@article{PradodeOliveira, author = {Prado de Oliveira, L. E.}, title = {Little Jeremy's Struggle with Autism, Schizophrenia and Paranoia}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 8 (No. 3, December 1999), pp. 172-188.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 8 (No. 3, December 1999), pp. 172-188.}, abstract = {Since its formulation by Bleuler in 1911, the generalisation of the term >autism<, mainly due to its use by Kanner in 1943 and its remake by authors of Kleinian inspiration, implies problems which mislead us, blurring our perception and understanding of clinical realities. Our psychoanalytical possibilities can be enlarged by a clear knowledge of the history of psychoanalysis, a dynamic approach to psychiatric classification and to problems related to our conception of the setting. On the basis of a case history the author shows how a child and its family worked through major autistic symptoms and proposes new approaches to some psychoanalytical concepts.}, language = {en} } @article{PradodeOliveira, author = {Prado de Oliveira, L. E.}, title = {Response to Dr Robbins' Commentaries}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 10 (No. 1, March 2001), pp. 75-76.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 10 (No. 1, March 2001), pp. 75-76.}, language = {en} } @article{PradodeOliveira, author = {Prado de Oliveira, L. E.}, title = {The Nature of the Transference Between Anna Freud and Melanie Klein: Learning from the Controversies}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 10 (No. 3-4, October 2001), pp. 247-258.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 10 (No. 3-4, October 2001), pp. 247-258.}, abstract = {As we work through our theories, we rejoice in discovering the logic of concepts and their articulation in clinical experience. Such joy hides other movements, in which the only stakes are demands for love, sexual curiosity and the satisfaction of hate, transferred from infancy to others worlds, idealised or despised. When we participate in our psychoanalytical institutions, we feel pride or even vanity to be participating in the great historical movement of psychoanalysis. This conceals the working of transference in our institutional life; transference which is crudely sexual at its origins, and implies maternal, paternal or fraternal objects. This is its constraining power. We should be fully aware of this, as Strachey or Balint have already shown, in order to attenuate the violence of transference and stimulate our creativity. Anna Freud and Melanie Klein's controversies had a reality of their own. This reality was quickly forgotten and trapped in various conflicts, as those existing between Jones and Freud or between Glover and the rest of the British Psychoanalytical Society of his times. These reelaborations gave rise to ideological elements, which have ever since pervaded the history of psychoanalytical theory, influencing psychoanalytical methods and clinics. It is important for us today to elucidate these ideologies in order to improve our achievements.}, language = {en} } @misc{PradodeOliveira, author = {Prado de Oliveira, L. E.}, title = {Review Gori, R.: Logic of passions. Deno{\"e}l, Paris, 2002}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Basingstoke (Routledge - Taylor and Francis) Vol. 12 (No. 4, December 2003), pp. 279-280.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Basingstoke (Routledge - Taylor and Francis) Vol. 12 (No. 4, December 2003), pp. 279-280.}, language = {en} }