TY - JOUR A1 - Sethness, Javier T1 - Psychoanalysis for Collective Liberation. A Review of Erich Fromm’s Critical Theory JF - New Politics Journal, New York January 21, 2022. Y1 - 2022 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Shim, Jae-Myung T1 - 에리히 프롬을 통해 본 여가의 의미 [Meaning of Leisure Implied in Erich Fromm] JF - 관광연구논총 [Journal of Tourism Studies], Vol. 34, No. 2 (2022), pp. 3-27. N2 - 본 연구는 에리히 프롬의 글을 통해 철학적 관점에서 여가에 대해 탐구하였다. 역사적으로 사회는 정치적, 경제적으로 인간에게 자유를 부여하는 방식으로 발전해왔으며, 그 기반 위에서 인간이 자유를 적극적으로 실현해 각자의 개성을 실현할 수 있을 것이라고 기대되었다. 그러나 그 같은 체험을 하는 사람은 소수이며 대부분의 사람들은 오로지 소극적 의미의 자유만을 경험함으로써 자유의 진정한 의미를 살리지 못하고 있다. 프롬의 저서들로부터 여가에 시사점을 준다고 판단되는 여덟 개의 주제를 도출하였다. 그것들은 현대자본주의 사회에 순응한 현대인에게서 어떻게 수동적 여가의 모습이 주를 이루고 있는가를 이해하는데 도움을 준다. 현대사회의 노동은 인간이 능동적 존재가 될 수 없는 영역이며 생존의 필요를 가지는 인간이 노동으로부터 벗어나기 어렵다. 따라서 여가를 통해 인간이 능동적인 존재가 되어 자유를 적극적으로 실현함으로써 개성을 실현하는 것이 여가가 삶에 줄 수 있는 진정한 보상이라는 것이 프롬이 던지는 메시지이다. N2 - This study explores the meaning of leisure based on Erich Fromm’s thesis of freedom. What we call democratic society has evolved such that people have been increasingly provided with more freedom, socially and politically, and it was expected that people actively would seek out to use that freedom to fulfill their potentials and individuality. But, most people have conformed to the existing social order and failed to achieve active use of it. Examination of a series of Fromm’s books resulted in eight themes, each of which may indicate how this failure took place, which, in turn, give implications in our understanding of leisure. Especially, they help us understand how modern leisure concedes to the norms of capitalist society and comes to only represent passive experiences in life. It is unlikely that people pursue an active existence in work, nor can they live without it. It is leisure therefore where people can exercise freedom, be a master of their own, build their identity, and be what they truly are. [Author's English version] Y1 - 2022 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Song, Ybing A1 - Gu, Xuefeng T1 - A Study on the Value of Fromm's >The Art of Loving< in Promoting the All-round Development of College Students in the New Era [弗洛姆《爱的艺术》对促进新时代大学生全面发展的价值研究] JF - PR World [公关世界], No. 4 (2022), pp. 142-143. N2 - 弗洛姆在《爱的艺术》中明确指出>爱<是关乎人类生存问题的重要要素。他分析了现代人对于爱的误区,对人类克服分离意识的方式进行了论述和分析,并给出了实现爱的艺术实践的要求。他认为掌握真正爱的方法才能使人脱离异化状态。立德树人,培养德、智、体、美、劳全面发展的新时代大学生是我国高校的根本任务。弗洛姆关于爱的理论强调每个个体对于其他个体的爱,对于培养新时代大学生形成健全的人格和心理具有重要参考价值。 N2 - In >The Art of Loving<, Fromm clearly points out that love is an important element in the problem of human existence. He analyzes the modern misconceptions about love, discusses and analyzes the ways in which human beings can overcome the sense of separation, and gives the requirements for the practice of the art of love. He believes that the mastery of true love is the only way to free people from alienation. It is the fundamental task of our universities to cultivate students of the new era with all-round development of morality, intellect, physique, beauty and labor. Fromm's theory of love emphasizes the love of each individual for other individuals, which is an important reference value for the formation of a sound personality and psychology of the new-age college students. [Translation: www.DeepL/Translator, free version, 4/2022] Y1 - 2022 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Stephens, Michelle T1 - More simply human than otherwise: interpersonal psychoanalysis and the field of the >negro problem< JF - R. Frie and P. Sauvayre (Eds., Culture, Politics and Race in the Making of Interpersonal Psychoanalysis. Breaking Boundaries, London and New York (Routledge) 2022, pp. 83-110. Y1 - 2022 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Topolska, Ewelina T1 - Teatr Angéliki Liddell z punktu widzenia psychoanalizy frommowskiej [Angélica Liddell's theater from the point of view of Fromm's psychoanalysis] JF - Skała Agata (Ed.): Filozoficzne aspekty literatury. O różnych porządkach aksjologicznych i ontologicznych, Lublin (Scientific Publishing House TYGIEL) Poland 2022, pp. 47 – 60, Polish. [ISBN 978-83-67104-32-6] N2 - Artykuł ma na celu analizę wybranych spektakli Angéliki Liddell, współczesnej hiszpańskiej dramaturżki, reżyserki i aktorki teatralnej poprzez teorię psychoanalityczną Ericha Fromma. Głównym konceptem, który wydaje się być kluczowy dla dogłębnego zrozumienia wymowy Liddellowskich sztuk, jest koncept nekrofilii, czyli umiłowania zniszczenia, śmierci i rozkładu, w przeciwieństwie do biofilii, orientacji życiowej nakierowanej na wzrost i syntezę. Sztuką, która jest rozpatrywana szczególnie dogłębnie pod kątem charakteru nekrofilijnego jest >Rok Ryszarda<, wystawiona w 2005 roku wariacja na temat >Króla Ryszarda III< Szekspira. Motywy, jakie pojawiają się w tym przedstawieniu, będą powracały w kolejnych tekstach wychodzących spod pióra Liddell, takich jak >Co zrobię z tym mieczem? Wokół problemu Prawa i Piękna< czy „Liebestod – zapach krwi stoi mi wciąż przed oczami – Juan Belmonte<. We wszystkich tych sztukach znajdziemy centralną figurę, która na skutek fizycznej deformacji wykluczona jest ze świata miłości, a więc skazana na samotność. Samotność ta wywołuje ogromny lęk i agresję, która popycha bohatera do wejścia ze światem w więź sadystyczną, bazującą na kontroli. Jednak jak zauważyła Simone Weil, najdoskonalszym przejawem siły, najpełniejszą formą kontroli jest zabicie obiektu, toteż ostatecznie bohaterowie Liddell pławią się w krwi, zaś ona sama próbuje przedstawić widzowi akty najbardziej odrażającej przemocy jako rytuały, które mogą nam pomóc w odnalezieniu trascendencji. Jej pesymistyczna i z punktu widzenia psychologicznego wypaczona koncepcja miłości, wedle której zawsze ostatecznie zabija się to, co się kocha, stoi w jaskrawej sprzeczności z biofilijną etyką Fromma, dla którego, jak przytaczamy w artykule, miłość do troska, odpowiedzialność poszanowanie i poznanie. Ostatecznie w artykule podkreśla się psychopatologiczny charakter Liddellowskiej ideologii, zwracając uwagę na konieczność oceny dzieła sztuki nie tylko przez pryzmat estetyki, ale także etyki, społecznego wpływu dzieła. N2 - The article aims to analyze selected plays by Angélica Liddell, a contemporary Spanish playwright, director and theater actress through the psychoanalytic theory of Erich Fromm. The main concept that seems to be crucial for a thorough understanding of the meaning of Liddell's plays is the concept of necrophilia, or love of destruction, death and decay, as opposed to biophilia, a life orientation directed toward growth and synthesis. A play that is examined in particular depth in terms of its necrophilic nature is >The Year of Richard<, a 2005 production of a variation on Shakespeare's >King Richard III<. The motifs that appear in this play would recur in subsequent texts coming out from under Liddell's pen, such as >What Will I Do With This Sword? Around the Problem of Law and Beauty< or >Liebestod – the smell of blood still stands before my eyes – Juan Belmonte<. In all of these plays we find a central figure who, as a result of physical deformity, is excluded from the world of love, and therefore doomed to loneliness. This loneliness causes great fear and aggression, which pushes the character to enter a sadistic bond with the world, based on control. However, as Simone Weil noted, the most perfect manifestation of power, the fullest form of control, is to kill the object, so ultimately Liddell's characters wallow in blood, while she attempts to present the viewer with acts of the most abhorrent violence as rituals that can help us find transcendence. Her pessimistic and, from a psychological point of view, distorted conception of love, according to which one always ultimately kills what one loves, stands in stark contrast to the biophilic ethics of Fromm, for whom, as quoted in the article, love to care, responsibility to respect and cognition. Ultimately, the article emphasizes the psychopathological nature of Liddell's ideology, noting the need to evaluate a work of art not only through the lens of aesthetics, but also ethics, the social impact of the work. [DeepL.com/Translator, free version, 2/2023] Y1 - 2022 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Trochowski, Daniela T1 - Zum Geleit JF - K. Krenzlin (Hg.), >Schreibe mir nur immer viel<. Der Briefwechsel zwischen Hans und Lea Grundig. Ein Werkstattbericht Im Auftrag der Akademie der Künste, Berlin, und der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung hg. von Kathleen Krenzlin, Berlin und München (Deutscher Kunstverlag), 2022, pp. 011-014. Y1 - 2022 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Umrath, Barbara T1 - A Feminist Reading of the Frankfurt School’s Studies on Authoritarianism JF - Clemens, M., et al. (Eds.), Die Wiederkehr des autoritären Charakters. Transatlantische Perspektiven, ed. by Manuel Clemens, Thorben Päthe and Marc Petersdorff, Wiesbaden (Springer SV) 2022, pp. 189-208. Y1 - 2022 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wagner, Martin T1 - Was verhindert Sublimierung? Spurensuche bei Freud und in der Dialektik der Aufklärung JF - Clemens, M., et al. (Eds.), Die Wiederkehr des autoritären Charakters. Transatlantische Perspektiven, ed. by Manuel Clemens, Thorben Päthe and Marc Petersdorff, Wiesbaden (Springer SV) 2022, pp. 071-086. Y1 - 2022 ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Ziotti Narita, Jeremiah A1 - Morelock, Felipe T1 - The Society of the Selfie. Social Media and the Crisis of Liberal Democracy, London (University of Westminster Press) 2022, 191 pp. Y1 - 2022 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Morita, Kazunao T1 - Radicalizing the Role of the Emancipatory Teacher in the Crisis of Democracy: Erich Fromm’s Psychoanalytic Approach to Deweyan Democratic Education JF - Studies in Philosophy and Education, Vol. 41, No. 4 (2022), pp. 467-483. [Online ISSN 1573-191x] [doi.org/10.1007/s11217-022-09830-y] N2 - This paper explores Erich Fromm’s contribution to Deweyan democratic education by referring to his psychoanalytic interpretation of John Dewey’s pragmatic theory. First, it employs the work by Gert Biesta to secure a space between critical pedagogy and Deweyan democratic education, from which Fromm’s theory can be discussed. Furthermore, it argues that Biesta’s perspective offers a valuable theoretical ground to extend the emancipatory potential of Deweyan democratic education, while avoiding some pitfalls of critical pedagogy. Subsequently, the paper contrasts Marcuse’s and Fromm’s views on Dewey to show how Fromm’s understanding of Dewey was more effective than that of Marcuse for developing the potential of Dewey’s philosophy. Next, the paper clarifies key similarities and differences between Fromm’s psychoanalysis and Dewey’s pragmatism, as it is applicable specifically to emancipatory education. Finally, the paper argues that despite the differences between these two thinkers, Fromm’s theory further radicalizes Deweyan democratic education by adding new elements to the list of preconditions on the role of the emancipatory teacher. Y1 - 2022 ER -