@article{KleinLandskron, author = {Klein Landskron, Erich}, title = {Auf der Suche nach der zeitgem{\"a}ßgen Theoriegestalt des Marxismus. Theoriegeschichtliche Skizze zu einem treibenden Motiv der fr{\"u}hen Kritischen Theorie}, series = {Wissenschaft vom Menschen/Science of Man, Jahrbuch der Internationalen Erich Fromm-Gesellschaft. Vol. 2: Erich Fromm und die Kritische Theorie, M{\"u}nster (Lit Verlag) 1991, pp. 214-249.}, journal = {Wissenschaft vom Menschen/Science of Man, Jahrbuch der Internationalen Erich Fromm-Gesellschaft. Vol. 2: Erich Fromm und die Kritische Theorie, M{\"u}nster (Lit Verlag) 1991, pp. 214-249.}, abstract = {>The Search for an Up-to-Date Theoretical Recasting of Marxism. Sketches towards the Intellectual History of a Dominant Theme in the Early Critical Theory<: The Critical Theory in its early version conceived of itself as a form of Marxist theory, and endeavored to cast itself in an up-to-date theoretical form appropriate to its historical context - one which by the end of the first half of the 20th century had taken a dramatic turn for the worst. Thus the principal propounders of the Critical Theory found themselves departing more and more from orthodox Marxism and devizing provisional positions that were revisionistic in nature. This essay focuses on reconstructing the principal waystations this revisionistic logic passed through, placing the lapse from orthodoxy in its intellectual history context. The central object of attention is the change in status undergone by economic theory and its dialectical structure. Grossmann's law of disintegration exemplifies admirably the attempt to preserve the body of theory in its orthodox form, notwithstanding the deep-reaching changes in the social configurations of the times. Pollock, on the other hand, wishes to embark on a provocative new theoretical construction. Of central concern are his theses on state capitalism, against which Neumann once again mounts a very powerfully argued defense of the theoretical tradition (i.e. one going considerably beyond the Pollock- Neumann controversy of such great importance to fascism theory). In the light of this scrutiny, Fromm's own revisionistic effort, analytic social psychology, is revealed as essentially an addendum focusing on the decay and reconstruction of the revolutionary subject - and indeed emerges as being strikingly compatible with Horkheimer's own position. Horkheimer it was too who took Pollock's thesis of the primacy of politics and reworked it to yield the bizarre racket theory - which just went to show just how far the Frankfurt School had distanced itself from traditional Marxism (or at least this was the case prior to the Institute's return to Germany from its American exile).}, language = {de} } @article{KleinLandskron, author = {Klein Landskron, Erich}, title = {Max Horkheimer und Erich Fromm}, series = {M. Kessler and R. Funk (Eds.), Erich Fromm und die Frankfurter Schule. Akten des internationalen, interdisziplin{\"a}ren Symposions Stuttgart-Hohenheim vom 31. 5. bis 2. 6. 1991, T{\"u}bingen (Francke Verlag) 1992, pp. 161-180.}, journal = {M. Kessler and R. Funk (Eds.), Erich Fromm und die Frankfurter Schule. Akten des internationalen, interdisziplin{\"a}ren Symposions Stuttgart-Hohenheim vom 31. 5. bis 2. 6. 1991, T{\"u}bingen (Francke Verlag) 1992, pp. 161-180.}, language = {de} } @article{KleinLandskron, author = {Klein Landskron, Erich}, title = {Erich Fromm und Alfred Weber. Ein Beitrag zur Rezeption kultursoziologischer Konzepte der Sinnkonstitution}, series = {E. Demm (Ed.), Soziologie, Politik, Kultur. Von Alfred Weber zur Frankfurter Schule, Frankfurt (Peter Lang) 2003, pp. 155-174.}, journal = {E. Demm (Ed.), Soziologie, Politik, Kultur. Von Alfred Weber zur Frankfurter Schule, Frankfurt (Peter Lang) 2003, pp. 155-174.}, language = {de} } @book{KleinLandskron, author = {Klein-Landskron, Erich}, title = {Von Freiheit allein kann Demokratie nicht leben. Essays zu Aspekten b{\"u}rgerlicher Mentalit{\"a}t, Berlin (Peter Lang), 2020, 365 pp.}, language = {de} }