TY - JOUR A1 - Kwawer, Jay S. T1 - Developmental Perspectives in Fromm's Psychoanalysis: A Response to Biancoli. JF - Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 623-634. Y1 - 2002 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Michael H. Stone: The Borderline Syndromes JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 10 (1982), pp. 159-160. Y1 - 1982 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Bruce Fink: Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique: A Lacanian Approach for Practioners JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2008), pp. 767-768. Y1 - 2008 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Ilany Kogan: The Struggle Against Mourning JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 37 (2009), pp. 395-397. Y1 - 2009 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review M. Berlin (Ed.): Poets On Prozac: Mental Illness, Treatment, and the Creative Process JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 37 (2009), pp. 403-404. Y1 - 2009 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Isabel Alvarez Borland and Lunette M. F. Bosch (Eds.): Cuban-American Literature and Art: Negotiating Identities JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2010), pp.545. 543 Y1 - 2010 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Dana Birkted-Breen, Sara Flanders, and Alain Gibeault (Eds.): Reading French Psychoanalysis JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2011), pp. 396-399. Y1 - 2011 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Otto Kernberg: The Inseparable Nature of Love and Aggression – Clinical and Theoretical Perspectives JF - Psychodynamic Psychiatry, Vol. 40 (2012), pp. 693-695- Y1 - 2012 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Sheila Klebanow: Changing Concepts in Psychoanalysis JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 11 (1983), pp. 467-468. Y1 - 1983 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review J. Sandler with Anna Freud: The Analysis of Defense: The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense Revisited JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 15 (1987), pp. 113-115. Y1 - 1987 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Ellen Handler Spitz: Art and Psyche JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 15 (1987), pp. 271-272. Y1 - 1987 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Joseph Masling (Ed.): Empirical Studies of Psychoanalytic Theories, Volume 2 JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 16 (1988), pp. 402-404. Y1 - 1988 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Sidney Hook (Ed.):Psychoanalysis, Scientific Method, and Philosophy JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 20 (1992), pp. 317-318. Y1 - 1992 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Ellen Handler Spitz: Museums of the Mind JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 23 (1995), pp. 753-754. Y1 - 1995 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Ellen Handler Spitz: Inside Picture Books JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 749-752. Y1 - 2000 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Theodore Millon, Paul H. Blaney and Roger D. Davis (Eds.): Oxford Textbook of Psychopathology JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 29 (2001), pp. 521-522. Y1 - 2001 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - The Psychoanalyst at the Medical Bedside JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 34 (2006), pp. 075-082. Y1 - 2006 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Jerome Oremland: Death and the Fear ofFiniteness in Hamlet JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 34 (2006), pp. 563-365. Y1 - 2006 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Frankel, Jay T1 - Rothstein as a Self and Object Freudian: Commentary on Paper by Arnold Rothstein JF - Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 101-139. N2 - When we feel overwhelmed by an inescapable threat, we >identify with the aggressor< (Ferenczi, 1933). Hoping to survive, we sense and >become< precisely what the attacker expects of us – in our behavior, perceptions, emotions, and thoughts. Identification with the aggressor is closely coordinated with other responses to trauma, including dissociation. Over the long run, it can become habitual and can lead to masochism, chronic hypervigilance, and other personality distortions. But habitual identification with the aggressor also frequently occurs in people who have not suffered severe trauma, which raises the possibility that certain events not generally considered to constitute trauma are often experienced as traumatic. Following Ferenczi, I suggest that emotional abandonment or isolation, and being subject to a greater power, are such events. In addition, identification with the aggressor is a tactic typical of people in a weak position as such, it plays an important role in social interaction in general. Y1 - 2002 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Frankel, Jay T1 - Reply to commentaries JF - Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 327-334. Y1 - 2000 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Frankel, Jay T1 - Self psychology and projective identification – whither shall they meet – a. Reply to the editors (1995) JF - Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 159-170. N2 - To anchor my response to three issues raised by Berman and Bonomi, I rely on Ferenczi's concept of >traumatic aloneness.< First, I agree with both discussants that identification often has constructive and life-creating effects, but I suggest that it may generally arise in response to (sometimes hidden) anxiety, specifically about separation or aloneness. Second, I examine what Ferenczi termed >introjection of the guilt feelings of the adult< – trauma victims frequently feel that they are >bad< – and explore this complex feeling both as an effort to preserve others as good objects and as a way to protect oneself from a frightening aggressor. Finally, I consider the idea that trauma leads to partial psychic death. While I think it is clinically dangerous to assume that trauma can cause the actual, permanent destruction of part of the personality – this assumption can lead to unwarranted therapeutic pessimism – trauma certainly often carries the subjective experience of partial death or dying. The therapeutic effort to undo dissociations and achieve authenticity and intimacy can be thought of as rediscovering one's aliveness through the process of sharing it with someone. Y1 - 2002 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Frankel, Jay T1 - The influence of culture on the self and selfobject relationships: An asian-north american comparison JF - Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 13 (2003), pp. 513-520. N2 - It is important for every treatment that we analysts feel some room for our own subjectivity and some recognition of this from our patients. But we may feel that our analytic ideals – part of what may be called our >preexisting analytic third<: our analytic inheritance – require that we expunge our subjectivity from view. A submissive attitude toward the preexisting third may result in our committing misdemeanors in an attempt to salvage some feeling of psychic existence in a treatment where we feel negated. We can also think of a different kind of analytic third – an >emergent third< – that is mutually created by the analytic couple. This kind of third can be a platform from which to develop a necessary active, independent, and critical stance toward that which we inherit. The emergent third can find expression through the play structures that may come to shape the analytic relationship. Misdemeanors, therefore, may reflect analysts' inevitably taking on certain roles in the unconscious, restitutive, and often sadomasochistic, scenarios that patients may play out in their analyses. The possible therapeutic value of playing out these scenarios – a possibility suggested by Grand's case material – tends to undermine a clear distinction between freely surrendering to a creative analytic process, and submitting in a self-negating, though potentially helpful, way. Y1 - 2003 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Frankel, Jay B. T1 - Kohut's contribution JF - Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 08 (1998), pp. 149-182. N2 - Analytic child therapy techniques developed as modifications of techniques from adult psychoanalysis. Child therapy continues to be regarded as an adaptation of adult analysis and to give a central place to the methods and conditions of adult analysis, such as interpretation, in its understanding of how therapy heals. I propose that child therapy is not a modified form of therapy and that the essential processes of therapy are fully present in child therapy. In fact, they often may be seen more clearly there than in adult therapy. I suggest two interrelated processes as the essential ones in all analytic therapy. The first is play. I examine several interrelated aspects of play, specifically as they occur in child therapy. These include the emergence and integration of dissociated self-states, symbolization, and recognition. The second process I propose as essential in analytic therapy is the renegotiation of self – other relationships through action. This renegotiation is what can help patients become able to play in therapy when they have difficulty doing so. Since I suggest that action is at the heart of analytic therapy, I go on to consider the role of talking in an action therapy. Finally, I explore the dimensions of mutuality in the relationship between child and therapist, including mutual influence and regulation, mutual recognition, and mutual regression. The intersubjective nature of psychotherapy, which is increasingly appreciated in adult analytic therapy but not in child therapy, provides a fertile context for the evolution of play and for the productive renegotiation of self – other relationships. Y1 - 1998 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Greenberg, Jay T1 - Ideology Springs Eternal: Reply to Commentaries JF - Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 07 (1997), pp. 337-340. Y1 - 1997 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Greenberg, Jay T1 - Listening to the Erotic Commentary on Paper by Eric Sherman JF - Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 08 (1998), pp. 217-224. Y1 - 1998 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Greenberg, Jay T1 - Analytic authority and analytic restraint. JF - Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 35 (1999), pp. 025-042. Y1 - 1999 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Greenberg, Jay T1 - Foreword. JF - Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 353-360. Y1 - 2003 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Greenberg, Jay T1 - Afterword. JF - Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 531. Y1 - 2003 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Greenberg, Jay R. T1 - Discussion of M.F. Basch >The interpersonal and the intrapsychic: Conflict or harmony?< JF - Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 23 (1987), pp. 391-399. Y1 - 1987 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Greenberg, Jay R. T1 - >Dirty,< >Clean,< and In-Between – Rolling with Uncertainty in Homoerotic Countertransference. Reply to Commentaries JF - Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 01 (1991), pp. 052-073. N2 - The psychoanalytic situation provides many opportunities for people to observe their analysts closely. These observations are inevitably woven into the fabric of patients’ transference experience. Because the observations can be uncomfortable for the analyst, there is a constant temptation to ignore or deny the plausibility of patients’ perceptions. They can be, and often are, quickly reinterpreted as derivatives of sexual or aggressive urges. Psychoanalytic drive theory, with its emphasis on impulse rather than observation as the force behind transference experience, can encourage counter-transferential disclaimers and lead to blind spots. Some technical suggestions are offered to avoid this tendency and are based on a relational understanding of the nature of transference. Y1 - 1991 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Greenberg, Jay R. T1 - Discussion: Toward a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation JF - Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 05 (1995), pp. 317-324. Y1 - 1995 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Greenberg, Jay T1 - An Appreciation of the Contribution of Louis Sander JF - Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 02 (1992), pp. 529-537. Y1 - 1992 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Greenberg, Jay T1 - Editorial. JF - Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 31 (1995), pp. 005-008. Y1 - 1995 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Greenberg, Jay T1 - Self-disclosure: Is it psychoanalysis? JF - Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 31 (1995), pp. 193-205. Y1 - 1995 ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Jay, Martin T1 - Dialektische Phantasie. Die Geschichte der Frankfurter Schule und des Instituts für Sozialforschung 1923-1950, Frankfurt (S. Fischer Verlag) 1976. Y1 - 1976 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lefer, Jay T1 - Review Peter I. Rudnytsky and Ellen Handler Spitz: Freud and Forbidden Knowledge JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, New York and London (The Guildford Press), Vol. 23 (No. 1, Spring 1995), pp. 170-172. Y1 - 1995 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Berman, Emanuel A1 - Frankel, Jay T1 - Remember Where You Come From: Dissociative Process in Multicultural Individuals JF - Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 267-270. Y1 - 2000 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Greenberg, Jay T1 - Therapeutic Action and the Analyst’s Responsibility JF - Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 63 (No. 1, February 2015), pp. 15-32. N2 - Models of the psychoanalytic situation can usefully be thought of as fictions. Viewed this way, the models can be understood as narrative structures that shape what we are able to see and how we are able to think about what happens between us and our analysands. Theories of therapeutic action are elements of what can be called a >controlling fiction<, mediating between these theories and our very real responsibilities, both to our preferred method and to a suffering patient. This venture into comparative psychoanalysis is illustrated by a discussion of published case material. Y1 - 2015 ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Greenberg, Jay R. T1 - Oedipus and Beyond. A Clinical Theory. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1991. Y1 - 1991 N1 - Ex libris Marco Bacciagaluppi ER - TY - BOOK A1 - Greenberg, Jay R. A1 - Mitchell, Stephen A. T1 - Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1983. Y1 - 1983 N1 - Ex libris Marco Bacciagaluppi ER - TY - GEN A1 - Frankel, Jay B. A1 - Dimitrijevic, Aleksandar T1 - >Being myself as the analyst I have become:< An interview with Jay B. Frankel by Aleksandar Dimitrijevic T2 - International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 32 (No. 1, 2023), pp. 040-061. Y1 - 2023 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Jay, Martin A1 - Geng, Hongming T1 - >Psychoanalysis is Nothing but an Exaggeration< – Freud and the Frankfurt School [>精神分析只不过是夸大其辞<——弗洛伊德与法兰克福学派] JF - Journal of Guangzhou University (Social Science Edition) [广州大学学报(社会科学版)], No. 6 (2020), pp. 34-46. N2 - 法兰克福学派不断尝试着丰富对现代社会的批判,这主要建立在这样的基础上——借鉴精神分析的观念,对那种名为>批判理论<的马克思主义,进行一种想象性重读。尽管恩里希·弗洛姆、马克斯·霍克海默、赫伯特·马尔库塞和西奥多·阿多诺的具体看法不同,但他们都支持对马克思和弗洛伊德进行创造性整合。法兰克福学派尤其爱用弗洛伊德的理论阐释如下事实——工人阶级的假想革命任务的失败,未曾预期的法西斯主义的兴起和构想乌托邦种种可能的形式。除此之外,阿多诺的作品更明显地利用了精神分析的唯物主义冲动,去反对在唯心主义传统中的意识哲学。 N2 - Over its long history, the Frankfurt School attempted to enrich its critique of modern society, largely rooted in the imaginative re-reading of the Marxist tradition that became known as Critical Theory, by drawing on insights from psychoanalysis. Although the specific insights informing the work of Erich Fromm, Max Horkheimer, Herbert Marcuse and Theodor W. Adorno may have been different, all supported the productive integration of Marx and Freud. In particular, the Frankfurt School used Freudian theory to explain the failure of the working class to assume its putative revolutionary mission, the unexpected rise of fascism, and the possible ways in which utopia might be envisaged. In addition, most explicitly in the work of Adorno, they pitted the materialist impulses of psychoanalysis against the consciousness philosophy they identified with the Idealist tradition. [Author's translation] Y1 - 2020 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Jay, Martin T1 - Integracja psychoanalizy i marksizmu – przypadek Ericha Fromma [Integration of Psychoanalysis and Marxism – the Case of Erich Fromm] JF - Paweł Jabłoński and Rafał Włodarczyk (Eds.): Fromm – aplikacje, Wrocław (>Chiasm< Publishing Initiative) Poland 2016, pp. 179-204. Y1 - 2016 ER - TY - GEN A1 - Fromm, Erich A1 - Jay, Martin T1 - Martin Jay interviews Erich Fromm on November 29, 1968, in California in preparation of his book >Dialectic Imagination<. The questions Jay sent in advance to Fromm by a letter dated November 13, 1968. Y1 - 1968 ER -