TY - BOOK A1 - Wang, Yuanming T1 - Fo luo mu rendao zhuyi jingshen fenxi xue 佛洛姆人道主义精 神分析学 [Fromm’s Humanistic Psychoanalysis], Taipei: Yuan liu chuban shiye gongsi 远流出版事业公司 [Yuan-Liou Publishing Company]. Y1 - 1990 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wang, Yuanming T1 - On Erich Fromm's Criticism to the Modern Western Society [论弗洛姆对现代西方社会的批判] JF - Journal of Tianjin Normal University (Social Science) [天津师范大学学报(社会科学版)], No. 3 (2006), pp. 6-10. N2 - Erich Fromm put forward that the criteria to judge a sane society was to see whether the society can meet the basic needs of human beings and accelerate the development of human beings. In his point of view, the western society was abnormal in spite of its economic prosperity, which catabolized human and people themselves become commodities and robots. Fromm's theory neglected the development of productive forces and only superficially criticized capitalism. But to some degree it can still serve as a source of inspiration in rectifying the development concept of excessively emphasizing economic growth and in establishing principle of regarding human beings as our basic concern. Fromm's theory can also help us have a correct understanding of the changes of capitalism and avoid some drawbacks of western society, so as to achieve the healthy development of our socialism cause. N2 - 弗洛姆提出,判断社会是否健全的标准,是看社会能否满足人的基本精神需要,对人的发展是否具有促进作用。他认为现代西方社会尽管有经济的繁荣,但使人发生了严重异化,人变成了商品、机器人,西方社会是一种病态社会。弗洛姆的理论忽视了生产力的发展,对资本主义的批判也是肤浅的,但它对于纠正片面强调经济增长的畸形发展观、确立以人为本的思想具有启发意义,对于正确认识当代资本主义的新变化,使社会主义事业健康发展,具有一定借鉴意义。 Y1 - 2006 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wang, Yuanming T1 - Fromm's Theory of Good Nature and Its Comparison with the Theory of Mencius [弗洛姆的性善论及其与孟子性善论的比较] JF - Journal of Tianjin Normal University (Social Science) [天津师范大学学报(社会科学版)], No. 5 (2007), pp. 20-24. N2 - Erich Fromm put forward that human's natural character was neither the collection of unchangeable instinctive desire nor the reflection of the infinitely plasticized social culture. Human's natural character, which is also called first potentiality was good-willed, and human's intention to destroy was only the result of the frustrated development of the first potentiality. Although both Fromm and Mencius advocated that human's nature was good, there are fundamental differences between their theories. Fromm regarded self-consciousness, spontaneous love and creativity as human's nature, which resulted from his probe into human's basic mental needs. However, according to Mencius, human's nature included virtue, morality, propriety, wisdom, loyalty and filial piety, which meet the needs of the feudal administration. While Fromm thought highly of independence, creativity and affection for oneself and other people, Mencius denied all these. He only preached affection for relatives and respect for people of higher ranks. Fromm demanded that the society is obliged to meet the basic mental needs of human beings. But Mencius asked people to abide by the autocratic hierarchy. N2 - 弗洛姆提出,人的本性既不是固定不变的本能欲望的总和,也不是无限可塑的社会文化的影子,而有其固有的特质。人的本性即第一潜能是善的,破坏性是人的第一潜能发展受阻的结果。虽然弗洛姆和孟子都主张性善论,但两者却有着根本的区别:前者把自我意识、自发的爱和自发创造性说成人的本性,是对人的基本精神需要探索的结果,后者把仁、义、礼、智及忠、孝说成是人的本性,迎合了封建统治的需要;前者高扬人的独立自主、爱己爱人、创造性,后者抹煞人的独立自主和创造性,反对爱己爱人,只讲亲亲、敬长;前者要求社会必须满足人的基本精神需要,后者要求人必须服从专制的等级制度。 Y1 - 2007 ER -