@article{Phillips, author = {Phillips, Adam}, title = {Erich Fromm}, series = {On Flirtation, Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1996 [Chapter 12].}, journal = {On Flirtation, Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1996 [Chapter 12].}, language = {en} } @article{Phillips, author = {Phillips, Adam}, title = {Returning the dream: in memoriam Masud Khan}, series = {Free Association, No. 21 (1991), pp. 099-108.}, journal = {Free Association, No. 21 (1991), pp. 099-108.}, language = {en} } @article{Phillips, author = {Phillips, Adam}, title = {Culture, Influence, and the >I-ness< of Me: Commentary on Papers by Susan Bodnar, Gary B. Walls, and Steven Botticelli}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 05 (1995), pp. 181-188.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 05 (1995), pp. 181-188.}, language = {en} } @article{Phillips, author = {Phillips, Adam}, title = {Introduction in Symposium on gender}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 07 (1997), pp. 741-752.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 07 (1997), pp. 741-752.}, language = {en} } @article{Phillips, author = {Phillips, Adam}, title = {Promises, promises.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 35 (1999), pp. 081-090.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 35 (1999), pp. 081-090.}, language = {en} } @article{Phillips, author = {Phillips, Adam}, title = {Reply to Gill, Jacobs, and Shapiro}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 11 (2001), pp. 001-021.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 11 (2001), pp. 001-021.}, abstract = {In this paper, I present a reading of Emmanuel Ghent as a writer and not merely as a theoretician. I explore the ways Ghent has worked against the latent and lurking Procrusteanism in psychoanalysis and how his distinction and blending of certain key terms - need and neediness, surrender and submission - reveal unconscious logic as paradoxical process. By taking seriously the family likenesses between psychoanalytic and related disciplines, Ghent has been able to counter the hardening of the theoretical arteries in psychoanalysis. Finally and above all, I draw attention to the way Ghent makes the word relationship sound unusually interesting again.}, language = {en} } @article{Phillips, author = {Phillips, Adam}, title = {Reply to Reviews by Slavin, Stein, and Stern}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 11 (2001), pp. 337-341.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 11 (2001), pp. 337-341.}, abstract = {This paper elaborates on Ken Corbett's sense of inclusive and paradoxical solutions to what are traditionally described as conflicts of gender.}, language = {en} } @article{Phillips, author = {Phillips, Adam}, title = {Talking About Talking About Patients}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 621-625.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 621-625.}, abstract = {This response questions the heuristic value, not to mention the ironies of subjectivity as a useful psychoanalytic concept (and tool). It intimates that the dilemmas of a child analyst at work are, whatever else they are, a function of the history of child analysis.}, language = {en} } @misc{Phillips, author = {Phillips, Adam}, title = {Review Burston, D. R.: The Legacy of Erich Fromm}, series = {New Republic, Vol. 205 (No. 2, 1991), pp. 41-42.}, journal = {New Republic, Vol. 205 (No. 2, 1991), pp. 41-42.}, language = {en} }