 1995 sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subways by the Aum Shinrikyo and the Oklahoma City Bombing by the American extreme right. A novel form of terrorism seems to have aroused since 1995. Therefore I have tried to analyze some similarity and difference between the Aum Shinrikyo Sect and Usama bin Laden's al-Quaida for several months in order to clarify the content of a >new terrorism<. Although at first assumed that the two incidents were heterogeneous, the more I have analyzed them, the more I have founded out that were homogeneous. This paper tries to examine the similarity between the two groups and point out that their common motivation is a kind of self-actualization developed by A. H. Maslow. The survey includes anomie scale and authoritarian scale. This analysis reveals that economic factor and anomie factor influence over the self-actualization of current Japanese students who must overcome their anxiety aroused by the serious economic crisis as well as their identity crisis developed by Erick H. Erikson. It also points out that such a self-actualization and authoritarian personality developed by Erich Fromm influence over their inclination to religion. As a result it implies that such a perspective could explain also the behaviors of the Aum Shinrikyo Sect and Usama bin Laden' al-Qaida: The two terrorist groups that are mainly consisted of young males escape from freedom committing to religion, namely Aum Shinrikyo or >fundamentalist< Islam to remove anxiety aroused by the serious economic crisis.
[First page] The aim of this paper is to clarify the difference between Fromm's concept of alienation from Marx's, and thus to evaluate the significance Fromm's idea of alienation. 1. The standard of the un-alienated Marx sees man as a process of self-creation through labor (= activity in general). To Marx, the un-alienated man is, first, the individual two each day realizes the potentialities of his being through work which gives his inner capacities the form of concrete embodiments, and second, at the same time the subject of history whose potentialities and inner capacities are got the form of historical embodiments through the mode of production in each period. Fromm as a moralist changes Marx's objective concept of man into a subjective one. Fromm conceives man as the bearer of the unchangeable basic needs which are inherent in human nature and the human condition. For Fromm, the un-alienated man is the man who has satisfied and fulfilled these basic needs in a productive way, who has realized a normative basis of his nature which remains the same always and everywhere. From Marx's point of view, love, happiness and other universal values which constitute Fromm's substantialized criterion of the un-alienated are nothing but passing phenomena which are at every moment to be enriched, to be changed and to be conquered in the self-creating process of man through labor. Fromm does not bring Marx's thought up to date but pulls it back to the stage of Feuerbach's thought. 2. Alienation and its social background. Fromm conceives alienation as a psychological phenomenon. Alienation is thought to be a pattern of social character which has been former without the fulfillment of the basic needs. Fromm's concept of alienation is, after all, an unhistorical concept. Alienation in Marx's sense is not a mere psychological state, but an objective and total situation of man which involves three spheres: the realm …
When we talk about the >quality of life< (QOL) we should inquire just into the >quality< of human life. Generally speaking, a qualitative thing includes something original that has no substitute. Each person's existence is an irreplaceable life, and it has a unique value. QOL is a subject about the qualitative values of human life. The pursuit of QOL is the pursuit of a >healthy< human life or >happiness.< E. Fromm said that a person represents the whole human being, and that an individual is a physico-spiritual totality. He also said that the goal of a person in life is to be himself. According to Fromm, the fundamental human desire aims to conquer >existential dichotomies,< such as >life and death,< >solidarity and aloneness.< Everyone shows one's answer depending on his/her character or personality. Only a >productive character< can get happiness through its answer. That is the basic attitude by which >human nature< and >individuality< are brought into full play at the same time. Such a person gropes for a >sane society<. And such a society ought to bring up sound persons. QOL as elements of a living environment are useful as conditions for happiness. However, the most important thing is the >quality< of each one's life itself. This kind of QOL is shown by the basic attitude as >personality.< A person who lives a well-filled life has a high quality of life. The scale of quality of life as the standard common to human beings is >human nature,< which is also the foundation of human equality. This is the >basis< of human rights. And each person will be the judge of the matter connected with >happiness<, making use of the activation of individuality. So, medical persons should not confuse QOL and >social usefulness!< Medical preference order is not a problem of QOL but purely a problem of medical technique.