The enduring encounter. Commentary on paper by Beebe, Lachmann, and Jaffe

  • I maintain that every therapist operates out of a >philosophy of treatment< that is not always conscious. Every interpretation made or not made is rooted in such a philosophy. I then consider my own approach in 14 points. In the second part, two cases are discussed. The case of Frank's perversion is understood as a defensive identification with two parents, themselves perverts, and particularly a mother who stimulated his incestuous wishes by jointly looking at pornography. In Laura's case, the father's assuming maternal functions encouraged a permanent fixation at the oral level. In both cases, I argue in favor of a more encompassing interpretation than those made by the original authors.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Martin S. Bergmann
Parent Title (English):Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 13 (2003), pp. 327-339.
Document Type:Articles
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2003
Release Date:2017/11/20
Format:xerox upon request / Fotokopie auf Anfrage
IdNo:Bergmann_M_S_2003
Erich Fromm's Library and Erich Fromm Archive:Articles / Artikel
Licence (German):xerox upon request
Einverstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.