Refine
Language
- Albanian (8)
- Arabic (58)
- Bulgarian (112)
- Catalan (3)
- Czech (42)
- Danish (22)
- German (6013)
- Greek (43)
- English (12964)
- Farsi, Persian (3)
- Finnish (76)
- French (583)
- Hebrew (14)
- Serbocroatic (155)
- Hungarian (79)
- Indonesian (46)
- Italian (981)
- Japanese (116)
- Korean (127)
- Latvian (24)
- Lithuanian (4)
- Dutch (23)
- Norwegian (37)
- Turkish (41)
- Polish (292)
- Portuguese (176)
- Romany (13)
- Roumain, Moldave (4)
- Russian (136)
- ser (2)
- Slovakian (6)
- Slovenian (15)
- Spanish (1370)
- Serbian (11)
- Swedish (11)
- Ukrainian (8)
- Sorbian (2)
- Chinese (1259)
Document Type
- Articles (24879) (remove)
The article discusses some moral aspects of the conceptions of A. Maslow, C. Rogers, S. Jourard, R. May, and other representatives of humanistic psychology. The relations between human nature and >good< and >evil<, autonomy of mature morality, personal freedom and responsibility, conscience and guilt, moral determinants of interpersonal relations are the major problems under analysis. The author also presents some basic objections made against the moral formulations stated in humanistic psychology.
Ievads jeb Fromms un Latvija
(2014)
Erich Fromm was one of the first psychoanalytic thinkers who was genuinely interested in Asian philosophies. In the first part of this article, I will show Fromm’s imago of Buddhism as a radical, nontheistic, and ethical philosophy >without God.< I will argue that Fromm made an important difference between the phenomenal ego and being that proves crucial for his understanding of psychoanalysis and his critique of modern society. I will also explore Fromm’s synthesis of Buddhist philosophy and psychoanalysis, and show the similarities and differences between them.