@book{Jordanetal, author = {Jordan, J. V. and et al.,}, title = {Women's Growth in Connection. Writings from the Stone Center. London (Guilford) 1991.}, language = {en} } @book{Kleinetal, author = {Klein, Melanie and et al.,}, title = {New Directions in Psycho-Analysis. London (Tavistock) 1955.}, language = {en} } @book{Kleinetal, author = {Klein, Melanie and et al.,}, title = {Developments in Psycho-Analysis. London (Hogarth) 1973.}, language = {en} } @book{Torreyetal, author = {Torrey, E. F. and et al.,}, title = {Schizophrenia and Manic-Depressive Disorder. The Biological Roots of Mental Illness as Revealed by the Landmark Study of Identical Twins. New York (BasicBooks) 1994.}, language = {en} } @book{Boscoloetal, author = {Boscolo, L. and et al.,}, title = {Milan Systemic Family Therapy. New York (Basic Books) 1987.}, language = {en} } @article{Holmetal, author = {Holm, Kari and et al.,}, title = {Institutt for Psykoterapi: background and developments of the Institute for Psychotherapy in Norway}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Abingdon (Routledge - Taylor and Francis) Vol. 23 (No. 2, 2014), pp. 119-126.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Abingdon (Routledge - Taylor and Francis) Vol. 23 (No. 2, 2014), pp. 119-126.}, abstract = {The Institutt for Psykoterapi is a nationwide training institution offering postgraduate studies in psychoanalytic psychotherapy for physicians and psychologists. It is also a membership society aiming at safeguarding and disseminating the psychoanalytically oriented perspective in mental health care. The Institute was founded in October 1962 as a result of cooperation between the psychologists Einar Dannevig and Per Mentzen and the psychiatrist Endre Ugelstad. At that time, the only systematic training in psychotherapy for physicians and psychologists in this country was provided by the Norwegian Psychoanalytic Society. The training took place in Oslo alone, the teaching capacity was limited, and only psychoanalysis was taught. It is a demanding form of treatment that many patients with mental disorders are unable to carry through. The great majority of patients in institutions needed other forms of psychotherapy, but there was at that time no systematic training for this purpose. In a letter of recommendation for the foundation, Harald Schjelderup, professor of psychology, described the prevailing poor conditions for training in psychotherapy: >Training in psychotherapy in our country has been both sparse and poorly organized. There is no institution at the moment which can offer physicians and psychologists a sufficient basis for an independent practice of depth psychologically oriented psychotherapy for adults. Neither does it appear that any of the existing institutions will be able to take on this task for a long time to come.<}, language = {en} } @article{XirauMillanetal, author = {Xirau, Ram{\´o}n de and Mill{\´a}n, Salvador and et al.,}, title = {Intervenciones Grabadas en el Centenario del Nacimiento de Fromm Transcript of Interviews about Erich Fromm with Ram{\´o}n Xirau, Salvador Mill{\´a}n, Sonia Gojman and Sabina Camacho, given at a meeting in November 17-20, 2000, Typescript 30 p.}, number = {unpublished version / unver{\"o}ffentlichte Fassung}, language = {es} } @book{Fonagyetal, author = {Fonagy, P. and et al.,}, title = {Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of the Self. New York (Other Press) 2002.}, language = {en} } @book{Fruggerietal, author = {Fruggeri, L. and et al.,}, title = {New Systemic Ideas from the Italian Mental Health Movement. London (Karnac) 1991.}, language = {en} } @article{Herzogetal, author = {Herzog, D. B. and et al.,}, title = {Integrating Treatments for Bulimia Nervosa}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 17 (1989), pp. 141-150.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 17 (1989), pp. 141-150.}, language = {en} } @article{Hietalahtietal, author = {Hietalahti, Jarno and et al.,}, title = {Insults, humour and freedom of speech}, series = {French Cultural Studies 2016, Vol. 27, pp. 245-255.}, journal = {French Cultural Studies 2016, Vol. 27, pp. 245-255.}, abstract = {In this article we argue that freedom of speech should be understood as a social freedom. In the public discussion after the Charlie Hebdo attacks, it has often been understood as an absolute right to say anything - to offend, to make a fool of others and of oneself, and to express any opinion regardless of the consequences. We challenge this view and propose that advocating freedom of speech without understanding its social foundations is misleading and counterproductive. Based on the critical social theories of Erich Fromm, Charles Taylor and Axel Honneth, we show that there is an alternative tradition in which freedom is fundamentally rooted in social relations and therefore requires respect for others. We argue that interpreting freedom of speech as a social freedom avoids some of the problems apparent in current discussions. In addition, our position has significant practical consequences on how humour and insults should be understood.}, language = {en} }