Refine
Language
- German (12)
- English (98)
- Serbocroatic (1)
- Spanish (28)
Document Type
- Articles (139) (remove)
Year of publication
- 2021 (3)
- 2020 (1)
- 2019 (1)
- 2018 (2)
- 2017 (2)
- 2015 (2)
- 2014 (1)
- 2011 (1)
- 2009 (2)
- 2002 (2)
- 2000 (1)
- 1997 (2)
- 1996 (7)
- 1995 (6)
- 1994 (2)
- 1992 (1)
- 1990 (1)
- 1988 (2)
- 1985 (6)
- 1984 (1)
- 1982 (4)
- 1981 (2)
- 1980 (3)
- 1979 (1)
- 1978 (5)
- 1977 (3)
- 1976 (2)
- 1975 (8)
- 1974 (6)
- 1973 (1)
- 1972 (4)
- 1971 (7)
- 1970 (6)
- 1969 (9)
- 1968 (1)
- 1967 (3)
- 1966 (6)
- 1965 (1)
- 1964 (6)
- 1963 (2)
- 1962 (7)
- 1961 (1)
Leadership in Context
(2021)
My studies of leadership build on the work of Sigmund Freud, Erich Fromm, and Erik Erikson. Those psychoanalysts described leaders of large groups, their personalities and relations with their followers. In my studies of leaders and experience with them, I have found that leadership is a relationship in a particular context. There are different kinds of leaders, and someone can be a leader in one context, but not in another. Furthermore, different leadership roles and different cultures call for different personality types and leadership behavior. People follow leaders for different reasons, and leaders can influence why and how they are followed. While Freud, Fromm, and Erikson only described male leaders, women are increasingly filling leadership roles, sometimes more effectively than men.
Mainstream social science has been blindsided by the rise of Trumpism and broader growth of authoritarian populism. We make the case that Frommian work is desperately needed inside the core of contemporary social science theorizing by examining social character theory up against and alongside the concept of habitus developed by French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. Both Fromm and Bourdieu were concerned with the human costs of social change and economic development, Fromm with his writings on advanced capitalism in The Sane Society (1955a) and on Mexican village life in Social Character in a Mexican Village (with Michael Maccoby, 1970b), and Bourdieu with his extended studies of peasants in Algeria during the French colonial war of the 1950s and early 1960s. We will compare and contrast the theory of social character developed in the Mexican study with Bourdieu's concept of habitus, and discuss what Fromm's ideas can add to Bourdieu-influenced critical social science.
Las aportaciones científicas de Erich Fromm se basaron en su teoría del carácter social y los métodos que él desarrolló para ponerla a prueba. El carácter social describe las actitudes emocionales bien enraizadas en personas criadas en una misma cultura. La familia, la escolaridad, el trabajo y el juego conforman el carácter social de modo que las personas están dispuestas a hacer lo que tengan que hacer para prosperar económica y socialmente en una cultura determinada. El primer estudio de Fromm sobre empleados y trabajadores alemanes antes del surgimiento de Hitler mostró que, a pesar de suscribir una ideología democrática, la mayoría de ellos apoyaría a quienquiera que llegara al poder. El segundo estudio de campesinos de un pueblo mexicano generó resultados estadísticamente significativos que demostraron que el carácter social explicaba tanto la productividad como la psicopatología. Estos hallazgos se vieron confirmados por los resultados de estudios posteriores. El núcleo del carácter social está conformado por los tipos de caracteres psicoanalíticos descubiertos por Freud y modificados por Fromm. Esta teoría aprovecha los conocimientos de la economía, la sociología, la antropología y la historia. Maccoby ha proseguido la tarea, mostrando la importancia del concepto de carácter social para comprender el liderazgo y la motivación en el trabajo.