@article{Maeder, author = {M{\"a}der, Ueli}, title = {Neue {\"o}kologische Bed{\"u}rfnisse mit neuen Sozial-Charakteren}, series = {Sozialalmanach 2024. Sozial{\"o}kologische Wende und Armut in der Schweiz, Luzern (Caritas-Verlag) 2024, pp. 143-156.}, journal = {Sozialalmanach 2024. Sozial{\"o}kologische Wende und Armut in der Schweiz, Luzern (Caritas-Verlag) 2024, pp. 143-156.}, language = {de} } @misc{MaederAenishaenslin, author = {M{\"a}der, Ueli and Aenish{\"a}nslin, Daniel}, title = {Der Preis passt zu meiner Arbeit. Interview von Daniel Aenish{\"a}nslin}, series = {Basler Zeitung, 21. M{\"a}rz 2022, Kultur und Gesellschaft, S. 17.}, journal = {Basler Zeitung, 21. M{\"a}rz 2022, Kultur und Gesellschaft, S. 17.}, language = {de} } @article{Mahnkopf, author = {Mahnkopf, Birgit}, title = {>Green Deal< als Pfad {\"o}kologischer Transformation im Kapitaloz{\"a}n?}, series = {Fromm Forum (Deutsche Ausgabe - ISSN 1437-0956), 27 / 2023, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag), pp. 145-161.}, volume = {d27/2023k}, journal = {Fromm Forum (Deutsche Ausgabe - ISSN 1437-0956), 27 / 2023, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag), pp. 145-161.}, language = {de} } @article{Maiwald, author = {Maiwald, Florian}, title = {The Burden of Freedom: Sartre's Sleep and Fromm's Awakening}, series = {Epoch{\´e} Magazine, Issue \#56, October 2022.}, journal = {Epoch{\´e} Magazine, Issue \#56, October 2022.}, language = {en} } @misc{Lukešova, author = {Lukešov{\´a}, Nikola}, title = {L{\´a}ska a nen{\´a}vist [Love and Hate], Bachelor thesis, Philosophy, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Poland 2013, 59 pp.}, abstract = {Tato bakal{\´a}řsk{\´a} pr{\´a}ce pojedn{\´a}v{\´a} o v{\´y}kladu l{\´a}sky a nen{\´a}visti, zejm{\´e}na na z{\´a}kladě dvou v{\´y}znamn{\´y}ch psychologů Ericha Fromma a Carla Gustava Junga. V {\´u}vodu je pops{\´a}na obecn{\´a} charakteristika l{\´a}sky a nen{\´a}visti pomoc{\´i} literatury Petera Laustera či M. Scott Pecka. V pr{\´a}ci se zaměřuji na to, jak Erich Fromm ve sv{\´y}ch stěžejn{\´i}ch d{\´i}lech pojedn{\´a}v{\´a} o l{\´a}sce a rozeb{\´i}r{\´a} jednotliv{\´e} druhy l{\´a}sky. D{\´a}le se věnuji tomu, co je př{\´i}činou nen{\´a}visti a destruktivity podle E. Fromma. U Carla Gustava Junga jsem se zaměřila předevš{\´i}m na archetyp anima a animus, na jejichž z{\´a}kladě se posl{\´e}ze dost{\´a}v{\´a}m k jeho pojet{\´i} manželstv{\´i} jako psychologick{\´e}ho vztahu. Nen{\´a}vist jako takovou, s{\´a}m o sobě Jung př{\´i}mo neřeš{\´i}, avšak pomoc{\´i} archetypů vztahuj{\´i}c{\´i} se k temn{\´e} str{\´a}nce člověka, lze vyč{\´i}st, co vede jedince ke špatn{\´e}mu jedn{\´a}n{\´i}. J{\´a} rozeb{\´i}r{\´a}m konkr{\´e}tně jeho pojet{\´i} archetypu st{\´i}n. V z{\´a}věru shrnuji vešker{\´e} poznatky z{\´i}skan{\´e} na z{\´a}kladě studi{\´i} v t{\´e}to pr{\´a}ci.}, language = {pl} } @misc{Lunsky, author = {Lunsky, Louis L.}, title = {Review Pears, J.: The Conditions of Human Growth}, series = {Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 112, No. 6 (1963), pp. 1007-1008. [Print ISSN 0003-9926] [doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1963.03860060219052]}, journal = {Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 112, No. 6 (1963), pp. 1007-1008. [Print ISSN 0003-9926] [doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1963.03860060219052]}, abstract = {This volume is the first major expansion of the interpersonal theory of psychiatry since the death of Harry Stack Sullivan. The authors, who are husband and wife, are directors of the Sullivan Institute for Research in Psychoanalysis. In addition to drawing in a major way on Sullivan's formulations, the authors were influenced by the particular approach of Drs. Frieda Fromm-Reichman, Erich Fromm, and Clara Thompson. The central idea of this book is that the life history of any particular individual can only be understood by the quality of his relatedness with significant people. The therapist is the agent who will help catalyze or impede the forces within the individual towards growth. The authors delineate the elements which need affirmation in order for human capacities to be realized. The text is divided into five sections: the structure of personality, normal sequence in interpersonal growth, love and hate, diagnostic categories in interpersonal […]}, language = {en} } @misc{Lunsky, author = {Lunsky, Louis L.}, title = {Review Fromm, E.: The Dogma of Christ and Other Essays on Religion, Psychology and Culture (1963a, English)}, series = {Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 113, No. 3 (1964), pp. 465-466. [Print ISSN 0003-9926] [doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1964.00280090151032]}, journal = {Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 113, No. 3 (1964), pp. 465-466. [Print ISSN 0003-9926] [doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1964.00280090151032]}, abstract = {Of all the psychological theorists who have tried to formulate a system better than Freud's to approach problems of contemporary life, no one has been more creative or influential than Erich Fromm. He is the most articulate advocate on the role of social forces in molding our character and on our manner of relating to others. This volume is an expansion of his systematic doctrine. >The Dogma of Christ<, which is also the longest essay in this collection, appears in English for the first time. It was written thirty years ago, when Fromm identified himself with the orthodox wing of the psychoanalytic movement. He describes the experience of the early Christian community, with its emphasis on the role of the son, as an expression of the revolutionary stirrings of an oppressed minority against the paternalism of the Roman Empire. >The suffering Jesus originated primarily from the need for identification on […]}, language = {en} } @misc{Luo, author = {Luo, Ding}, title = {From Freud to Foucault - The Study of Oedipus Complex from A Triple Perspective, Master thesis, Art Theory, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China 2021 [application of Fromm's theories to art].}, abstract = {Oedipus complex is a key concept in psychoanalysis. It is related to the theory of sexual instinct within the system, the field of unconsciousness, the analysis of dreams, neurosis and other important categories, and has caused numerous disputes since its birth. In the past, the evaluation of Oedipus complex mainly focused on three aspects: one is that children depend on their mother rather than sexual desire for food and emotional needs; the other is the penile centralism and neglect of mother in Freud's theory; the third is the universality of Oedipus complex. These controversies still follow the critical thinking of Malinowski and Fromm, but actually do not touch the core of Oedipus complex. Because the Oedipus complex in Freud's view is essentially a concept about sex, and the successors of Lacan and other psychoanalytic schools have responded to these disputes by reinterpreting the Oedipus complex.- Therefore, this paper will focus on the initial definition of Oedipus complex and explore the original rationality of this concept. Freud first discovered the special relationship between early children and their parents when exploring the causes of neurosis. This relationship appears again frequently in typical dream cases and self-analysis. Therefore, Freud regarded this connection as a common phenomenon and applied it to clinical treatment and analysis. In addition to returning to the context in which Freud raised this issue, we also introduce Levi Strauss and Foucault's theory of sex and gender from the perspective of triangular interpersonal structure and human gender differences to reflect on the bias of traditional interpretation of the concept of Oedipus complex. Specifically speaking: Freud believed that the sexual desire contained in Oedipus complex can only appear in the form of heterosexuality, that is, the first impulse of a child should be directed to the heterosexual side of the parents. According to Foucault's analysis of the relationship between power and sex, sexual experience is produced rather than born with us. Therefore, in this sense, the concept of Oedipus complex constructed by Freud falls into the power. Furthermore, Freud limited the external manifestation of Oedipus complex to the family triangle in the general sense of experience. This kind of setting only pays attention to the interaction between kinship roles, and does not consider each role in the whole system. In Levi Strauss's view, the deep structure of kinship is the uncle nephew relationship based on the premise of >incest taboo<, which includes four words: >brother-sister-father-son<. This >basic structure of kinship< is universal and stable in explaining all the facts of kinship. To sum up, this paper intends to analyze the heterosexual form and triangular relationship in Oedipus complex through Foucault's theory of sexual experience and Levi Strauss's theory of kinship structure. [Translation: www.cnki.net, 4/2023]}, language = {en} } @article{Luo, author = {Luo, Dongmei}, title = {The Complex Historical Context of Marx's Concept of Man [马克思关于人的概念的复杂历史脉络]}, series = {Theory Research [学理论], No. 3 (2022), pp. 22-24.}, journal = {Theory Research [学理论], No. 3 (2022), pp. 22-24.}, abstract = {以弗洛姆为代表的西方学者认为马克思人的概念是>本真性<的人自我演化的同一性过程,但是马克思关于人的概念是复杂的,它从>人的自我意识<的问题式转换为>人的社会类本质>的问题式,最后转换为一定历史的<现实的个人<的科学阐释。因此,在这种差别转换中,不存在始终如一的>本真性<的人的概念,也就是说这一概念在马克思那里不应简单当作某种自我深化、自我演化的同一性过程,而应理解成在特定历史交互语境之下不同问题式和话语实践的差异性转换。}, language = {zh} } @article{LuoChen, author = {Luo, Songtao and Chen, Keyu}, title = {From Labor Alienation to Criticism of Existential Alienation - Based on Fromm's Thoughts on Marx's Humanism [从劳动异化到生存异化批判——基于弗洛姆对马克思人学思想的思考]}, series = {Foreign Theoretical Trends [国外理论动态], No. 3 (2021), pp. 72-79.}, journal = {Foreign Theoretical Trends [国外理论动态], No. 3 (2021), pp. 72-79.}, abstract = {作为西方马克思主义中新弗洛伊德主义的代表,弗洛姆强调在西方人道主义传统中理解马克思的人学思想。在《马克思关于人的概念》一文中,弗洛姆深入解读了马克思《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的>人的本质<和>异化劳动<这两个关键问题。针对现代西方资本主义社会中人的生存异化困境,弗洛姆沿着马克思批判异化劳动的思路,着重揭批了自由异化、爱的异化、消费异化等三种异化状况。弗洛姆的生存异化批判虽然发人深省,却仍带有非历史的抽象人性论色。}, language = {zh} }