TY - JOUR A1 - Reis, Carlos T1 - Introdução á leitura de Erich Fromm [Introduction to Erich Fromm's Thought] [Introduction à la Pensée de Erich Fromm] JF - Filosofia. Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, Vol. 4 (1987), pp. 65-75. [Online ISSN 2183-6892] [ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/filosofia/article/view/202/188] [doi.org/10.21747/202] N2 - Erich Fromm tenta o diálogo entre Marx e Freud, um encontro entre a teoria crítica da sociedade e a da sua consciência. Este é o ponto de partida para uma crítica das ideologias, ou seja, uma análise do que o Autor considera a patologia dos comportamentos que se codificam num >Carácter Social<, peça-móvel e articuladora da infra e da superstruturas. O cimento, mas também a dinamite, que estão na origem e nos objectivos duma estratégia global de manipulação da(s) exigência(s). A 'nossa intenção é apresentar uma recensão crítica, que apela para o seu universo teórico origina. N2 - Erich Fromm tries a dialogue between Marx and Freud, producing a meeting between the critical theory of society and the one of its conscience. This is the starting point from where a critic of ideology departs, which means an analysis of what the Author considers a pathology of those actions codified as >Social Character< something like an articulation of the infra and the superstructure. The cement, but also the dynamite that stands at the origin and the goals of a global strategy to manipulate motivations. Our purpose is to present a critical epitome, that appeals to its original theoretic universe. N2 - Erich Fromm essaie un dialogue entre Marx et Freud, un rendez-vous de la théorie de la société et celle de la conscience. Ceci représente le point de départ d'une critique de l'idéologie, c'est-à-dire, une analyse de ce que l'Auteur considère la pathologie de ces actions codifiées comme un >Character Social<, quelque chose semblable à une articulation entre l'infra et la superstructure. Le ciment, aussi bien que la dynamite qui est à l'origine et dans les objectifs d'une stratégie global de manipulation des motivations. Notre propos est de présenter un épitome critique, qui fait appelle à son univers théorique originaire. Y1 - 1987 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Goya, Will T1 - Review Fromm, E.: Escape from Freedom (1941a, Portuguese) JF - Internet: http://www.filosofia.com.br/vi_classic.php?id=9 Y1 - 1987 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Carvalho, E. T1 - O humanismo normativo de Fromm. JF - Revista da Faculdade de Letras: Filosofia, série II, vol. 04, 1987, pp. 117-141. Disponível em: http://ler.letras.up.pt/uploads/ficheiros/1353.pdf. N2 - Our work >Fromm’s Normative Humanism< — which, as a matter of fact, is divided in six topics: 1] Sacred Contemporaneity; 2) Ideologic Logos; 3) One more >ism< to rhyme with Reformism; 4) Fromm’s Marx; 5) The Frommian man; and 6) The Metaphysical Terrorism — has as its main aim the critical >break-up< of the theoretical conjectures which are the structure of Fromm’s work (and specially, his The Sane Society), whose analytical insufficiency, for us, is notorious, being determined somehere in the text as follows: – >E. Fromm confines himself to repeat the humanistic myth of the supernatural man, in which the opposition nature/culture assumes the shape of methodological directive of all his discourse.< – However, even if our analysis has as its focal point Fromm’s conceptualization of the being of man in the contemporaneous society, it is not restricted by this subject, because it generically fits in the whole problematic of humanism. – Really, in the last resort, the text reveals not only a criticism to Fromm’s theoretical posture, but also a criticism >Flumianism<, whose definition to us is the metaphisical determination of man edified by the occidental thought. So, won’t be somewhat problematic the title of our dissertation? Is it really possible to achieve a humanism without a normative imposition? Owing to this, by the by, it would be stimulating to read the >Brief über den ‘Humanismus’<, by Heidegger. Finally, it must be said — to eliminate possible misunderstandings — that being theoretically anti-humanistic isn’t properly to be against man. This seem to be clear, but as to many people it isn’t, we let here the warning. Y1 - 1987 ER -