Reply to commentary
- The author comments on Dean and Dyess's >Gender: The Impossibility of Meaning.< They provide a valuable critique, based on Lacan's work, of postmodern gender theories. However, Dean and Dyess's argument for the >impossibility of meaning< in regard to gender may erect a new false dichotomy (gender as endless possibility versus gender as total impossibility) in place of the problematic dichotomy (gender essentialism versus gender constructivism) they so usefully deconstruct.
| Author: | James H. Hansell |
|---|---|
| Parent Title (English): | Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 771-774. |
| Document Type: | Articles |
| Language: | English |
| Year of first Publication: | 2000 |
| Release Date: | 2017/11/20 |
| Format: | xerox upon request / Fotokopie auf Anfrage |
| IdNo: | Hansell_J_H_2000 |
| Erich Fromm's Library and Erich Fromm Archive: | Articles / Artikel |
| Licence (German): |
