TY - JOUR A1 - Song, Feifei T1 - On the Three Stages of Stockmann's >Escape from Freedom< in >An Enemy of the People< [论《人民公敌》中斯托克曼的>逃避自由<的三个阶段] [application of Fromm's theories to art] JF - Literary and Art Weekly [文学艺术周刊], No. 22 (2024), pp. 22-24. N2 - 剧作家易卜生以《人民公敌》中的主人公斯托克曼为代言人,阐述自己对资本主义社会中民主自由的道德观念的思考和审视。剧作中随着自由境遇的变化,斯托克曼的自由观也发生变化,呈现出不同的性格结构和行为表现。本文基于弗洛姆>逃避自由<的理论,将斯托克曼的经历划分为三个阶段:反权威、破坏、创造性劳动,解读各个阶段下他的性格结构和心理形式的不同表现和变化逻辑。对资本主义自由民主痼疾的批判是易卜生创作《人民公敌》的主要意图。 N2 - The playwright Ibsen uses the protagonist Stockmann in >An Enemy of the People< as a spokesperson to expound his thoughts and examinations on the moral concepts of democracy and freedom in capitalist society. As the situation of freedom changes in the play, Stockmann's concept of freedom also changes, showing different personality structures and behavioral manifestations. Based on Fromm's theory of >escape from freedom<, this article divides Stockmann's experience into three stages: anti-authority, destruction, and creative labor, and interprets the different manifestations and changing logic of his personality structure and psychological form in each stage. Criticism of the chronic disease of capitalist liberal democracy is the main intention of Ibsen in creating >An Enemy of the People<. [Translation: www.google translator, 12/2024] Y1 - 2024 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Smith, David Norman T1 - The Agitator Supplies What the Base Demands: Trumpism Before and After Donald Trump JF - Critical Sociology, Vol. 50 (No. 4-5, 2024), pp. 813-843 [Online ISSN 1569-1632] [doi.org/10.1177/08969205231208921] N2 - The fierce loyalty of Donald Trump’s base has long mystified his critics. For 8 years now, they have expressed puzzlement that his followers support him >despite everything< – despite his incendiary rhetoric, his misogyny, his racial prejudices, and his authoritarianism. In this paper, I argue that, in fact, Trump’s hectic agitation is precisely what his base wants. My reading of the data – including data I gathered with my collaborator, Eric Hanley, in 2016 – is that Trump owes his demagogic success to the fact that he says what his followers want him to say and acts accordingly. Donald Trump, today’s agitator par excellence, supplies what his base demands. Trump, in short, is less an architect of Trumpism than its reflex. However effectively he performs in the public arena, he remains an emissary, personifying a social movement that preceded him and will survive him. And that movement, I will argue, is authoritarian in a very specific sense – driven by a wish for a domineering leader who is loyal to his partisans and hostile to their adversaries. Analytic insight into this phenomenon is drawn, below, from a range of authors, including marketing professionals and critical theorists including Erich Fromm and Theodor W. Adorno. Y1 - 2024 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schindel, Rolf T1 - Review Funk, R.: Erich Fromm. Bildmonographie JF - Rias Berlin Kirchenfunk (23. Dezember 1983). Y1 - 1983 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Spiers, Robbie T1 - Love, Actually? Theodor Adorno, Erich Fromm, and the Possibility of Love in Capitalist Modernity JF - New German Critique, Vol. 51 (No. 3, 2024), pp. 45-68. [Online ISSN 1558-1462] [doi.org/10.17863/CAM.106983] N2 - Love is not regularly associated with the Frankfurt School. Theodor Adorno and Erich Fromm are not regularly associated with each other. Yet, when we bring these Critical Theorists’ works together, a rich discussion of love emerges. Love is viewed by both as a dialectical force, bringing two subjects into union while also allowing them to cultivate their individual selves. Fromm and Adorno operate within the same Marxist philosophical tradition, meaning that they share concerns about the increasing commodification of love and the disappearance of genuine, spontaneous relationships between people. The similarities are not endless, however, and important differences between them remain: Fromm, with his optimism and his concern for existential issues, maintains a belief in revolutionary political change and high spiritual ideals that the materialist pessimist Adorno resists as comfortable illusions. Through this philosophical encounter, two faces of Critical Theory emerge, one oriented toward an analysis of the present and the other turned toward hopes for the future. Y1 - 2024 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Strosberg, Benjamin B. T1 - Critical Theory and Anti-Semitism: Implications for Politics, Education, and Psychoanalysis JF - Critical Theory and Psychoanalysis. From the Frankfurt School to Contemporary Critique, London and New York (Routledge) 2022, pp. 131-157. Y1 - 2022 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Subaşi, Yakub T1 - Erich Fromm'un modernite eleştirisi [Modernity criticism of Erich Fromm] JF - Sosyolojik Düşün, Vol. 4 (No. 2, 2019), pp. 59-69. [Online ISSN 2587-2699] [dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/910617] N2 - Bu çalışmada 20. yüzyılın önemli sosyal bilimcilerinden biri olan Erich Fromm’un modernite eleştirisi ele alınmıştır. Fromm, dünyayı derinden sarsan birinci ve ikinci Harbi Umuminin öncesini, savaş esnasını ve sonrasını bu savaşlardan en çok etkilenen merkezlerde şahit olup yaşamıştır. Eleştirel düşünce geleneği içinde önemli bir yer tutan Fromm, modern toplumu farklı ve kendine has bir bakış açısıyla irdeler. O, modernitenin doğuşunu batı insanının despot kilisenin tekelinden kurtuluşuna dayandırır. Ona göre kilisenin tekelinden özgürlüğe giden yolda insanlık bütün zamanların en kötü koşullarını kendisinde barındıran modernitenin kucağına düşmüştür. O, moderniteyi insani özellikleri birer birer ortadan kaldıran sistemler bütünü olarak görür. Fromm’a göre modernite insanları başarılı bir şekilde istediği şekle dönüştürmektedir; kurulan modernite sistemi öylesine muazzam bir şekilde işlemektedir ki bu sistemi durduracak bir güç görünmemektedir. O, modernitenin hâkim olmaya başladığı toplumlarda bilumum herkes bu çarkın ağzına girdiğinden dolayı bu çarkın yanlışlarını görecek nazarların kalmayacağı (kalmadığı) kanaatindedir. Fromm’un modernitede eleştirdiği temel konuların başında; makineleşme, aynılaşma, cansıza yönelme, karar verememe, iletişimsizlik, tüketicilik, vb. gelir. N2 - In this study, the modernity criticism of Erich Fromm who is one of the important social scientists of the 20th century, is discussed. Fromm witnessed the before and after of the World War I and II which affected the world deeply, he lived during the war and saw the most effected centers of these wars. Fromm, who holds an important place within the tradition of critical thinking, analyzes the modern society from a different and unique perspective. He thinks that the birth of modernity comes from the liberation of the western man from the monopoly of the despot church. He believes that the humanity has fallen into the embrace of modernity, which contains the worst conditions of all times on the way from the monopoly of the church to freedom, He sees modernity as a set of systems that eliminate human characteristics one by one. According to Fromm, modernity successfully transforms people into the way they want it to be, and the established modernity system operates in such an amazing way that there is no power to stop it. He believes that in the societies where modernity has started to dominate, there will be (and there is) no regard to see the wrongs of this wheel because everyone knows it. Mechanization, dedifferentiation, inclination to lifelessness, inability to make decisions, lack of communication, consumerism, etc. are among the top subjects that Fromm criticizes within the scope of modernity. Y1 - 2019 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Stamer, Melanie A1 - Umbach, Susanne T1 - Frieden lernen in unfriedlichen Zeiten. Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen für Friedensbildung in Schulen JF - Fromm Forum (Deutsche Ausgabe – ISSN 1437-0956), 30 / 2026, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag), pp. 138-146. T3 - Fromm Forum (German edition / deutsche Ausgabe) - 14 Y1 - 2026 VL - d30/2026k ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Steyerl, Hito T1 - >Praxis< heute. Erich Fromm Lecture 2025 JF - Fromm Forum (Deutsche Ausgabe – ISSN 1437-0956), 30 / 2026, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag), pp. 097-106. T3 - Fromm Forum (German edition / deutsche Ausgabe) - 15 Y1 - 2026 VL - d30/2026h ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Steyerl, Hito T1 - >Praxis< heute. Erich Fromm Lecture 2025 JF - Erich Fromm Stiftung (Ed.), 2025: Erich Fromm-Preis 2025 an Hito Steyerl. Die Beiträge der Preisverleihung, Neuhofen/Ybbs (Zeuys Books), 2025, pp. 47-66. Y1 - 2025 ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Roazen, Paul T1 - Cultural Foundations of Political Psychology, New York (Routledge) 2003, 312 pp. [eBook ISBN 9780203794210] [doi.org/10.4324/9780203794210] N2 - Over the centuries all of the great philosophers made psychology central to understanding social life. Indeed, the ancient Greeks thought it impossible to conceive of political life without insight into the human soul. Yet insufficient professional legitimization attaches to the central importance of modern depth psychology in understanding politics. Cultural Foundations of Political Psychology explores the linkages between psychology and politics, focusing on how rival conceptions of the good life and unspoken moral purposes in the social sciences have led to sectarian intolerance. Roazen has always approached the history of psychoanalysis with the conviction that ethical issues are implicit in every clinical encounter. Thus, his opening chapter on Erich Fromm's exclusion from the International Psychoanalytic Association touches on a host of political matters, including collaboration as opposed to resistance to Nazi tyranny. Roazen also brings a public/private perspective to such well-known episodes as the Hiss/Chambers case, the circumstances of Virginia Woolf's madness and suicide, and the matter of CIA funding of the monthly Encounter. He deals with the reaction to psychoanalysis on the part of three major philosophers – Althusser, Wittgenstein, and Buber – and looks at the link between psychology and politics in the work of such political theorists as Machiavelli, Rousseau, Burke, Tocqueville, Berlin, and Arendt. A chapter grappling with Vietnam and the Cold War illustrates how political psychology should be concerned with questions of an ethical or >ought< character. In examining the social and psychological bases for political theorizing, Roazen shows how both psychology and politics must change and redefine their methodologies as a result of their interaction. Roazen concludes with a chapter on how political psychology must deal with issues posed by changing conceptions of femininity. This volume is a pioneering exploration of the intersection of psychology and politics. Y1 - 2003 ER -