@article{Menzel, author = {Menzel, Niels}, title = {Entfremdung im Kapitalismus. Zu den modernen Gefahren f{\"u}r das psychische Wohl des Individuums bei Erich Fromm, Studienarbeit, Fachbereich Philosophie - Philosophie des 20. Jahrhunderts, Grin Verlag 2014,14 pp.}, abstract = {Erich Fromm, ein untersch{\"a}tzter Klassiker, steht in der Reihe jener kritischer Geister, die in den vermeintlichen Errungenschaften des Kapitalismus ein Problempotential erkannten, das sich negativ auf die Gesellschaft und auf das Individuum auswirkt. Es w{\"a}re m{\"u}ßig, in einer von marktwirtschaftlichen Grundannahmen zutiefst {\"u}berzeugten Gesellschaft den Versuch einer Bekehrung wagen zu wollen, indem man die Grundannahmen eines linken Denkers zu verteidigen sucht; diese Arbeit soll sich daher der Veranschaulichung und Hinterfragung der fr{\"u}hen, unter dem Eindruck freudomarxistischer Gedanken gefassten Thesen Erich Fromms widmen. Jene Thesen sind von Fromm in vielen popul{\"a}ren Bestsellern besprochen worden, so dass es nur allzu leicht fiel, ihn zu einem zwar popul{\"a}ren, aber wenig gehaltvollen Philosophen zu erkl{\"a}ren. Der Erfolg eines Philosophen macht seine Thesen nicht falscher, auch wenn er durch jenen Erfolg Teil einer Gesellschaft wird, an deren Bekehrung seiner Philosophie eigentlich gelegen ist. Im Falle Fromms lag sein Erfolg nahe: Es ging ihm in der Tradition des j{\"u}dischen Humanismus um das psychische Wohl der Menschen, das er in einer wirtschaftlich und politisch unlauteren Mitteln unterworfenen Welt gef{\"a}hrdet sah. Daher ist es auch der Mensch, der im Mittelpunkt dieser Arbeit steht: Welche Gefahren wirken laut Fromm auf das Individuum der Moderne ein und welche Wechselwirkungen von Gesellschaft und Individuum macht er aus? Und warum ist der Kapitalismus eine Gefahr, die sich kaum {\"u}berwinden l{\"a}sst? Sp{\"a}testens mit der Trennung vom Institut f{\"u}r Sozialforschung widmete sich Erich Fromm der Ausarbeitung und Vertiefung seiner Untersuchungen der fr{\"u}hen Jahre. Die sich daraus ergebende Vielfalt und Bandbreite kann in dieser Arbeit nicht besprochen werden; wesentliche Aspekte des Frommschen Werks m{\"u}ssen daher hintanstehen, wenn die vermittels Analytischer Sozialpsychologie herausgearbeitete Kapitalismuskritik dargestellt werden soll. [Hugendubel.de]}, language = {de} } @article{Meisenhelder, author = {Meisenhelder, Thomas}, title = {From character to habitus in sociology}, series = {The Social Science Journal, Vol. 43, No. 1 (2006), pp. 55-66. [Online ISSN 1873-5355] [doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2005.12.005]}, journal = {The Social Science Journal, Vol. 43, No. 1 (2006), pp. 55-66. [Online ISSN 1873-5355] [doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2005.12.005]}, abstract = {The idea of social character has a long and important history within sociological thought. The concept addresses the fundamental question of the relationship between society and the individual, structure and agency. Tracing the development of the idea of social character from the classical sociology of Marx and Weber to more contemporary writings within American sociology by figures such as Fromm, Riesman, and Mills reveals ideas and perspectives central to the development of social theory. Although many argue that the idea of social character is no longer important in sociology, it has in fact resurfaced in Pierre Bourdieu's notion of habitus. Habitus specifies the original idea of social character without the biological or essentialist traits found in most of the earlier work. Habitus marks a substantial advance beyond earlier ideas of social character, providing a more purely sociological answer to the structure/agency (society/individual) problematic.}, language = {en} } @article{MinChang, author = {Min, Yoon Young and Chang, Haram}, title = {출생 이전 인간생명의 증강 목적 유전자 편집에 대한 법정신분석학적 고찰 [Legal Psychoanalytical Considerations on the Genetic Enhancement of Human Life before Birth]}, series = {법학논총 [Dankook Law Review], Vol. 42, No.4 (2018), pp. 95-132.}, journal = {법학논총 [Dankook Law Review], Vol. 42, No.4 (2018), pp. 95-132.}, abstract = {이 글은 출생 이전 인간생명의 증강목적 유전자 편집에 관한 현재의 담론이 도덕적 현기증에 빠져있다는 샌델의 지적에 공감하며, 이 문제에 관한 정신분석학적 고찰을 시도하여 도덕적 현기증을 극복한 법규범의 확립을 위한 토대를 놓는 것에 기여를 하고자 한다. 출생이전 인간생명의 증강 목적 유전자 편집 문제와 관련하여 크게 두 가지 입장이 있는데, 하나는 증강목적 유전자 편집을 찬성하는 트랜스휴머니즘이고 다른 하나는 반대하는 생명보수주의이다. 이 글은 정신분석학의 관점에서 트랜스휴머니스트들의 주장의 중요한 오류들을 비판하고, 생명보수주의자들의 논증은 보완하고 강화한다. 각 장의 중심 주제를 간략히 밝히자면, 제II장에서는 부모의 자녀를 위한 >합리적 선택<이 무의식을 고려한다면 허무한 신화일 수 있기에, 불가역적 변화인 출생 이전 인간생명의 증강목적 유전자 편집을 부모의 선택에 맡기는 것이 크게 위험할 수 있음을 밝히는데 주안점을 둘 것이고, 제III장은 >완벽<을 향한 트랜스휴머니스트들의 욕망의 파괴적 위험성을, 제IV장은 출생 이전 인간생명에 대한 유전자 편집의 욕망이 생명을 존중하는 바이오필리아적인 것이 아니라 통제를 갈구하는 네크로필리아적인 것임을 다룰 것이다. 제II장은 프로이트와 현대의 역동심리치료 이론들이, 제III장은 융의 분석심리학이, 제IV장은 프롬의 정신분석학이 중심적인 이론적 틀이 되며, 생명보수주의자로는 샌델과 하버마스가, 트랜스휴머니스트로는 보스트롬과 사블레스쿠가 주로 고찰될 것이다. 이 과정을 통해 인간 존재에 대한 균형 있는 관점을 가진 바이오필리아적 법의 확립을 위한 기초적 토대 마련에 기여할 수 있기를 바란다.}, language = {ko} } @article{Min, author = {Min, Yoon Young}, title = {한국의 부부간 심리적 폭력의 실태와 형사정책적 함의 - 강압적 통제론과 네크로필리아(necrophilia) 개념을 활용하여] [Psychological Violence between Spouses and its Implications for Criminal Justice Policy in Korea - Using Coercive Control Theory and the Concept of Necrophilia]}, series = {형사정책 [Korean Journal of Criminology], Vol. 29, No. 3 (2017), pp. 93-125.}, journal = {형사정책 [Korean Journal of Criminology], Vol. 29, No. 3 (2017), pp. 93-125.}, abstract = {가정폭력처벌법과 가정폭력방지법이 제정된 이후 20년이 흘렀음에도 가정폭력은 여전히 심각한 사회적 문제이다. 이 문제의 해결을 위해 가정폭력 가해자의 체포우선주의나 상담조건부 기소유예제도의 폐지 등 법적 개선의 논의가 활발하다. 이러한 상황에서 영국이 2015년 Serious Crime Act를 개정하여 신체적 폭력이 없는 패턴화된 강압적이고 통제적인 행위를 독립적인 범죄로 처벌할 수 있게 한 것은 인상 깊은 사건이다. 형법상 범죄를 구성하지 않는 심리적 폭력들도 가족구성원 사이에서 지속적이고 반복적으로 행해지고 피해자에게 심각한 영향을 미쳤다면 범죄로 처벌될 수 있게 된 것이다. 가정폭력에 대처하는 영국법의 이러한 새로운 입장은 미국의 Evan Stark 교수의 강압적 통제론(coercive control)을 바탕으로 가정폭력의 개념을 새롭게 정의함으로써 가능해졌다. 스타크 교수의 강압적 통제론은 가정폭력의 핵심은 '통제'이고, 가정폭력은 피해자의 자유에 대한 침해라고 재정의하였다. 즉, 그 자체로는 폭력성이 낮은 행위라도 강압적이고 통제적인 방식으로 지속적으로 행해질 때에는 통제의 패턴을 이룸으로써 피해자의 자유를 구속하는 폭력이 될 수 있다는 이론이다. 가정은 매우 친밀한 공동체이기 때문에 폭력성의 수위 자체는 낮은 통제적 행위라 하더라도, 지속적이고 반복적으로 행해질 때 그 해악이 크다. 따라서 형법적 범죄를 구성하는 수준에 이르지 않는 통제적 행위들이 꾸준히 가해져서 통제적 패턴이 형성되는 상황을 법적으로 규제할 필요성이 충분하다. 이 글에서는 영국이 가정폭력의 개념과 규제 방식을 바꾼 취지를 수용하여, 영국의 SCA Part 5 Section 76을 소개하고(II), 2016년에 실시한 한국의 부부간 심리적 폭력의 실태조사와 부부간 심리적 폭력의 범죄화에 대한 여론조사의 결과를 소개함으로써 한국의 상황에서도 영국의 문제의식이 유효한 것임을 고찰해보았다(III). 나아가 강압적 통제 행위의 해악을 프롬(Fromm)이 제시한 네크로필리아(necrophilia)의 개념을 활용해 재해석함으로써 이러한 유형의 가정폭력이 심각한 해악을 미치는 것임을 새롭게 이해해보고자 하였다(IV). 마지막으로는 연구의 결과를 바탕으로 한국의 가정폭력 관련 형사정책이 부부간 심리적 폭력에 관심을 더욱 둠으로써 더욱 실효적으로 되기를 제안하면서 글을 마무리 한다(V).}, language = {ko} } @misc{Miyamoto, author = {Miyamoto, Kaori}, title = {Erich Fromm's Theory on Alienation, Master of Arts, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Fine Arts), Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA 1987, 71+4 pp. [doi.org/10.7275/9975323]}, language = {en} } @article{Mizdrak, author = {Mizdrak, Inga}, title = {Za chciwością czy przeciw niej? [For or against Greed?]}, series = {Zeszyty Naukowe (UEK), No. 2 (980) (2019), pp. 45-59. [Online ISSN 2545-3238] [zeszyty-naukowe.uek.krakow.pl/index.php/zeszyty-naukowe/article/view/1642/1316]}, journal = {Zeszyty Naukowe (UEK), No. 2 (980) (2019), pp. 45-59. [Online ISSN 2545-3238] [zeszyty-naukowe.uek.krakow.pl/index.php/zeszyty-naukowe/article/view/1642/1316]}, abstract = {Fenomen chciwości może być ujmowany z r{\´o}żnych stron. W zależności od kontekstu może przejawiać się niemal we wszystkich dziedzinach życia społeczno-ekonomiczno-kulturowego. W dobie zachodzących zmian cywilizacyjnych problematyczne staje się nie tylko zdefiniowanie samej chciwości, ale także wyartykułowanie najważniejszych jej znamion. Dzieje się tak z powodu podejmowanych pr{\´o}b redefinicji chciwości w obrębie nauk ekonomicznych (gdzie rozumiana jest jako istotny czynnik napędzający gospodarkę) i społecznych (gdzie traktowana jest jako naturalny przejaw konsumpcjonizmu). Celem artykułu jest ukazanie chciwości w kontekście podmiotowości człowieka i wywoływanych w nim przer{\´o}żnych pęknięć przy jej udziale. Okazuje się, że zar{\´o}wno warstwa duchowa, wolicjonalna, emocjonalna, jak i intelektualna ulegają destabilizacji pod wpły wem zainicjowanej przez podmiot chciwości, rugując tym samym istotną rolę kształtowania siebie od wewnątrz (zwłaszcza w znaczeniu moralnym). Poprzez analizy Ericha Fromma, Tom{\´a}ša Sedl{\´a}čka, Michaela Sandela oraz Benjamina Barbera ukazano wymiar chciwo ści w jej ekonomiczno-etyczno-antropologicznym aspekcie jako prowadzącej do szeroko rozumianego zniewolenia jednostki. Przy tym odsłoniła się r{\´o}wnież antypersonalistyczna perspektywa międzyludzkich relacji, eliminująca możliwość działania z innymi na zasadach sprawiedliwości, uczciwej wymiany oraz solidarności.}, language = {pl} } @article{Misawa, author = {Misawa, Ken-Ichi}, title = {エーリッヒ・フロムの疎外概念 [A Critical Appraisal of Erich Fromm's Concept of Alienation]}, series = {社会学評論 [Japanese Sociological Review], Vol. 15, No. 4 (1965), pp. 67-78, 203. [doi.org/10.4057/jsr.15.4_67]}, journal = {社会学評論 [Japanese Sociological Review], Vol. 15, No. 4 (1965), pp. 67-78, 203. [doi.org/10.4057/jsr.15.4_67]}, abstract = {[First page] The aim of this paper is to clarify the difference between Fromm's concept of alienation from Marx's, and thus to evaluate the significance Fromm's idea of alienation. 1. The standard of the un-alienated Marx sees man as a process of self-creation through labor (= activity in general). To Marx, the un-alienated man is, first, the individual two each day realizes the potentialities of his being through work which gives his inner capacities the form of concrete embodiments, and second, at the same time the subject of history whose potentialities and inner capacities are got the form of historical embodiments through the mode of production in each period. Fromm as a moralist changes Marx's objective concept of man into a subjective one. Fromm conceives man as the bearer of the unchangeable basic needs which are inherent in human nature and the human condition. For Fromm, the un-alienated man is the man who has satisfied and fulfilled these basic needs in a productive way, who has realized a normative basis of his nature which remains the same always and everywhere. From Marx's point of view, love, happiness and other universal values which constitute Fromm's substantialized criterion of the un-alienated are nothing but passing phenomena which are at every moment to be enriched, to be changed and to be conquered in the self-creating process of man through labor. Fromm does not bring Marx's thought up to date but pulls it back to the stage of Feuerbach's thought. 2. Alienation and its social background. Fromm conceives alienation as a psychological phenomenon. Alienation is thought to be a pattern of social character which has been former without the fulfillment of the basic needs. Fromm's concept of alienation is, after all, an unhistorical concept. Alienation in Marx's sense is not a mere psychological state, but an objective and total situation of man which involves three spheres: the realm …}, language = {ja} } @article{Miranda, author = {Miranda, Lucas}, title = {The Self is Dead - Alienation and Nihilism in >Rick and Morty< [application of Fromm's theories to art]}, series = {Class, Race and Corporate Power, Vol. 5, No. 3 (2017), Article 9, 10 pp. [Online ISSN: 2330-6297] [digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower/vol5/iss3/9]}, journal = {Class, Race and Corporate Power, Vol. 5, No. 3 (2017), Article 9, 10 pp. [Online ISSN: 2330-6297] [digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower/vol5/iss3/9]}, abstract = {Drawing upon Erich Fromm's psychoanalytical-diagnosis of man in capitalism, this essay reflects upon some of the most political and philosophical themes of Cartoon Network's adult animated sitcom >Rick and Morty<. It focuses mainly in juxtaposing the nihilism and the alienation of the characters Rick and Jerry, respectively. Discussing the loss of agency due to the illusions and repressions of contemporary society, the essay concludes that capitalism benefits from both Jerry and Rick's self-destructive worldviews.}, language = {en} } @article{Mizuta, author = {Mizuta, Makoto}, title = {エーリッヒ・フロムにおける「健康」と「幸福」 : クォリティ・オブ・ライフ」に関する基礎付けの試み [>Health< and >Happiness< in Erich Fromm: Having an Elementary Concept of the >Quality of Life<]}, series = {医学哲学 医学倫理 [Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine], Vol. 21 (2003), pp. 98-111. [doi.org/10.24504/itetsu.21.0_98]}, journal = {医学哲学 医学倫理 [Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine], Vol. 21 (2003), pp. 98-111. [doi.org/10.24504/itetsu.21.0_98]}, abstract = {When we talk about the >quality of life< (QOL) we should inquire just into the >quality< of human life. Generally speaking, a qualitative thing includes something original that has no substitute. Each person's existence is an irreplaceable life, and it has a unique value. QOL is a subject about the qualitative values of human life. The pursuit of QOL is the pursuit of a >healthy< human life or >happiness.< E. Fromm said that a person represents the whole human being, and that an individual is a physico-spiritual totality. He also said that the goal of a person in life is to be himself. According to Fromm, the fundamental human desire aims to conquer >existential dichotomies,< such as >life and death,< >solidarity and aloneness.< Everyone shows one's answer depending on his/her character or personality. Only a >productive character< can get happiness through its answer. That is the basic attitude by which >human nature< and >individuality< are brought into full play at the same time. Such a person gropes for a >sane society<. And such a society ought to bring up sound persons. QOL as elements of a living environment are useful as conditions for happiness. However, the most important thing is the >quality< of each one's life itself. This kind of QOL is shown by the basic attitude as >personality.< A person who lives a well-filled life has a high quality of life. The scale of quality of life as the standard common to human beings is >human nature,< which is also the foundation of human equality. This is the >basis< of human rights. And each person will be the judge of the matter connected with >happiness<, making use of the activation of individuality. So, medical persons should not confuse QOL and >social usefulness!< Medical preference order is not a problem of QOL but purely a problem of medical technique.}, language = {ja} } @article{Molesworthetal, author = {Molesworth, Mike and et al.,}, title = {Having, being and higher education: the marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer}, series = {Teaching in Higher Education, Vol.14, No. 3 (2009), pp. 277-287. [Online ISSN: 1470-1294] [doi.org/10.1080/13562510902898841]}, journal = {Teaching in Higher Education, Vol.14, No. 3 (2009), pp. 277-287. [Online ISSN: 1470-1294] [doi.org/10.1080/13562510902898841]}, abstract = {In this paper we express concerns that the marketisation of British higher education that has accompanied its expansion has resulted in some sections becoming pedagogically limited. We draw from Fromm's humanist philosophy based on >having< to argue that the current higher education (HE) market discourse promotes a mode of existence, where students seek to >have a degree< rather than >be learners<. This connects pedagogic theory to a critique of consumer culture. We argue that a 'market-led' university responds to consumer calls by focusing on the content students want at a market rate. It may decrease intellectual complexity if this is not in demand, and increase connections with the workplace if this is desired. Once, under the guidance of the academic, the undergraduate had the potential to be transformed into a scholar, someone who thinks critically, but in our consumer society such 'transformation' is denied and 'confirmation' of the student as consumer is favoured. We further argue that there is a danger that the new HE's link to business through the expansion of vocational courses in business, marketing and related offerings, inevitably embeds expanded HE in a culture of having. This erodes other possible roles for education because a consumer society is unlikely to support a widened HE sector that may work to undermine its core ideology.}, language = {en} }