TY - JOUR A1 - Niel, Mathilde T1 - The Phenomenon of Technology: Liberation or Alienation of Man? (Japanese) JF - E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 106-119. Y1 - 1967 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Nakagawa, Yoshiharu T1 - 「永遠の哲学」における「気づき」の存在論 – マインドフルネスの新たな基礎づけを求めて [An Ontology of Awareness in the Perennial Philosophy: Toward a New Foundation of Mindfulness] JF - トランスパーソナル心理学/精神医学[Japanese Journal of Transpersonal Psychology/Psychiatry], Vol. 17, No. 1 (2018), pp. 33-48. [doi.org/10.32218/transpersonal.17.1_33] N2 - づき」の概念が位置しており、この意味で永遠の哲学はマインドフルネスの理論基盤になりうるものである。本考察ではまず、ハクスレー、スミス、ラム・ダス、ウィルバーを援用し、永遠の哲学が多次元的な理論であることを示し、とくに魂の本質が気づき、観照であり、さらにスピリットが限りない純粋な気づきであること明らかにし、非二元的気づきに言及した。つぎに気づきの存在論を、ウパニシャッド、シャンカラ、ラマナ・マハルシ、ニサルガダッタ・マハラジを引きながら検討した。そしてクリシュナムルティ、フロム、ウィルバーを用いて、気づきと身心の関連を考察し、最後にハクスレーの端緒をもとに、気づきの多次元的教育をとりあげた。 N2 - This paper is an attempt to provide a foundation of mindfulness by >perennial philosophy. >The perennial philosophy includes essential ideas on the world and the human beings across the world wisdom traditions. The central concept of perennial philosophy is >awareness.< In this regard, perennial philosophy becomes a theoretical foundation of mindfulness, or awareness practice in general. Relying on Aldous Huxley, Huston Smith, Ram Dass, and Ken Wilber, this paper firstly states that the perennial philosophy is a multidimensional theory and suggests that the essence of the soul is awareness or witness and spirit is boundless pure awareness, including an important discussion of nondual awareness. In the next section, it explores an ontology of awareness by referring to the Upanishad, Shankara, Ramana Maharshi, Nisargadatta Maharaj, and others. Then, referring to J. Krishnamurti, Erich Fromm, and Wilber, it discusses how awareness relates to the body-mind aspect. Finally, it explores a multidimensional way of awareness practice in education, based on Huxley's pioneering ideas on the education of awareness that provides a wider perspective for the current mindfulness practices. Y1 - 2018 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Motoyama, Yoichi T1 - 「迷惑をかけたこと」の今日的解釈 [A Current Interpretation of >Causing Troubles to Others<] JF - 内観研究 [Journal of the Japan Naikan Association], Vol. 13, No. 1 (2007), pp. 59-70. [doi.org/10.34593/jna.13.1_59] N2 - 内観を外部から見ると、内観三項目の中の「迷惑をかけたこと」が、自己抑制的になり自分の考えや気持ちを表現できなくなるのではないか、あるいは、道徳的な響きを感じる、といったふうな誤解を与える場合もあるようである。そこで、内観三項目がいかに精神の認識力を成長させるか、その構造について考察するとともに、とりわけ「迷惑をかけたこと」を調べる有用性を精神分析学者のエーリッヒ・フロムの「成熟すると両親から自由になり、自分自身の中に母性原理と父性原理を作り上げる。子どもは自分自身の父親になり、母親となる」という理論を借りて説明を試みた。内観をすることが、どうして内部に母性原理と父性原理を作り上げることが出来るのかを考察し、内観における「罪悪感」をその過程と構造を従来の罪悪感と比較しながら考察することによって「迷惑をかけたこと」の今日的解釈を導き、東洋思想から生まれた内観を西洋思想の言葉に置き換えようとするものである。 N2 - When you think about Naikan from the outside, you may misunderstand it. Naikan's third theme >What troubles and difficulties did you cause a specific person, such as mother or father?< may cause you to feel moralistically held back in expressing your thoughts and feelings. Here I consider the usefulness of Naikan's three themes in extending capabilities for developing and extending insight. In addition, I aim to explain the utility of Naikan's third item, >the matters with which I troubled you<, through the Erich Fromm's psychoanalytic theory. His theory holds that in maturing we must free ourselves from our parents while incorporating the motherhood principle and fatherhood principle into ourselves, becoming our own mothers and fathers. I examine the reason why Naikan can instill the motherhood principle and fatherhood principle. Furthermore, I compare the process and structure of guilt in Naikan with dysfunctional guilt. By these means, I intend to offer a modern interpretation of the third theme of Naikan, born of Oriental thought, interpreted though Western thought. Y1 - 2007 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Morita, Kazunao T1 - E. フロム精神分析理論における宗教論の教育的含意 [Educational Implications of the Theory of Religion in E. Fromm's Psychoanalysis] JF - 教育学研究 [The Japanese Journal of Educational Research], Vol. 87, No. 4 (2020), pp. 131-141. [doi.org/10.11555/kyoiku.87.4_597] N2 - 本稿の目的は、精神分析家エリッヒ・フロムの宗教論を検討し、「教化」する権威的な「宗教」に抵抗しつつ、なおも「宗教的」に生きる方途を探った彼の思索の教育的含意を明らかにすることである。結論として、本稿は、フロムが「気づき」の「能力」を尊重することによって、「宗教的」に生きることを構想していた事実を闡明し、最後に、彼の理論が道徳教育の教科化の事例に先鋭化される現代教育の問題に対してもつ意義を明示する。 N2 - German-born psychoanalyst Erich Fromm (1900-1980), who worked mainly in the U.S., criticized the forcible indoctrination of authoritarian religion. However, at the same time he tried to help his clients achieve an attitude that could be called religious in the humanistic sense. In this sense, his psychoanalytic theory has educational implications. This paper explains the structure of Fromm's discussion of religion in his psychoanalytic theory, and presents a critical viewpoint on contemporary Japanese education based on Fromm's theory. To this end, this study focuses on Fromm's theory of religion in his psychoanalytic theory as found in his Psychoanalysis and Religion. First, the paper outlines Fromm's theory of religion, namely, the functional definition of >religion<, >humanistic religion>, and >authoritarian religion<, in comparison with Freud's understanding of religion. Then the paper examines Fromm's idea of the relationship between psychoanalysis and religion, neither irreconcilable nor conciliatory. Second, this paper reviews previous studies discussing and lauding Fromm's ideas of the relationship between psychoanalysis and religion, finding that these studies have already criticized because of their conciliatory stance on the relationship. Subsequently, the paper shows that most Fromm-related studies in education overlook the theory of religion and conciliate his psychoanalytic and religious theories. The paper also addresses a study that does not conciliate the relationship but overlooks the importance of Fromm's theory of religion, focusing only on the logic of Freudian psychoanalytic theory. Third, this paper confirms how Fromm's >revised< psychoanalytic theory grasps the position of >religion< in its theory, and clarifies the point that Fromm regards >religion< as a product of human need springing from human beings' existential dichotomy. Therefore, Fromm's psychoanalysis is a theory that continues to face the problems of >religion< and of how to identify >religion.< Fourth, this paper considers how Fromm's psychoanalytic theory distinguishes the nature of >religion< from the perspective of whether the domain is humanistic or authoritarian. The paper then demonstrates that this distinction is governed by the role of >awareness< in his psychoanalytic process, which Fromm refers to as a search for the truth: a step in the direction of un-deception (de-deception [Ent-täuschung]). Then the paper shows that his psychoanalytic theory is an educational theory that discovers the truth while becoming aware of the unconscious and aims at attaining religious experience. Finally, the paper reveals that discussing Fromm's psychoanalytic theory while focusing on his theory of religion has its own educational implications. Y1 - 2020 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Mizuta, Makoto T1 - エーリッヒ・フロムにおける「健康」と「幸福」 : クォリティ・オブ・ライフ」に関する基礎付けの試み [>Health< and >Happiness< in Erich Fromm: Having an Elementary Concept of the >Quality of Life<] JF - 医学哲学 医学倫理 [Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine], Vol. 21 (2003), pp. 98-111. [doi.org/10.24504/itetsu.21.0_98] N2 - When we talk about the >quality of life< (QOL) we should inquire just into the >quality< of human life. Generally speaking, a qualitative thing includes something original that has no substitute. Each person's existence is an irreplaceable life, and it has a unique value. QOL is a subject about the qualitative values of human life. The pursuit of QOL is the pursuit of a >healthy< human life or >happiness.< E. Fromm said that a person represents the whole human being, and that an individual is a physico-spiritual totality. He also said that the goal of a person in life is to be himself. According to Fromm, the fundamental human desire aims to conquer >existential dichotomies,< such as >life and death,< >solidarity and aloneness.< Everyone shows one's answer depending on his/her character or personality. Only a >productive character< can get happiness through its answer. That is the basic attitude by which >human nature< and >individuality< are brought into full play at the same time. Such a person gropes for a >sane society<. And such a society ought to bring up sound persons. QOL as elements of a living environment are useful as conditions for happiness. However, the most important thing is the >quality< of each one's life itself. This kind of QOL is shown by the basic attitude as >personality.< A person who lives a well-filled life has a high quality of life. The scale of quality of life as the standard common to human beings is >human nature,< which is also the foundation of human equality. This is the >basis< of human rights. And each person will be the judge of the matter connected with >happiness<, making use of the activation of individuality. So, medical persons should not confuse QOL and >social usefulness!< Medical preference order is not a problem of QOL but purely a problem of medical technique. Y1 - 2003 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Misawa, Ken-Ichi T1 - エーリッヒ・フロムの疎外概念 [A Critical Appraisal of Erich Fromm's Concept of Alienation] JF - 社会学評論 [Japanese Sociological Review], Vol. 15, No. 4 (1965), pp. 67-78, 203. [doi.org/10.4057/jsr.15.4_67] N2 - [First page] The aim of this paper is to clarify the difference between Fromm's concept of alienation from Marx's, and thus to evaluate the significance Fromm's idea of alienation. 1. The standard of the un-alienated Marx sees man as a process of self-creation through labor (= activity in general). To Marx, the un-alienated man is, first, the individual two each day realizes the potentialities of his being through work which gives his inner capacities the form of concrete embodiments, and second, at the same time the subject of history whose potentialities and inner capacities are got the form of historical embodiments through the mode of production in each period. Fromm as a moralist changes Marx's objective concept of man into a subjective one. Fromm conceives man as the bearer of the unchangeable basic needs which are inherent in human nature and the human condition. For Fromm, the un-alienated man is the man who has satisfied and fulfilled these basic needs in a productive way, who has realized a normative basis of his nature which remains the same always and everywhere. From Marx's point of view, love, happiness and other universal values which constitute Fromm's substantialized criterion of the un-alienated are nothing but passing phenomena which are at every moment to be enriched, to be changed and to be conquered in the self-creating process of man through labor. Fromm does not bring Marx's thought up to date but pulls it back to the stage of Feuerbach's thought. 2. Alienation and its social background. Fromm conceives alienation as a psychological phenomenon. Alienation is thought to be a pattern of social character which has been former without the fulfillment of the basic needs. Fromm's concept of alienation is, after all, an unhistorical concept. Alienation in Marx's sense is not a mere psychological state, but an objective and total situation of man which involves three spheres: the realm … Y1 - 1965 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Medow, Paul T1 - The Humanistic Ideals of the Enlightenment and Mathematical Economics (Japanese) JF - E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 183-195. Y1 - 1967 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Marković, Mihailo T1 - Humanism and Dialectic (Japanese) JF - E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 109-122. Y1 - 1967 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Marcuse, Herbert T1 - Socialist Humanism? (Japanese) JF - E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 134-145. Y1 - 1967 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kosík, Karel T1 - Man and Philosophy (Japanese) JF - E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 199-208. Y1 - 1967 ER -