TY - JOUR A1 - Lin, Xi T1 - Development as Civitas Homini [论>情理共同体<] JF - Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Section) [同济大学学报(社会科学版)], No. 2 (2016), pp. 77-87. N2 - 对于一个转型社会而言,高速的发展必然会带来同样多的积极和消极结果。在综合阿玛蒂亚•森和弗洛姆论说的基础上,笔者提出了>发展辩证法<的概念,来总括这种由发展而导致的>喜忧参半<的社会病理学状况。解决这种>发展悖论<的方式在于从传统社会的>机械团结<过渡到现代社会的>有机团结<,促进>有机团结<在转型社会中的扩大和增加。笔者在批判吸收迪尔凯姆>职业团体<论说的基础上提出了>情理共同体<这一概念,指出了其所包含的>新五伦说<、>情理兼顾<、>个体选择优先<、>主体间性承认<等四个基本特征,并认为这样一种>非理想<的理论概念能够更有效地应用于当下中国转型社会的现实 N2 - Rapid development in a transitioning society will surely bring to fore as many positive consequences as negative ones. Drawing upon Amartya Sen and Fromm, this concept of Entwicklungsdialektik is put forward to generalize the pathological representation of this highly mixed record of development. The solution to such Entwicklungsparadox lies in the shift from mechanical solidarity (as a charac-teristic of traditional society) to organic solidarity (typical of a modern one), enabling the latter to increase in both scale and depth in the society. A critical reflection on the Durkheimian thesis on >oc-cupational groups/corporation< paves the way for us to propose the new concept of civitas homini, which is characterized by >the new quintochomy of human relations<, >an all-in-all consideration of both Vernünftigkeit and Rationalität<, >priority to individual choice preferences<, and >intersubjective recognition.< This concept is of greater hermeneutic value and empirical validity for the reality in contemporary China. [Author’s translation] Y1 - 2015 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Xi, Lin T1 - The China Model of Development as Solidarity JF - Chinese Political Science Review, Vol. 5, No. 1 (2020), pp. 31-49. [Online ISSN 2365-4252] N2 - [Chinese abstract not available] What is the unique feature of China’s model of development? Upon reviewing the >dialectics of development< that draws on both Amartya Sen and Erich Fromm, this paper argues that the China Model may have a particular strength in reconstructing its Confucian tradition towards social solidarity. In China, like other countries with a rapid development, swift social transformation has brought to fore as many positive as negative consequences, on the basis of which a mixed record of development in modern society can be pathologically diagnosed. Following the Durkheimer's premise that these social ills may be cured by a shift from mechanical solidarity (characteristic of a traditional society) to its organic counterpart, this paper, drawing on both Fisk and Confucius, proposes the idea of >civitas hominicivitas homini<, when combined together, shall reach a stage of >res publica latium< (commonwealth) that ensures both individual liberties and social solidarity, with different communities entering into terms of intersubjective recognition, tolerance, and peaceful coexistence. Through this >civitas homini<, we can rewrite the paradigm of development as one that aims at solidarity rather than purely individualistic freedom. [Author's English] Y1 - 2020 ER -