@misc{Peng, author = {Peng, Liang}, title = {An Interpretation of >Ragtime< by E.L. Doctorow from the Perspective of Fromm's Freedom Theory, Master thesis, World Literature, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China 2023 [application of Fromm's theories to art]. [doi.org/10.27328/d.cnki.gshsc.2023.000987]}, abstract = {[Chinese abstract not available] >Ragtime<, published in 1975, is the fourth novel written by Jewish-American novelist E. L. Doctorow, for which he was awarded >the 1976 National Book Critics Circle Award<. Doctorow focused on the important figures in three families to explore the fate of different classes in the United States, and he didn't try to write a grand history of the entire United States to reflect that time. He perfectly presented three very different American family freedom dilemmas in >Ragtime<: One was a wealthy middle-class white family, the other was a Jewish family from European immigrants, and the last was a black family, which genuinely reproduced the microcosm of all classes in that era. At present, some scholars have explored >Ragtime< from different angles such as feminist criticism and new historicism. Because of its unique writing style and ingenious narrative techniques, there are also many scholars studying the narrative strategy of the novel. However, there is a lack of comprehensive comments on the dilemma of freedom of the protagonists, the mechanism to negative freedom and how to realize positive freedom in the novel. From the perspective of Fromm's freedom theory, we can find that the freedom dilemma of an individual in modern society makes people confused. So manipulation and being manipulated, a desire to destroy, automaton conformity, and other mechanisms of negative freedom come into being. As for Fromm, to be a complete human being, to be truly free must be achieved through the spontaneous love and creative labor of the individual. Based on Fromm's view of freedom, the interpretation of >Ragtime< is of guiding significance for individuals in today's society to move from freedom dilemma to positive freedom. Ultimately, the liberation and free and all-around development of human beings is the highest value orientation for realizing a community with a shared future for mankind, which promotes the human beings to move towards a better tomorrow.}, language = {zh} } @article{Peters, author = {Peters, Matthijs}, title = {Reification and the Duty to Work Through the Past: On Critical Theory and Temporality}, series = {New German Critique, Vol. 47, No. 2 (2020), pp. 107-138. [Online ISSN 1558-1462] [doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-8288153]}, journal = {New German Critique, Vol. 47, No. 2 (2020), pp. 107-138. [Online ISSN 1558-1462] [doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-8288153]}, abstract = {This article focuses on the role that the notion of temporality can and should play in the tradition of Critical Theory. Following an overview of the critical analyses of time found in the works of Marx, Luk{\´a}cs, Weber, Adorno, Fromm, and Marcuse, the article analyzes Hartmut Rosa's critique of social acceleration and argues that this critique lacks a firm normative basis. This basis is required, however, for one to claim why certain processes of social acceleration are wrong. It is shown that Rosa's analyses of acceleration contain two suggestions for such a basis: autonomy understood as a narrative identity, and autonomy as defended by Honneth's theory of recognition. After an exploration of both suggestions, in which the ideas of MacIntyre and Ricoeur are briefly discussed as well, it is argued that a combination of both may result in a specific, normative understanding of reification, which is defended against Honneth's definition of this concept. Based on an interpretation of passages in Horkheimer and Adorno's >Dialectic of Enlightenment< and Adorno's notion of >working through the past<, the article claims that reification should be understood as a forgetting of the narratives that have shaped the self and the social structures under which this self is formed, and therefore as the inability to recognize the temporal dimensions of the autonomous self.}, language = {en} } @article{SchatzWinter, author = {Schatz, Oskar and Winter, Ernst Florian}, title = {Alienazione, marxismo e umanesimo}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), L'Umanesimo socialista, a cura di Erich Fromm, Bari (Daedalo Libri) 1971, pp. 353-372.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), L'Umanesimo socialista, a cura di Erich Fromm, Bari (Daedalo Libri) 1971, pp. 353-372.}, language = {it} } @article{SchatzWinter, author = {Schatz, Oskar and Winter, Ernst Florian}, title = {Alienaci{\´o}n, marxismo y humanismo}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Humanismo socialista, Buenos Aires (Editorial Paid{\´o}s) 1968, pp. 342-361.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Humanismo socialista, Buenos Aires (Editorial Paid{\´o}s) 1968, pp. 342-361.}, language = {es} } @article{SchatzWinter, author = {Schatz, Oskar and Winter, Ernst Florian}, title = {Af{\`a}ena{\c{c}}{\~a}o, Marxismo e Humanismo (Um ponto de vista crist{\~a}o)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Humanismo Socialista, traducao de Artur Morao, Lusa (biblioteca 70) 1976, pp. 324-346.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Humanismo Socialista, traducao de Artur Morao, Lusa (biblioteca 70) 1976, pp. 324-346.}, language = {pt} } @article{SchatzWinter, author = {Schatz, Oskar and Winter, Ernst Florian}, title = {Alienation, Marxism, and Humanism (A Christian Viewpoint) (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 084-105.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 084-105.}, language = {ja} } @article{Schaff, author = {Schaff, Adam}, title = {Il marxismo e la filosofia dell'uomo}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), L'Umanesimo socialista, a cura di Erich Fromm, Bari (Daedalo Libri) 1971, pp. 165-175.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), L'Umanesimo socialista, a cura di Erich Fromm, Bari (Daedalo Libri) 1971, pp. 165-175.}, language = {it} } @article{Schaff, author = {Schaff, Adam}, title = {O Marxismo e a Filosofia do Homem}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Humanismo Socialista, traducao de Artur Morao, Lusa (biblioteca 70) 1976, pp. 151-162.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Humanismo Socialista, traducao de Artur Morao, Lusa (biblioteca 70) 1976, pp. 151-162.}, language = {pt} } @misc{Schragmann, author = {Schragmann, Hannah}, title = {Produktivit{\"a}t neu denken. Vom Trennungs- zum Vermittlungsbegriff, Wiesbaden (Springer VS) 2024. [Online ISBN 978-3-658-43858-6] [doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43858-6_3]}, abstract = {Nach diesem (eklektisch bleibenden) ideengeschichtlichen {\"U}berblick widmet sich das folgende Kapitel der Frage, wie ein humanistischer Produktivit{\"a}tsbegriff aussehen k{\"o}nnte, der das Subjekt und dessen Selbst- und Weltbezug ins Zentrum stellt. Zu diesem Zweck soll in Kapitel drei auf die Theorien Erich Fromms und Hartmut Rosas zur{\"u}ckgegriffen werden, bevor in Kapitel vier Kriterien f{\"u}r einen humanistischen Produktivit{\"a}tsbegriff definiert werden. Der Auswahl der Autoren liegt die These zugrunde, dass beide die Frage nach produktiver Selbstwerdung neu stellen und diese an der lebensweltlichen Erfahrung spiegeln.}, language = {de} } @article{Schreiber, author = {Schreiber, Beate}, title = {>Mein Vater war ein Kaufmann<. Zur Herkunfts- und Einwanderungsgeschichte der Familie von Lea Grundig}, series = {K. Krenzlin (Hg.), >Schreibe mir nur immer viel<. Der Briefwechsel zwischen Hans und Lea Grundig. Ein Werkstattbericht Im Auftrag der Akademie der K{\"u}nste, Berlin, und der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung hg. von Kathleen Krenzlin, Berlin und M{\"u}nchen (Deutscher Kunstverlag), 2022, pp. 121-154.}, journal = {K. Krenzlin (Hg.), >Schreibe mir nur immer viel<. Der Briefwechsel zwischen Hans und Lea Grundig. Ein Werkstattbericht Im Auftrag der Akademie der K{\"u}nste, Berlin, und der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung hg. von Kathleen Krenzlin, Berlin und M{\"u}nchen (Deutscher Kunstverlag), 2022, pp. 121-154.}, language = {de} }