TY - JOUR A1 - Bodnar, Susan T1 - The therapeutic relationship as a paradoxical experience JF - Psychoanalytic Dialogues, Vol. 14 (2004), pp. 693-698. N2 - White contrasts the primacy of individual personality process with a more dialectical position. Nonetheless, Bodnar reaffirms that understanding dialectical process in self-experience does not detract from the unique self-state of individuality. The philosophical roots of dialecticism indicate that the >I-ness< of me is only enhanced by recognizing dialogic processes, especially in the psychotherapeutic relationship. Y1 - 2004 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bodnar, Susan T1 - The struggle for recognition disruption and reintegration in the experience of agency JF - Psychoanalytic Dialogues, Vol. 14 (2004), pp. 581-603. N2 - Psychoanalysts participate in the internal constructs and the external exigencies of the people with whom they work, sitting where society and individuality cross paths. Yet, much of psychoanalytic writing mutes culture's bass line from the self's composition, even though every gesture – not to mention every word – evinces the cultural world in the analyst's room. Psychic disconnection takes place as the analyst decontextualizes an individual's personality from cultural reality in a dissociative process that compromises the analytic work. Cultural truths are very much a part of that work's mutuality. Social history underscores the motivations of the seekers and the providers of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. Interpretations, enactments, and the relationship's construction unconsciously replicate unexamined tenets of analysts' cultural belief system. If analysts don't connect the dynamic process in which they work to social influence, they and the people who consult with them will inevitably wall off access to transformative meaning. Increased consciousness about how culture affects the therapeutic relationship inspires change. This paper presents three clinical examples in which culture was openly acknowledged as another actor in the psychoanalytic relationship. Two persons working together from and within cultural history create a common language: the dream of a better life. Y1 - 2004 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bodnar, Susan T1 - >I'm in the Milk and the Milk's in Me<: Eros in the Clinical Relationship JF - The International Journal of Relational Perspectives, Vol.16, No. 1 (2006), pp. 45-69. [Online ISSN 1940-9222] [tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2513/s10481885pd1601_4] N2 - This paper explores the unconscious communication of primary-process material in clinical work with a Latin American male that occurred while I was nursing my first child. Mutually dissociated aspects of self-experience became part of the relationship soon after an unexpected instance of >let-down<. The concept of Eros, the collection of life-preserving instincts that preserve and protect the body and mind – borrowed by Marcuse and other thinkers of the Frankfurt School to understand specifically the generative potential of consciousness – emerged as a helpful construct for understanding the transference and countertransference. Bowlby's notion of attachment, Fromm's social reconceptualization of drive, and Mitchell's integration of the biological and the social dimensions of drive all can be conceived as attesting to the powerful impetus to seek in others connections that create and enable a life structure. Eros in the therapeutic relationship can help recover dissociated elements of the individual, cultural, and political psyche. Y1 - 2006 ER -