Refine
Language
- Albanian (14)
- Arabic (64)
- Bulgarian (128)
- Catalan (12)
- Czech (36)
- Danish (43)
- German (5912)
- Greek (65)
- English (11615)
- Estonian (1)
- Euskara, Basqe (2)
- Farsi, Persian (8)
- Finnish (78)
- French (565)
- Gujaritic (3)
- Hebrew (48)
- Serbocroatic (256)
- Hungarian (83)
- Indonesian (13)
- Icelandish (1)
- Italian (398)
- Japanese (108)
- Korean (105)
- Kurdish (1)
- Latin (1)
- Latvian (4)
- Lithuanian (6)
- Macedonian (2)
- Mongolian (1)
- Burmese (1)
- Dutch (43)
- Norwegian (32)
- Turkish (69)
- Polish (249)
- Portuguese (108)
- Romansh (1)
- Romany (14)
- Roumain, Moldave (13)
- Russian (139)
- Slovakian (8)
- Slovenian (24)
- Spanish (582)
- Albanian (1)
- Serbian (21)
- Swedish (34)
- Vietnamese (10)
- Sorbian (2)
- Chinese (1942)
Document Type
- Articles (15386)
- Books (4197)
- Reviews (955)
- Dissertations (818)
- Collections (698)
- Ebooks (382)
- Interviews (168)
- Forewords (164)
- Journals (70)
- Necrologues (18)
Has Fulltext
- no (22866) (remove)
Grenzbewusstsein – zwischen Abgrenzung und EntgrenzungDramatische, Lengerich (Pabst) 2024, 182 pp.
(2024)
Dramatische oder schleichende Grenzveränderungen prägen unsere Zeit - als Verletzungen, Risiken, Herausforderungen, Chancen und nicht zuletzt in der Dimension von Spiritualität. Autorinnen und Autoren aus humanwissenschaft-lichen Disziplinen berichten aus sensiblen Grenzregionen Erfahrungen und Re-flexionen: Kirche, Beruf, Jugendhilfe, Pädagogik, Psychotherapie, Sexualität, Sadomasochismus, Macht. Die Essays, empirisch fundiert, folgen der Ambiguität der Themen und verzichten auf kurzschlüssige Konventionen.
Nach diesem (eklektisch bleibenden) ideengeschichtlichen Überblick widmet sich das folgende Kapitel der Frage, wie ein humanistischer Produktivitätsbegriff aussehen könnte, der das Subjekt und dessen Selbst- und Weltbezug ins Zentrum stellt. Zu diesem Zweck soll in Kapitel drei auf die Theorien Erich Fromms und Hartmut Rosas zurückgegriffen werden, bevor in Kapitel vier Kriterien für einen humanistischen Produktivitätsbegriff definiert werden. Der Auswahl der Autoren liegt die These zugrunde, dass beide die Frage nach produktiver Selbstwerdung neu stellen und diese an der lebensweltlichen Erfahrung spiegeln.
The current political climate is marked by polarization, which presents new difficulties for psychoanalysis. Erich Fromm, as a Freudian theorist and clinician, is uniquely positioned to address these issues. Fromm is a politically radical thinker who can help psychoanalysis think about society and social injustice beyond the clinical context while avoiding the dangers of excessively orthodox left-wing thinking that risks taking the field away from its core mission. Fromm can help psychoanalysis avoid what we are calling the >Peterson problem,< which is partly the result of provocative and extreme ideas in institutions and psychoanalytic publications that create reputational problems for the field. The >Peterson problem< brings new attention to the political bias of left-liberal authoritarians inside the profession, who focus on changing society rather than healing individuals and neglect audiences outside the liberal university and highly educated classes and thus create space for polarizing figures like psychologist Jordan Peterson to fill the gap. Peterson’s fame and influence serves as a lightning rod for the wider critique of left leaning political and cultural currents in psychoanalysis. Fromm can act as a role model as well as provide the intellectual resources for responding to these challenges.
Humanism has been criticized as a philosophical and political stance from different points of view in recent decades. The paper summarizes four common types of criticism, stemming from political, ethical, technological, and ecological concerns. These criticisms relate back to a preoccupation with the respect for otherness or difference, either toward human or non-human beings. The paper tries to demonstrate that these concerns are also to be found as essential elements in the development of humanism itself, not only among its political and theoretical opponents. It does so with reference to Erich Fromm’s works, where a life-oriented ethics is coupled with a demand for sustained political relatedness to difference, without giving up notions of a radical humanism and the anthropology that accompanies it.
On the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the foundation of the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt am Main, in 1923, this book aims at shedding light on the archives of some of the key thinkers of Critical Theory of Society, also well known as >Frankfurt School<. To pay homage to this current of thought, this contributed volume aims to make the archives speak for themselves, to show the public the quantity of unpublished material still existing by the authors of the Critical Theory which are now in funds in different parts of the world (in Germany, in Italy, or in the United States), and to show that Critical Theory remains alive 100 years after its inception.– The volume starts by presenting the archives of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the thinkers who inspired Critical Theory, and the archives of the Institute for Social Research itself. Then it dedicates separate sections to the archives of Walter Benjamin, Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, Friedrich Pollock, Herbert Marcuse, Leo Löwenthal and Jürgen Habermas. The book is composed of chapters written by researchers and editors who worked in the different fonds, as well as chapters written by or interviews with researchers who were or are in charge of some of the archives, or who are especially familiar with the material.– The Archives of Critical Theory will be an invaluable tool for researchers in many disciplines working with Critical Theory of Society, such as Sociology, Anthropology, Political Science, Philosophy, History, Education, Law and Cultural Studies, among others. Readers will find information about the content of each archive and the history of its constitution. The various contributions present many ways in which the materials may be explored and explain how such explorations affected or may yet affect the state of the research.
Learning >in the Hive<: >Social Character< and Student Wellbeing in the Age of Psychometric Data
(2023)
Growing societal concern about a crisis in the wellbeing of young people has prompted a range of responses from governments and corporations, predicated on an ideal of the resilient, self-reliant individual. Behavioural economists, data scientists and educational technology companies now offer a variety of psychological interventions based on psychometric data, aimed at ‘equipping’ individual students with the necessary skills and character to enable them to withstand the pressures of contemporary life. As a consequence, the critical importance of mutually supportive interpersonal relationships continues to be neglected in mainstream approaches to Social and Emotional Learning (SEL). This article draws on Fromm’s theory of social character and Zuboff’s analysis of >life in the hive< to challenge the assumptions about human behaviour underpinning data science and its application in digital tools for social and emotional learning and self-managed wellbeing. To improve students’ wellbeing, we need to begin with an understanding of why they are more likely to thrive within a network of mutually supportive social relationships than a digital >hive<.
O poczuciu bezradności
(2023)
Poczucie bezsilności
(2023)