TY - JOUR A1 - Fromm, Erich T1 - Psikolojik ve Ahlaki bir Sorun olarak Itaatsizlik JF - E. Fromm: Itaatsizlik üzerine. Özgürlük Neden Otoriteye >Hayir< Demektir?, Ankara (Say Yayinlari) 2014, pp. 9-16 Y1 - 1963 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Fromm, Erich T1 - Nieposłuszeństwo jako problem psychologiczny i moralny JF - O nieposluszenstwie i inne eseje, Krakow (Vis-a-vis, Etudia) 2015, pp. 25-33. Y1 - 1963 UR - http://etiuda.net/?p=productsMore&iProduct=243 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Anonymus-1963b, T1 - Bi恩巴哈 [Bì ēn bā hā]: >The New Social Philosophy Freudism< [毕恩巴哈:《新弗洛伊德主义的社会哲学》] JF - Digest of Foreign Social Sciences [现代外国哲学社会科学文摘], No. 5 (1963), 40-41. N2 - 据联合国《国际社会科学杂志》1962年第3期介绍说,这本著作——正象作者在一开头所说的那样——是以政治科学的立场,或者更确切地说,是以政治哲学的立场来阐述的。它试图在两门学科:政治科学和弗洛伊德与新弗洛伊德主义者所通晓的社会心理学之间架起一座桥梁,这一打算是颇有意义的。实际上,毕思巴哈的用意与其说是评价这两门学科,和研究他们的方法结合的可能性,不如说是根据许多伭述精神分析理论对政治现象分析的影响的著作来综合这两门学科的现状。弗洛姆 N2 - Erich According to the United Nations >International Social Science Journal< in 1962, said the first three, this book – just as the author said that in the beginning – is the position of political science, or more rather, the position of political philosophy is to set forth. It tries to two disciplines: political science, and between Freud and new Freudian psychology are literate society a bridge, this was going to be quite meaningless. In fact, the intention is not so much complete 思巴哈 evaluate these two disciplines, and study the possibility of combining their method, as it is based on the writings influenced many 伭 described psychoanalytic theory to the analysis of political phenomena integrated two Status discipline. Fromm (Erich). [automatic translation] Y1 - 1963 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kaplan, Martin F. A1 - Singer, Erwin T1 - Dogmatism and sensory alienation: An empirical investigation JF - Journal of Consulting Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 6 (1963), pp. 486–491. [Online ISSN 1939-2117] [doi.org/10.1037/h0042057] N2 - This study was designed to investigate certain aspects of the concept of >alienation< as employed by Fromm. Using Fromm's framework and suggestions offered by Schachtel concerning inherent autocentrism and allocentrism in various sensory modalities, it was hypothesized that: (a) dogmatism as measured by Rokeach's scale and adequacy on sensory discrimination tasks would vary negatively with each other and (b) differences between dogmatic and nondogmatic individuals would be more pronounced in their performances utilizing predominantly autocentric modes than on tasks involving essentially allocentric modalities. Sensory discrimination was assessed by requiring Ss to match and/or differentiate between stimuli in 5 areas. 13 dogmatic and 13 nondogmatic Ss (controlling other relevant variables) served as populations. Data obtained supported the hypotheses at least at the 5% level. Y1 - 1963 ER -